Unintended dose to the lower axilla in adjuvant radiotherapy for breast cancer: Differences between tangential beam and VMAT

Adapting radiation therapy to immunotherapy: Delineation and treatment planning of pre-operative immune-modulating breast iSBRT in 151 patients treated in the randomized phase II Neo-CheckRay trial

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE

The randomized multicentric phase II Neo-CheckRay trial investigated preoperative immune-modulating stereotactic body radiation therapy (iSBRT) 8 Gy x 3 fractions in combination with chemotherapy with or without the anti PD-L1 durvalumab and the anti-CD73 oleclumab in early-stage, high-risk, luminal B breast cancer. iSBRT was solely delivered to the primary breast cancer leveraging on its immune modulating potential to sustain an anti-tumour response. To avoid immunosuppression induced by radiation therapy (RT), the tumour draining lymph nodes (TDLN) were spared. Here, we present the constraints used in the Neo-CheckRay trial and a dosimetric analysis of all delivered treatment plans with a special focus on the dose to the TDLN.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Main constraints were the skin (D0.1 cc < 19.2 Gy), chest wall (D1cc < 15 Gy) and ipsilateral uninvolved breast (V24Gy < 30 %). The dose to the TDLN was reduced by avoiding beams entering or exiting the TDLN. In the present work, the DICOM-RT data of all the patients treated in the Neo-CheckRay trial were collected (n = 151) to describe doses to the target volume, to the organs at risk and the TDLN. The TDLN volumes consisted of the internal mammary nodes (IMN) and the axilla levels I-IV including the interpectoral nodes.

RESULTS

In 151 patients, the median V95% of the gross target volume (GTV) and planning target volume (PTV) were 97.4 % (90 % CI 26.5-100) and 95.5 % (56.1-100). The mean dose (dMean) to all TDLN volumes was < 1 Gy. The highest dMean were to the IMN and axilla level 1: 0.8 Gy (90 % CI 0.1-2.7) and 0.6 Gy (0.0-3.9), respectively. The dMean to the involved lymph nodes, if present, was 0.3 Gy (0.0-5.0).

CONCLUSION

In the Neo-CheckRay trial, the predefined organs at risk dose constraints were feasible and the TDLN were adequately spared.

First-in-human study of SBRT and adenosine pathway blockade to potentiate the benefit of immunochemotherapy in early-stage luminal B breast cancer: results of the safety run-in phase of the Neo-CheckRay trial

BACKGROUND

Luminal B breast cancer (BC) presents a worse prognosis when compared with luminal A BC and exhibits a lower sensitivity to chemotherapy and a lower immunogenicity in contrast to non-luminal BC subtypes. The Neo-CheckRay clinical trial investigates the use of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) directed to the primary tumor in combination with the adenosine pathway inhibitor oleclumab to improve the response to neo-adjuvant immuno-chemotherapy in luminal B BC. The trial consists of a safety run-in followed by a randomized phase II trial. Here, we present the results of the first-in-human safety run-in.

METHODS

The safety run-in was an open-label, single-arm trial in which six patients with early-stage luminal B BC received the following neo-adjuvant regimen: paclitaxel q1w×12 → doxorubicin/cyclophosphamide q2w×4; durvalumab (anti-programmed cell death receptor ligand 1 (PD-L1)) q4w×5; oleclumab (anti-CD73) q2w×4 → q4w×3 and 3×8 Gy SBRT to the primary tumor at week 5. Surgery must be performed 2-6 weeks after primary systemic treatment and adjuvant therapy was given per local guidelines, RT boost to the tumor bed was not allowed. Key inclusion criteria were: luminal BC, Ki67≥15% or histological grade 3, MammaPrint high risk, tumor size≥1.5 cm. Primary tumor tissue samples were collected at three timepoints: baseline, 1 week after SBRT and at surgery. Tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes, PD-L1 and CD73 were evaluated at each timepoint, and residual cancer burden (RCB) was calculated at surgery.

RESULTS

Six patients were included between November 2019 and March 2020. Median age was 53 years, range 37-69. All patients received SBRT and underwent surgery 2-4 weeks after the last treatment. After a median follow-up time of 2 years after surgery, one grade 3 adverse event (AE) was reported: pericarditis with rapid resolution under corticosteroids. No grade 4-5 AE were documented. Overall cosmetical breast evaluation after surgery was 'excellent' in four patients and 'good' in two patients. RCB results were 2/6 RCB 0; 2/6 RCB 1; 1/6 RCB 2 and 1/6 RCB 3.

