1
|
van den Bosch S, Doornaert PAH, Hoebers FJP, Kreike B, Vergeer MR, Zwijnenburg EM, Cox MC, Hannink G, Dijkema T, Kaanders JHAM. Clinical Benefit and Safety of Reduced Elective Dose in Definitive Radiotherapy for Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma: The UPGRADE-RT Multicenter Randomized Controlled Trial. J Clin Oncol 2025:JCO2402194. [PMID: 40233286 DOI: 10.1200/jco-24-02194] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2024] [Revised: 01/16/2025] [Accepted: 03/04/2025] [Indexed: 04/17/2025] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE Definitive radiotherapy (RT) for head and neck cancer (HNC) has significant long-term toxicity with elective neck irradiation (ENI) as a major contributor. In this multicenter randomized trial, the clinical benefit and safety of definitive RT with reduced versus standard elective dose were compared. METHODS Newly diagnosed patients with cT2-4N0-2M0 HNC were accrued and treated in five Dutch centers (definitive accelerated RT, 68 Gy in 34 fractions in 5.5 weeks). Patients receiving concurrent chemotherapy were not eligible. Dose for ENI was randomly assigned (2:1; dose reduction, 43 Gy, versus control, 50 Gy). The primary outcome was normalcy of diet score at 1 year. The secondary outcome was recurrence in electively irradiated nodes at 2 years in the dose reduction group with the null hypothesis rejected if the upper-bound one-sided 95% CI exceeded 9%. RESULTS Between 2016 and 2022, 300 patients were randomnly assigned, of whom 295 were evaluable and included in analysis (dose reduction, 196 and control, 99). The mean normalcy of diet score at 1 year was 91.6 (95% CI, 88.5 to 94.7) in the dose reduction group and 92.6 (95% CI, 88.2 to 97.1) in the control group (mean difference, -1.1 [95% CI, -6.5 to 4.4]). The 2-year recurrence rate in electively irradiated nodes in the dose reduction group was 4.9% (upper-bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.5%). In the control group, this was 4.3% (upper bound one-sided 95% CI, 7.7%). Exploratory analyses demonstrated less acute dysphagia grade ≥3 and better xerostomia-related quality of life in the dose reduction group. CONCLUSION This is the second randomized controlled trial demonstrating that reduced elective dose is safe in definitive RT for HNC.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sven van den Bosch
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Patricia A H Doornaert
- University Medical Center Utrecht, Department of Radiation Oncology, Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Frank J P Hoebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, GROW School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht University, Maastricht, the Netherlands
| | - Bas Kreike
- Radiotherapiegroep, Department of Radiation Oncology, Arnhem, the Netherlands
| | - Marije R Vergeer
- Amsterdam UMC, Department of Radiation Oncology, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Ellen M Zwijnenburg
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Maurice C Cox
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Gerjon Hannink
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Medical Imaging, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Tim Dijkema
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| | - Johannes H A M Kaanders
- Radboud University Medical Center, Department of Radiation Oncology, Nijmegen, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Margalit DN, Anker CJ, Aristophanous M, Awan M, Bajaj GK, Bradfield L, Califano J, Caudell JJ, Chapman CH, Garden AS, Harari PM, Helms A, Lin A, Maghami E, Mehra R, Parker L, Shnayder Y, Spencer S, Swiecicki PL, Tsai JC, Sher DJ. Radiation Therapy for HPV-Positive Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma: An ASTRO Clinical Practice Guideline. Pract Radiat Oncol 2024; 14:398-425. [PMID: 39078350 DOI: 10.1016/j.prro.2024.05.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/30/2024] [Accepted: 05/06/2024] [Indexed: 07/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE Human Papilloma Virus (HPV)-associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) is a distinct disease from other head and neck tumors. This guideline provides evidence-based recommendations on the critical decisions in its curative treatment, including both definitive and postoperative radiation therapy (RT) management. METHODS ASTRO convened a task force to address 5 key questions on the use of RT for management of HPV-associated OPSCC. These questions included indications for definitive and postoperative RT and chemoradiation; dose-fractionation regimens and treatment volumes; preferred RT techniques and normal tissue considerations; and posttreatment management decisions. The task force did not address indications for primary surgery versus RT. Recommendations were based on a systematic literature review and created using a predefined consensus-building methodology and system for grading evidence quality and recommendation strength. RESULTS Concurrent cisplatin is recommended for patients receiving definitive RT with T3-4 disease and/or 1 node >3 cm, or multiple nodes. For similar patients who are ineligible for cisplatin, concurrent cetuximab, carboplatin/5-fluorouracil, or taxane-based systemic therapy are conditionally recommended. In the postoperative setting, RT with concurrent cisplatin (either schedule) is recommended for positive surgical margins or extranodal extension. Postoperative RT alone is recommended for pT3-4 disease, >2 nodes, or a single node >3 cm. Observation is conditionally recommended for pT1-2 disease and a single node ≤3 cm without other risk factors. For patients treated with definitive RT with concurrent systemic therapy, 7000 cGy in 33 to 35 fractions is recommended, and for patients receiving postoperative RT without positive surgical margins and extranodal extension, 5600 to 6000 cGy is recommended. For all patients receiving RT, intensity modulated RT over 3-dimensional techniques with reduction in dose to critical organs at risk (including salivary and swallowing structures) is recommended. Reassessment with positron emission tomography-computed tomography is recommended approximately 3 months after definitive RT/chemoradiation, and neck dissection is recommended for convincing evidence of residual disease; for equivocal positron emission tomography-computed tomography findings, either neck dissection or repeat imaging is recommended. CONCLUSIONS The role and practice of RT continues to evolve for HPV-associated OPSCC, and these guidelines inform best clinical practice based on the available evidence.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Danielle N Margalit
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Brigham & Women's/Dana-Farber Cancer Center, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
| | - Christopher J Anker
- Division of Radiation Oncology, University of Vermont Cancer Center, Burlington, Vermont
| | - Michalis Aristophanous
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York
| | - Musaddiq Awan
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin
| | - Gopal K Bajaj
- Department of Advanced Radiation Oncology and Proton Therapy, Inova Schar Cancer Institute, Fairfax, Virginia
| | - Lisa Bradfield
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Joseph Califano
- Department of Surgery, University of California San Diego Health, San Diego, California
| | - Jimmy J Caudell
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, Florida
| | - Christina H Chapman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas
| | - Adam S Garden
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas - MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas
| | - Paul M Harari
- Department of Human Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin
| | - Amanda Helms
- American Society for Radiation Oncology, Arlington, Virginia
| | - Alexander Lin
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania
| | - Ellie Maghami
- Department of Surgery, City of Hope, Duarte, California
| | - Ranee Mehra
