1
|
Dubec MJ, Berks M, Price J, McDaid L, Gaffney J, Little RA, Cheung S, van Herk M, Choudhury A, Matthews JC, McPartlin A, Parker GJ, Buckley DL, O’Connor JP. Translation of dynamic contrast-enhanced imaging onto a magnetic resonance-guided linear accelerator in patients with head and neck cancer. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2025; 33:100689. [PMID: 39802650 PMCID: PMC11721217 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100689] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 12/05/2024] [Accepted: 12/10/2024] [Indexed: 01/16/2025] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Magnetic resonance imaging - linear accelerator (MRI-linac) systems permit imaging of tumours to guide treatment. Dynamic contrast enhanced (DCE)-MRI allows investigation of tumour perfusion. We assessed the feasibility of performing DCE-MRI on a 1.5 T MRI-linac in patients with head and neck cancer (HNC) and measured biomarker repeatability and sensitivity to radiotherapy effects. Materials and methods Patients were imaged on a 1.5 T MRI-linac or a 1.5 T diagnostic MR system twice before treatment. DCE-MRI parameters including Ktrans were calculated, with the optimum pharmacokinetic model identified using corrected Akaike information criterion. Repeatability was assessed by within-subject coefficient of variation (wCV). Treatment effects were assessed as change measured at week 2 of radiotherapy. Results 14 patients were recruited (6 scanned on diagnostic MR and 8 on MRI-linac), with a total of 24 lesions. Baseline Ktrans estimates were comparable on both MR systems; 0.13 [95 %CI: 0.10 to 0.16] min-1 (diagnostic MR) and 0.15 [0.12 to 0.18] min-1 (MRI-linac). wCV values were 22.6 % [95 % CI: 16.2 to 37.3 %] (diagnostic MR) and 11.7 % [8.4 to 19.3 %] (MRI-linac). Combined cohort increase in Ktrans was significant (p < 0.01). Similar results were seen for other DCE-MRI parameters. Conclusions DCE-MRI is feasible on a 1.5 T MRI-linac system in patients with HNC. Parameter estimates, repeatability, and sensitivity to treatment were similar to those measured on a conventional diagnostic MR system. These data support performing DCE-MRI in studies on the MRI-linac to assess treatment response and adaptive guidance based on tumour perfusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Michael J. Dubec
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Michael Berks
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - James Price
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Lisa McDaid
- Radiotherapy, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - John Gaffney
- Radiation Oncology, University Hospital Galway, Ireland
| | - Ross A. Little
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Susan Cheung
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Marcel van Herk
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Ananya Choudhury
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Clinical Oncology, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
| | - Julian C. Matthews
- Psychology, Communication & Human Neuroscience, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
| | - Andrew McPartlin
- Radiation Oncology, Princess Margaret Cancer Center, Toronto, Canada
| | - Geoff J.M. Parker
- Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester, UK
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, London, UK
| | - David L. Buckley
- Christie Medical Physics and Engineering, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Biomedical Imaging, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| | - James P.B. O’Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK
- Radiology Department, The Christie NHS Foundation Trust, Manchester, UK
- Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Abbott NL, Chauvie S, Marcu L, DeJean C, Melidis C, Wientjes R, Gasnier A, Lisbona A, Luzzara M, Mazzoni LN, O'Doherty J, Koutsouveli E, Appelt A, Hansen CR. The role of medical physics experts in clinical trials: A guideline from the European Federation of Organisations for Medical Physics. Phys Med 2024; 126:104821. [PMID: 39361978 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2024.104821] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 12/13/2023] [Revised: 08/26/2024] [Accepted: 09/22/2024] [Indexed: 10/05/2024] Open
Abstract
The EFOMP working group on the Role of Medical Physics Experts (MPEs) in Clinical Trials was established in 2010, with experts from across Europe and different areas of medical physics. Their main aims were: (1) To develop a consensus guidance document for the work MPEs do in clinical trials across Europe. (2) Complement the work by American colleagues in AAPM TG 113 and guidance from National Member Organisations. (3) To cover external beam radiotherapy, brachytherapy, nuclear medicine, molecular radiotherapy, and imaging. This document outlines the main output from this working group. Giving guidance to MPEs, and indeed all Medical Physicists (MP) and MP trainees wishing to work in clinical trials. It also gives guidance to the wider multidisciplinary team, advising where MPEs must legally be involved, as well as highlighting areas where MPEs skills and expertise can really add value to clinical trials.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Natalie Louise Abbott
- King George V Building, St. Bartholomews Hospital, West Smithfield, London EC1A 7BE, UK; National RTTQA Group, Cardiff & London, UK.
