Optimal cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy among children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma: A real-world data study

Anticancer therapy-induced adverse drug reactions in children and preventive and control measures

In recent years, considerable achievements have been made in pediatric oncology with the innovation and development of antitumor drugs. However, compared to adults, children as a special group have not yet matured fully in terms of liver and kidney function. Moreover, pediatric patients are prone to more adverse drug reactions (ADRs) from the accumulation of antineoplastic drugs due to their smaller body size and larger body surface area. Chemotherapy-related ADRs have become a non-negligible factor that affects cancer remission. To date, studies on ADRs in pediatric cancer patients have emerged internationally, but few systematic summaries are available. Here, we reviewed the various systemic ADRs associated with antitumor drugs in children and adolescent patients, as well as the advances in strategies to cope with ADRs, which consisted of neurotoxicity, hematological toxicity, cardiotoxicity, ADRs of the respiratory system and gastrointestinal system and urinary system, ADRs of the skin and its adnexa, allergic reactions, and other ADRs. For clinicians and researchers, understanding the causes, symptoms, and coping strategies for ADRs caused by anticancer treatments will undoubtedly benefit more children.

Concurrent chemoradiotherapy with or without neoadjuvant chemotherapy in pediatric patients with stage III-IVa nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a real-world propensity score-matched cohort study

OBJECTIVES

To compare neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) plus concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) to CCRT alone in children and adolescents (age ≤ 18 years) with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC, stage III-IVA).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

195 CA-LANPC patients who were treated through CCRT with or without NAC between 2008 and 2018 were enrolled in this study. A matched cohort composed of CCRT patients and NAC-CCRT patients was generated by propensity score matching (PSM) at a 1:2 ratio. Survival outcomes and toxicities were compared between the CCRT group and NAC-CCRT group.

RESULTS

Of the 195 patients, 158 (81%) received NAC plus CCRT, and 37 (19%) received CCRT alone. The NAC-CCRT group had higher EBV DNA levels (≥ 4000 copy/mL), more advanced TNM stage (stage IV disease), and lower incidence of a high radiation dose (> 6600 cGy) than the CCRT group. To avoid bias in treatment selection within retrospectively analysis, 34 patients from the CCRT group were matched with 68 patients from the NAC-CCRT group. In the matched cohort, the 5-year DMFS rate was 94.0% in the NAC-CCRT group versus 82.4% in the CCRT group, with marginal statistical significance (HR = 0.31; 95%CI 0.09-1.10; P = 0.055). During treatment, the accumulate incidence of severe acute toxicities (65.8% vs 45.9%; P = 0.037) in the NAC-CCRT group was higher than the CCRT group. However, the CCRT group had significantly higher accumulate incidence of severe late toxicities (30.3% vs 16.8%; P = 0.041) than the NAC-CCRT group.

CONCLUSIONS

Addition of NAC to CCRT tended to improve long-term DMFS in CA-LANPC patients with acceptable toxicity. However, relative randomized clinical trial is still needed in the future.

The feasibility of reduced-dose radiotherapy in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma with favorable response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy

BACKGROUND

To assess the feasibility of adjusting radiation dose (RD) in childhood NPC with favorable tumor response after neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC).

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Using an NPC-specific database, children and adolescents (≤18 years) with locoregionally advanced NPC (CA-LANPC) were retrospectively analyzed. Enrolled patients were those who received favorable tumor response after 2-4 cycles of NAC followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy. Survival outcomes and treatment-related toxicities were compared for the standard RD on primary tumors (PT-RD_standard, 66-72 Gy) and the reduced RD on primary tumors (PT-RD_reduced, 60-65.9 Gy).

RESULTS

A total of 132 patients were included, and the median follow-up time was 75.2 months (IQR, 53.2-98.7 months) for the entire cohort. The PT-RD_reduced group had a significantly decreased incidence of severe mucositis (51.3 % vs 32.1 %; P = 0.034) when compared to the PT-RD_standard group. The total incidence of severe sequela in the PT-RD_standard group were significantly higher than those in the PT-RD_reduced group (31.8 % vs 13.7 %; P = 0.029). In the propensity-matched analysis, the PT-RD_reduced group resulted in parallel 5-year survival with the PT-RD_standard group from the matched cohort (disease-free survival, 82.7 % vs 80.3 %, P = 0.841; overall survival, 91.7 % vs 91.3 %, P = 0.582; distant metastasis-free survival, 87.5 % vs 82.8 %, P = 0.573; and locoregional relapse-free survival, 95.6 % vs 97.3 %, P = 0.836). In multivariate analysis, the impact of PT-RD_reduced on all survival end points remained insignificant.

CONCLUSIONS

Chemoradiotherapy with RD at levels of 60-65.9 Gy may be a reasonable strategy for CA-LANPC with favorable tumor response after NAC.

Development of a web-based prognostic model to quantify the survival benefit of cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy in childhood nasopharyngeal carcinoma

PURPOSE

To quantify and predict the survival benefits of cumulative cisplatin dose during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CC-CCD) in children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patients with CA-LANPC who received first-line neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) followed by concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) between September 2007 and April 2018 were evaluated. Recursive partitioning analyses (RPAs) helped identify the ideal thresholds of CC-CCD on disease-free survival (DFS). We then developed a web-based predictive model to quantify the survival benefit of CC-CCD for CA-LANPC.

