1
|
Murphy DJ, Mayoral M, Larici AR, Ginsberg MS, Cicchetti G, Fintelmann FJ, Marom EM, Truong MT, Gill RR. Imaging Follow-Up of Nonsurgical Therapies for Lung Cancer: AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review. AJR Am J Roentgenol 2023; 221:409-424. [PMID: 37095669 PMCID: PMC11037936 DOI: 10.2214/ajr.23.29104] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/08/2023]
Abstract
Lung cancer continues to be the most common cause of cancer-related death worldwide. In the past decade, with the implementation of lung cancer screening programs and advances in surgical and nonsurgical therapies, the survival of patients with lung cancer has increased, as has the number of imaging studies that these patients undergo. However, most patients with lung cancer do not undergo surgical re-section, because they have comorbid disease or lung cancer in an advanced stage at diagnosis. Nonsurgical therapies have continued to evolve with a growing range of systemic and targeted therapies, and there has been an associated evolution in the imaging findings encountered at follow-up examinations after such therapies (e.g., with respect to posttreatment changes, treatment complications, and recurrent tumor). This AJR Expert Panel Narrative Review describes the current status of nonsurgical therapies for lung cancer and their expected and unexpected imaging manifestations. The goal is to provide guidance to radiologists regarding imaging assessment after such therapies, focusing mainly on non-small cell lung cancer. Covered therapies include systemic therapy (conventional chemotherapy, targeted therapy, and immunotherapy), radiotherapy, and thermal ablation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- David J. Murphy
- Department of Radiology, St Vincent’s University Hospital and University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland
| | - Maria Mayoral
- Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY
- Medical Imaging Department, Hospital Clinic Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain
| | - Anna R. Larici
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | | | - Giuseppe Cicchetti
- Department of Diagnostic Imaging, Oncological Radiotherapy and Hematology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli, Rome, Italy
- Department of Radiological and Hematological Sciences, Section of Radiology, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Florian J. Fintelmann
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA
| | - Edith M. Marom
- Chaim Sheba Medical Center, Ramat Gan, and Tel Aviv University, Tel Aviv, Israel
| | - Mylene T. Truong
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX
| | - Ritu R. Gill
- Department of Radiology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Harvard Medical School, 330 Brookline Ave, Boston, MA 02115. Address correspondence to R. R. Gill ()
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Mercier SL, Moore SM, Akurang D, Tiberi D, Wheatley-Price P. Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) in Very Limited-Stage Small Cell Lung Cancer (VLS-SCLC). Curr Oncol 2022; 30:100-109. [PMID: 36661657 PMCID: PMC9858162 DOI: 10.3390/curroncol30010008] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/06/2022] [Revised: 12/16/2022] [Accepted: 12/19/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is an aggressive neuroendocrine tumour with metastatic propensity. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is an emerging therapeutic option for SCLC, despite limited supporting evidence. By evaluating the use of SBRT in very limited stage (VLS) SCLC at our institution, we aimed to contribute to the existing knowledge in this area while establishing a basis for further research. We performed a retrospective review of all cases of VLS-SCLC treated with SBRT between 2013 and 2020. Baseline demographics, diagnostic, and treatment information were collected. The primary outcome was overall survival (OS). We identified 46 patients with pathologically confirmed VLS-SCLC; 25 were treated with SBRT, and the remainder received either surgery, conventional radiation therapy, chemotherapy, or palliative-intent therapy. After a median follow-up of 23.7 months, 44% of the patients had died; the median OS was of 24.4 months for the SBRT cohort and 67.0 months for the curative intent non-SBRT cohort. The difference in disease recurrence and survival between cohorts was underpowered and not statistically significant. Higher baseline ECOG and comorbidity was noted in the SBRT cohort.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sara M. Moore
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L5, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - Deborah Akurang
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| | - David Tiberi
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
- Department of Radiology, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L6, Canada
| | - Paul Wheatley-Price
