Radical accelerated radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC): A 5-year retrospective review of two dose fractionation schedules

Breaking barriers: harnessing hypofractionated radiotherapy to transform outcomes in low tumor mutation burden stage III non-small cell lung cancer - a retrospective study

Background

Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer (NSCLC) patients with low tumor mutational burden (TMB) showed low sensitive to conventional fractionated radiotherapy in our previous study. This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) in locally advanced NSCLC patients with low-TMB compared to conventional fractionated radiotherapy (CFRT).

Methods

We retrospectively analyzed clinical outcomes of 74 locally advanced NSCLC patients with low-TMB undergoing definitive radiotherapy from January 2017 to July 2023, with 31 patients received HFRT (received radiation doses of >2Gy and ≤5 Gy per fraction) and 43 received CFRT (received radiation doses of 1.8-2 Gy per fraction). Progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS) and objective response rate (ORR) to radiotherapy was analyzed in the two groups. Univariate analysis was performed to assess the impact of clinical characteristics on PFS. We also analyzed PFS in subgroups receiving HFRT or CFRT combined with immunotherapy and chemotherapy.

Results

Survival analysis revealed the median PFS of 13 months in the HFRT group was significantly better than the 10 months in the CFRT group (p = 0.024). The 6-month and 12-month PFS rates were 80.6% and 61.3% for the HFRT group, versus 81.4% and 39.5% for the CFRT group, respectively. Median OS was 27 months in the HFRT group and 20 months in the CFRT group (p = 0.079). There were no statistically significant differences in major adverse events between the HFRT and CFRT groups (all p>0.05). In the subgroup receiving combined immunotherapy and chemotherapy, the median PFS was 10 months in the HFRT group and 9 months in the CFRT group (p = 0.092).

Conclusion

HFRT was superior to CFRT in prolonging PFS for patients with low-TMB locally advanced NSCLC. It was a safely and effective approach for these patients and was worth further prospective studies with larger sample sizes.

Metal-Protein Hybrid Materials: Unlocking New Frontiers in Biomedical Applications

Metal-protein hybrid materials represent a novel class of functional materials that exhibit exceptional physicochemical properties and tunable structures, rendering them remarkable applications in diverse fields, including materials engineering, biocatalysis, biosensing, and biomedicine. The design and development of multifunctional and biocompatible metal-protein hybrid materials have been the subject of extensive research and a key aspiration for practical applications in clinical settings. This review provides a comprehensive analysis of the design strategies, intrinsic properties, and biomedical applications of these hybrid materials, with a specific emphasis on their potential in cancer therapy, drug and vaccine delivery, antibacterial treatments, and tissue regeneration. Through rational design, stable metal-protein hybrid materials can be synthesized using straightforward methods, enabling them with therapeutic, delivery, immunomodulatory, and other desired functionalities. Finally, the review outlines the existing limitations and challenges associated with metal-protein hybrid materials and evaluates their potential for clinical translation, providing insights into their practical implementation within biomedical applications.

Identification of hub genes and potential molecular mechanisms related to radiotherapy in thyroid cancer

Radiotherapy is a common approach during the treatment of thyroid cancer (THCA). It is urgent to identify the radiotherapy-related gene and explore the underlying mechanisms. An message RNA expression clinical data was gained from the Cancer Genome Atlas. The differential expression genes between normal individuals and THCA patients were identified by the "limma" package of R software. The differential expression genes between the patients without radiation therapy and the patients with radiation therapy were also obtained via the same method. Survival analysis, gene set enrichment analysis, immune analysis, drug sensitivity analysis, gene-miRNA, and nomogram analysis were performed to explore the radiotherapy-related gene value. The results showed that 354 DGEs between the THCA patients without radiation therapy and THCA patients with radiation therapy including the 148 up-regulated genes and 206 down-regulated were screened and displayed by volcano plot. A gene enrichment analysis showed radiation-related genes were enriched in various pathways such as mineral absorption, complement and coagulation cascades, B cell receptor signaling pathway, salivary secretion, and hematopoietic cell lineage. Then the hub-related-radiotherapy prognosis gene LRP1B was identified. The expression analysis showed that the LRP1B expression level was higher in normal individuals than in THCA patients with an obvious difference via T test in independent samples and paired samples. Immune analysis results showed that the stroma score, immune score, and ESTIMATES score were higher in the low-risk score than in the high-risk score. LRP1B is a vital gene that executes function via a variety of pathways in THCA patients with radiotherapy. Radiotherapy could reduce the expression of LRP1B and AL356596.1. Moreover, the constructed nomogram is based on risk score and clinical features, and it had a great function in predicting survival time for patients.