CONCLUSIONS

This novel treatment combination was considered safe and is worth further investigation in a randomized phase II trial.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

NCT03875573.

Incidental Axillary Dose of Tomotherapy in Hypofractionated Whole Breast Radiotherapy for Early Breast Cancer: A Dosimetrical Analysis

Background and Objectives: Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) is becoming a more common method of performing whole breast irradiation (WBI) for early breast cancer. This study aimed to examine the incidental dose to the axillary region using tomotherapy, a unique form of IMRT. Patients and Methods: This study included 30 patients with early-stage breast cancer who underwent adjuvant WBI using TomoDirect IMRT. A hypofractionation scheme of 42.4 Gy delivered in 16 fractions was prescribed. The plan comprised of two parallel-opposed beams, along with two additional beams positioned anteriorly at gantry angles of 20° and 40° from the medial beam. The incidental dose received at axillary levels I, II, and III was evaluated using several dose-volume parameters. Results: The study participants had a median age of 51 years, and 60% had left-sided breast cancer. The mean dose of the axilla for levels I, II, and III were 15.5 ± 4.8 Gy, 14.9 ± 4.2 Gy, and 1.5 ± 1.6 Gy, respectively. Adequate coverage of the axilla, defined as V95%[%], was achieved for 4.7 ± 3.9%, 4.8 ± 3.7%, and 0 ± 0% for levels I, II, and III, respectively. The results were compared with those of previously published studies, and the axillary mean dose and V95%[%] of TomoDirect IMRT were low, comparable to other IMRT techniques, and lower than those of traditional tangential therapy. Conclusions: While incidental axillary radiation during WBI has been proposed to assist in regional disease control, the TomoDirect plan was demonstrated to decrease this dose, and a hypofractionation scheme would further lower its biological effectiveness. Future clinical studies should incorporate dosimetrical analysis of incidental axillary dose, in order to facilitate hypofractionated IMRT planning with risk-adjusted axilla coverage in early breast cancer.

Incidental irradiation of the regional lymph nodes during deep inspiration breath-hold radiation therapy in left-sided breast cancer patients: a dosimetric analysis

Background

Radiotherapy using the deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) technique compared with free breathing (FB) can achieve substantial reduction of heart and lung doses in left-sided breast cancer cases. The anatomical organ movement in deep inspiration also cause unintended exposure of locoregional lymph nodes to the irradiation field.

Methods

From 2017–2020, 148 patients with left-sided breast cancer underwent breast conserving surgery (BCS) or mastectomy (ME) with axillary lymph node staging, followed by adjuvant irradiation in DIBH technique. Neoadjuvant or adjuvant systemic therapy was administered depending on hormone receptor and HER2-status.

CT scans in FB and DIBH position with individual coaching and determination of the breathing amplitude during the radiation planning CT were performed for all patients. Intrafractional 3D position monitoring of the patient surface in deep inspiration and gating was performed using Sentinel and Catalyst HD 3D surface scanning systems (C-RAD, Catalyst, C-RAD AB, Uppsala, Sweden). Three-dimensional treatment planning was performed using standard tangential treatment portals (6 or 18 MV). The delineation of ipsilateral locoregional lymph nodes was done on the FB and the DIBH CT-scan according to the RTOG recommendations.

Results

The mean doses (D_mean) in axillary lymph node (AL) level I, II and III in DIBH were 32.28 Gy (range 2.87–51.7), 20.1 Gy (range 0.44–53.84) and 3.84 Gy (range 0.25–39.23) vs. 34.93 Gy (range 10.52–50.40), 16.40 Gy (range 0.38–52.40) and 3.06 Gy (range 0.21–40.48) in FB (p < 0.0001). Accordingly, in DIBH the D_mean for AL level I were reduced by 7.59%, whereas for AL level II and III increased by 22.56% and 25.49%, respectively.

The D_mean for the supraclavicular lymph nodes (SC) in DIBH was 0.82 Gy (range 0.23–4.11), as compared to 0.84 Gy (range 0.22–10.80) with FB (p = 0.002). This results in a mean dose reduction of 2.38% in DIBH.

The D_mean for internal mammary lymph nodes (IM) was 12.77 Gy (range 1.45–39.09) in DIBH vs. 11.17 Gy (range 1.34–44.24) in FB (p = 0.005). This yields a mean dose increase of 14.32% in DIBH.

Conclusions

The DIBH technique may result in changes in the incidental dose exposure of regional lymph node areas.