- Department of Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON K1H 8L5, Canada
- Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, ON K1Y 4E9, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Cost-effectiveness of stereotactic body radiotherapy versus conventional radiotherapy for the treatment of surgically ineligible stage I non-small cell lung cancer in the Brazilian public health system. LANCET REGIONAL HEALTH. AMERICAS 2022; 14:100329. [PMID: 36777381 PMCID: PMC9903892 DOI: 10.1016/j.lana.2022.100329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/20/2022]
Abstract
Background The Brazilian public health system does not pay for the use of Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) due to its costs and the absence of cost-effectiveness analysis showing its benefit. The present study aims to evaluate whether the SBRT is a more cost-effective strategy than the conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT) for surgically ineligible stage I non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Brazilian public health system. Methods Adopting the perspective of the Brazilian Unified Healthcare System (SUS) as the payer, a Markov model with a lifetime horizon was built to delineate the health states for a cohort of 75-years-old men with medically inoperable NSCLC after treatment with SBRT or CFRT. Transition probabilities and health states utilities were adapted from the literature. Costs were based on the public health system reimbursement values and simulated in the private sector. Findings The SBRT strategy results in more quality-adjusted life-year (QALYs) and costs with an incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) of R$ 164.86 (U$ 65.16) per QALY and R$ 105 (U$ 41.50) per life-year gained (LYG). This strategy was cost-effective, considering a willingness-to-pay of R$ 25,000 (U$ 9,881.42) per QALY. The net monetary benefit (NMB) was approximately twice higher. The outcomes were confirmed with 92% of accuracy in the probabilistic sensitivity analysis. Interpretation Using a threshold of R$25,000 per QALY, SBRT was more cost-effective than CFRT for NSCLC in a public health system of an upper-middle-income country. SBRT generates higher NMB than CFRT, which could open the opportunity to incorporate new technologies. Funding Varian Medical Systems.
Collapse
|
4
|
Pangua C, Rogado J, Serrano-Montero G, Belda-Sanchís J, Álvarez Rodríguez B, Torrado L, Rodríguez De Dios N, Mielgo-Rubio X, Trujillo JC, Couñago F. New perspectives in the management of small cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2022; 13:429-447. [PMID: 35949427 PMCID: PMC9244973 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v13.i6.429] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/18/2021] [Revised: 09/05/2021] [Accepted: 05/23/2022] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
The treatment of small cell lung cancer (SCLC) is a challenge for all specialists involved. New treatments have been added to the therapeutic armamentarium in recent months, but efforts must continue to improve both survival and quality of life. Advances in surgery and radiotherapy have resulted in prolonged survival times and fewer complications, while more careful patient selection has led to increased staging accuracy. Developments in the field of systemic therapy have resulted in changes to clinical guidelines and the management of patients with advanced disease, mainly with the introduction of immunotherapy. In this article, we describe recent improvements in the management of patients with SCLC, review current treatments, and discuss future lines of research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Cristina Pangua
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid 28031, Spain
| | - Jacobo Rogado
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid 28031, Spain
| | - Gloria Serrano-Montero
- Department of Medical Oncology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid 28031, Spain
| | - José Belda-Sanchís
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau & Hospital de Mar, Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Barcelona 08041, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Beatriz Álvarez Rodríguez
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario HM Sanchinarro, HM Hospitales, HM CIOCC Centro Integral Oncológico Clara Campal, Madrid 28050, Spain
| | - Laura Torrado
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Lucus Augusti & Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Santiago de Compostela (IDIS), Lugo 27003, Spain
| | - Nuria Rodríguez De Dios
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Del Mar & Hospital Del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM) & Pompeu Fabra University, Barcelona 08003, Catalonia, Spain
| | - Xabier Mielgo-Rubio
- Department of Medical Oncology, Alcorcón Foundation University Hospital, Alcorcón 28922, Madrid, Spain
| | - Juan Carlos Trujillo
