A systematic review and meta-analysis of liver tumor position variability during SBRT using various motion management and IGRT strategies

Radiation Therapy Quality Assurance Analysis of Alliance A021501: Preoperative mFOLFIRINOX or mFOLFIRINOX Plus Hypofractionated Radiation Therapy for Borderline Resectable Adenocarcinoma of the Pancreas

PURPOSE

Alliance A021501 is the first randomized trial to evaluate stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for borderline resectable pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. In this post hoc study, we reviewed the quality of radiation therapy (RT) delivered.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

SBRT (6.6 Gy × 5) was intended but hypofractionated RT (5 Gy × 5) was permitted if SBRT specifications could not be met. Institutional credentialing through the National Cancer Institute-funded Imaging and Radiation Oncology Core (IROC) was required. Rigorous RT quality assurance (RT QA) was mandated, including pretreatment review by a radiation oncologist. Revisions were required for unacceptable deviations. Additionally, we performed a post hoc RT QA analysis in which contours and plans were reviewed by 3 radiation oncologists and assigned a score (1, 2, or 3) based on adequacy. A score of 1 indicated no deviation, 2 indicated minor deviation, and 3 indicated a major deviation that could be clinically significant. Clinical outcomes were compared by treatment modality and by case score.

RESULTS

Forty patients were registered to receive RT (1 planned but not treated) at 27 centers (18 academic and 9 community). Twenty-three centers were appropriately credentialed for moving lung/liver targets and 4 for static head and neck only. Thirty-two of 39 patients (82.1%) were treated with SBRT and 7 (17.9%) with hypofractionated RT. Five cases (13%) required revision before treatment. On post hoc review, 23 patients (59.0%) were noted to have suboptimal contours or plan coverage, 12 (30.8%) were scored a 2, and 11 (28.2%) were scored a 3. There were no apparent differences in failure patterns or surgical outcomes based on treatment technique or post hoc case score. Details related to on-treatment imaging were not recorded.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite rigorous QA, we encountered variability in simulation, contouring, plan coverage, and dose on trial. Although clinical outcomes did not appear to have been affected, findings from this analysis serve to inform subsequent PDAC SBRT trial designs and QA requirements.

4D-MRI assisted stereotactic body radiation therapy for unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases

This study evaluated the feasibilities and outcomes following four-dimensional magnetic resonance imaging (4D-MRI) assisted stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for unresectable colorectal liver metastases (CRLMs). From March 2018 to January 2022, we identified 76 unresectable CRLMs patients with 123 lesions who received 4D-MRI guided SBRT in our institution. 4D-MRI simulation with or without abdominal compression was conducted for all patients. The prescription dose was 50-65 Gy in 5-12 fractions. The image quality of computed tomography (CT) and MRI were compared using the Clarity Score. Clinical outcomes and toxicity profiles were evaluated. 4D-MRI improved the image quality compared with CT images (mean Clarity Score: 1.67 vs 2.88, P < 0.001). The abdominal compression reduced motions in cranial-caudal direction (P = 0.03) with two phase T2 weighted images assessing tumor motion. The median follow-up time was 12.5 months. For 98 lesions assessed for best response, the complete response, partial response and stable disease rate were 57.1 %, 30.6 % and 12.2 %, respectively. The local control (LC) rate at 1 year was 97.3 %. 46.1 % of patients experienced grade 1-2 toxicities and only 2.6 % patients experienced grade 3 hematologic toxicities. The 4D-MRI technique allowed accurate target delineation and motion tracking in unresectable CRLMs patients. Favorable LC rate and mild toxicities were achieved. This study provided evidence for using 4D-MRI assisted SBRT as an alternative treatment in unresectable CRLMs.

Dosimetric Effect of Target Position Accuracy on Single-Isocenter Multiple Liver Metastases SBRT