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Maryland Medical School and Greenebaum Comprehensive Cancer Center, Baltimore, Maryland
| | | | - Yelizaveta Shnayder
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Kansas Medical Center, Kansas City, Kansas
| | - Sharon Spencer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Alabama Heersink School of Medicine, Birmingham, Alabama
| | - Paul L Swiecicki
- Department of Medical Oncology, University of Michigan Rogel Cancer Center, Ann Arbor, Michigan
| | | | - David J Sher
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, Texas
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
van den Bosch S, Takes R, de Ridder M, de Bree R, Al-Mamgani A, Schreuder W, Hoebers F, van Weert S, Elbers J, Hardillo J, Meijer T, Plaat B, de Jong M, Jansen J, Wellenstein D, van den Broek G, Vogel W, Arens A, Kaanders J. Personalized neck irradiation guided by sentinel lymph node biopsy in patients with squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx with a clinically negative neck: (Chemo)radiotherapy to the PRIMary tumor only. Protocol of the PRIMO study. Clin Transl Radiat Oncol 2024; 44:100696. [PMID: 37965060 PMCID: PMC10641572 DOI: 10.1016/j.ctro.2023.100696] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/03/2023] [Accepted: 10/25/2023] [Indexed: 11/16/2023] Open
Abstract
Background Elective neck irradiation (ENI) is performed in head and neck cancer patients treated with definitive (chemo)radiotherapy. The aim is to eradicate nodal metastases that are not detectable by pretreatment imaging techniques. It is conceivable that personalized neck irradiation can be performed guided by the results of sentinel lymph node biopsy (SLNB). It is expected that ENI can be omitted to one or both sides of the neck in 9 out of 10 patients, resulting in less radiation side effects with better quality of life. Methods/design This is a multicenter randomized controlled trial aiming to compare safety and efficacy of treatment with SLNB guided neck irradiation versus standard bilateral ENI in 242 patients with cN0 squamous cell carcinoma of the oropharynx, larynx or hypopharynx for whom bilateral ENI is indicated. Patients randomized to the experimental-arm will undergo SLNB. Based on the histopathologic status of the SLNs, patients will receive no ENI (if all SLNs are negative), unilateral neck irradiation only (if a SLN is positive at one side of the neck) or bilateral neck irradiation (if SLNs are positive at both sides of the neck). Patients randomized to the control arm will not undergo SLNB but will receive standard bilateral ENI. The primary safety endpoint is the number of patients with recurrence in regional lymph nodes within 2 years after treatment. The primary efficacy endpoint is patient reported xerostomia-related quality of life at 6 months after treatment. Discussion If this trial demonstrates that the experimental treatment is non-inferior to the standard treatment in terms of regional recurrence and is superior in terms of xerostomia-related quality of life, this will become the new standard of care.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- S. van den Bosch
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - R.P. Takes
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - M. de Ridder
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - R. de Bree
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht, The Netherlands
| | - A. Al-Mamgani
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - W.H. Schreuder
- Department of Head and Neck Surgical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - F.J.P. Hoebers
- Department of Radiation Oncology (Maastro), Maastricht University Medical Center+, GROW-School for Oncology and Reproduction, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - S. van Weert
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Maastricht University Medical Center+, Maastricht, The Netherlands
| | - J.B.W. Elbers
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - J.A. Hardillo
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Erasmus MC Cancer Centre, Rotterdam, The Netherlands
| | - T.W.H. Meijer
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - B.E.C. Plaat
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, University Medical Center Groningen, Groningen, The Netherlands
| | - M.A. de Jong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - J.C. Jansen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands
| | - D.J. Wellenstein
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - G.B. van den Broek
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - W.V. Vogel
- Department of Medical Imaging/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Netherlands Cancer Institute/Antoni van Leeuwenhoek, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
| | - A.I.J. Arens
- Department of Medical Imaging/Department of Nuclear Medicine, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| | - J.H.A.M. Kaanders
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Nijmegen, The Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Niyoteka S, Seban RD, Rouhi R, Scarsbrook A, Genestie C, Classe M, Carré A, Sun R, La Greca Saint-Esteven A, Chargari C, McKenna J, McDermott G, Malinen E, Tanadini-Lang S, Guckenberger M, Guren MG, Lemanski C, Deutsch E, Robert C. A common [18F]-FDG PET radiomic signature to predict survival in patients with HPV-induced cancers. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2023; 50:4010-4023. [PMID: 37632562 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-023-06320-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/22/2022] [Accepted: 06/24/2023] [Indexed: 08/28/2023]
Abstract
Locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC) and anal and oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (ASCC and OPSCC) are mostly caused by oncogenic human papillomaviruses (HPV). In this paper, we developed machine learning (ML) models based on clinical, biological, and radiomic features extracted from pre-treatment fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography ([18F]-FDG PET) images to predict the survival of patients with HPV-induced cancers. For this purpose, cohorts from five institutions were used: two cohorts of patients treated for LACC including 104 patients from Gustave Roussy Campus Cancer (Center 1) and 90 patients from Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust (Center 2), two datasets of patients treated for ASCC composed of 66 patients from Institut du Cancer de Montpellier (Center 3) and 67 patients from Oslo University Hospital (Center 4), and one dataset of 45 OPSCC patients from the University Hospital of Zurich (Center 5). Radiomic features were extracted from baseline [18F]-FDG PET images. The ComBat technique was applied to mitigate intra-scanner variability. A modified consensus nested cross-validation for feature selection and hyperparameter tuning was applied on four ML models to predict progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using harmonized imaging features and/or clinical and biological variables as inputs. Each model was trained and optimized on Center 1 and Center 3 cohorts and tested on Center 2, Center 4, and Center 5 cohorts. The radiomic-based CoxNet model achieved C-index values of 0.75 and 0.78 for PFS and 0.76, 0.74, and 0.75 for OS on the test sets. Radiomic feature-based models had superior performance compared to the bioclinical ones, and combining radiomic and bioclinical variables did not improve the performances. Metabolic tumor volume (MTV)-based models obtained lower C-index values for a majority of the tested configurations but quite equivalent performance in terms of time-dependent AUCs (td-AUC). The results demonstrate the possibility of identifying common PET-based image signatures for predicting the response of patients with induced HPV pathology, validated on multi-center multiconstructor data.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephane Niyoteka
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France.
