1
|
Arsenijević T, Stepanović A, Milošević‐Maračić B, Poparić‐Bandjur B, Mišković I, Gavrilović D, Nikitović M. What did COVID-19 pandemics teach us about single-fraction radiotherapy for painful bone metastases-State of the art or undertreatment? Cancer Med 2023; 12:15912-15921. [PMID: 37317639 PMCID: PMC10469708 DOI: 10.1002/cam4.6231] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/30/2023] [Revised: 04/25/2023] [Accepted: 06/01/2023] [Indexed: 06/16/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND Choosing the optimal treatment approach for patients with painful bone metastases during the COVID-19 pandemic became challenging. A simple technique, single fraction radiotherapy was recommended for these patients usually referring to bone metastases as a single entity, although it is a very heterogeneous group of patients. AIM This study aimed to analyze the response to palliative single fraction radiotherapy in relation to age, performance status, primary tumor, histopathology, and bone localization in the group of patients with painful bone metastases. METHODS A clinical, prospective, non-randomized study was conducted at the Institute for Oncology and Radiology of Serbia, which included 64 patients with noncomplicated, painful bone metastases who underwent palliative, pain-relieving radiation therapy with a single tumor dose of 8Gy in a single hospital visit. Response to treatment was patient reported via telephone interview using visual analog scale. The response assessment was based on the international consensus panel of radiation oncologists. RESULTS In the entire group of patients, 83% responded to radiotherapy. No statistically significant difference was observed in response to therapy, time to reach the maximum response, degree of pain reduction, nor in response duration depending on the patient's age, performance status, the primary origin of the tumor, histopathology, or location of the metastasis (bone) that was irradiated. CONCLUSION Regardless of clinical parameters, palliative radiotherapy with a single dose of 8Gy can be considered very effective in quick pain relief in patients with noncomplicated painful bone metastases. Single fraction radiotherapy in a single hospital visit, as well as patient-reported outcome for these patients may be considered favorable beyond Covid pandemics.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tatjana Arsenijević
- University of Belgrade, Faculty of MedicineBelgradeSerbia
- Institute for Oncology and Radiology of SerbiaBelgradeSerbia
| | - Aleksandar Stepanović
- University of Belgrade, Faculty of MedicineBelgradeSerbia
- Institute for Oncology and Radiology of SerbiaBelgradeSerbia
| | | | | | - Ivana Mišković
- Institute for Oncology and Radiology of SerbiaBelgradeSerbia
| | | | - Marina Nikitović
- University of Belgrade, Faculty of MedicineBelgradeSerbia
- Institute for Oncology and Radiology of SerbiaBelgradeSerbia
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cellini F, Di Rito A, Siepe G, Pastore F, Lattanzi E, Meaglia I, Tozzi A, Manfrida S, Longo S, Saldi S, Cassese R, Arcidiacono F, Fiore M, Masiello V, Mazzarella C, Diroma A, Miccichè F, Maurizi F, Dominici L, Scorsetti M, Santarelli M, Fusco V, Aristei C, Deodato F, Gambacorta MA, Maranzano E, Muto P, Valentini V, Morganti AG, Marino L, Donati CM, Di Franco R. Prognostic Score in Radiotherapy Practice for Palliative Treatments (PROPHET) Study for Bone Metastases: An Investigation Into the Clinical Effect on Treatment Prescription. Adv Radiat Oncol 2022; 8:101134. [PMID: 36632087 PMCID: PMC9827357 DOI: 10.1016/j.adro.2022.101134] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/14/2022] [Accepted: 11/18/2022] [Indexed: 11/29/2022] Open
Abstract
Purpose Bone metastases frequently occur during malignant disease. Palliative radiation therapy (PRT) is a crucial part of palliative care because it can relieve pain and improve patients' quality of life. Often, a clinician's survival estimation is too optimistic. Prognostic scores (PSs) can help clinicians tailor PRT indications to avoid over- or undertreatment. Although the PS is supposed to aid radiation oncologists (ROs) in palliative-care scenarios, it is unclear what type of support, and to what extent, could impact daily clinical practice. Methods and Materials A national-based investigation of the prescriptive decisions on simulated clinical cases was performed in Italy. Nine clinical cases from real-world clinical practice were selected for this study. Each case description contained complete information regarding the parameters defining the prognosis class according to the PS (in particular, the Mizumoto Prognostic Score, a validated PS available in literature and already applied in some clinical trials). Each case description contained