Dose perturbation behind tantalum clips in ocular proton therapy

A Novel Polymer-Encapsulated Multi-Imaging Modality Fiducial Marker with Positive Signal Contrast for Image-Guided Radiation Therapy

BACKGROUND

Current fiducial markers (FMs) in external-beam radiotherapy (EBRT) for prostate cancer (PCa) cannot be positively visualized on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and create dose perturbation and significant imaging artifacts on computed tomography (CT) and MRI. We report our initial experience with clinical imaging of a novel multimodality FM, NOVA.

METHODS

We tested Gold Anchor [G-FM], BiomarC [carbon, C-FM], and NOVA FMs in phantoms imaged with kilovoltage (kV) X-rays, transrectal ultrasound (TRUS), CT, and MRI. Artifacts of the FMs on CT were quantified by the relative streak artifacts level (rSAL) metric. Proton dose perturbations (PDPs) were measured with Gafchromic EBT3 film, with FMs oriented either perpendicular to or parallel with the beam axis. We also tested the performance of NOVA-FMs in a patient.

RESULTS

NOVA-FMs were positively visualized on all 4 imaging modalities tested. The rSAL on CT was 0.750 ± 0.335 for 2-mm reconstructed slices. In F-tests, PDP was associated with marker type and depth of measurement (p < 10-6); at 5-mm depth, PDP was significantly greater for the G-FM (12.9%, p = 10-6) and C-FM (6.0%, p = 0.011) than NOVA (4.5%). EBRT planning with MRI/CT image co-registration and daily alignments using NOVA-FMs in a patient was feasible and reproducible.

CONCLUSIONS

NOVA-FMs were positively visible and produced less PDP than G-FMs or C-FMs. NOVA-FMs facilitated MRI/CT fusion and identification of regions of interest.

Carbon Fiducial Markers for Tumor Localization in Stereotactic Irradiation of Uveal Melanoma

Purpose

The aim of this study was to demonstrate the role of carbon fiducial markers (fiducials) for guiding radiotherapy in the management of uveal melanoma (UM).

Methods

This is a retrospective interventional case series at a single-center ocular oncology practice. The medical records were reviewed retrospectively for all patients with UM treated with stereotactic radiosurgery using episcleral fiducials. We report our short-term experience with surgical placement of fiducials, UM localization, treatment outcomes, and optimization approaches.

Results

We evaluated 11 cases of UM (mean age: 65 years; 64% female). The placed fiducials were numbered from 2 to 4, each secured to the sclera with a surgical microscope or surgical loupes and either 5-0 or 8-0 nylon sutures at 50% scleral depth and 3 mm beyond the tumor margin. Over a median follow-up of 11 months (range: 4.2-43.2 months), no recurrences of intraocular UM were observed. One case of enucleation after stereotactic radiosurgery developed because of radiation-related surface irritation, ocular dryness, and secondary keratopathy. Two patients (18%) with 5-0 nylon sutures required fiducial removal because of suture exposure, successfully accomplished in an outpatient setting.

Conclusions

Fiducials represent a viable alternative to tantalum rings for guiding stereotactic radiotherapy to manage UM and provide additional definition of the tumor border with linear orientation that helps optimize targeted radiation delivery. Fiducial placement with a 3-mm margin from the visible tumor border should not result in clinically important radiation dose attenuation at the tumor margins. Anteriorly placed fiducials may cause discomfort, yet they are easily removed in the outpatient setting.

Examining the frequency and concomitant dose of geometric verification imaging for patients undergoing proton beam therapy for ocular tumours; an audit of current clinical practice

OBJECTIVES

This paper uses clinical audit to determine the extent and dosimetric impact of additional imaging for patients undergoing ocular proton beam therapy who have no clips visible in the collimated beam.

METHODS

An audit was conducted on 399 patients treated at The National Centre for Eye Proton Therapy between 3 July 2017 and 14 June 2019. The mean total number of image pairs over the course of treatment for patients with and without clips visible in the collimated beam were compared.

RESULTS

Among 364 evaluable patients, 333 had clips visible in the collimated beam and 31 did not. There was a statistically significant increase of five image pairs required for patients with no clips visible compared with those with clips visible (mean 14.6 vs 9.6 image pairs, respectively; p = 2.74 × 10-6). This equated to an additional 1.5 mGy absorbed dose, representing an increase in secondary cancer induction risk from 0.0004 to 0.0007%.

