Paclitaxel, cisplatin, 5-fluorouracil and radiotherapy in the management of advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck. A phase II trial

Future chemotherapy and radiotherapy options in head and neck cancer

Chemoradiation is a standard approach to advanced unresectable head and neck cancer, although the optimum combination regimen remains controversial. However, in the past few years, chemoradiation has been successfully extended from the treatment of unresectable disease to the postsurgical therapy of high-risk patients and its value as an organ preservation procedure is under evaluation. More recently, molecular-targeted therapies have emerged, which interfere with mechanisms of chemo- and radioresistance, and preliminary data are promising. Their use in the combined treatment of head and neck cancer will hopefully further improve the value of chemoradiation in the clinical setting.

Cisplatin-based chemoradiation plus cetuximab in locally advanced head and neck cancer: a phase II clinical study

BACKGROUND

Intensification of chemoradiation for advanced head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is unlikely due to toxicity. Cetuximab combined either with radiotherapy or with chemotherapy showed favourable toxic profile with positive results in both combinations. Therefore, cetuximab could intensify chemoradiation without worsening toxicity. We conducted a phase II study of chemoradiation and cetuximab.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Eligible patients had stage III-IV M0 HNSCC. Treatment consisted of three cycles of cisplatin (20 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days) and fluorouracil (200 mg/m(2)/day × 5 days) rapidly alternated to three split courses of radiotherapy up to 70 Gy and concurrent weekly cetuximab. The primary end point of the study was complete response (CR) rate. Secondary end points were toxicity, progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Fourty-five patients were enrolled: median age was 56 years, 38 had stage IV disease and 40 nodal involvement. CR occurred in 32 patients (71%). PFS and OS was 21+ months and 32.6+, respectively. Acute grade 3-4 toxic effects were in the expected range, but grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 33 patients.

CONCLUSIONS

The combination of cetuximab, cisplatin, fluorouracil and radiotherapy leads to a very high proportion of CR and it is feasible with toxic effects similar to those expected by radiochemotherapy. The only unexpected toxicity was skin toxicity: grade 3 radiodermatitis occurred in 73% of the patients.

The role of taxanes and targeted therapies in locally advanced head and neck cancer

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

This review presents new data on the role of taxanes and targeted therapies in the management of squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck.

RECENT FINDINGS

Taxane-containing triplets are clearly superior as an induction regimen in locally advanced squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck when compared with cisplatin/5 fluorouracil which has been the standard for two decades. Preliminary data suggest that the addition of a taxane to cisplatin/5 fluorouracil as induction regimen followed by chemoradiation may be superior to chemoradiation alone. The addition of cetuximab to radiation prolongs locoregional control and survival without increasing mucositis. Areas of active investigation are the search for epidermal growth factor receptor mutations and the optimal way of integrating epidermal growth factor receptor-directed therapies into standard management. Meanwhile new targets are explored.

SUMMARY

Taxane/cisplatin/5 fluorouracil induction chemotherapy is clearly superior to cisplatin/5 fluorouracil. Epidermal growth factor receptor directed therapies can safely be combined with radiation and the combination shows encouraging results.

Hyperfractionated, accelerated chemoradiation with concurrent mitomycin-C and cisplatin in locally advanced head and neck cancer, a phase I/II study

BACKGROUND

To determine the outcome, acute and late toxicity in locally advanced head and neck cancer stage IVA with mitomycin-C (MMC), cisplatin (DDP) chemotherapy and hyperfractionated accelerated radiation therapy (C-HART).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Thirty-five patients, with squamous cell cancer of the oral cavity (20%), oropharynx (37%), hypopharynx (26%) and larynx (17%), received 30 Gy (2 Gy every day) followed by 1.4 Gy bid to a total of 70.6 Gy concurrently with MMC 10mg/m(2) (day 1 plus 36) and DDP 6 mg/m(2) given Mondays through Fridays during weeks 1-3. Median follow up was 19 months.