| | - Stephane Chauvie
- Medical Physics Division, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, Cuneo, Italy
| | - Loredana Marcu
- Faculty of Informatics and Science, University of Oradea, Oradea 410087, Romania; UniSA Allied Health & Human Performance, University of South Australia, Adelaide SA 5001, Australia
| | | | - Christos Melidis
- CAP Santé, Radiation Therapy, Clinique Maymard. Bastia, France; milliVolt.eu, a Health Physics Company. Bastia, France
| | | | - Anne Gasnier
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Henri Becquerel Cancer Centre, Rouen, France
| | - Albert Lisbona
- MP emeritus, Institut de Cancérologie de l'Ouest, Saint Herblain, France
| | | | | | - Jim O'Doherty
- Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA, United States; Radiography & Diagnostic Imaging, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland; Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC, United States
| | - Efi Koutsouveli
- Department of Medical Physics, Hygeia Hospital, Athens, Greece
| | - Ane Appelt
- Leeds Institution of Medical Research at St James's, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK; Department of Medical Physics, Leeds Cancer Centre, Leeds Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Leeds, UK
| | - Christian Rønn Hansen
- Institute of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, Denmark; Danish Center of Particle Therapy, Aarhus University Hospital, Denmark; Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Guerreiro F, van Houdt P, Navest R, Hoekstra N, de Jong M, Heijnen B, Zijlema S, Verbist B, van der Heide U, Astreinidou E. Validation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging techniques in head and neck healthy structures involved in the salivary and swallowing function: Accuracy and repeatability. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 31:100608. [PMID: 39071157 PMCID: PMC11283017 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100608] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/17/2024] [Revised: 06/20/2024] [Accepted: 06/27/2024] [Indexed: 07/30/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and Purpose Radiation-induced damage to the organs at risk (OARs) in head-and-neck cancer (HNC) patient can result in long-term complications. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) techniques such as diffusion-weighted imaging (DWI), DIXON for fat fraction (FF) estimation and T2 mapping could potentially provide a spatial assessment of such damage. The goal of this study is to validate these qMRI techniques in terms of accuracy in phantoms and repeatability in-vivo across a broad selection of healthy OARs in the HN region. Materials and Methods Scanning was performed at a 3 T diagnostic MRI scanner, including the calculation of apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) from DWI, FF and T2 maps. Phantoms were scanned to estimate the qMRI techniques bias using Bland-Altman statistics. Twenty-six healthy subjects were scanned twice in a test-retest study to determine repeatability. Repeatability coefficients (RC) were calculated for the parotid, submandibular, sublingual and tubarial salivary glands, oral cavity, pharyngeal constrictor muscle and brainstem. Additionally, a linear mixed-effect model analysis was used to evaluate the effect of subject-specific characteristics on the qMRI values. Results Bias was 0.009x10-3 mm2/s for ADC, -0.7 % for FF and -7.9 ms for T2. RCs ranged 0.11-0.25x10-3 mm2/s for ADC, 1.2-6.3 % for FF and 2.5-6.3 ms for T2. A significant positive linear relationship between age and the FF and T2 for some of the OARs was found. Conclusion These qMRI techniques are feasible, accurate and repeatable, which is promising for treatment response monitoring and/or differentiating between healthy and unhealthy tissues due to radiation-induced damage in HNC patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- F. Guerreiro
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - P.J. van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - R.J.M. Navest
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - N. Hoekstra
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - M. de Jong
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - B.J. Heijnen
- Department of Otorhinolaryngology and Head and Neck Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| | - S.E. Zijlema
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - B. Verbist
- Department of Radiology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- HollandPTC, Delft, the Netherlands
| | - U.A. van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands
| | - E. Astreinidou
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Kåstad Høiskar M, Sæther O, Delange Alsaker M, Røe Redalen K, Winter RM. Quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging in head and neck cancer: A systematic comparison of different modelling approaches. Phys Imaging Radiat Oncol 2024; 29:100548. [PMID: 38380153 PMCID: PMC10876686 DOI: 10.1016/j.phro.2024.100548] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/27/2023] [Revised: 01/24/2024] [Accepted: 02/05/2024] [Indexed: 02/22/2024] Open
Abstract
Background and purpose Dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) describes tissue microvasculature and has prognostic and predictive potential in radiotherapy for head and neck cancer (HNC). However, lack in standardization of DCE-MRI hinders comparison of studies and clinical implementation. This study investigated the accuracy and robustness of the population arterial input function (AIF), correlations between pharmacokinetic parameters and their association to T stage and human papillomavirus (HPV) status for HNC. Materials and methods DCE-MRI was acquired for 44 HNC patients. Population AIFs were calculated with six different approaches. DCE-MRI was analysed in primary and lymph node tumours using Tofts model (TM) with population AIFs and individual AIFs, extended TM (ETM) with individual AIFs, Brix model (BM), and areas under the curve (AUCs). Intraclass correlation, concordance correlation, Pearson correlation and Whitney Mann U test helped examining the robustness and accuracy of population AIF, correlations between DCE-MRI parameters and their association to T stage and HPV status, respectively. Results The population AIF was robust but differed from individual AIFs. There was significant correlation between KtransTM/ETM and ve, TM/ETM, and KtransTM/ETM and Kep, TM/ETM. ABrix and AUCs correlated for lymph nodes. Kep, Brix correlated with ABrix, KtransTM/ETM and Kep, TM/ETM for primary tumours. Kep, TM significantly decreased with increasing T stage. Both the correlations and the parameters' association to T stage were stronger for HPV negative lesions. Conclusions Individual AIF was preferred for accurate pharmacokinetic modelling of DCE-MRI. DCE-MRI parameters and their correlations were affected by the lesion type, HPV status and T staging.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marte Kåstad Høiskar