complete information regarding the parameters defining the prognosis class according to the PS. ROs were interviewed through questionnaires, each comprising the same 3 questions per clinical case, asking (1) the prescription after detailing the clinical case features but not the PS prognostic class definition; (2) whether the RO wanted to change the prescription once the PS prognostic class definition was revealed; and (3) in case of a change of the prescription, a new prescriptive option. Three RO categories were defined: dedicated to PRT (RO-d), nondedicated to PRT (RO-nd), and resident in training (IT). Interviewed ROs were distributed among different regions of the country. Results Conversion rates, agreements, and prescription trends were investigated. The PS determined a statistically significant 11.12% of prescription conversion among ROs. The conversion was higher for the residents and significantly higher for worse prognostic scenario subgroups, respectively. The PS improved prescriptive agreement among ROs (particularly for worse-prognostic-scenario subgroups). Moreover, PS significantly increased standard prescriptive approaches (particularly for worse-clinical-case presentations). Conclusions To the best of our knowledge, the PROPHET study is the first to directly evaluate the potential clinical consequences of the regular application of any PS. According to the Prophet study, a prognostic score should be integrated into the clinical practice of palliative radiation therapy for bone metastasis and training programs in radiation oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
- Corresponding author: Cellini Francesco, MD
| | - Alessia Di Rito
- Radiotherapy Unit - IRCCS Istituto Tumori 'Giovanni Paolo II' Bari - Italy
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | | | | | - Ilaria Meaglia
- Department of Radiotherapy, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Angelo Tozzi
- Department of Radiotherapy, Istituti Clinici Scientifici Maugeri IRCCS, 27100 Pavia, Italy
| | - Stefania Manfrida
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Silvia Longo
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Simonetta Saldi
- Section of Radiation Oncology, Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | | | - Fabio Arcidiacono
- Radiation Oncology, Azienda Ospedaliera Santa Maria di Terni, Terni, Italy
| | - Michele Fiore
- Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Department of Medicine and Surgery, Università Campus Bio-Medico di Roma
- Operative Research Unit of Radiation Oncology, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Campus Bio-Medico
| | - Valeria Masiello
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ciro Mazzarella
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Antonio Diroma
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesco Miccichè
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Francesca Maurizi
- Radiation Oncology, A.O. Ospedali Riuniti Marche Nord, Pesaro, Italy
| | - Luca Dominici
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
| | - Marta Scorsetti
- Department of Radiotherapy and Radiosurgery, IRCCS Humanitas Research Hospital, Milan, Italy
- Department of Biomedical Sciences, Humanitas University, Milan, Italy
| | | | - Vincenzo Fusco
- Radiotherapy Oncology Department, IRCCS CROB, Rionero In Vulture, Italy
| | - Cynthia Aristei
- Radiation Oncology Section, Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia and Perugia General Hospital, Perugia, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Radiotherapy Unit, Gemelli Molise Hospital, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Maria A. Gambacorta
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Ernesto Maranzano
- Radiotherapy Oncology Centre, Santa Maria Hospital, Terni, Italy
- Department of Medicine and Surgery, University of Perugia, Perugia, Italy
| | - Paolo Muto
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori–IRCCS–Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| | - Vincenzo Valentini
- Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario “A. Gemelli” IRCCS, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessio G. Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum–Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Lorenza Marino
- Radiation Oncology Department, Humanitas Istituto Clinico Catanese, Misterbianco, Catania, Italy
| | - Costanza M. Donati
- Radiation Oncology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
- Department of Experimental, Diagnostic, and Specialty Medicine–DIMES, Alma Mater Studiorum Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Rossella Di Franco