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France.
| | - Romain-David Seban
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Institut Curie, Saint Cloud, France
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Rahimeh Rouhi
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Andrew Scarsbrook
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
- Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | | | - Marion Classe
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Pathology Department, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Alexandre Carré
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Roger Sun
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | | | - Cyrus Chargari
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Jack McKenna
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Garry McDermott
- Department of Radiology, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | | | - Matthias Guckenberger
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital of Zurich, Zurich, Switzerland
| | - Marianne G Guren
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
- Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Claire Lemanski
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Institut Régional du Cancer de Montpellier, Montpellier, France
| | - Eric Deutsch
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| | - Charlotte Robert
- Université Paris Saclay, INSERM UMR1030, Gustave Roussy, 94805, Villejuif, France
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Gustave Roussy, F-94805, Villejuif, France
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Lee J, Davis SJ, Amin SN, Rohde SL, Kim YJ. Utility of PET-CT in Newly Diagnosed HPV-Associated Oropharyngeal Squamous Cell Carcinoma. Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol 2023; 132:1133-1139. [PMID: 36453776 DOI: 10.1177/00034894221135934] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 08/23/2023]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To compare the utility of positron emission tomography-computed tomography (PET-CT) versus contrasted CT neck combined with routine chest imaging for disease staging and treatment planning in human papillomavirus (HPV) associated oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinoma (OPSCC) with clinically evident sites of primary disease. METHODS All adult patients with primary HPV-associated OPSCC at a single quaternary care cancer center from 2018 to 2019 were reviewed, and those with images available for re-review were included. Primary outcomes included concordance in clinical staging between the 2 imaging modalities of interest (PET-CT vs CT), as well as independent agreement of each with pathologic staging. Analysis was performed via ordinal logistic regression. A secondary outcome was treatment selection after diagnostic imaging, analyzed via chi-squared testing. RESULTS In total, 100 patients were included for evaluation, of which 89% were male, 91% Caucasian, and mean age was 61.2 years (SD 9.6). Clinical disease staging agreed between imaging modalities in 95% of cases (54 of 57 patients). Pathologic staging agreed with clinical staging from CT neck in 93% of cases (25 of 27 patients; P = .004), and with PET-CT in 82% (14 of 17 patients; P =.003). No differences were observed between the 2 imaging modalities for subsequent treatment selection (P = .39). CONCLUSION In uncomplicated HPV-associated OPSCC, CT offers equivalent diagnostic accuracy to that of combined whole-body PET-CT for clinical staging, and has no appreciable impact on treatment selection. A reduced reliance on routine PET-CT during initial workup of HPV-associated OPSCC may be favorable for otherwise healthy patients with clinically evident sites of primary disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jaclyn Lee
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Seth J Davis
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Shaunak N Amin
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, University of Washington, Seattle, WA
| | - Sarah L Rohde
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| | - Young J Kim
- Department of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
- Division of Head and Neck Surgery, Vanderbilt University Medical Center, Nashville, TN, USA
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Deantonio L, Vigna L, Paolini M, Matheoud R, Sacchetti GM, Masini L, Loi G, Brambilla M, Krengli M. Application of a smart 18F-FDG-PET adaptive threshold segmentation algorithm for the biological target volume delineation in head and neck cancer. THE QUARTERLY JOURNAL OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE AND MOLECULAR IMAGING : OFFICIAL PUBLICATION OF THE ITALIAN ASSOCIATION OF NUCLEAR MEDICINE (AIMN) [AND] THE INTERNATIONAL ASSOCIATION OF RADIOPHARMACOLOGY (IAR), [AND] SECTION OF THE SOCIETY OF... 2023; 67:238-244. [PMID: 35238518 DOI: 10.23736/s1824-4785.22.03405-7] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 06/14/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND The aim of the present study is to evaluate the reliability of a 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET adaptive threshold segmentation (ATS) algorithm, previously validated in a preclinical setting on several scanners, for the biological target volume (BTV) delineation of head and neck radiotherapy planning. METHODS [18F]FDG PET ATS algorithm was studied in treatment plans of head and neck squamous cell carcinoma on a dedicated workstation (iTaRT, Tecnologie Avanzate, Turin, Italy). BTVs segmented by the present ATS algorithm (BTVATS) were compared with those manually segmented for the original radiotherapy treatment planning (BTVVIS). We performed a qualitative and quantitative volumetric analysis with a comparison tool within the ImSimQA TM software package (Oncology Systems Limited, Shrewsbury, UK). We reported figures of merit (FOMs) to convey complementary information: Dice Similarity Coefficient, Sensitivity Index, and Inclusiveness Index. RESULTS The study was conducted on 32 treatment plans. Median BTVATS was 11 cm3 while median BTVVIS was 14 cm3. The median Dice Similarity Coefficient, Sensitivity Index, Inclusiveness Index were 0.72, 63%, 88%, respectively. Interestingly, the median volume and the median distance of the voxels that are over contoured by ATS were respectively 1 cm3 and 1 mm. CONCLUSIONS ATS algorithm could be a smart and an independent operator tool when implemented for 18F-FDG-PET-based tumor volume delineation. Furthermore, it might be relevant in case of BTV-based dose painting.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Letizia Deantonio
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy -
| | - Luca Vigna
- Department of Medical Physics, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marina Paolini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Roberta Matheoud
- Department of Medical Physics, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Gian M Sacchetti
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Laura Masini
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Gianfranco Loi
- Department of Medical Physics, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Brambilla
- Department of Medical Physics, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
| | - Marco Krengli
- Department of Radiotherapy, Maggiore della Carità University Hospital, Novara, Italy
- Department of Translational Medicine, University of Eastern Piedmont, Novara, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Glogauer J, Kohanzadeh A, Feit A, Fournier JE, Zians A, Somogyi DZ. The Use of Radiomic Features to Predict Human Papillomavirus (HPV) Status in Head and Neck Tumors: A Review. Cureus 2023; 15:e44476. [PMID: 37664330 PMCID: PMC10472720 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.44476] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 08/30/2023] [Indexed: 09/05/2023] Open
Abstract
Head and neck cancers represent a significant source of morbidity and mortality across the world. The individual genetic makeup of each tumor can help to determine the course of treatment and can help clinicians predict prognosis. Non-invasive tools to determine the genetic status of these tumors, particularly p16 (human papillomavirus (HPV)) status could prove extremely valuable to treating clinicians and surgeons. The field of radiomics is a burgeoning area of radiology practice that aims to provide quantitative biomarkers that can be derived from radiological images and could prove useful in determining p16 status non-invasively. In this review, we summarize the current evidence for the use of radiomics to determine the HPV status of head and neck tumors. .
