Subdural spinal metastases detected on CT myelography: A case report and brief review

Prognostic analysis of percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) combined with 125I implantation on lumbosacral vertebral osteoblastic metastases

OBJECTIVE

Lumbosacral vertebral osteoblastic metastasis is treated with percutaneous vertebroplasty (PVP) combined with 125I seed implantation and PVP alone. Compared to PVP alone, we evaluated the effects of combination therapy with PVP and 125I seed implantation on pain, physical condition, and survival and evaluated the clinical value of PVP combined with 125I particle implantation.

METHODS

We retrospectively analyzed 62 patients with lumbosacral vertebral osseous metastases treated at our hospital between 2016 and 2019. All the patients met the inclusion criteria for 125I implantation, and they were randomly divided into a combined treatment group and a pure PVP surgery group. The visual analog pain scale (VAS), Karnofsky Performance Status (KPS), and survival time were recorded at different time points, including preoperative, postoperative 1 day, 1 month, 3 months, 6 months, 12 months, and 36 months in each group. The variation in clinical indicators and differences between the groups were analyzed using SPSS version 20.0. Correlations between different variables were analyzed using the nonparametric Spearman's rank test. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to estimate the relationship between survival time and KPS score, VAS score, or primary tumor progression, and survival differences were analyzed using the log-rank test. Multivariate analyses were performed using a stepwise Cox proportional hazards model to identify independent prognostic factors.

RESULTS

Compared to the PVP treatment group, the pain level in the combined treatment group was significantly reduced (P = 0.000), and the patient's physical condition in the combination treatment group significantly improved. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the survival rate of the PVP group was significantly lower than that of the combination group (P = 0.038). We also found that the median survival of patients in both groups significantly increased with an increase in the KPS score (14 months vs. 33 months) (P = 0.020). Patients with more than three transfer sections had significantly lower survival rates than those with one or two segments of the section (P = 0.001). Further, Cox regression analysis showed that age (P = 0.002), the spinal segment for spinal metastasis (P = 0.000), and primary tumor growth rate (P = 0.005) were independent factors that affected the long-term survival of patients with lumbosacral vertebral osseous metastases.

CONCLUSIONS

PVP combined 125I seeds implantation surgery demonstrated superior effectiveness compared to PVP surgery alone in treating lumbosacral vertebral osseous metastases, which had feasibility in the clinical operation. Preoperative KPS score, spine transfer section, and primary tumor growth rate were closely related to the survival of patients with lumbosacral vertebral osteoblastic metastasis. Age, spinal segment for spinal metastasis, and primary tumor growth can serve as prognostic indicators and guide clinical treatment.

The Role of Surgery in Spinal Intradural Metastases from Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Literature Review

BACKGROUND

Due to the few reported cases of spinal intradural metastases from renal cell carcinoma (RCC), there is no unanimous consensus on the best treatment strategy, including the role of surgery.

METHODS

A wide and accurate literature review up to January 2022 has disclosed only 51 cases of spinal intradural metastases from RCC. Patients with extramedullary (19) and those with intramedullary (32) localization have been separately considered and compared. Demographics, clinical, pathological, management, and outcome features have been analyzed.

RESULTS

Extramedullary lesions more frequently showed the involvement of the lumbar spine, low back pain, and solitary metastasis at diagnosis. Conversely, the intramedullary lesions were most often detected in association with multiple localizations of disease, mainly in the brain. Surgery resulted in improvement of clinical symptoms in both groups.

CONCLUSION

Several factors affect the prognosis of metastatic RCC. The surgical removal of spinal metastases resulted in pain relief and the arresting of neurological deficit progression, improving the quality of life and overall survival of the patient. Considering the relative radioresistant nature of the RCC, the surgical treatment of the metastasis is a valid option even if it is subtotal, with a consequent increased risk of recurrence, and/or a nerve root should be sacrificed.