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori–IRCCS–Fondazione G. Pascale, Napoli, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Morganti AG, Macchia G, Cellini F, Deodato F, Zamagni A, Siepe G, Buwenge M. A "SHort course Accelerated RadiatiON therapy" (SHARON) During and Beyond the COVID-19 Pandemic. Front Oncol 2022; 12:823445. [PMID: 35280809 PMCID: PMC8904873 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2022.823445] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/29/2021] [Accepted: 01/11/2022] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Affiliation(s)
- Alessio G Morganti
- Radiation Oncology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Gabriella Macchia
- Gemelli Molise Hospital, Radiotherapy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy
| | - Francesco Cellini
- Dipartimento di Diagnostica per Immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario "A. Gemelli" Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS), Rome, Italy.,Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Francesco Deodato
- Gemelli Molise Hospital, Radiotherapy Unit, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Campobasso, Italy.,Dipartimento Universitario Diagnostica per immagini, Radioterapia Oncologica ed Ematologia, Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Roma, Italy
| | - Alice Zamagni
- Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| | - Giambattista Siepe
- Radiation Oncology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy
| | - Milly Buwenge
- Radiation Oncology, Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) Azienda Ospedaliero - Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy.,Dipartimento di Medicina Specialistica Diagnostica e Sperimentale (DIMES), Alma Mater Studiorum - Bologna University, Bologna, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Palliative radiotherapy indications during the COVID-19 pandemic and in future complex logistic settings: the NORMALITY model. Radiol Med 2021; 126:1619-1656. [PMID: 34570309 PMCID: PMC8475365 DOI: 10.1007/s11547-021-01414-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 7] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2021] [Accepted: 08/30/2021] [Indexed: 12/03/2022]
Abstract
Introduction The COVID-19 pandemic has challenged healthcare systems worldwide over the last few months, and it continues to do so. Although some restrictions are being removed, it is not certain when the pandemic is going to be definitively over. Pandemics can be seen as a highly complex logistic scenario. From this perspective, some of the indications provided for palliative radiotherapy (PRT) during the COVID-19 pandemic could be maintained in the future in settings that limit the possibility of patients achieving symptom relief by radiotherapy.
This paper has two aims: (1) to provide a summary of the indications for PRT during the COVID-19 pandemic; since some indications can differ slightly, and to avoid any possible contradictions, an expert panel composed of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) and the Palliative Care and Supportive Therapies Working Group (AIRO-palliative) voted by consensus on the summary; (2) to introduce a clinical care model for PRT [endorsed by AIRO and by a spontaneous Italian collaborative network for PRT named “La Rete del Sollievo” (“The Net of Relief”)]. The proposed model, denoted “No cOmpRoMise on quality of life by pALliative radiotherapy” (NORMALITY), is based on an AIRO-palliative consensus-based list of clinical indications for PRT and on practical suggestions regarding the management of patients potentially suitable for PRT but dealing with highly complex logistics scenarios (similar to the ongoing logistics limits due to COVID-19).
Material and Methods First, a summary of the available literature guidelines for PRT published during the COVID-19 pandemic was prepared. A systematic literature search based on the PRISMA approach was performed to retrieve the available literature reporting guideline indications fully or partially focused on PRT. Tables reporting each addressed clinical presentation and respective literature indications were prepared and distributed into two main groups: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. These summaries were voted in by consensus by selected members of the AIRO and AIRO-palliative panels. Second, based on the summary for palliative indications during the COVID-19 pandemic, a clinical care model to facilitate recruitment and delivery of PRT to patients in complex logistic scenarios was proposed. The summary tables were critically integrated and shuffled according to clinical presentations and then voted on in a second consensus round. Along with the adapted guideline indications, some methods of performing the first triage of patients and facilitating a teleconsultation preliminary to the first in-person visit were developed.