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Judah Glogauer
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Waterloo, CAN
| | | | - Avery Feit
- Medical School, Albert Einstein College of Medicine, Bronx, USA
| | - Jeffrey E Fournier
- Department of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, CAN
| | - Avraham Zians
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Montefiore Medical Center, Wakefield Campus, Bronx, USA
| | - Dafna Z Somogyi
- Department of Internal Medicine, Westchester Medical Center, Valhalla, USA
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Li C, Yang Y, Hu F, Xu Y, Wu B, Huang J, Yang K, Lan X. Evaluation of 11 C-Choline PET/CT for T Staging and Tumor Volume Delineation in Nasopharyngeal Cancer Patients in Comparison to 18 F-FDG PET/CT. Clin Nucl Med 2023; 48:563-573. [PMID: 37115936 DOI: 10.1097/rlu.0000000000004645] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/30/2023]
Abstract
PURPOSE Accurate determination of the primary tumor extension of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) by 18 F-FDG PET/CT is limited by the high physiological 18 F-FDG uptake in the surrounding area, especially in the brain tissue. We aimed to assess whether 11 C-choline PET/CT could improve the accuracy of T staging and tumor volume delineation for NPC patients. METHODS Patients with pathologically confirmed diagnosis of NPC were enrolled. The primary tumor extension of each patient was evaluated by 11 C-choline PET/CT, 18 F-FDG PET/CT, and contrast-enhanced MRI. The PET/CT-based tumor volume ( VPET ) was measured by 3 threshold methods, including the threshold of SUV 2.5 (Th 2.5 ), 40% of maximal SUV (Th 40% ), and the relative background-dependent threshold (Th bgd ). Tumor volume and Dice similarity coefficient were compared among VPET with different segmentation methods and VMR . RESULTS Thirty-three patients with treatment-naive NPC and 6 patients with suspicious recurrent disease were enrolled. The NPC lesions were avid for both 11 C-choline and 18 F-FDG. Visual analysis showed that 11 C-choline PET/CT had better contrast and higher discernability than 18 F-FDG PET/CT for intracranial, skull base, and orbital involvement. 11 C-choline PET/CT also exhibited advantage over MRI for differentiation between local recurrence and radiation-induced alterations. For the tumor delineated, the VMR was larger than VPET in general, except for 18 F-FDG PET/CT with Th 2.5 threshold. For all 3 threshold methods applied, 11 C-choline PET/CT produced more consistent and comparable tumor volume to MRI than 18 F-FDG PET/CT. 11 C-choline PET/CT with Th bgd threshold showed the closest tumor volume and highest similarity to MRI. CONCLUSIONS 11 C-choline PET/CT provides a higher accuracy than 18 F-FDG PET/CT in mapping tumor extension in locally advanced NPC and may be a promising complement to MRI in delineating the primary tumor.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Yuhui Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
| | | | | | - Bian Wu
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
| | - Jing Huang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
| | - Kunyu Yang
- Cancer Center, Union Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology
| | | |
Collapse
|
9
|
Duggar WN, Vengaloor Thomas T, Wang Y, Rahman A, Wang H, Roberts PR, Bian L, Gatewood RT, Vijayakumar S. Preoperative Prediction and Identification of Extracapsular Extension in Head and Neck Cancer Patients: Progress and Potential. Cureus 2023; 15:e34769. [PMID: 36909098 PMCID: PMC10001423 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.34769] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 02/08/2023] [Indexed: 02/11/2023] Open
Abstract
Background This study aimed to demonstrate both the potential and development progress in the identification of extracapsular nodal extension in head and neck cancer patients prior to surgery. Methodology A deep learning model has been developed utilizing multilayer gradient mapping-guided explainable network architecture involving a volume extractor. In addition, the gradient-weighted class activation mapping approach has been appropriated to generate a heatmap of anatomic regions indicating why the algorithm predicted extension or not. Results The prediction model shows excellent performance on the testing dataset with high values of accuracy, the area under the curve, sensitivity, and specificity of 0.926, 0.945, 0.924, and 0.930, respectively. The heatmap results show potential usefulness for some select patients but indicate the need for further training as the results may be misleading for other patients. Conclusions This work demonstrates continued progress in the identification of extracapsular nodal extension in diagnostic computed tomography prior to surgery. Continued progress stands to see the obvious potential realized where not only can unnecessary multimodality therapy be avoided but necessary therapy can be guided on a patient-specific level with information that currently is not available until postoperative pathology is complete.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- William N Duggar
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | | | - Yibin Wang
- Industrial Systems and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA
| | - Abdur Rahman
- Industrial Systems and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA
| | - Haifeng Wang
- Industrial Systems and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Paul R Roberts
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Linkan Bian
- Industrial Systems and Engineering, Mississippi State University, Starkville, USA
| | - Ronald T Gatewood
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | | |
Collapse
|
10
|
Vijayakumar S, Yang J, Nittala MR, Velazquez AE, Huddleston BL, Rugnath NA, Adari N, Yajurvedi AK, Komanduri A, Yang CC, Duggar WN, Berlin WP, Duszak R, Vijayakumar V. Changing Role of PET/CT in Cancer Care With a Focus on Radiotherapy. Cureus 2022; 14:e32840. [PMID: 36694538 PMCID: PMC9867792 DOI: 10.7759/cureus.32840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Accepted: 12/22/2022] [Indexed: 12/24/2022] Open
