Evaluation of bleeding risk in patients on anticoagulation for mechanical cardiac valve operated for benign prostatic obstruction

Multicenter experience with photoselective vaporization of the prostate on men taking novel oral anticoagulants

Objective

Photoselective vaporization of the prostate (PVP) is a widely performed surgical procedure for benign prostatic obstruction. This approach has become particular favoured for men on anti-platelet and anticoagulation agents such as clopidogrel and warfarin but there is minimal published experience in the setting of novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs). This study was to examine the perioperative outcomes in men on NOACs undergoing PVP, with particular reference to perioperative morbidity.

Methods

A retrospective analysis of PVP datasets was undertaken from three centres in Sydney (Australia), Toulouse (France) and Boston (USA). Subjects who had been treated whilst on NOACs without discontinuation or bridging were identified. Perioperative outcomes and treatment parameters were examined and morbidity recorded according to Clavien-Dindo (CD) classification.

Results

There were a total of 20 subjects who had undergone PVP whilst NOACs had been continued during the perioperative period. The mean age was 77±6.5 years. The mean prostate volume, energy utilization and vaporisation time was 94±56 mL, 301±211 kJ, and 35±21 min respectively. The mean postoperative duration of catheterization and duration of hospitalization was 2.2±2.4 days and 2.4±2.4 days respectively. There was a single episode of urinary tract infection and four subjects required re-catheterisation for non-hematuric retentions.

Conclusions

This study supports the safety of men on NOACs undergoing PVP. Whilst this study represents the largest experience of PVP in these men, larger studies are necessary to confirm the safety of PVP in this group of men undergoing BPH-related surgery.

[Anticoagulation impact on bleeding risk during HoLEP: Monocentric study of 156 patients]

OBJECTIVE

Compare the length of hospital stay and the complications after HoLEP between three groups of patients: a control group, a group with antiplatelet therapy, a group with anticoagulation therapy.

MATERIALS

Retrospective cohort study that included all consecutive patients who underwent HoLEP for prostatic hyperplasia in our center from may 2013 to may 2016. Anticoagulated patients and patients under clopidogrel had respectively a relay with heparine and aspirine. Patients were seen after surgery at 1 and 3 months.

RESULTS

A hundred and fifty six patients were analysed, mean age was 70.7 years (DS 6.8), mean prostate volume 88.8g (DS 34.1). 106 patients were in the control group, 34 had antiplatelet therapy and 16 had anticoagulation therapy. There were no difference between the 3 groups for mean age, mean prostatic volume, PSA. There was also no difference for length of intervention, irrigated volume and length of morcellation between the three groups. There were no difference between patients in the control group and patients with antiplatelet therapy for length of hospital stay (2.1 days vs 2.0 days), lenght of urethral catheterization (1.6 days vs 1.5 days). There was a statistical difference between patients in the control group and patients with anticoagulation therapy for lenght of hospital stay (2.0 days vs 4.4 days; P=0.01), length of bladder irrigation (0.9 day vs 1.8 days; P=0.01), lenght of urethral catheterization (1.6 days vs 3.5 days; P=0.01). Transfusion rate was 18.75% (n=3) for patients with anticoagulation, 2.9% (n=1) for patients under antiplatelet therapy and 0.9% (n=1) for patients in the control group.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulation during HoLEP is a valid option but need to be proceed with carefully management.

LEVEL OF PROOF

4.