- Department of Thoracic Surgery, Hospital de la Santa Creu i Sant Pau, Barcelona 08029, Spain
| | - Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid 28223, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Safavi AH, Mak DY, Boldt RG, Chen H, Louie AV. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy in T1-2N0M0 small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Lung Cancer 2021; 160:179-186. [PMID: 34330566 DOI: 10.1016/j.lungcan.2021.07.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 11] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/11/2021] [Revised: 07/01/2021] [Accepted: 07/04/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is used to treat inoperable early-stage, node-negative small cell lung cancer (SCLC). We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature on SABR for T1-2N0M0 SCLC to summarize outcomes including local control (LC), overall survival (OS), recurrence rates, and toxicity. MATERIALS AND METHODS This study was conducted in accordance with PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses) and MOOSE (Meta-analysis of Observational Studies in Epidemiology) guidelines. A systematic review of PubMed and EMBASE (inception to April 2021) was conducted. Two authors independently reviewed articles for inclusion and extracted study-level data. Random-effects meta-analysis was conducted using R (version 3.6.2) at a significance threshold of 0.05. RESULTS Eleven studies were identified in the systematic review and seven (399 patients) were selected for meta-analysis. Inoperability was noted as the indication for SABR in 94% (75-100%) of patients. Median follow-up and tumor size were 19.5 months (11.9-32) and 24 mm (19-29), respectively. Chemotherapy and PCI use rates were 44.1% (95% confidence interval [CI], 27.0-61.9%) and 13.8% (95% CI, 0.4-41.2%), respectively. Local control was 97.3% (95% CI, 92.3-99.8%) at 1 year and 95.7% (95% CI, 74.2-100.0%) at 2 years. Overall survival was 86.3% (95% CI, 74.4-94.9%) at 1 year and 63.7% (95% CI, 45.7-79.9%) at 2 years. Nodal and distant recurrence rates were 17.8% (95% CI, 7.5-31.2%) and 26.9% (95% CI, 7.4-53.0%), respectively. The rates of grade 1, grade 2, and grade 3 toxicity (CTCAE) were 12.6% (95% CI, 6.7-19.9%), 6.7% (95% CI, 3.3-11.2%), and 1.4% (95% CI, 0.0-5.3%), respectively. No grade 4 or 5 events were observed across the studies. CONCLUSION SABR for inoperable early-stage, node-negative SCLC is locally effective with limited toxicity. Prospective studies are required to further evaluate the role of SABR for patients at higher risk of toxicity with surgery or combined chemoradiation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amir H Safavi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 700 University Ave 7(th) Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - David Y Mak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 700 University Ave 7(th) Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - R Gabriel Boldt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, London Health Sciences Centre, 790 Commissioners Road East, London, Ontario N6A 5W9, Canada.
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 700 University Ave 7(th) Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 700 University Ave 7(th) Floor, Toronto, Ontario M5G 2M9, Canada; Odette Cancer Centre, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, 2075 Bayview Avenue, Toronto, Ontario M4N 3M5, Canada.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Strange CD, Shroff GS, Truong MT, Nguyen QN, Vlahos I, Erasmus JJ. Imaging of the post-radiation chest in lung cancer. Clin Radiol 2021; 77:19-30. [PMID: 34090709 DOI: 10.1016/j.crad.2021.04.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2021] [Accepted: 04/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
Abstract
Radiation therapy using conventional fractionated external-beam or high-precision dose techniques including three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy, stereotactic body radiation therapy, intensity-modulated radiation therapy, and proton therapy, is a key component in the treatment of patients with lung cancer. Knowledge of the radiation technique used, radiation treatment plan, expected temporal evolution of radiation-induced lung injury and patient-specific parameters, such as previous radiotherapy, concurrent chemoradiotherapy, and/or immunotherapy, is important in imaging interpretation. This review discusses factors that affect the development and severity of radiation-induced lung injury and its radiological manifestations with emphasis on the differences between conventional radiation and high-precision dose radiotherapy techniques.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C D Strange
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - G S Shroff
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - M T Truong
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - Q-N Nguyen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - I Vlahos