[New Radiation Therapy Concepts in Non-Metastatic Lung Cancer]

Radiotherapy plays a critical role in the management of non-metastatic lung cancer, offering curative potential and symptom relief. It serves as a primary treatment modality or adjuvant therapy post-surgery, enhancing local control and survival rates. Modern techniques like Stereotactic Body Radiotherapy (SBRT) enable precise tumor targeting, minimizing damage to healthy tissue and reducing treatment duration. The synergy between radiotherapy and systemic treatments, including immunotherapy, holds promise in improving outcomes. Immunotherapy augments the immune response against cancer cells, potentially enhancing radiotherapy's efficacy. Furthermore, radiotherapy's ability to modulate the tumor microenvironment complements the immunotherapy's mechanism of action. As a result, the combination of radiotherapy and immunotherapy may offer superior tumor control and survival benefits. Moreover, the integration of radiotherapy with surgery and chemotherapy in multidisciplinary approaches maximizes treatment efficacy while minimizing toxicity. Herein we present an overview on modern radiotherapy and potential developments in the close future.

Evidence-based clinical recommendations for hypofractionated radiotherapy: exploring efficacy and safety - Part 2. Lung (non-small cell lung cancer)

Several recent studies have investigated the use of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) for various cancers. However, HFRT for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with or without concurrent chemotherapy is not yet widely used because of concerns about serious side effects and the lack of evidence for improved treatment results. Investigations of HFRT with concurrent chemotherapy in NSCLC have usually been performed in single-arm studies and with a small number of patients, so there are not yet sufficient data. Therefore, the Korean Society for Radiation Oncology Practice Guidelines Committee planned this review article to summarize the evidence on HFRT so far and provide it to radiation oncology clinicians. In summary, HFRT has demonstrated promising results, and the reviewed data support its feasibility and comparable efficacy for the treatment of locally advanced NSCLC. The incidence and severity of esophageal toxicity have been identified as major concerns, particularly when treating large fraction sizes. Strategies, such as esophagus-sparing techniques, image guidance, and dose constraints, may help mitigate this problem and improve treatment tolerability. Continued research and clinical trials are essential to refine treatment strategies, identify optimal patient selection criteria, and enhance therapeutic outcomes.

Efficiency of moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy in NSCLC cell model

Background

The current standard of radiotherapy for inoperable locally advanced NSCLCs with single fraction doses of 2.0 Gy, results in poor outcomes. Several fractionation schedules have been explored that developed over the past decades to increasingly more hypofractionated treatments. Moderate hypofractionated radiotherapy, as an alternative treatment, has gained clinical importance due to shorter duration and higher patient convenience. However, clinical trials show controversial results, adding to the need for pre-clinical radiobiological studies of this schedule.

Methods

We examined in comparative analysis the efficiency of moderate hypofractionation and normofractionation in four different NSCLC cell lines and fibroblasts using several molecular-biological approaches. Cells were daily irradiated with 24x2.75 Gy (moderate hypofractionation) or with 30x2 Gy (normofractionation), imitating the clinical situation. Proliferation and growth rate via direct counting of cell numbers, MTT assay and measurements of DNA-synthesizing cells (EdU assay), DNA repair efficiency via immunocytochemical staining of residual γH2AX/53BP1 foci and cell surviving via clonogenic assay (CSA) were experimentally evaluated.

