Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI in the clinical setting - correlation with dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in the post-treatment imaging of adult glioma patients at 3T

Advancements in Image-Based Models for High-Grade Gliomas Might Be Accelerated

The first half of 2022 saw the publication of several major research advances in image-based models and artificial intelligence applications to optimize treatment strategies for high-grade gliomas, the deadliest brain tumors. We review them and discuss the barriers that delay their entry into clinical practice; particularly, the small sample size and the heterogeneity of the study designs and methodologies used. We will also write about the poor and late palliation that patients suffering from high-grade glioma can count on at the end of life, as well as the current legislative instruments, with particular reference to Italy. We suggest measures to accelerate the gradual progress in image-based models and end of life care for patients with high-grade glioma.

CEST2022: Amide proton transfer-weighted MRI improves the diagnostic performance of multiparametric non-contrast-enhanced MRI techniques in patients with post-treatment high-grade gliomas

New or enlarged lesions in malignant gliomas after surgery and chemoradiation can be associated with tumor recurrence or treatment effect. Due to similar radiographic characteristics, conventional-and even some advanced MRI techniques-are limited in distinguishing these two pathologies. Amide proton transfer-weighted (APTw) MRI, a protein-based molecular imaging technique that does not require the administration of any exogenous contrast agent, was recently introduced into the clinical setting. In this study, we evaluated and compared the diagnostic performances of APTw MRI with several non-contrast-enhanced MRI sequences, such as diffusion-weighted imaging, susceptibility-weighted imaging, and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling. Thirty-nine scans from 28 glioma patients were obtained on a 3 T MRI scanner. A histogram analysis approach was employed to extract parameters from each tumor area. Statistically significant parameters (P < 0.05) were selected to train multivariate logistic regression models to evaluate the performance of MRI sequences. Multiple histogram parameters, particularly from APTw and pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling images, demonstrated significant differences between treatment effect and recurrent tumor. The regression model trained on the combination of all significant histogram parameters achieved the best result (area under the curve = 0.89). We found that APTw images added value to other advanced MR images for the differentiation of treatment effect and tumor recurrence.

Differentiation between glioma recurrence and treatment effects using amide proton transfer imaging: A mini-Bayesian bivariate meta-analysis

Background

Amide proton transfer (APT) imaging as an emerging MRI approach has been used for distinguishing tumor recurrence (TR) and treatment effects (TEs) in glioma patients, but the initial results from recent studies are different.

Aim

The aim of this study is to systematically review and quantify the diagnostic performance of APT in assessing treatment response in patients with post-treatment gliomas.

Methods

A systematic search in PubMed, EMBASE, and the Web of Science was performed to retrieve related original studies. For the single and added value of APT imaging in distinguishing TR from TEs, we calculated pooled sensitivity and specificity by using Bayesian bivariate meta-analyses.

Results

Six studies were included, five of which reported on single APT imaging parameters and four of which reported on multiparametric MRI combined with APT imaging parameters. For single APT imaging parameters, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.85 (95% CI: 0.75–0.92) and 0.88 (95% CI: 0.74–0.97). For multiparametric MRI including APT, the pooled sensitivity and specificity were 0.92 (95% CI: 0.85–0.97) and 0.83 (95% CI: 0.55–0.97), respectively. In addition, in the three studies reported on both single and added value of APT imaging parameters, the combined imaging parameters further improved diagnostic performance, yielding pooled sensitivity and specificity of 0.91 (95% CI: 0.80–0.97) and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.79–0.98), respectively, but the pooled sensitivity was 0.81 (95% CI: 0.65-0.93) and specificity was 0.82 (95% CI: 0.61–0.94) for single APT imaging parameters.

Conclusion

APT imaging showed high diagnostic performance in assessing treatment response in patients with post-treatment gliomas, and the addition of APT imaging to other advanced MRI techniques can improve the diagnostic accuracy for distinguishing TR from TE.