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA
| | - J J Erasmus
- Department of Thoracic Imaging, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX, 77030-4009, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Levy A, Botticella A, Le Péchoux C, Faivre-Finn C. Thoracic radiotherapy in small cell lung cancer-a narrative review. Transl Lung Cancer Res 2021; 10:2059-2070. [PMID: 34012814 PMCID: PMC8107758 DOI: 10.21037/tlcr-20-305] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/11/2022]
Abstract
Small-cell lung cancer (SCLC) represents 10–15% of all lung cancers and has a poor prognosis. Thoracic radiotherapy plays a central role in current SCLC management. Concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CTRT) is the standard of care for localised disease (stage I−III, limited-stage, LS). Definitive thoracic radiotherapy may be offered in metastatic patients (stage IV, extensive stage, ES-SCLC) after chemotherapy. For LS-SCLC, the gold standard is early accelerated hyperfractionated twice-daily CTRT (4 cycles of cisplatin etoposide, starting with the first or second chemotherapy cycle). Modern radiation techniques should be used with involved-field radiotherapy based on baseline CT and PET/CT scans. In ES-SCLC, thoracic radiotherapy should be discussed in cases of initial bulky mediastinal disease/residual thoracic disease not progressing after induction chemotherapy. This strategy was however not assessed in recent trials establishing chemo-immunotherapy as the standard first line treatment in ES-SCLC. Future developments include technical radiotherapy advances and the incorporation of new drugs. Thoracic irradiation is delivered more precisely given technical developments (IMRT, image-guided radiotherapy, stereotactic radiotherapy), reducing the risks of severe adverse events. Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy may be discussed in rare early stage (T1 to 2, N0) inoperable patients. A number of current clinical trials are investigating immunoradiotherapy. In this review, we highlight the current role of thoracic radiotherapy and describe ongoing research in the integration of biological surrogate markers, advanced radiotherapy technologies and novel drugs in SCLC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonin Levy
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France.,Univ Paris Sud, Université Paris-Saclay, Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, France.,INSERM U1030, Molecular Radiotherapy, Gustave Roussy, Université Paris-Saclay, Villejuif, France
| | - Angela Botticella
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Cécile Le Péchoux
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut d'Oncologie Thoracique (IOT), Gustave Roussy, Villejuif, France
| | - Corinne Faivre-Finn
- Division of Cancer Sciences, School of Medical Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.,The Christie NHS Foundation Trust and Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Couñago F, de la Pinta C, Gonzalo S, Fernández C, Almendros P, Calvo P, Taboada B, Gómez-Caamaño A, Guerra JLL, Chust M, González Ferreira JA, Álvarez González A, Casas F. GOECP/SEOR radiotherapy guidelines for small-cell lung cancer. World J Clin Oncol 2021; 12:115-143. [PMID: 33767969 PMCID: PMC7968106 DOI: 10.5306/wjco.v12.i3.115] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/14/2020] [Revised: 01/25/2021] [Accepted: 02/12/2021] [Indexed: 02/06/2023] Open
Abstract
Small cell lung cancer (SCLC) accounts for approximately 20% of all lung cancers. The main treatment is chemotherapy (Ch). However, the addition of radiotherapy significantly improves overall survival (OS) in patients with non-metastatic SCLC and in those with metastatic SCLC who respond to Ch. Prophylactic cranial irradiation reduces the risk of brain metastases and improves OS in both metastatic and non-metastatic patients. The 5-year OS rate in patients with limited-stage disease (non-metastatic) is slightly higher than 30%, but less than 5% in patients with extensive-stage disease (metastatic). The present clinical guidelines were developed by Spanish radiation oncologists on behalf of the Oncologic Group for the Study of Lung Cancer/Spanish Society of Radiation Oncology to provide a current review of the diagnosis, planning, and treatment of SCLC. These guidelines emphasise treatment fields, radiation techniques, fractionation, concomitant treatment, and the optimal timing of Ch and radiotherapy. Finally, we discuss the main indications for reirradiation in local recurrence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Felipe Couñago
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Quirónsalud Madrid, Hospital La Luz, Universidad Europea de Madrid, Madrid 28223, Madrid, Spain
| | - Carolina de la Pinta
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid 28034, Spain
| | - Susana Gonzalo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid 28006, Spain
| | - Castalia Fernández