Results

Overall, the four tumor cell lines and fibroblasts showed different sensitivity to both radiation regimes, indicating cell specificity of the effect. The absolute cell numbers and the CSA revealed significant differences between schedules (P < 0.0001 for all employed cell lines and both assays) with a stronger effect of moderate hypofractionation.

Conclusion

Our results provide evidence for the similar effectiveness and toxicity of both regimes, with some favorable evidence towards a moderate hypofractionation. This indicates that increasing the dose per fraction may improve patient survival and therapy outcomes.

Explainable deep learning-based survival prediction for non-small cell lung cancer patients undergoing radical radiotherapy

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Survival is frequently assessed using Cox proportional hazards (CPH) regression; however, CPH may be too simplistic as it assumes a linear relationship between covariables and the outcome. Alternative, non-linear machine learning (ML)-based approaches, such as random survival forests (RSFs) and, more recently, deep learning (DL) have been proposed; however, these techniques are largely black-box in nature, limiting explainability. We compared CPH, RSF and DL to predict overall survival (OS) of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients receiving radiotherapy using pre-treatment covariables. We employed explainable techniques to provide insights into the contribution of each covariable on OS prediction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The dataset contained 471 stage I-IV NSCLC patients treated with radiotherapy. We built CPH, RSF and DL OS prediction models using several baseline covariable combinations. 10-fold Monte-Carlo cross-validation was employed with a split of 70%:10%:20% for training, validation and testing, respectively. We primarily evaluated performance using the concordance index (C-index) and integrated Brier score (IBS). Local interpretable model-agnostic explanation (LIME) values, adapted for use in survival analysis, were computed for each model.

RESULTS

The DL method exhibited a significantly improved C-index of 0.670 compared to the CPH and a significantly improved IBS of 0.121 compared to the CPH and RSF approaches. LIME values suggested that, for the DL method, the three most important covariables in OS prediction were stage, administration of chemotherapy and oesophageal mean radiation dose.

CONCLUSION

We show that, using pre-treatment covariables, a DL approach demonstrates superior performance over CPH and RSF for OS prediction and use explainable techniques to provide transparency and interpretability.

miR-338-3p acts as a tumor suppressor in lung squamous cell carcinoma by targeting FGFR2/FRS2

Background

Lung cancer refers to the occurrence of malignant tumors in the lung, and squamous cell carcinoma is one of the most common pathological types of non-small cell lung cancer. Studies have shown that microRNAs (miRNAs) play an important role in the occurrence, development, early diagnosis, and treatment of lung cancer. This study aimed to explore the role and possible mechanism of MicroRNA-338-3p (miR-338-3p) in lung squamous cell carcinoma (LUSC).

Method

In this study, we compared 238 LUSC patients with relatively high miR-338-3p expression levels with 238 miR-338-3p expression levels in The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA)-LUSC dataset using first-line gene set enrichment analysis (GSEA). Second, the mRNA expression of miR-338-3p, FGFR2, and fibroblast growth factor receptor substrate 2 (FRS2) in 30 lung cancers and adjacent lung tissues was detected using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction (qRT-PCR). Finally, in vitro experiments were conducted, whereby the expression levels of miR-338-3p in lung cancer cells (H1703, SKMES1, H2170, H520) and normal lung epithelial cells (16HBE) were detected using qRT-PCR. miR-338-3p was overexpressed in lung cancer cells (H1703), and the cell proliferation (cell counting kit-8 [CCK8] assay), colony formation, cell apoptosis, cell cycle (BD-FACSVerse assay, Becton Dickinson, Bedford, MA, USA), cell invasion, and migration (Transwell assay, Thermo Fischer Corporation, Waltham, MA, USA) were detected.

Results

We found that the expression of miR-338-3p was significantly reduced in LUSC tissues (p ​< ​0.001) and cancer cell lines (P < 0.01), and miR-338-3p was significantly negatively correlated with the expression of FGFR2 (P < 0.001) and FRS2 (P < 0.01). Furthermore, overexpression of miR-338-3p inhibited proliferation (P < 0.001), migration, and invasion (P < 0.001) of LUSC cell lines and increased apoptosis in the G1 phase (P < 0.001) and cell cycle arrest (P < 0.05).