CONCLUSIONS

The small increase in concomitant dose and set-up time for patients with no clips visible in the collimated beam is not clinically significant.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

This novel work highlights clinical audit from real on-treatment geometric verification data and frequencies, rather than protocols, for ocular proton beam therapy; something not present in the literature. The simple and straightforward methodology is easily and equally applicable to clinical audits (especially those under Ionising Radiation (Medical Exposure) Regulations) for photon techniques.

The physics of proton therapy

The physics of proton therapy has advanced considerably since it was proposed in 1946. Today analytical equations and numerical simulation methods are available to predict and characterize many aspects of proton therapy. This article reviews the basic aspects of the physics of proton therapy, including proton interaction mechanisms, proton transport calculations, the determination of dose from therapeutic and stray radiations, and shielding design. The article discusses underlying processes as well as selected practical experimental and theoretical methods. We conclude by briefly speculating on possible future areas of research of relevance to the physics of proton therapy.

Quantification of dose perturbations induced by external and internal accessories in ocular proton therapy and evaluation of their dosimetric impact

PURPOSE

Proton scattering on beam shaping devices and protons slowing down on media with different densities within the treatment volume may produce dose perturbations and range variations that are not predicted by treatment planning systems. The aim of this work was to assess the dosimetric impact of elements present in ocular proton therapy treatments that may disturb the prescribed treatment plan. Both distal beam shaping devices and intraocular elements were considered.

METHODS

A wedge filter, tantalum fiducial marker, hemispherical compensator, two intraocular endotamponades (densities 0.97 and 1.92 g cm(-3)) and an intraocular eye lens (IOL) were considered in the study. For these elements, longitudinal dose distributions were measured and∕or calculated in water in beam alignment for a clinical spread-out Bragg peak. Under the same conditions, the unperturbed dose distributions were similarly measured and∕or calculated in the absence of the element. The dosimetric impact was assessed by comparison of unperturbed and perturbed dose distributions. Measurements and calculations were carried out with two methods. Measurements are based on EBT3 films with dedicated software, which makes use of a calibration curve and correction for the quenching effect. Calculations are based on the Monte Carlo (MC) code MCNPX and reproduce the experimental conditions. Both dose maps are obtained with a resolution of 300 dpi.

RESULTS

The degree of disturbance of distal beam shaping devices is low for the wedge filter (2% overdose ripple all along the central axis) and moderate for the hemispherical compensator (two bands of variable overdose of up to 10% downstream the compensator lateral edges and -5% underdose on the plateau at off-axis distance of 5 cm). Tantalum clips produce important dose shadows (-20% behind the clip parallel to the beam and range reduction of 1.1 mm) and bands of overdose (15%). The presence of endotamponades modifies the dose distribution very significantly (-5% underdose on the plateau and 3 mm range prolongation for the tamponade with density 0.97 g cm(-3) and -15% underdose on plateau and 8 mm range reduction for that with density 1.92 g cm(-3)). No dose perturbations were found for the IOL. The high performance of EBT3 film and MC tools used was confirmed and good agreement was found between them (percentage of pixels passing the gamma test >87%).

CONCLUSIONS

The degree of disturbance by external beam shaping devices remains low in ocular proton therapy and can be reduced by bringing accessories closer to the eye. Tantalum fiducial markers must be located in such a way that dose perturbation is not projected on the tumor. The treatment of patients with intraocular endotamponades must be carefully managed. It is fundamental that radiation oncologists and medical physicists are informed about the presence of such substances prior to the treatment.

Investigation of dose perturbations and the radiographic visibility of potential fiducials for proton radiation therapy of the prostate

Image guidance using implanted fiducial markers is commonly used to ensure accurate and reproducible target positioning in radiation therapy for prostate cancer. The ideal fiducial marker is clearly visible in kV imaging, does not perturb the therapeutic dose in the target volume and does not cause any artifacts on the CT images used for treatment planning. As yet, ideal markers that fully meet all three of these criteria have not been reported. In this study, 12 fiducial markers were evaluated for their potential clinical utility in proton radiation therapy for prostate cancer. In order to identify the good candidates, each fiducial was imaged using a CT scanner as well as a kV imaging system. Additionally, the dose perturbation caused by each fiducial was quantified using radiochromic film and a clinical proton beam. Based on the results, three fiducials were identified as good candidates for use in proton radiotherapy of prostate cancer.