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - Oddbjørn Sæther
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, St. Olavs Hospital, Trondheim University Hospital, Trondheim, Norway
| | | | - Kathrine Røe Redalen
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| | - René M. Winter
- Department of Physics, Norwegian University of Science and Technology, Trondheim, Norway
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Chauvie S, Mazzoni LN, O’Doherty J. A Review on the Use of Imaging Biomarkers in Oncology Clinical Trials: Quality Assurance Strategies for Technical Validation. Tomography 2023; 9:1876-1902. [PMID: 37888741 PMCID: PMC10610870 DOI: 10.3390/tomography9050149] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/16/2023] [Revised: 10/10/2023] [Accepted: 10/13/2023] [Indexed: 10/28/2023] Open
Abstract
Imaging biomarkers (IBs) have been proposed in medical literature that exploit images in a quantitative way, going beyond the visual assessment by an imaging physician. These IBs can be used in the diagnosis, prognosis, and response assessment of several pathologies and are very often used for patient management pathways. In this respect, IBs to be used in clinical practice and clinical trials have a requirement to be precise, accurate, and reproducible. Due to limitations in imaging technology, an error can be associated with their value when considering the entire imaging chain, from data acquisition to data reconstruction and subsequent analysis. From this point of view, the use of IBs in clinical trials requires a broadening of the concept of quality assurance and this can be a challenge for the responsible medical physics experts (MPEs). Within this manuscript, we describe the concept of an IB, examine some examples of IBs currently employed in clinical practice/clinical trials and analyze the procedure that should be carried out to achieve better accuracy and reproducibility in their use. We anticipate that this narrative review, written by the components of the EFOMP working group on "the role of the MPEs in clinical trials"-imaging sub-group, can represent a valid reference material for MPEs approaching the subject.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Stephane Chauvie
- Medical Physics Division, Santa Croce e Carle Hospital, 12100 Cuneo, Italy;
| | | | - Jim O’Doherty
- Siemens Medical Solutions, Malvern, PA 19355, USA;
- Department of Radiology & Radiological Sciences, Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, SC 20455, USA
- Radiography & Diagnostic Imaging, University College Dublin, D04 C7X2 Dublin, Ireland
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
Li T, Wang J, Yang Y, Glide-Hurst CK, Wen N, Cai J. Multi-parametric MRI for radiotherapy simulation. Med Phys 2023; 50:5273-5293. [PMID: 36710376 PMCID: PMC10382603 DOI: 10.1002/mp.16256] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/11/2021] [Revised: 09/10/2022] [Accepted: 12/06/2022] [Indexed: 01/31/2023] Open
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has become an important imaging modality in the field of radiotherapy (RT) in the past decade, especially with the development of various novel MRI and image-guidance techniques. In this review article, we will describe recent developments and discuss the applications of multi-parametric MRI (mpMRI) in RT simulation. In this review, mpMRI refers to a general and loose definition which includes various multi-contrast MRI techniques. Specifically, we will focus on the implementation, challenges, and future directions of mpMRI techniques for RT simulation.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tian Li
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, Division of Radiation Oncology, MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas, USA
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Univeristy School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- SJTU-Ruijing-UIH Institute for Medical Imaging Technology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
| | - Carri K Glide-Hurst
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, USA
| | - Ning Wen
- Department of Radiology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong Univeristy School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- SJTU-Ruijing-UIH Institute for Medical Imaging Technology, Ruijin Hospital, Shanghai Jiaotong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China
- The Global Institute of Future Technology, Shanghai Jiaotong University, Shanghai, China
| | - Jing Cai
- Department of Health Technology and Informatics, The Hong Kong Polytechnic University, Hong Kong, China
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Korte JC, Chin Z, Carr M, Holloway L, Franich R. Magnetic resonance biomarker assessment software (MR-BIAS): an automated open-source tool for the ISMRM/NIST system phantom. Phys Med Biol 2023; 68. [PMID: 36796102 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/acbcbb] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/10/2022] [Accepted: 02/16/2023] [Indexed: 02/18/2023]
Abstract