Results After the revision of 161 documents, 13 papers were selected for analysis. From the papers, 19 clinical presentation items were collected; in total, 61 question items were extracted and voted on (i.e., for each presentation, more than one indication was provided from the literature). Two tables summarizing the PRT indications during the COVID-19 pandemic available from the literature (PRT COVID-19 summary tables) were developed: palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies. The consensus of the vote by the AIRO panel for the PRT COVID-19 summary was reached. The PRT COVID-19 summary tables for palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were adapted for clinical presentations possibly associated with patients in complex clinical scenarios other than the COVID-19 pandemic. The two new indication tables (i.e., “Normality model of PRT indications”) for both palliative emergencies and palliative non-emergencies were voted on in a second consensus round. The consensus rate was reached and strong. Written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) were also developed, both in English and in Italian, to evaluate the patients for possible indications for PRT before scheduling clinical visits. Conclusion We provide a comprehensive summary of the literature guideline indications for PRT during COVID-19 pandemic. We also propose a clinical care model including clinical indications and written forms facilitating two levels of teleconsultation (triage and remote visits) to evaluate the patients for indications of PRT before scheduling clinical visits. The normality model could facilitate the provision of PRT to patients in future complex logistic scenarios.
Collapse
|
5
|
Haaser T, Constantinides Y, Huguet F, De Crevoisier R, Dejean C, Escande A, Ghannam Y, Lahmi L, Le Tallec P, Lecouillard I, Lorchel F, Thureau S, Lagrange JL. [Ethical stakes in palliative care in radiation oncology]. Cancer Radiother 2021; 25:699-706. [PMID: 34400087 DOI: 10.1016/j.canrad.2021.07.004] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/13/2021] [Accepted: 07/24/2021] [Indexed: 11/29/2022]
Abstract
In 2021, the Ethics Commission of the SFRO has chosen the issue of the practice of palliative care in radiotherapy oncology. Radiation oncology plays a central role in the care of patients with cancer in palliative phase. But behind the broad name of palliative radiotherapy, we actually find a large variety of situations involving diverse ethical issues. Radiation oncologists have the delicate task to take into account multiple factors throughout a complex decision-making process. While the question of the therapeutic indication and the technical choice allowing it to be implemented remains central, reflection cannot be limited to these decision-making and technical aspects alone. It is also a question of being able to create the conditions for a singularity focused care and to build an authentic care relationship, beyond technicity. It is through this daily ethical work, in close collaboration with patients, and under essential conditions of multidisciplinarity and multiprofessionalism, that our fundamental role as caregiver can be deployed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- T Haaser
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Haut Lévêque, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Bordeaux, avenue Magellan, 33600 Pessac, France.
| | - Y Constantinides
- Espace Éthique Ile de France, Paris Université Sorbonne Nouvelle, Paris, France
| | - F Huguet
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine UMR_S 938, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - R De Crevoisier
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - C Dejean
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Unité de Physique Médicale, Centre Antoine Lacassagne, Nice, France
| | - A Escande
- Service universitaire d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Oscar Lambret, Faculté de médecine Henri Warembourg, Laboratoire CRIStAL, UMR9189, Université de Lille, Lille, France
| | - Y Ghannam
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine UMR_S 938, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - L Lahmi
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Hôpital Tenon, Centre de Recherche Saint-Antoine UMR_S 938, Institut Universitaire de Cancérologie, AP-HP, Sorbonne Université, Paris, France
| | - P Le Tallec
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Quantis Litis EA 4108, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - I Lecouillard
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Eugène Marquis, Rennes, France
| | - F Lorchel
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Centre Hospitalier Universitaire Lyon-Sud, Lyon, France; Centre d'Oncologie Radiothérapie et Oncologie de Mâcon - ORLAM, Mâcon, France
| | - S Thureau
- Service d'Oncologie Radiothérapie, Quantis Litis EA 4108, Centre Henri Becquerel, Rouen, France
| | - J L Lagrange
- Université Paris-Est Créteil Val de Marne, Paris, France
| | | |
Collapse
|