Conclusions

Our study demonstrates that miR-338-3p inhibits tumor cell proliferation and migration by targeting FGFR2 and FRS2 in LUSC. We believe that miR-338-3p may be a promising target for the treatment of LUSC.

Poly-Lactide-Co-Glycolide-Polyethylene Glycol-Ginsenoside Rg3-Ag Exerts a Radio-Sensitization Effect in Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer

Radiotherapy is an effective anti-cancer therapy for patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), however, the prognosis is unsatisfactory owing to radio-resistance and toxicity. It is crucial to improve radiotherapy efficacy. Ag nanoparticles (NPs) and ginsenoside Rg3 (Rg3) exerted antitumor and radio-sensitization effects. Therefore, we investigated whether poly-lactide-co-glycolide-polyethylene glycol (PLGA-PEG)-Rg3-Ag will function as a noninvasive, tracing, radiotherapy sensitizer. The morphology of NPs was visualized with transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The drug loading content, encapsulation efficiency, and cumulative drug release of Rg3 was determined by HPLC. Cellular uptake of NPs in A549 and SPCA-1 was measured by immunostaining. The radio-sensitization effect of PLGA-PEG-Rg3-Ag in vitro was determined in A549 by detecting proliferation, colony formation, and apoptosis with CCK-8, clonogenic survival assay, and flow cytometry, while in vivo was determined in nude mice by testing the body weight and tumor volume. PLGA-PEG-Rg3-Ag exerted radio-sensitization effect by reducing cell proliferation and colony formation while enhancing cell apoptosis in A549; reduced tumor volume in nude mice. PLGA-PEG-Rg3-Ag exhibits radio-sensitization effects in NSCLC.

GOECP/SEOR radiotheraphy guidelines for non-small-cell lung cancer

Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) is a heterogeneous disease accounting for approximately 85% of all lung cancers. Only 17% of patients are diagnosed at an early stage. Treatment is multidisciplinary and radiotherapy plays a key role in all stages of the disease. More than 50% of patients with NSCLC are treated with radiotherapy (curative-intent or palliative). Technological advances-including highly conformal radiotherapy techniques, new immobilization and respiratory control systems, and precision image verification systems-allow clinicians to individualize treatment to maximize tumor control while minimizing treatment-related toxicity. Novel therapeutic regimens such as moderate hypofractionation and advanced techniques such as stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) have reduced the number of radiotherapy sessions. The integration of SBRT into routine clinical practice has radically altered treatment of early-stage disease. SBRT also plays an increasingly important role in oligometastatic disease. The aim of the present guidelines is to review the role of radiotherapy in the treatment of localized, locally-advanced, and metastatic NSCLC. We review the main radiotherapy techniques and clarify the role of radiotherapy in routine clinical practice. These guidelines are based on the best available evidence. The level and grade of evidence supporting each recommendation is provided.

Landscape of mortality during and within thirty days after non-palliative radiotherapy across eleven major cancer types

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

Peri-RT mortality (death during or within 30 days of non-palliative radiotherapy) has been historically overlooked, and rates and risk factors are unclear.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with non-metastatic cancer, treated with non-palliative external beam radiation (RT) 2004-2016, were identified in the National Cancer Database for 11 cancer types: breast, prostate, non-prostate genitourinary, bone/soft tissue, gynecological, head/neck, lymphoma, gastrointestinal (GI), small cell lung, non-small cell lung, and central nervous system (CNS). Multivariable logistic regression was used to identify predictors of peri-RT mortality controlled for 17 covariates, including patient, tumor, and treatment factors.