Objective.To provide an open-source software for repeatable and efficient quantification ofT1andT2relaxation times with the ISMRM/NIST system phantom. Quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (qMRI) biomarkers have the potential to improve disease detection, staging and monitoring of treatment response. Reference objects, such as the system phantom, play a major role in translating qMRI methods into the clinic. The currently available open-source software for ISMRM/NIST system phantom analysis, Phantom Viewer (PV), includes manual steps that are subject to variability.Approach.We developed the Magnetic Resonance BIomarker Assessment Software (MR-BIAS) to automatically extract system phantom relaxation times. The inter-observer variability (IOV) and time efficiency of MR-BIAS and PV was observed in six volunteers analysing three phantom datasets. The IOV was measured with the coefficient of variation (CV) of percent bias (%bias) inT1andT2with respect to NMR reference values. The accuracy of MR-BIAS was compared to a custom script from a published study of twelve phantom datasets. This included comparison of overall bias and %bias for variable inversion recovery (T1VIR), variable flip angle (T1VFA) and multiple spin-echo (T2MSE) relaxation models.Main results.MR-BIAS had a lower mean CV withT1VIR(0.03%) andT2MSE(0.05%) in comparison to PV withT1VIR(1.28%) andT2MSE(4.55%). The mean analysis duration was 9.7 times faster for MR-BIAS (0.8 min) than PV (7.6 min). There was no statistically significant difference in the overall bias, or the %bias for the majority of ROIs, as calculated by MR-BIAS or the custom script for all models.Significance.MR-BIAS has demonstrated repeatable and efficient analysis of the ISMRM/NIST system phantom, with comparable accuracy to previous studies. The software is freely available to the MRI community, providing a framework to automate required analysis tasks, with the flexibility to explore open questions and accelerate biomarker research.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- James C Korte
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.,The University of Melbourne, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Zachary Chin
- RMIT University, School of Science, Melbourne, Australia
| | - Madeline Carr
- University of Wollongong, Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, Wollongong, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia.,GenesisCare, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- University of Wollongong, Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, Wollongong, Australia.,Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centres and Ingham Institute, Liverpool, Sydney, Australia
| | - Rick Franich
- Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Department of Physical Sciences, Melbourne, Australia.,RMIT University, School of Science, Melbourne, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Skipar K, Hompland T, Lund KV, Løndalen A, Malinen E, Kristensen GB, Lindemann K, Nakken ES, Bruheim K, Lyng H. Risk of recurrence after chemoradiotherapy identified by multimodal MRI and 18F-FDG-PET/CT in locally advanced cervical cancer. Radiother Oncol 2022; 176:17-24. [PMID: 36113778 DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2022.09.002] [Citation(s) in RCA: 4] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/10/2022] [Revised: 08/24/2022] [Accepted: 09/02/2022] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE MRI, applying dynamic contrast-enhanced (DCE) and diffusion-weighted (DW) sequences, and 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) PET/CT provide information about tumor aggressiveness that is unexploited in treatment of locally advanced cervical cancer (LACC). We investigated the potential of a multimodal combination of imaging parameters for classifying patients according to their risk of recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS Eighty-two LACC patients with diagnostic MRI and FDG-PET/CT, treated with chemoradiotherapy, were collected. Thirty-eight patients with MRI only were included for validation of MRI results. Endpoints were survival (disease-free, cancer-specific, overall) and tumor control (local, locoregional, distant). Ktrans, reflecting vascular function, apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC), reflecting cellularity, and standardized uptake value (SUV), reflecting glucose uptake, were extracted from DCE-MR, DW-MR and FDG-PET images, respectively. By applying an oxygen consumption and supply-based method, ADC and Ktrans parametric maps were voxel-wise combined into hypoxia images that were used to determine hypoxic fraction (HF). RESULTS HF showed a stronger association with outcome than the single modality parameters. This association was confirmed in the validation cohort. Low HF identified low-risk patients with 95% precision. Based on the 50th SUV-percentile (SUV50), patients with high HF were divided into an intermediate- and high-risk group with high and low SUV50, respectively. This defined a multimodality biomarker, HF/SUV50. HF/SUV50 increased the precision of detecting high-risk patients from 41% (HF alone) to 57% and showed prognostic significance in multivariable analysis for all endpoints. CONCLUSION Multimodal combination of MR- and FDG-PET/CT-images improves classification of LACC patients compared to single modality images and clinical factors.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kjersti Skipar
- Department of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Oncology, Telemark Hospital Trust, Skien, Norway; Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Tord Hompland
- Department of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Vassmo Lund
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Ayca Løndalen
- Department of Radiology and Nuclear Medicine, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Eirik Malinen
- Department of Medical Physics, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Gunnar B Kristensen
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kristina Lindemann
- Department of Gynecological Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
| | - Esten S Nakken
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Kjersti Bruheim
- Department of Oncology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway
| | - Heidi Lyng