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GenesisCare Madrid, Madrid 28043, Spain
| | - Piedad Almendros
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital General Universitario, Valencia 46014, Spain
| | - Patricia Calvo
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15706, Spain
| | - Begoña Taboada
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15706, Spain
| | - Antonio Gómez-Caamaño
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Clínico Universitario Santiago de Compostela, Santiago de Compostela 15706, Spain
| | - José Luis López Guerra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla 41013, Spain
| | - Marisa Chust
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Fundación Instituto Valenciano de Oncología, Valencia 46009, Spain
| | | | | | - Francesc Casas
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Thoracic Unit, Hospital Clinic, Barcelona 08036, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Deng X, Chen C, Wu F, Qiu L, Ke Q, Sun R, Duan Q, Luo M, Luo Z. Curcumin Inhibits the Migration and Invasion of Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Cells Through Radiation-Induced Suppression of Epithelial-Mesenchymal Transition and Soluble E-Cadherin Expression. Technol Cancer Res Treat 2020; 19:1533033820947485. [PMID: 33124505 PMCID: PMC7607721 DOI: 10.1177/1533033820947485] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy has been reported to cause cancer metastasis. Thus, a new strategy for radiotherapy must be developed to avoid this side effect. A549 cells were exposed to radiation to induce an epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT) cell model. Real-time PCR and western blotting were used to detect mRNA and protein expression levels, and Transwell invasion and wound healing assays were used to detect cell migration and invasion. ELISA was used to detect soluble E-cadherin (sE-cad) secretion. siRNA was used to silence MMP9 expression. The results show that A549R cells exhibited an EMT phenotype with increased E-cadherin, N-cadherin, Snail, Slug, vimentin and Twist expression and decreased pan-keratin expression. sE-cad levels were increased in A549R cells and in the serum of NSCLC patients with distant metastasis. Exogenous sE-cad treatment and sE-cad overexpression promoted A549R and A549 cell migration and invasion. In contrast, blocking sE-cad attenuated A549 cell migration and invasion. Curcumin inhibited sE-cad expression and reversed EMT induced by radiation. Furthermore, curcumin suppressed sE-cad-enhanced A549 and A549R cell migration and invasion. Curcumin inhibited MMP9 expression, and silencing MMP9 suppressed sE-cad expression. Taken together, we found a nonclassic EMT phenomenon induced by radiation. Curcumin inhibits NSCLC migration and invasion by suppressing radiation-induced EMT and sE-cad expression by decreasing MMP9 expression.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xinzhou Deng
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China,HubeiKey Laboratory of Embryonic Stem Cell Research, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Chunli Chen
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Feng Wu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Li Qiu
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qing Ke
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Renhuang Sun
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Qiwen Duan
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China
| | - Ming Luo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China,Zhiguo Luo and Ming Luo, Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, 30 South Renmin Road, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, People’s Republic of China. Emails: ;
| | - Zhiguo Luo
- Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, Shiyan, Hubei, People’s Republic of China,Zhiguo Luo and Ming Luo, Department of Clinical Oncology, Taihe Hospital, Hubei University of Medicine, 30 South Renmin Road, Shiyan, Hubei 442000, People’s Republic of China. Emails: ;
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Faivre-Finn C, Fenwick JD, Franks KN, Harrow S, Hatton MQF, Hiley C, McAleese JJ, McDonald F, O'Hare J, Peedell C, Pope T, Powell C, Rulach R, Toy E. Reduced Fractionation in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Curative-intent Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol) 2020; 32:481-489. [PMID: 32405158 PMCID: PMC7218369 DOI: 10.1016/j.clon.2020.05.