Abstract
Positron emission tomography (PET) integrated with computed tomography (CT) has brought revolutionary changes in improving cancer care (CC) for patients. These include improved detection of previously unrecognizable disease, ability to identify oligometastatic status enabling more aggressive treatment strategies when the disease burden is lower, its use in better defining treatment targets in radiotherapy (RT), ability to monitor treatment responses early and thus improve the ability for early interventions of non-responding tumors, and as a prognosticating tool as well as outcome predicting tool. PET/CT has enabled the emergence of new concepts such as radiobiotherapy (RBT), radioimmunotherapy, theranostics, and pharmaco-radiotherapy. This is a rapidly evolving field, and this primer is to help summarize the current status and to give an impetus to developing new ideas, clinical trials, and CC outcome improvements.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Johnny Yang
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Mary R Nittala
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | | | | | - Nickhil A Rugnath
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Neha Adari
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Abhay K Yajurvedi
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Abhinav Komanduri
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Claus Chunli Yang
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - William N Duggar
- Radiation Oncology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - William P Berlin
- Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Richard Duszak
- Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| | - Vani Vijayakumar
- Radiology, University of Mississippi Medical Center, Jackson, USA
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Pruijssen JT, Wenmakers A, Kessels RPC, Piai V, Meijer FJA, Pegge SAH, Loonen JJ, Tuladhar AM, Hansen HHG, Kaanders JHAM, Wilbers J. Long-term cognitive, psychosocial, and neurovascular complications of unilateral head and neck irradiation in young to middle-aged adults. BMC Cancer 2022; 22:244. [PMID: 35248013 PMCID: PMC8897732 DOI: 10.1186/s12885-022-09295-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/08/2021] [Accepted: 02/10/2022] [Indexed: 11/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Background With a growing, younger population of head and neck cancer survivors, attention to long-term side-effects of prior, often radiotherapeutic, treatment is warranted. Therefore, we studied the long-term cognitive effects in young adult patients irradiated for head and neck neoplasms (HNN). Methods Young to middle-aged adults with HNN (aged 18-40 years) and treated with unilateral neck irradiation ≥ 5 years before inclusion underwent cardiovascular risk and neuropsychological assessments and answered validated questionnaires regarding subjective cognitive complaints, fatigue, depression, quality of life, and cancer-specific distress. Additionally, magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) of the brain was performed to assess white matter hyperintensities (WMH), infarctions, and atrophy. Results Twenty-nine patients (aged 24–61, 13 men) median 9.2 [7.3–12.9] years post-treatment were included. HNN patients performed worse in episodic memory (Z-score = -1.16 [-1.58–0.34], p < 0.001) and reported more fatigue symptoms (Z-score = 1.75 [1.21–2.00], p < 0.001) compared to normative data. Furthermore, patients had a high level of fear of tumor recurrence (13 patients [44.8%]) and a heightened speech handicap index (13 patients [44.8%]). Only a small number of neurovascular lesions were found (3 infarctions in 2 patients and 0.11 [0.00–0.40] mL WMH), unrelated to the irradiated side. Cognitive impairment was not associated with WMH, brain atrophy, fatigue, or subjective speech problems. Conclusions HNN patients showed impairments in episodic memory and an increased level of fatigue ≥ 5 years after radiotherapy compared to normative data. Cognitive impairments could not be explained by WMH or brain atrophy on brain MRI or psychological factors. Trial registration Clinicaltrials.gov (https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT04257968). Supplementary Information The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12885-022-09295-9.
Collapse
|
12
|
PET/CT. PET Clin 2022; 17:297-305. [DOI: 10.1016/j.cpet.2021.12.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
|
13
|
Comparison of PET-CT, CT and MRI scan in initial staging and management of head and neck cancers. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol 2021; 279:2651-2656. [PMID: 34546395 DOI: 10.1007/s00405-021-07087-8] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/24/2021] [Accepted: 09/10/2021] [Indexed: 10/20/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND To evaluate the utility of positron-emission tomography (FDG PET) in initial staging and management of head and neck cancers. METHODS This is a retrospective study of 99 treatment naïve head and neck cancer patients treated between January 2017 and December 2020 at a tertiary teaching centre. Change in initial staging and management was noted based on PET scan compared to cross-sectional imaging (CT and MRI). RESULTS There were 73 (73.7%) males and 26 (26.2%) females with male-to-female ratio of 2.8:1.Overall, change in management was seen in 36/99 (36.4%) patients due to PET scan. With regards to initial staging, T, N and M stage was changed in 14/99 (14.1%), 19/99 (19.1%) and 3/99 (3%) patients, respectively. These changes were significantly higher in patients with unknown primary (63.3%, p value -0.001) and N3 (41%, p -0.045) nodal disease. CONCLUSION PET-CT plays an important role in appropriate initial staging and subsequent treatment planning of head and neck cancers. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE Initial staging PETCT changes management in 36.4% cases. Accuracy of various different imaging modalities have been compared.
