Acute toxicity after a diverting stoma and spacer prior to chemoradiation in locally advanced rectal cancer

Clinical application of precise radiotherapy in rectal cancer

Precise radiotherapy plays an important role in the comprehensive multidisciplinary therapy of rectal cancer. The mainstream technology is the intensity modulated radiation therapy (IMRT). The technique of repetitive body positioning and the filling of the bladder and rectum are the important factors influencing the accuracy and efficacy of radiotherapy for rectal cancer. The quality of life for patients with rectal cancer is highly affected by side effects associated with radiotherapy. The application of precise positioning technique and image guided radiotherapy (IGRT) can significantly contribute to the accurate delivery of radiotherapy to the region of rectal cancer to improve the local tumor control and reduce unnecessary exposure of normal tissues to irradiation. In this paper, the clinical application of precise positioning technique and the improvement of accurate delivery of radiotherapy are comprehensively reviewed.

Phase II study of computed tomography-guided (125)I-seed implantation plus chemotherapy for locally recurrent rectal cancer

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

This trial evaluated the efficacy and safety of CT guided (125)I-seed implantation (CTII) plus chemotherapy with fluorouracil, leucovorin, and irinotecan (FOLFIRI) compared with FOLFIRI alone as second-line treatment for locally recurrent rectal cancer (LRRC).

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Patients with LRRC who received one prior chemotherapy regimen were enrolled and divided randomly assigned to FOLFORI alone (Arm A) and FOLFORI plus CTII (Arm B). The primary endpoint was local control time (LCT). Overall survival (OS) and treatment related adverse events (TRAEs) were also observed.

RESULTS

Fifty-seven patients were enrolled from October 2008 and December 2014. Twenty-seven were assigned into Arm A and 30 into Arm B. The overall response rate of locally recurrent tumor was improved to 100% in Arm B versus 29.6% in Arm A (P<0.001). A significant longer LCT was observed in Arm A (P<0.001); median LCT was 12 months in Arm B versus 4 months in Arm A. A borderline significant improvement in OS was also observed in Arm B (P=0.0464); median OS was 25 months in Arm B versus 19 months in Arm A. For patients without distant metastases, median OS was 37 months in Arm B versus 21 months in Arm A (P=0.0101). For patients with (neo)adjuvant radiotherapy (ART), a longer LCT and OS were also found in Arm B (P<0.001 and P=0.0217, respectively). TRAEs were not serious generally. There was no statistically significant difference in treatment related toxicity between Arm A and B both for all patients and patients receiving ART.

CONCLUSIONS

CTII plus FOLFIRI improves the LCT with tolerable toxicities as a second-line treatment in patients with local recurrent rectal cancer, and is helpful to prolong the OS, particularly in patients without distant metastases or with a history of radiotherapy.

Chemotherapy for advanced non-small cell lung cancer in the elderly population

BACKGROUND

Approximately 50% of patients with newly diagnosed non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) are over 70 years of age at diagnosis. Despite this fact, these patients are underrepresented in randomized controlled trials (RCTs). As a consequence, the most appropriate regimens for these patients are controversial, and the role of single-agent or combination therapy is unclear. In this setting, a critical systematic review of RCTs in this group of patients is warranted.

OBJECTIVES

To assess the effectiveness and safety of different cytotoxic chemotherapy regimens for previously untreated elderly patients with advanced (stage IIIB and IV) NSCLC. To also assess the impact of cytotoxic chemotherapy on quality of life.

SEARCH METHODS

We searched the following electronic databases: Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL; 2014, Issue 10), MEDLINE (1966 to 31 October 2014), EMBASE (1974 to 31 October 2014), and Latin American Caribbean Health Sciences Literature (LILACS) (1982 to 31 October 2014). In addition, we handsearched the proceedings of major conferences, reference lists from relevant resources, and the ClinicalTrial.gov database.

SELECTION CRITERIA

We included only RCTs that compared non-platinum single-agent therapy versus non-platinum combination therapy, or non-platinum therapy versus platinum combination therapy in patients over 70 years of age with advanced NSCLC. We allowed inclusion of RCTs specifically designed for the elderly population and those designed for elderly subgroup analyses.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

Two review authors independently assessed search results, and a third review author resolved disagreements. We analyzed the following endpoints: overall survival (OS), one-year survival rate (1yOS), progression-free survival (PFS), objective response rate (ORR), major adverse events, and quality of life (QoL).

MAIN RESULTS

We included 51 trials in the review: non-platinum single-agent therapy versus non-platinum combination therapy (seven trials) and non-platinum combination therapy versus platinum combination therapy (44 trials). Non-platinum single-agent versus non-platinum combination therapy Low-quality evidence suggests that these treatments have similar effects on overall survival (hazard ratio (HR) 0.92, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.72 to 1.17; participants = 1062; five RCTs), 1yOS (risk ratio (RR) 0.88, 95% CI 0.73 to 1.07; participants = 992; four RCTs), and PFS (HR 0.94, 95% CI 0.83 to 1.07; participants = 942; four RCTs). Non-platinum combination therapy may better improve ORR compared with non-platinum single-agent therapy (RR 1.79, 95% CI 1.41 to 2.26; participants = 1014; five RCTs; low-quality evidence).Differences in effects on major adverse events between treatment groups were as follows: anemia: RR 1.10, 95% 0.53 to 2.31; participants = 983; four RCTs; very low-quality evidence; neutropenia: RR 1.26, 95% CI 0.96 to 1.65; participants = 983; four RCTs; low-quality evidence; and thrombocytopenia: RR 1.45, 95% CI 0.73 to 2.89; participants = 914; three RCTs; very low-quality evidence. Only two RCTs assessed quality of life; however, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis because of the paucity of available data. Non-platinum therapy versus platinum combination therapy Platinum combination therapy probably improves OS (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.85; participants = 1705; 13 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence), 1yOS (RR 0.89, 95% CI 0.82 to 0.96; participants = 813; 13 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence), and ORR (RR 1.57, 95% CI 1.32 to 1.85; participants = 1432; 11 RCTs; moderate-quality evidence) compared with non-platinum therapies. Platinum combination therapy may also improve PFS, although our confidence in this finding is limited because the quality of evidence was low (HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.61 to 0.93; participants = 1273; nine RCTs).Effects on major adverse events between treatment groups were as follows: anemia: RR 2.53, 95% CI 1.70 to 3.76; participants = 1437; 11 RCTs; low-quality evidence; thrombocytopenia: RR 3.59, 95% CI 2.22 to 5.82; participants = 1260; nine RCTs; low-quality evidence; fatigue: RR 1.56, 95% CI 1.02 to 2.38; participants = 1150; seven RCTs; emesis: RR 3.64, 95% CI 1.82 to 7.29; participants = 1193; eight RCTs; and peripheral neuropathy: RR 7.02, 95% CI 2.42 to 20.41; participants = 776; five RCTs; low-quality evidence. Only five RCTs assessed QoL; however, we were unable to perform a meta-analysis because of the paucity of available data.

AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS

In people over the age of 70 with advanced NSCLC who do not have significant co-morbidities, increased survival with platinum combination therapy needs to be balanced against higher risk of major adverse events when compared with non-platinum therapy. For people who are not suitable candidates for platinum treatment, we have found low-quality evidence suggesting that non-platinum combination and single-agent therapy regimens have similar effects on survival. We are uncertain as to the comparability of their adverse event profiles. Additional evidence on quality of life gathered from additional studies is needed to help inform decision making.