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 39] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/17/2020] [Accepted: 04/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Patients treated with curative-intent lung radiotherapy are in the group at highest risk of severe complications and death from COVID-19. There is therefore an urgent need to reduce the risks associated with multiple hospital visits and their anti-cancer treatment. One recommendation is to consider alternative dose-fractionation schedules or radiotherapy techniques. This would also increase radiotherapy service capacity for operable patients with stage I-III lung cancer, who might be unable to have surgery during the pandemic. Here we identify reduced-fractionation for curative-intent radiotherapy regimes in lung cancer, from a literature search carried out between 20/03/2020 and 30/03/2020 as well as published and unpublished audits of hypofractionated regimes from UK centres. Evidence, practical considerations and limitations are discussed for early-stage NSCLC, stage III NSCLC, early-stage and locally advanced SCLC. We recommend discussion of this guidance document with other specialist lung MDT members to disseminate the potential changes to radiotherapy practices that could be made to reduce pressure on other departments such as thoracic surgery. It is also a crucial part of the consent process to ensure that the risks and benefits of undergoing cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and the uncertainties surrounding toxicity from reduced fractionation have been adequately discussed with patients. Furthermore, centres should document all deviations from standard protocols, and we urge all colleagues, where possible, to join national/international data collection initiatives (such as COVID-RT Lung) aimed at recording the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung cancer treatment and outcomes.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- C Faivre-Finn
- The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK; The University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
| | - J D Fenwick
- Department of Molecular and Clinical Cancer Medicine, Institute of Translational Medicine, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, UK; Department of Physics, Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, UK
| | - K N Franks
- Leeds Cancer Centre, St James's University Hospital, Leeds, UK; University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - S Harrow
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | | | - C Hiley
- CRUK Lung Cancer Centre of Excellence, University College London, London, UK; Department of Clinical Oncology, University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J J McAleese
- Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - F McDonald
- The Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK
| | - J O'Hare
- Northern Ireland Cancer Centre, Belfast City Hospital, Belfast, UK
| | - C Peedell
- James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough, UK
| | - T Pope
- Clatterbridge Cancer Centre, Bebington, Wirral, UK
| | - C Powell
- South West Wales Cancer Centre, Singleton Hospital, Swansea, UK; Velindre Cancer Centre, Cardiff, UK
| | - R Rulach
- Beatson West of Scotland Cancer Centre, Glasgow, UK; University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK
| | - E Toy
- Royal Devon and Exeter NHS Foundation Trust, Exeter Hospital, Exeter, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Tjong MC, Mak DY, Shahi J, Li GJ, Chen H, Louie AV. Current Management and Progress in Radiotherapy for Small Cell Lung Cancer. Front Oncol 2020; 10:1146. [PMID: 32760673 PMCID: PMC7372592 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.01146] [Citation(s) in RCA: 17] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/26/2020] [Accepted: 06/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy (RT) and chemotherapy continue to be widely utilized in small cell lung cancer (SCLC) management. In most limited stage (LS)-SCLC cases, the standard initial therapy remains concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CRT), typically with an etoposide and platinum-based regimen. Hyperfractionated twice daily (BID) RT remains the standard of care, though conventional daily (QD) RT is now a viable alternative supported by randomized evidence. In LS-SCLC patients who experienced good response to CRT, prophylactic cranial irradiation (PCI) remains the standard of care. Brain imaging, ideally with MRI, should be performed prior to PCI to screen for clinically apparent brain metastases that may require a higher dose of cranial irradiation. Platinum doublet chemotherapy alone is the historic standard initial therapy in extensive stage (ES)-SCLC. Addition of immunotherapy such as atezolizumab and durvalumab to chemotherapy is now recommended after their benefits were demonstrated in recent trials. In patients with response to chemotherapy, consolidation thoracic RT and PCI could be considered, though with caveats. Emergence of hippocampal avoidance cranial irradiation and SRS in SCLC patients may supplant whole cranial irradiation as future standards of care. Incorporation of novel systemic therapies such as immunotherapies has changed the treatment paradigm and overall outlook of patients with SCLC. This narrative review summarizes the current state, ongoing trials, and future directions of radiotherapy in management of SCLC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael C Tjong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - David Y Mak