Collapse
|
14
|
Marcus C, Sheikhbahaei S, Shivamurthy VKN, Avey G, Subramaniam RM. PET Imaging for Head and Neck Cancers. Radiol Clin North Am 2021; 59:773-788. [PMID: 34392918 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2021.05.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/19/2022]
Abstract
Head and neck cancers are commonly encountered cancers in clinical practice in the United States. Fluorine-18-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT has been clinically applied in staging, occult primary tumor detection, treatment planning, response assessment, follow-up, recurrent disease detection, and prognosis prediction in these patients. Alternative PET tracers remain investigational and can provide additional valuable information such as radioresistant tumor hypoxia. The recent introduction of 18F-FDG PET/MR imaging has provided the advantage of combining the superior soft tissue resolution of MR imaging with the functional information provided by 18F-FDG PET. This article is a concise review of recent advances in PET imaging in head and neck cancer.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Charles Marcus
- Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Emory University Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.
| | - Sara Sheikhbahaei
- Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins Medical Institutions, 601 N. Caroline Street, JHOC 3235, Baltimore, MD 21287, USA
| | - Veeresh Kumar N Shivamurthy
- Epilepsy Center, St. Francis Hospital and Medical Center, Trinity Health of New England, 114 Woodland Street, Hartford, CT 06105, USA
| | - Greg Avey
- Department of Radiology, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, 600 Highland Ave #3284, Madison, WI 53792, USA
| | - Rathan M Subramaniam
- Dean's Office, Otago Medical School, University of Otago, 201 Great King Street, Dunedin 9016, New Zealand
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Strahlenther Onkol 2021; 197:1-23. [PMID: 34259912 DOI: 10.1007/s00066-021-01812-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2021] [Accepted: 06/09/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
- Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca-L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Christoph Henkenberens
- Department of Radiotherapy and Special Oncology, Medical School Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe-University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
- OncoRay-National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.
- National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany, Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
- Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology-OncoRay, Dresden, Germany.
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Lapa C, Nestle U, Albert NL, Baues C, Beer A, Buck A, Budach V, Bütof R, Combs SE, Derlin T, Eiber M, Fendler WP, Furth C, Gani C, Gkika E, Grosu AL, Henkenberens C, Ilhan H, Löck S, Marnitz-Schulze S, Miederer M, Mix M, Nicolay NH, Niyazi M, Pöttgen C, Rödel CM, Schatka I, Schwarzenboeck SM, Todica AS, Weber W, Wegen S, Wiegel T, Zamboglou C, Zips D, Zöphel K, Zschaeck S, Thorwarth D, Troost EGC. Value of PET imaging for radiation therapy. Nuklearmedizin 2021; 60:326-343. [PMID: 34261141 DOI: 10.1055/a-1525-7029] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
This comprehensive review written by experts in their field gives an overview on the current status of incorporating positron emission tomography (PET) into radiation treatment planning. Moreover, it highlights ongoing studies for treatment individualisation and per-treatment tumour response monitoring for various primary tumours. Novel tracers and image analysis methods are discussed. The authors believe this contribution to be of crucial value for experts in the field as well as for policy makers deciding on the reimbursement of this powerful imaging modality.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Constantin Lapa
- Nuclear Medicine, Medical Faculty, University of Augsburg, Augsburg, Germany
| | - Ursula Nestle
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Kliniken Maria Hilf, Mönchengladbach, Germany
| | - Nathalie L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Baues
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Ambros Beer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Andreas Buck
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany
| | - Volker Budach
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Campus Virchow-Klinikum, Berlin, Germany
| | - Rebecca Bütof
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Stephanie E Combs
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany.,Department of Radiation Sciences (DRS), Institute of Radiation Medicine (IRM), Neuherberg, Germany
| | - Thorsten Derlin
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Hannover Medical School, Germany
| | - Matthias Eiber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang P Fendler
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University of Duisburg-Essen and German Cancer Consortium (DKTK)-University Hospital Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Christian Furth
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Cihan Gani
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Eleni Gkika
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Anca L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | | | - Harun Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Steffen Löck
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany
| | - Simone Marnitz-Schulze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Matthias Miederer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital Mainz, Mainz, Germany
| | - Michael Mix
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, Medical Center, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Nils H Nicolay
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Maximilian Niyazi
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christoph Pöttgen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, West German Cancer Centre, University of Duisburg-Essen, Essen, Germany
| | - Claus M Rödel
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Frankfurt, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiotherapy and Oncology, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany
| | - Imke Schatka
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | | | - Andrei S Todica
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Weber
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, Technical University of Munich (TUM), Klinikum rechts der Isar, Munich, Germany
| | - Simone Wegen
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Cyberknife and Radiotherapy, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Cologne, Cologne, Germany
| | - Thomas Wiegel
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Ulm University Hospital, Ulm, Germany
| | - Constantinos Zamboglou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine, University Medical Center Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - Daniel Zips
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Klaus Zöphel
- OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,Department of Nuclear Medicine, Klinikum Chemnitz gGmbH, Chemnitz, Germany
| | - Sebastian Zschaeck
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Charité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Berlin Institute of Health, Berlin, Germany
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Tübingen, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Esther G C Troost
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiation Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.,OncoRay - National Center for Radiation Research in Oncology, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Dresden, Germany.,National Center for Tumor Diseases (NCT), Partner Site Dresden, Germany: German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany; Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Carl Gustav Carus, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany; Helmholtz Association/Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf (HZDR), Dresden, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), Partner Site Dresden, and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Helmholtz-Zentrum Dresden-Rossendorf, Institute of Radiooncology - OncoRay, Dresden, Germany
| | | |
Collapse
|
17
|
A hidden Markov model for lymphatic tumor progression in the head and neck. Sci Rep 2021; 11:12261. [PMID: 34112849 PMCID: PMC8192955 DOI: 10.1038/s41598-021-91544-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/22/2021] [Accepted: 05/27/2021] [Indexed: 11/08/2022] Open
Abstract
Currently, elective clinical target volume (CTV-N) definition for head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is mostly based on the prevalence of nodal involvement for a given tumor location. In this work, we propose a probabilistic model for lymphatic metastatic spread that can quantify the risk of microscopic involvement in lymph node levels (LNL) given the location of macroscopic metastases and T-category. This may allow for further personalized CTV-N definition based on an individual patient's state of disease. We model the patient's state of metastatic lymphatic progression as a collection of hidden binary random variables that indicate the involvement of LNLs. In addition, each LNL is associated with observed binary random variables that indicate whether macroscopic metastases are detected. A hidden Markov model (HMM) is used to compute the probabilities of transitions between states over time. The underlying graph of the HMM represents the anatomy of the lymphatic drainage system. Learning of the transition probabilities is done via Markov chain Monte Carlo sampling and is based on a dataset of HNSCC patients in whom involvement of individual LNLs was reported. The model is demonstrated for ipsilateral metastatic spread in oropharyngeal HNSCC patients. We demonstrate the model's capability to quantify the risk of microscopic involvement in levels III and IV, depending on whether macroscopic metastases are observed in the upstream levels II and III, and depending on T-category. In conclusion, the statistical model of lymphatic progression may inform future, more personalized, guidelines on which LNL to include in the elective CTV. However, larger multi-institutional datasets for model parameter learning are required for that.