RESULTS

Approximately 1.53 million patients were identified. Peri-RT mortality was 2.46% overall, spanning two orders of magnitude from 0.14% for breast to 8.52% for CNS. Peri-RT mortality steadily improved from 3.13% in 2004 to 1.78% in 2016 (P < .0001). Major predictors of peri-RT mortality included age, baseline comorbidity, male sex, and stage (P < .0001). Conversely, higher patient volume at the treating facility and use of more conformal RT planning techniques were moderately protective (P < .0001). Racial disparities varied based on disease site, as Black patients had increased peri-RT mortality for breast, lymphoma, and GI cancers, but not for other cancer types. Lack of private insurance was associated with substantially increased peri-RT mortality regardless of cancer type.

CONCLUSION

Peri-RT mortality varied considerably according to multiple factors. Sociodemographic differences highlight areas of health disparities and opportunities for quality improvement. Early recognition of patients at increased risk may facilitate implementation of closer monitoring or other preventive measures.

Outcomes of Image-Guided Moderately Hypofractionated Radiotherapy for Stage III Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of hypofractionated radiotherapy (hypo-RT) for stage III non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) in the Chinese population.

Methods

Eighty-six stage III NSCLC patients who received hypo-RT (60 Gy/20 fractions, BED = 78.00 Gy: 73 patients; 62.5 Gy/25 fractions, BED = 78.13 Gy: 13 patients) were recruited. Fifty-seven patients who received conventional radiotherapy (60 Gy/30 fractions, BED = 72.00 Gy) during the same period were enrolled as the control group. All hypo-RT treatments were conducted using image-guided technology. The efficacy and toxicity of the treatment were compared between the two groups.

Results

The median duration of follow-up was 23.0 months (range: 4.0–82.0 months). Univariate and multivariate analyses of all 143 stage III NSCLC patients revealed that hypo-RT was an independent factor for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). The median PFS and OS of hypo-RT were significantly higher than in the conventional RT group (PFS: 14.30, 11.00 months, p=0.035; OS: 43.30, 31.50 months, p=0.045). The incidence rates of symptomatic radiation pneumonitis and radiation esophagitis (≥grade 2) were 17.77% and 27.91%, respectively, in the hypo-RT group. Compared to the conventional radiation therapy group (22.81% and 19.30%, respectively), no significant differences were found between the two common side effects (p=0.662 and p=0.241, respectively).

Conclusion

For Chinese stage III NSCLC patients, image-guided hypo-RT offers favorable prognosis, and the treatment toxicity was totally acceptable. This radiation modality deserves further prospective clinical trials.

Duration of acute esophageal toxicity in concomitant radio-chemotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer with different fractionation schedules

OBJECTIVES

In our previous prospective trial on accelerated hypofractionated concomitant radiochemotherapy (AHRT-CHT) for non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), the incidence of grade ≥3 acute esophageal toxicity (AET) was similar to that reported for conventionally fractionated concomitant radiochemotherapy (CFRT-CHT), but its duration was prolonged. Thus, we aimed to compare the duration of grade ≥3 AET between AHRT-CHT and CFRT-CHT.

METHODS

Clinical data of 76 NSCLC patients treated with CFRT-CHT (60-66 Gy/2 Gy) during 2015-2020 were retrospectively compared with the data of 92 patients treated with AHRT-CHT (58.8 Gy/2.8 Gy) in the prospective trial. The maximum grade of AET, incidence, and duration of grade ≥3 AET were the end points. Univariate and multivariate analyses were applied to correlate clinical and treatment variables with these end points.

RESULTS

Neither the maximum grade of AET (p = 0.71), nor the incidence of grade ≥3 AET (p = 0.87) differed between the two groups. The number of CHT cycles delivered (2 vs 1, p = 0.005) and higher esophagus mean BED (p = 0.009) were significant predictors for a higher maximum grade of AET; older age was a significant predictor for higher incidence of grade ≥3 AET (p = 0.03). The median duration of grade ≥3 AET in AHRT-CHT and CFRT-CHT group was 30 days (range 5-150) vs 7 days (range 3-20), respectively, p = 0.0005. In multivariate analysis, only the AHRT-CHT schedule (p=0.003) was a significant predictor for a longer duration of grade ≥3 AET.