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Jeevin Shahi
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - George J Li
- Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Hanbo Chen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| | - Alexander V Louie
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Adamczyk M, Kruszyna-Mochalska M, Rucińska A, Piotrowski T. Software simulation of tumour motion dose effects during flattened and unflattened ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT. Rep Pract Oncol Radiother 2020; 25:684-691. [PMID: 32581656 DOI: 10.1016/j.rpor.2020.06.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/12/2020] [Revised: 05/04/2020] [Accepted: 06/02/2020] [Indexed: 12/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Restricted studies comparing different dose rate parameters are available while ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT planning leads to perform the analysis of the most suitable parameters of the external beams used. The special emphasis was placed on the impact of dose rate on dose distribution variations in target volumes due to interplay effects. Methods Four VMAT plans were calculated for 15 lung tumours using 6 MV photon beam quality (flattening filter FF vs. flattening filter free FFF beams) and maximum dose rate of 600 MU/min, 1000 MU/min and 1400 MU/min. Three kinds of motion simulations were performed finally giving 180 plans with perturbed dose distributions. Results 6FFF-1400 MUs/min plans were characterized by the shortest beam on time (1.8 ± 0.2 min). Analysing the performed motion simulation results, the mean dose (Dmean) is not a sensitive parameter to related interplay effects. Looking for local maximum and local minimum doses, some discrepancies were found, but their significance was presented for individual patients, not for the whole cohort. The same was observed for other verified dose metrics. Conclusions Generally, the evaluation of VMAT robustness between FF and FFF concepts against interplay effect showed a negligible effect of simulated motion influence on tumour coverage among different photon beam quality parameters. Due to the lack of FFF beams, smaller radiotherapy centres are able to perform ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT treatment in a safe way. Radiotherapy department having FFF beams could perform safe, fast and efficient ITV-based VMAT lung SBRT without a concern about significance of interplay effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marta Adamczyk
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
| | - Marta Kruszyna-Mochalska
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| | - Anna Rucińska
- 1st Radiotherapy Ward, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
| | - Tomasz Piotrowski
- Department of Medical Physics, Greater Poland Cancer Centre, Poznań, Poland
- Department of Electroradiology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Wegner RE, Abel S, Colonias A. Stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy versus conventionally fractionated radiotherapy for early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of the lung. Lung Cancer Manag 2020; 9:LMT32. [PMID: 32774465 PMCID: PMC7399604 DOI: 10.2217/lmt-2020-0004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Aim Some patients with early stage large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma (LCNEC) of the lung are not surgical candidates and will be managed with radiotherapy. We used the national cancer database to identify predictors of stereotactic radiotherapy and compare outcomes. Materials & methods We queried national cancer database for T1-2N0 LCNEC treated with radiation. Logistic regression and Cox regression identified predictors of stereotactic ablative body radiotherapy (SABR) and survival, respectively. Results We identified 754 patients, with 238 (32%) treated with SABR. Predictors of SABR were distance to facility, no chemotherapy, academic center, T1 and recent year. After propensity matching, median survival was 34.7 months compared with 23.7 months in favor of SABR (p = 0.02). Conclusion SABR for LCNEC has increased over time and was associated with improved survival.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Rodney E Wegner
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Stephen Abel
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| | - Athanasios Colonias
- Division of Radiation Oncology, Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA 15212, USA
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Abel S, Lee S, Ludmir EB, Verma V. Principles and Applications of Stereotactic Radiosurgery and Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy. Hematol Oncol Clin North Am 2019; 33:977-987. [DOI: 10.1016/j.hoc.2019.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/25/2022]
|