Collapse
|
18
|
Flaus A, Nevesny S, Guy JB, Sotton S, Magné N, Prévot N. Positron emission tomography for radiotherapy planning in head and neck cancer: What impact? Nucl Med Commun 2021; 42:234-243. [PMID: 33252513 DOI: 10.1097/mnm.0000000000001329] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/25/2022]
Abstract
PET-computed tomography (CT) plays a growing role to guide target volume delineation for head and neck cancer in radiation oncology. Pretherapeutic [18F]FDG PET-CT adds information to morphological imaging. First, as a whole-body imaging modality, it reveals regional or distant metastases that induce major therapeutic changes in more than 10% of the cases. Moreover, it allows better pathological lymph node selection which improves overall regional control and overall survival. Second, locally, it allows us to define the metabolic tumoral volume, which is a reliable prognostic feature for survival outcome. [18F]FDG PET-CT-based gross tumor volume (GTV) is on average significantly smaller than GTV based on CT. Nevertheless, the overlap is incomplete and more evaluation of composite GTV based on PET and GTV based on CT are needed. However, in clinical practice, the study showed that using GTV PET alone for treatment planning was similar to using GTVCT for local control and dose distribution was better as a dose to organs at risk significantly decreased. In addition to FDG, pretherapeutic PET could give access to different biological tumoral volumes - thanks to different tracers - guiding heterogeneous dose delivery (dose painting concept) to resistant subvolumes. During radiotherapy treatment, follow-up [18F]FDG PET-CT revealed an earlier and more important diminution of GTV than other imaging modality. It may be a valuable support for adaptative radiotherapy as a new treatment plan with a significant impact on dose distribution became possible. Finally, additional studies are required to prospectively validate long-term outcomes and lower toxicity resulting from the use of PET-CT in treatment planning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anthime Flaus
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, St Etienne
| | - Stéphane Nevesny
- Département de Radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire-Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest en Jarez
| | - Jean-Baptiste Guy
- Département de Radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire-Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest en Jarez
- UMR CNRS 5822/IN2P3, IPNL, PRISME, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Lyon 1, Oullins Cedex
| | - Sandrine Sotton
- Department of Research and Teaching, Lucien Neuwirth Cancer Institute, Saint-Priest-en-Jarez, University Departement of Research and Teaching
| | - Nicolas Magné
- Département de Radiothérapie, Institut de Cancérologie de la Loire-Lucien Neuwirth, St Priest en Jarez
- UMR CNRS 5822/IN2P3, IPNL, PRISME, Laboratoire de Radiobiologie Cellulaire et Moléculaire, Faculté de Médecine Lyon-Sud, Université Lyon 1, Oullins Cedex
| | - Nathalie Prévot
- Service de Médecine Nucléaire, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Saint-Etienne, St Etienne
- INSERM U 1059 Sainbiose, Université Jean Monnet, Saint-Etienne, France
| |
Collapse
|
19
|
Moe YM, Groendahl AR, Tomic O, Dale E, Malinen E, Futsaether CM. Deep learning-based auto-delineation of gross tumour volumes and involved nodes in PET/CT images of head and neck cancer patients. Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging 2021; 48:2782-2792. [PMID: 33559711 PMCID: PMC8263429 DOI: 10.1007/s00259-020-05125-x] [Citation(s) in RCA: 21] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/10/2020] [Accepted: 11/15/2020] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
PURPOSE Identification and delineation of the gross tumour and malignant nodal volume (GTV) in medical images are vital in radiotherapy. We assessed the applicability of convolutional neural networks (CNNs) for fully automatic delineation of the GTV from FDG-PET/CT images of patients with head and neck cancer (HNC). CNN models were compared to manual GTV delineations made by experienced specialists. New structure-based performance metrics were introduced to enable in-depth assessment of auto-delineation of multiple malignant structures in individual patients. METHODS U-Net CNN models were trained and evaluated on images and manual GTV delineations from 197 HNC patients. The dataset was split into training, validation and test cohorts (n= 142, n = 15 and n = 40, respectively). The Dice score, surface distance metrics and the new structure-based metrics were used for model evaluation. Additionally, auto-delineations were manually assessed by an oncologist for 15 randomly selected patients in the test cohort. RESULTS The mean Dice scores of the auto-delineations were 55%, 69% and 71% for the CT-based, PET-based and PET/CT-based CNN models, respectively. The PET signal was essential for delineating all structures. Models based on PET/CT images identified 86% of the true GTV structures, whereas models built solely on CT images identified only 55% of the true structures. The oncologist reported very high-quality auto-delineations for 14 out of the 15 randomly selected patients. CONCLUSIONS CNNs provided high-quality auto-delineations for HNC using multimodality PET/CT. The introduced structure-wise evaluation metrics provided valuable information on CNN model strengths and weaknesses for multi-structure auto-delineation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yngve Mardal Moe
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | | | - Oliver Tomic
- Faculty of Science and Technology, Norwegian University of Life Sciences, Ås, Norway
| | - Einar Dale
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway.,Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | | |
Collapse
|
20
|
Jensen K, Al-Farra G, Dejanovic D, Eriksen JG, Loft A, Hansen CR, Pameijer FA, Zukauskaite R, Grau C. Imaging for Target Delineation in Head and Neck Cancer Radiotherapy. Semin Nucl Med 2020; 51:59-67. [PMID: 33246540 DOI: 10.1053/j.semnuclmed.2020.07.010] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/24/2023]
Abstract