CONCLUSION

Despite similar incidence of grade ≥3 AET, its duration is significantly prolonged in NSCLC patients treated with AHRT-CHT compared to CFRT-CHT.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

Reporting only the rate of grade ≥3 AET in clinical trials may underestimate the real extent of the esophageal toxicity; its duration should also be routinely reported.

Hypofractionated Intensity Modulated Radiation Therapy With Concurrent Chemotherapy in Locally Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Phase II Prospective Clinical Trial (GASTO1011)

PURPOSE

We aimed to explore the efficacy and toxicity of split-course hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent chemotherapy (HRT-CHT) in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LANSCLC) in this single-arm, phase II study.

METHODS

LANSCLC patients were considered eligible if their forced expiratory volume in 1 second/forced vital capacity (FEV1/FVC%) and carbon monoxide diffusing capacity (DLCO%) were ≥40% and ≥45%, respectively. HRT-CHT using the IMRT technique was administered with 51 Gy in 17 fractions as the first course followed by a break. Patients without disease progression or persistent ≥grade 2 toxicities had an HRT-CHT of 15-18 Gy in 5-6 fractions as a boost. The primary endpoint was progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoint was overall survival (OS).

RESULTS

Eighty-nine patients were enrolled and analyzed. The median follow-up was 29.5 months for all patients and 35.3 months for the survivors. The objective response rate was 97.8%; the median PFS and OS were 11.0 months and 27.0 months, respectively. Grade 3 acute esophagitis/pneumonitis occurred in 15 (16.9%)/7 (7.9%) patients. Grade 3/5 late pneumonitis occurred in 2 (2.2%)/1 (1.1%) patients. Of the 78 (87.6%) who completed the split-course HRT-CHT per protocol, patients with better FEV1/FVC% and DLCO% after the break had significantly better OS (for the FEV/FVC1%≥80% vs 60-79% vs 41-59% groups, 2-year OS values were 57.2% vs 56.9% vs 0%, respectively, p=0.024; for the DLCO%≥80% vs 60-79% vs 45-59% groups, 2-year OS values were 70.4% vs 48.4% vs 37.5%, respectively, p=0.049).

CONCLUSIONS

Split-course HRT-CHT achieved a promising response rate and survival with tolerable toxicity in LANSCLC. Pulmonary function tests are necessary indicators for radiation treatment planning and dose escalation.

Sequential chemo-hypofractionated RT versus concurrent standard CRT for locally advanced NSCLC: GRADE recommendation by the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO)

INTRODUCTION

Almost 30% of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients have locally advanced-stage disease. In this setting, definitive radiotherapy concurrent to chemotherapy plus adjuvant immunotherapy (cCRT + IO) is the standard of care, although only 40% of these patients are eligible for this approach.

AIMS

A comparison between cCRT and hypofractionated radiotherapy regimens (hypo-fx RT) with the addition of sequential chemotherapy (sCHT) could be useful for future combinations with immunotherapy. We developed a recommendation about the clinical question of whether CHT and moderately hypo-fx RT are comparable to cCRT for locally advanced NSCLC MATERIALS AND METHODS: The panel used GRADE methodology and the Evidence to Decision (EtD) framework. After a systematic literature search, five studies were eligible. We identified the following outcomes: progression-free survival (PFS), overall survival (OS), freedom from locoregional recurrence (FFLR), deterioration of quality of life (QoL), treatment-related deaths, severe G3-G4 toxicity, late pulmonary toxicity G3-G4, and acute esophageal toxicity G3-G4.

RESULTS

The probability of OS and G3-G4 late lung toxicity seems to be worse in patients submitted to sCHT and hypo-fx RT. The panel judged unfavorable the balance benefits/harms.

CONCLUSIONS

The final recommendation was that sCHT followed by moderately hypo-fx RT should not be considered as an alternative to cCRT in unresectable stage III NSCLC patients.