- Department of Radiation Biology, Oslo University Hospital, Oslo, Norway; Department of Physics, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Hubbard Cristinacce PL, Keaveney S, Aboagye EO, Hall MG, Little RA, O'Connor JPB, Parker GJM, Waterton JC, Winfield JM, Jauregui-Osoro M. Clinical translation of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers - An overview and gap analysis of current practice. Phys Med 2022; 101:165-182. [PMID: 36055125 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2022.08.015] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/09/2022] [Revised: 08/05/2022] [Accepted: 08/17/2022] [Indexed: 10/14/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE This overview of the current landscape of quantitative magnetic resonance imaging biomarkers (qMR IBs) aims to support the standardisation of academic IBs to assist their translation to clinical practice. METHODS We used three complementary approaches to investigate qMR IB use and quality management practices within the UK: 1) a literature search of qMR and quality management terms during 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; 2) a database search for clinical research studies using qMR IBs during 2016-2020; and 3) a survey to ascertain the current availability and quality management practices for clinical MRI scanners and associated equipment at research institutions across the UK. RESULTS The analysis showed increased use of all qMR methods between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020 and diffusion-tensor MRI and volumetry to be popular methods. However, the "translation ratio" of journal articles to clinical research studies was higher for qMR methods that have evidence of clinical translation via a commercial route, such as fat fraction and T2 mapping. The number of journal articles citing quality management terms doubled between the periods 2011-2015 and 2016-2020; although, its proportion relative to all journal articles only increased by 3.0%. The survey suggested that quality assurance (QA) and quality control (QC) of data acquisition procedures are under-reported in the literature and that QA/QC of acquired data/data analysis are under-developed and lack consistency between institutions. CONCLUSIONS We summarise current attempts to standardise and translate qMR IBs, and conclude by outlining the ideal quality management practices and providing a gap analysis between current practice and a metrological standard.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - Sam Keaveney
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Eric O Aboagye
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, W12 0NN London, UK
| | - Matt G Hall
- National Physical Laboratory, Hampton Road, Teddington TW11 0LW, UK
| | - Ross A Little
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - James P B O'Connor
- Division of Cancer Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Geoff J M Parker
- Centre for Medical Image Computing, Department of Medical Physics and Biomedical Engineering, University College London, 90 High Holborn, London WC1V 6LJ, UK; Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester M15 6SZ, UK
| | - John C Waterton
- Bioxydyn Ltd, Manchester M15 6SZ, UK; Division of Informatics, Imaging and Data Sciences, The University of Manchester, Manchester M13 9PT, UK
| | - Jessica M Winfield
- MRI Unit, Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, Downs Road, Sutton, Surrey SM2 5PT, UK; Division of Radiotherapy and Imaging, The Institute of Cancer Research, 123 Old Brompton Road, London SW7 3RP, UK
| | - Maite Jauregui-Osoro
- Department of Surgery & Cancer, Division of Cancer, Imperial College London, W12 0NN London, UK
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Kron T, Fox C, Ebert MA, Thwaites D. Quality management in radiotherapy treatment delivery. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2022; 66:279-290. [PMID: 35243785 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13348] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/01/2021] [Accepted: 10/29/2021] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
Abstract
Radiation Oncology continues to rely on accurate delivery of radiation, in particular where patients can benefit from more modulated and hypofractioned treatments that can deliver higher dose to the target while optimising dose to normal structures. These deliveries are more complex, and the treatment units are more computerised, leading to a re-evaluation of quality assurance (QA) to test a larger range of options with more stringent criteria without becoming too time and resource consuming. This review explores how modern approaches of risk management and automation can be used to develop and maintain an effective and efficient QA programme. It considers various tools to control and guide radiation delivery including image guidance and motion management. Links with typical maintenance and repair activities are discussed, as well as patient-specific quality control activities. It is demonstrated that a quality management programme applied to treatment delivery can have an impact on individual patients but also on the quality of treatment techniques and future planning. Developing and customising a QA programme for treatment delivery is an important part of radiotherapy. Using modern multidisciplinary approaches can make this also a useful tool for department management.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Tomas Kron
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Sir Peter MacCallum Institute of Oncology, Melbourne University, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.,Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Chris Fox
- Department of Physical Sciences, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia
| | - Martin A Ebert
- Centre for Medical Radiation Physics, University of Wollongong, Wollongong, New South Wales, Australia.,Department of Radiation Oncology, Sir Charles Gairdner Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,School of Physics, Mathematics and Computing, University of Western Australia, Perth, Western Australia, Australia.,5D Clinics, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| | - David Thwaites
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.,Medical Physics Group, Leeds Institute of Cardiovascular and Metabolic Medicine and Leeds Institute of Medical Research, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Quantification of Tumor Hypoxia through Unsupervised Modelling of Consumption and Supply Hypoxia MR Imaging in Breast Cancer. Cancers (Basel) 2022; 14:cancers14051326. [PMID: 35267636 PMCID: PMC8909402 DOI: 10.3390/cancers14051326] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/18/2022] [Revised: 02/25/2022] [Accepted: 03/02/2022] [Indexed: 02/01/2023] Open