RESULTS

In total, 139 patients were eligible for the analysis. The median CC-CCD was 162 mg/m² (IQR, 138-192 mg/m²). The optimum cut-off point of CC-CCD was 160 mg/m² for DFS. Hence, we selected 160 mg/m² as the cut-off to classify CA-LANPC into either high or low CC-CCD groups for survival analysis. The 5-year DFS rates were 91.6% in the high (≥160 mg/m²) CC-CCD group and 77.8% in the low (<160 mg/m²) CC-CCD group (P = 0.011). Multivariate analysis indicated CC-CCD (HR, 0.34; 95%CI, 0.13-0.87; P = 0.024), T stage (HR, 3.72; 95%CI, 1.35-10.22; P = 0.011), and EBV DNA (HR, 3.00; 95%CI, 1.00-8.97; P = 0.049) were independent prognostic factors and were incorporated into the prognostic model. N stage was also included due to its clinical importance. The predictive model was demonstrably accurate (C-index, 0.741) when predicting 5-year DFS rates.

CONCLUSIONS

We built a predictive model to quantify the survival benefit of CC-CCD for CA-LANPC treated with NAC plus CCRT. This tool may improve individual treatment consultations and facilitate evidence-based decision-making.

The Role of Pretreatment 18F-FDG PET/CT for Early Prediction of Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy Response in Patients with Locoregionally Advanced Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

Introduction

To evaluate the role of maximal standardized uptake values (SUVmax) and total lesion glycolysis (TLG) from serial ¹⁸F-fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG) positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) for early prediction of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) response in locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (LANPC).

Methods

A total of 121 LANPC patients who completed pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT between June 2017 and July 2020 were retrospectively included. The median age of all the participants was 50 years old (range: 19–74 years), with 94 (77.7%) males and 27 (22.3%) females. The SUVmax from the primary tumor site (SUVmax-PT) and the total lesion glycolysis from the primary tumor site (TLG-PT) were recorded. Tumor response was calculated according to the Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumor (RECIST) 1.1 Criteria at two-week post-secondary NAC cycle. Patients who achieved an objectively partial or full reaction after two cycles of NAC were defined as ‘responders’, and patients who obtained stability or progression were classified as ‘non-responders’.

Results

After two cycles of NAC, 96 patients were categorized as “responders” and 25 patients as “non-responders”. The optimal thresholds of the SUVmax-PT were 11.8 and 38.5 for the TLG-PT. Non-responders were significantly associated with high SUVmax-PT (HR, 3.49; 95% CI, 1.17–10.36; p = 0.024) and TLG-PT (HR, 4.45; 95% CI, 1.44–13.78; p = 0.010) in multivariate analysis. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) categorized patients into three prognostic groups based on SUVmax-PT and TLG-PT: high-response group, intermediate-response group, and low-response group, with corresponding favorable response rates of 94%, 80%, and 55%, respectively. Moreover, a nomogram was created based on metabolic parameters that precisely projected an individual’s response of NAC (C-index, 0.787; 95% CI, 0.533–1.000).

Conclusion

Pretreatment ¹⁸F-FDG PET/CT to measure SUVmax-PT and TLG-PT could be a useful non-invasive method for early indication of NAC efficacy. The nomogram based on PET/CT parameters may potentially provide direction for treatment decisions based on NAC levels.

Does three cycles of neoadjuvant chemotherapy prior to concurrent chemoradiotherapy provide benefits for all childhood patients with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma?

BACKGROUND

Adding neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) to concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT) is the main strategy in treatment of children and adolescents with locoregionally advanced nasopharyngeal carcinoma (CA-LANPC). Yet, an optimal number of NAC cycles remains unknown. We aimed to optimize the NAC cycle and potentially contribute to clinical decision making for the individual treatment of CA-LANPC.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Utilizing an NPC-specific database through an acknowledged big-data information system at our center, we identified 143 CA-LANPC treated with NAC followed by CCRT between September 2007 through April 2018. Recursive partitioning analysis (RPA) was performed to categorize the patients and predict disease-free survival (DFS). The clinical benefits of NAC cycles (two cycles vs three cycles) were assessed in each risk group.

RESULTS

Independent factors derived from multivariable analysis to predict DFS were T stage (T1-3 vs T4) and plasma Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) DNA (< 4000 vs ≥ 4000 copies/mL) for risk stratification. Consequently, 87 (61%) participants were classified as low-risk group (T1-3 with low or high EBV DNA, and T4 with low EBV DNA) and the other 56 patients (39%) were classified as a high-risk group (T4 with high EBV DNA) through RPA, and corresponding 5-year DFS rates of 91.9% and 71.2%, respectively (p = 0.001). Among the high-risk group, patients receiving three cycles of NAC had statistically significant improvement in 5-year DFS over those who received two cycles of NAC (86.7% vs 59.1%; p = 0.020), while the survival benefit of three cycles NAC for low-risk groups were not observed (94.7% vs 89.7%; p = 0.652).

CONCLUSIONS

We found three cycles of NAC with CCRT was a positive prognostic indicator for improved DFS for the high-risk group among CA-LANPC. However, whether low-risk patients could benefit from three cycles NAC needs further study.