Dose and fractionation schedules in radiotherapy for non-small cell lung cancer

In the field of radiotherapy (RT), the issues of total dose, fractionation, and overall treatment time for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) have been extensively investigated. There is some evidence to suggest that higher treatment intensity of RT, when given alone or sequentially with chemotherapy (CHT), is associated with improved survival. However, there is no evidence that the outcome is improved by RT at a higher dose and/or higher intensity when it is used concurrently with CHT. Moreover, some reports on the combination of full dose CHT with a higher biological dose of RT warn of the significant risk posed by such intensification. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) provides a high rate of local control in the management of early-stage NSCLC through the use of high ablative doses. However, in centrally located tumors the use of SBRT may carry a risk of serious damage to the great vessels, bronchi, and esophagus, owing to the high ablative doses needed for optimal tumor control. There is a similar problem with moderate hypofractionation in radical RT for locally advanced NSCLC, and more evidence needs to be gathered regarding the safety of such schedules, especially when used in combination with CHT. In this article, we review the current evidence and questions related to RT dose/fractionation in NSCLC.

Reduced Fractionation in Lung Cancer Patients Treated with Curative-intent Radiotherapy during the COVID-19 Pandemic

Patients treated with curative-intent lung radiotherapy are in the group at highest risk of severe complications and death from COVID-19. There is therefore an urgent need to reduce the risks associated with multiple hospital visits and their anti-cancer treatment. One recommendation is to consider alternative dose-fractionation schedules or radiotherapy techniques. This would also increase radiotherapy service capacity for operable patients with stage I-III lung cancer, who might be unable to have surgery during the pandemic. Here we identify reduced-fractionation for curative-intent radiotherapy regimes in lung cancer, from a literature search carried out between 20/03/2020 and 30/03/2020 as well as published and unpublished audits of hypofractionated regimes from UK centres. Evidence, practical considerations and limitations are discussed for early-stage NSCLC, stage III NSCLC, early-stage and locally advanced SCLC. We recommend discussion of this guidance document with other specialist lung MDT members to disseminate the potential changes to radiotherapy practices that could be made to reduce pressure on other departments such as thoracic surgery. It is also a crucial part of the consent process to ensure that the risks and benefits of undergoing cancer treatment during the COVID-19 pandemic and the uncertainties surrounding toxicity from reduced fractionation have been adequately discussed with patients. Furthermore, centres should document all deviations from standard protocols, and we urge all colleagues, where possible, to join national/international data collection initiatives (such as COVID-RT Lung) aimed at recording the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on lung cancer treatment and outcomes.

Accelerated hypofractionated radiotherapy with concurrent full dose chemotherapy for locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer: A phase I/II study

INTRODUCTION

We report the results of toxicity and survival in stage III NSCLC patients treated with concurrent accelerated hypofractionated AHRT-CHT within a prospective study.

METHODS

92 patients received 3D-CRT or IMRT-planned RT: 58.8 Gy /21 fractions (2.8 Gy/fraction, 4 weeks) with 2 cycles of CHT (Cisplatin 80 mg/m² D1 and D22; and Vinorelbine 25 mg/m², D1, D8, D22, and D29) started with D1 of RT. Non-hematological toxicity was evaluated using RTOG-EORTC criteria, every week during treatment, one month after treatment completion, and every three months thereafter.

RESULTS

Two patients did not receive the prescribed RT dose; 22 (24%) received only one CHT cycle. Median follow-up was 21.5 months (range: 1-65) for all patients and 32 months (range: 8-65) for living patients. There were: 13 (14%) cases of grade ≥III acute esophageal toxicity; 3 grade III acute pneumonitis, and 2 grade III late pulmonary toxicities. Two toxic deaths occurred within 3 months after treatment: fatal hemoptysis (1) and complications of esophageal toxicity (1). Five other deaths that occurred within one year after treatment were probably treatment-related: lung abscess (1), fatal hemoptysis (2), death from undetermined cause (2). Median overall survival was 38 months (95%CI:27-49), median progression free survival was 25 months (95%CI:14-36).

CONCLUSIONS

Survival rates are encouraging, but the observed rate of toxic and probably toxic deaths is of potential concern. We proceed with the use of AHRT with concomitant full dose CHT, but patients with large PTV and major vascular abutment are excluded due to potentially increased risk of toxic death.