Abstract
Simple Summary Hypoxia in solid tumors is common in most solid cancers and is associated with treatment resistance to both chemo- and radiation-therapy. There is also reason to believe that hypoxia is an important determinant of metastic disease. Identifying hypoxia in solid tumors is important in treatment planning and decision making. In 2018 Hompland et al. proposed a method, based on quantifying consumption and supply of oxygen from diffusion weighted magnetic resonance imaging, to estimate the hypoxic fraction of a solid tumor. The method was based on training model parameters on a known hypoxia state in prostate cancer. In the present study we verified the validity of the consumption and supply concept in breast cancer. Furthermore, we developed and validated a new approach to the concept that does not require a ground truth to train the parameters. Abstract The purpose of the present study is to investigate if consumption and supply hypoxia (CSH) MR-imaging can depict breast cancer hypoxia, using the CSH-method initially developed for prostate cancer. Furthermore, to develop a generalized pan-cancer application of the CSH-method that doesn’t require a hypoxia reference standard for training the CSH-parameters. In a cohort of 69 breast cancer patients, we generated, based on the principles of intravoxel incoherent motion modelling, images reflecting cellular density (apparent diffusion coefficient; ADC) and vascular density (perfusion fraction; fp). Combinations of the information in these images were compared to a molecular hypoxia score made from gene expression data, aiming to identify a way to apply the CSH-methodology in breast cancer. Attempts to adapt previously proposed models for prostate cancer included direct transfers and model parameter rescaling. A novel approach, based on rescaling ADC and fp data to give more nuanced response in the relevant physiologic range, was also introduced. The new CSH-method was validated in a prostate cancer cohort with known hypoxia status. The proposed CSH-method gave estimates of hypoxia that was strongly correlated to the molecular hypoxia score in breast cancer, and hypoxia as measured in pathology slices stained with pimonidazole in prostate cancer. The generalized approach to CSH-imaging depicted hypoxia in both breast and prostate cancers and requires no model training. It is easy to implement using readily available technology and encourages further investigation of CSH-imaging in other cancer entities and in other settings, with the goal being to overcome hypoxia-induced resistance to treatment.
Collapse
|
12
|
van Houdt PJ, Saeed H, Thorwarth D, Fuller CD, Hall WA, McDonald BA, Shukla-Dave A, Kooreman ES, Philippens MEP, van Lier ALHMW, Keesman R, Mahmood F, Coolens C, Stanescu T, Wang J, Tyagi N, Wetscherek A, van der Heide UA. Integration of quantitative imaging biomarkers in clinical trials for MR-guided radiotherapy: Conceptual guidance for multicentre studies from the MR-Linac Consortium Imaging Biomarker Working Group. Eur J Cancer 2021; 153:64-71. [PMID: 34144436 PMCID: PMC8340311 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejca.2021.04.041] [Citation(s) in RCA: 18] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/23/2021] [Accepted: 04/27/2021] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) derived from MRI techniques have the potential to be used for the personalised treatment of cancer patients. However, large-scale data are missing to validate their added value in clinical practice. Integrated MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) systems, such as hybrid MRI-linear accelerators, have the unique advantage that MR images can be acquired during every treatment session. This means that high-frequency imaging of QIBs becomes feasible with reduced patient burden, logistical challenges, and costs compared to extra scan sessions. A wealth of valuable data will be collected before and during treatment, creating new opportunities to advance QIB research at large. The aim of this paper is to present a roadmap towards the clinical use of QIBs on MRIgRT systems. The most important need is to gather and understand how the QIBs collected during MRIgRT correlate with clinical outcomes. As the integrated MRI scanner differs from traditional MRI scanners, technical validation is an important aspect of this roadmap. We propose to integrate technical validation with clinical trials by the addition of a quality assurance procedure at the start of a trial, the acquisition of in vivo test-retest data to assess the repeatability, as well as a comparison between QIBs from MRIgRT systems and diagnostic MRI systems to assess the reproducibility. These data can be collected with limited extra time for the patient. With integration of technical validation in clinical trials, the results of these trials derived on MRIgRT systems will also be applicable for measurements on other MRI systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Hina Saeed
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Av, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Hoppe-Seyler-Str. 3, Tübingen, 72076, Germany.
| | - Clifton D Fuller
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - William A Hall
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, 9200 W Wisconsin Av, Milwaukee, WI, 53226, USA.
| | - Brigid A McDonald
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA; Department of Radiology, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Ernst S Kooreman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| | - Marielle E P Philippens
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Astrid L H M W van Lier
- Department of Radiotherapy, University Medical Center Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
| | - Rick Keesman
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Radboud University Medical Center, Geert Grooteplein Zuid 32, Nijmegen, 6525GA, the Netherlands.
| | - Faisal Mahmood
- Laboratory of Radiation Physics, Department of Oncology, Odense University Hospital, Kløvervænget 19, Odense C, 5000, Denmark; Department of Clinical Research, University of Southern Denmark, J. B. Winsløws Vej 19.3, Odense C, 5000, Denmark.
| | - Catherine Coolens
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5M 1G7, Canada.