RESULTS

C-HART was given as planned in 12 of 35 patients, with radiotherapy completed per protocol in 91%. Overall, patients received 70% of the intended dose of MMC and 91% of DDP. Mucositis CTC III/IV occurred in 27%, leucopenia CTC III/IV in 47%, and three early deaths were observed. Osteoradionecrosis occurred in 14% with cT4-tumours. At 3 years the locoregional control and survival rates were 60% and 46%, respectively.

CONCLUSION

C-HART resulted in promising overall response with acceptable toxicity. Mucositis is a frequent, severe toxicity in patients treated with C-HART for head and neck cancer. While it appears that mucositis and hematological toxicity may lead to hospitalization and omitting of the second dose of mitomycin C, its impact on radiotherapy interruptions is marginal.

3D-conformal-intensity modulated radiotherapy with compensators for head and neck cancer: clinical results of normal tissue sparing

Background

To investigate the potential of parotic gland sparing of intensity modulated radiotherapy (3D-c-IMRT) performed with metallic compensators for head and neck cancer in a clinical series by analysis of dose distributions and clinical measures.

Materials and methods

39 patients with squamous cell cancer of the head and neck irradiated using 3D-c-IMRT were evaluable for dose distribution within PTVs and at one parotid gland and 38 patients for toxicity analysis. 10 patients were treated primarily, 29 postoperatively, 19 received concomittant cis-platin based chemotherapy, 20 3D-c-IMRT alone. Initially the dose distribution was calculated with Helax ^® and photon fluence was modulated using metallic compensators made of tin-granulate (n = 22). Later the dose distribution was calculated with KonRad ^® and fluence was modified by MCP 96 alloy compensators (n = 17). Gross tumor/tumor bed (PTV 1) was irradiated up to 60–70 Gy, [5 fractions/week, single fraction dose: 2.0–2.2 (simultaneously integrated boost)], adjuvantly irradiated bilateral cervical lymph nodes (PTV 2) with 48–54 Gy [single dose: 1.5–1.8]). Toxicity was scored according the RTOG scale and patient-reported xerostomia questionnaire (XQ).

Results

Mean of the median doses at the parotid glands to be spared was 25.9 (16.3–46.8) Gy, for tin graulate 26 Gy, for MCP alloy 24.2 Gy. Tin-granulate compensators resulted in a median parotid dose above 26 Gy in 10/22, MCP 96 alloy in 0/17 patients. Following acute toxicities were seen (°0–2/3): xerostomia: 87%/13%, dysphagia: 84%/16%, mucositis: 89%/11%, dermatitis: 100%/0%. No grade 4 reaction was encountered. During therapy the XQ forms showed °0–2/3): 88%/12%. 6 months postRT chronic xerostomia °0–2/3 was observed in 85%/15% of patients, none with °4 xerostomia.

Conclusion

3D-c-IMRT using metallic compensators along with inverse calculation algorithm achieves sufficient parotid gland sparing in virtually all advanced head and neck cancers. Since the concept of lower single (and total) doses in the adjuvantly treated volumes reduces acute morbidity 3D-c-IMRT nicely meets demands of concurrent chemotherapy protocols.

Alternating Chemotherapy and Radiotherapy in Locally Advanced Head and Neck Cancer: An Alternative?

Rapidly alternating chemotherapy and radiotherapy (ACR) is a minor variation of concurrent chemoradiation (CCR). This scheduling has been tested in advanced head and neck cancer and has shown superiority over standard radiation in some randomized trials with only marginally greater toxicity. This paper reviews ACR in advanced head and neck cancer. The hypothesis that this approach could have a better toxicity profile than CCR is discussed in light of the published clinical data. Efficacy is also discussed on the basis of available phase III trials. Published data indicate that rapidly alternating chemoradiation adds to toxicity less than CCR and results in comparable 3-year overall survival rates. In conclusion, ACR could be as active as, and possibly less toxic than, CCR. Comparative trials are highly recommended.