The definition of tumor involved volumes in patients with head and neck cancer poses great challenges with the increasing use of highly conformal radiotherapy techniques eg, volumetric modulated arc therapy and intensity modulated proton therapy. The risk of underdosing the tumor might increase unless great care is taken in the process. The information gained from imaging is increasing with both PET and MRI becoming readily available for the definition of targets. The information gained from these techniques is indeed multidimensional as one often acquire data on eg, metabolism, diffusion, and hypoxia together with anatomical and structural information. Nevertheless, much work remains to fully exploit the available information on a patient-specific level. Multimodality target definition in radiotherapy is a chain of processes that must be individually scrutinized, optimized and quality assured. Any uncertainties or errors in image acquisition, reconstruction, interpretation, and delineation are systematic errors and hence will potentially have a detrimental effect on the entire radiotherapy treatment and hence; the chance of cure or the risk of unnecessary side effects. Common guidelines and procedures create a common minimum standard and ground for evaluation and development. In Denmark, the treatment of head and neck cancer is organized within the multidisciplinary Danish Head and Neck Cancer Group (DAHANCA). The radiotherapy quality assurance group of DAHANCA organized a workshop in January 2020 with participants from oncology, radiology, and nuclear medicine from all centers in Denmark, treating patients with head and neck cancer. The participants agreed on a national guideline on imaging for target delineation in head and neck cancer radiotherapy, which has been approved by the DAHANCA group. The guidelines are available in the Supplementary. The use of multimodality imaging is being recommended for the planning of all radical treatments with a macroscopic tumor. 2-[18F]FDG-PET/CT should be available, preferable in the treatment position. The recommended MRI sequences are T1, T2 with and without fat suppression, and T1 with contrast enhancement, preferable in the treatment position. The interpretation of clinical information, including thorough physical examination as well as imaging, should be done in a multidisciplinary setting with an oncologist, radiologist, and nuclear medicine specialist.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kenneth Jensen
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy. Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark.
| | - Gina Al-Farra
- Department of Radiology, Herlev and Gentofte Hospital, Denmark
| | - Danijela Dejanovic
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | | | - Annika Loft
- Department of Clinical Physiology, Nuclear Medicine and PET, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Christian R Hansen
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark; Danish Center for Particle Therapy. Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| | - Frank A Pameijer
- Department of Radiology, University Medical Center Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Ruta Zukauskaite
- Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark; Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark
| | - Cai Grau
- Danish Center for Particle Therapy. Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
21
|
Unterrainer M, Eze C, Ilhan H, Marschner S, Roengvoraphoj O, Schmidt-Hegemann NS, Walter F, Kunz WG, Rosenschöld PMA, Jeraj R, Albert NL, Grosu AL, Niyazi M, Bartenstein P, Belka C. Recent advances of PET imaging in clinical radiation oncology. Radiat Oncol 2020; 15:88. [PMID: 32317029 PMCID: PMC7171749 DOI: 10.1186/s13014-020-01519-1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 77] [Impact Index Per Article: 15.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/02/2020] [Accepted: 03/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/25/2022] Open
Abstract
Radiotherapy and radiation oncology play a key role in the clinical management of patients suffering from oncological diseases. In clinical routine, anatomic imaging such as contrast-enhanced CT and MRI are widely available and are usually used to improve the target volume delineation for subsequent radiotherapy. Moreover, these modalities are also used for treatment monitoring after radiotherapy. However, some diagnostic questions cannot be sufficiently addressed by the mere use standard morphological imaging. Therefore, positron emission tomography (PET) imaging gains increasing clinical significance in the management of oncological patients undergoing radiotherapy, as PET allows the visualization and quantification of tumoral features on a molecular level beyond the mere morphological extent shown by conventional imaging, such as tumor metabolism or receptor expression. The tumor metabolism or receptor expression information derived from PET can be used as tool for visualization of tumor extent, for assessing response during and after therapy, for prediction of patterns of failure and for definition of the volume in need of dose-escalation. This review focuses on recent and current advances of PET imaging within the field of clinical radiotherapy / radiation oncology in several oncological entities (neuro-oncology, head & neck cancer, lung cancer, gastrointestinal tumors and prostate cancer) with particular emphasis on radiotherapy planning, response assessment after radiotherapy and prognostication.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- M Unterrainer
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany. .,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.
| | - C Eze
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - H Ilhan
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - S Marschner
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - O Roengvoraphoj
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - N S Schmidt-Hegemann
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - F Walter
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - W G Kunz
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany
| | - P Munck Af Rosenschöld
- Radiation Physics, Department of Hematology, Oncology and Radiation Physics, Skåne University Hospital, and Lund University, Lund, Sweden
| | - R Jeraj
- Department of Medical Physics, School of Medicine and Public Health, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, USA
| | - N L Albert
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - A L Grosu
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical Center - University of Freiburg, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner Site Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany
| | - M Niyazi
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - P Bartenstein
- Department of Nuclear Medicine, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Marchioninistr. 15, 81377, Munich, Germany.,German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany
| | - C Belka
- German Cancer Consortium (DKTK), partner site Munich; and German Cancer Research Center (DKFZ), Heidelberg, Germany.,Department of Radiation Oncology, University Hospital, LMU Munich, Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|