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Department of Medical Physics, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre and University Health Network, 700 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5M 1G7, Canada; Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, 610 University Avenue, Toronto, Ontario, M5G 2M9, Canada.
| | - Jihong Wang
- Department of Radiation Physics, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, 1515 Holcombe Blvd, Unit 0097, Houston, TX, 77030, USA.
| | - Neelam Tyagi
- Department of Medical Physics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, 10065, USA.
| | - Andreas Wetscherek
- Joint Department of Physics, The Institute of Cancer Research and the Royal Marsden NHS Foundation Trust, 15 Cotswold Road, London, SM2 5NG, United Kingdom.
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Plesmanlaan 102, Amsterdam, 1066CX, the Netherlands.
| |
Collapse
|
13
|
Keenan KE, Gimbutas Z, Dienstfrey A, Stupic KF, Boss MA, Russek SE, Chenevert TL, Prasad PV, Guo J, Reddick WE, Cecil KM, Shukla-Dave A, Aramburu Nunez D, Shridhar Konar A, Liu MZ, Jambawalikar SR, Schwartz LH, Zheng J, Hu P, Jackson EF. Multi-site, multi-platform comparison of MRI T1 measurement using the system phantom. PLoS One 2021; 16:e0252966. [PMID: 34191819 PMCID: PMC8244851 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0252966] [Citation(s) in RCA: 15] [Impact Index Per Article: 3.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/26/2021] [Indexed: 11/19/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent innovations in quantitative magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) measurement methods have led to improvements in accuracy, repeatability, and acquisition speed, and have prompted renewed interest to reevaluate the medical value of quantitative T1. The purpose of this study was to determine the bias and reproducibility of T1 measurements in a variety of MRI systems with an eye toward assessing the feasibility of applying diagnostic threshold T1 measurement across multiple clinical sites. We used the International Society of Magnetic Resonance in Medicine/National Institute of Standards and Technology (ISMRM/NIST) system phantom to assess variations of T1 measurements, using a slow, reference standard inversion recovery sequence and a rapid, commonly-available variable flip angle sequence, across MRI systems at 1.5 tesla (T) (two vendors, with number of MRI systems n = 9) and 3 T (three vendors, n = 18). We compared the T1 measurements from inversion recovery and variable flip angle scans to ISMRM/NIST phantom reference values using Analysis of Variance (ANOVA) to test for statistical differences between T1 measurements grouped according to MRI scanner manufacturers and/or static field strengths. The inversion recovery method had minor over- and under-estimations compared to the NMR-measured T1 values at both 1.5 T and 3 T. Variable flip angle measurements had substantially greater deviations from the NMR-measured T1 values than the inversion recovery measurements. At 3 T, the measured variable flip angle T1 for one vendor is significantly different than the other two vendors for most of the samples throughout the clinically relevant range of T1. There was no consistent pattern of discrepancy between vendors. We suggest establishing rigorous quality control procedures for validating quantitative MRI methods to promote confidence and stability in associated measurement techniques and to enable translation of diagnostic threshold from the research center to the entire clinical community.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Kathryn E. Keenan
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, United State of America
- * E-mail:
| | - Zydrunas Gimbutas
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, United State of America
| | - Andrew Dienstfrey
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, United State of America
| | - Karl F. Stupic
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, United State of America
| | - Michael A. Boss
- American College of Radiology, Center for Research and Innovation, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania, United State of America
| | - Stephen E. Russek
- National Institute of Standards and Technology, Boulder, Colorado, United State of America
| | | | - P. V. Prasad
- NorthShore University Health System, Evanston, Illinois, United State of America
| | - Junyu Guo
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United State of America
| | - Wilburn E. Reddick
- St. Jude Children’s Research Hospital, Memphis, Tennessee, United State of America
| | - Kim M. Cecil
- Cincinnati Children’s Hospital Medical Center, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine Cincinnati, Ohio, United State of America
| | - Amita Shukla-Dave
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United State of America
| | - David Aramburu Nunez
- Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, New York, United State of America
| | | | - Michael Z. Liu
- Columbia University Medical Center, New York, New York, United State of America
| | | | | | - Jie Zheng
- Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, Missouri, United State of America
| | - Peng Hu
- University of California, Los Angeles, California, United State of America
| | - Edward F. Jackson
- University of Wisconsin, Madison, Wisconsin, United State of America
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
RESUME N: A flexible class of multi-parameter qMRI protocols. Phys Med 2021; 88:23-36. [PMID: 34171573 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2021] [Revised: 03/16/2021] [Accepted: 04/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/30/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To introduce a class of fast 3D quantitative MRI (qMRI) schemes (RESUMEN, for N=1,…,4) that allow for a thorough characterization of microstructural properties of brain tissues. METHODS An arbitrary multi-echo GRE acquisition optimized for quantitative susceptibility mapping (QSM) is complemented with an appropriate low flip-angle GRE sequence drawn from four possible choices. The acquired signals are processed to analytically derive the longitudinal relaxation (R1) and free induction decay (R2∗) rates, as well as the proton density (PD) and QSM. A comprehensive modeling of the excitation and B1- profiles and of the RF-spoiling is included in the acquisition and processing pipeline. RESULTS The RESUMEN maps appear homogeneous throughout the field-of-view and exhibit comparable values and high SNR across the considered range of N values. CONCLUSIONS The introduced schemes represent a class of robust and flexible strategies to derive a thorough and fast qMRI study, suitable for a whole-brain acquisition with isotropic voxel resolution of 700 μm in less than 15 min.
Collapse
|
15
|
Wang YF, Tadimalla S, Hayden AJ, Holloway L, Haworth A. Artificial intelligence and imaging biomarkers for prostate radiation therapy during and after treatment. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol 2021; 65:612-626. [PMID: 34060219 DOI: 10.1111/1754-9485.13242] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/16/2021] [Revised: 04/18/2021] [Accepted: 05/02/2021] [Indexed: 12/15/2022]
Abstract
Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is increasingly used in the management of prostate cancer (PCa). Quantitative MRI (qMRI) parameters, derived from multi-parametric MRI, provide indirect measures of tumour characteristics such as cellularity, angiogenesis and hypoxia. Using Artificial Intelligence (AI), relevant information and patterns can be efficiently identified in these complex data to develop quantitative imaging biomarkers (QIBs) of tumour function and biology. Such QIBs have already demonstrated potential in the diagnosis and staging of PCa. In this review, we explore the role of these QIBs in monitoring treatment response during and after PCa radiotherapy (RT). Recurrence of PCa after RT is not uncommon, and early detection prior to development of metastases provides an opportunity for salvage treatments with curative intent. However, the current method of monitoring treatment response using prostate-specific antigen levels lacks specificity. QIBs, derived from qMRI and developed using AI techniques, can be used to monitor biological changes post-RT providing the potential for accurate and early diagnosis of recurrent disease.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Yu-Feng Wang
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Sirisha Tadimalla
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Amy J Hayden
- Sydney West Radiation Oncology, Westmead Hospital, Wentworthville, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Western Sydney University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Faculty of Medicine, Health & Human Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Lois Holloway
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
- Ingham Institute for Applied Medical Research, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
- Liverpool and Macarthur Cancer Therapy Centre, Liverpool Hospital, Liverpool, New South Wales, Australia
| | - Annette Haworth
- Institute of Medical Physics, School of Physics, Faculty of Science, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Thorwarth D, Low DA. Technical Challenges of Real-Time Adaptive MR-Guided Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 11:634507. [PMID: 33763369 PMCID: PMC7982516 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.634507] [Citation(s) in RCA: 45] [Impact Index Per Article: 11.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/27/2020] [Accepted: 01/26/2021] [Indexed: 12/18/2022] Open
Abstract
In the past few years, radiotherapy (RT) has experienced a major technological innovation with the development of hybrid machines combining magnetic resonance (MR) imaging and linear accelerators. This new technology for MR-guided cancer treatment has the potential to revolutionize the field of adaptive RT due to the opportunity to provide high-resolution, real-time MR imaging before and during treatment application. However, from a technical point of view, several challenges remain which need to be tackled to ensure safe and robust real-time adaptive MR-guided RT delivery. In this manuscript, several technical challenges to MR-guided RT are discussed. Starting with magnetic field strength tradeoffs, the potential and limitations for purely MR-based RT workflows are discussed. Furthermore, the current status of real-time 3D MR imaging and its potential for real-time RT are summarized. Finally, the potential of quantitative MR imaging for future biological RT adaptation is highlighted.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniela Thorwarth
- Section for Biomedical Physics, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
| | - Daniel A Low
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| |
Collapse
|
17
|
van Houdt PJ, Yang Y, van der Heide UA. Quantitative Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Biological Image-Guided Adaptive Radiotherapy. Front Oncol 2021; 10:615643. [PMID: 33585242 PMCID: PMC7878523 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2020.615643] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Accepted: 12/08/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022] Open
Abstract
MRI-guided radiotherapy systems have the potential to bring two important concepts in modern radiotherapy together: adaptive radiotherapy and biological targeting. Based on frequent anatomical and functional imaging, monitoring the changes that occur in volume, shape as well as biological characteristics, a treatment plan can be updated regularly to accommodate the observed treatment response. For this purpose, quantitative imaging biomarkers need to be identified that show changes early during treatment and predict treatment outcome. This review provides an overview of the current evidence on quantitative MRI measurements during radiotherapy and their potential as an imaging biomarker on MRI-guided radiotherapy systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Petra J van Houdt
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| | - Yingli Yang
- Department of Radiation Oncology, University of California, Los Angeles, CA, United States
| | - Uulke A van der Heide
- Department of Radiation Oncology, The Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|