Purpose: To evaluate the dosimetric effects of intrafraction baseline shifts combined with rotational errors on Four-dimensional computed tomography-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy for multiple liver metastases (MLMs). Methods: A total of 10 patients with MLM (2 or 3 lesions) were selected for this retrospective study. Baseline shift errors of 0.5, 1.0, and 2.0 mm; and rotational errors of 0.5°, 1°, and 1.5°, were simulated about all axes. All of the baseline shifts and rotation errors were simulated around the planned isocenter using a matrix transformation of 6° of freedom. The coverage degradation of baseline shifts and rotational errors were analyzed according to the dose to 95% of the planning target volume (D95) and the volume covered by 95% of the prescribed dose (V95), and related changes in gross tumor volume were also analyzed. Results: At the rotation error of 0.5° and the baseline offset of less than 0.5 mm, the D95 and V95 values of all targets were >95%. For rotational errors of 1.0° (combined with all baseline shift errors), 36.3% of targets had D95 and V95 values of <95%. Coverage worsened substantially when the baseline shift errors were increased to 1.0 mm. D95 and V95 values were >95% for about 77.3% of the targets. Only 11.4% of the D95 and V95 values were >95% when the baseline shift errors were increased to 2.0 mm. When the rotational error was increased to 1.5° and baseline shift errors increased to 1.0 mm, the D95 and V95 values were >95% in only 3 cases. Conclusions: The multivariate regression model analysis in this study showed that the coverage of the target decreased further with reduced target volume, increasing the baseline drift, the rotation error, and the distance to the target.

Artificial intelligence applied to image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT): a systematic review by the Young Group of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (yAIRO)

INTRODUCTION

The advent of image-guided radiation therapy (IGRT) has recently changed the workflow of radiation treatments by ensuring highly collimated treatments. Artificial intelligence (AI) and radiomics are tools that have shown promising results for diagnosis, treatment optimization and outcome prediction. This review aims to assess the impact of AI and radiomics on modern IGRT modalities in RT.

METHODS

A PubMed/MEDLINE and Embase systematic review was conducted to investigate the impact of radiomics and AI to modern IGRT modalities. The search strategy was "Radiomics" AND "Cone Beam Computed Tomography"; "Radiomics" AND "Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy"; "Radiomics" AND "on board Magnetic Resonance Radiotherapy"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Cone Beam Computed Tomography"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "Magnetic Resonance guided Radiotherapy"; "Artificial Intelligence" AND "on board Magnetic Resonance Radiotherapy" and only original articles up to 01.11.2022 were considered.

RESULTS

A total of 402 studies were obtained using the previously mentioned search strategy on PubMed and Embase. The analysis was performed on a total of 84 papers obtained following the complete selection process. Radiomics application to IGRT was analyzed in 23 papers, while a total 61 papers were focused on the impact of AI on IGRT techniques.

DISCUSSION

AI and radiomics seem to significantly impact IGRT in all the phases of RT workflow, even if the evidence in the literature is based on retrospective data. Further studies are needed to confirm these tools' potential and provide a stronger correlation with clinical outcomes and gold-standard treatment strategies.

Comparison of baseline drifts using three reflector blocks versus using a single reflector block for the calibration of wall-mounted Respiratory Gating for Scanner (RGSC) camera integrated with a CT

BACKGROUND

The calibration of the Respiratory Gating for SCanner (RGSC) system is critical to achieve better and more stable accuracy. The current procedure for a wall-mounted RGSC system has a relatively large residual error.

PURPOSE

To compare the baseline drifts in the image acquisition of DIBH using three reflector blocks versus using a single reflector block in the calibration of a wall-mounted RGSC camera system.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Varian provides a calibration plate with three rows of calibration points: each row is separated by 15 cm longitudinally and by 10 cm laterally. In Varian's single-block calibration method, the reflector block was first placed on the center point of the calibration plate and aligned with the scanner isocenter. The calibration took a picture of the block, then placed the block on the other eight points sequentially. In the proposed three-block method, we placed three reflector blocks on the center row, with the center block aligned with the isocenter, and we took a picture of the center block by manually blocking the other two blocks in calibration. By moving the couch longitudinally in or out 15 cm, the calibration goes through all nine points. Monte Carlo simulation was done using Matlab to analyze the calibration matrix eigenvalue characteristics.

RESULTS

For a typical scan length of 40 cm of DIBH, the residual baseline drift in simulated DIBH is 0.02 ± 0.03  versus 0.30 ± 0.12 cm for three-block calibration and single-block calibration, respectively. To achieve 0.5 mm tolerance for the eigenvalue, the laser and reflector box should be within ±3 mm uncertainties based on the eigenvalue simulation.

CONCLUSION

Three-block calibration method effectively removes baseline drift caused by couch movement in DIBH/4D CT scan for the wall-mounted camera while the single-block calibration method still has significant residual baseline drift.

Local Control Following Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy for Liver Oligometastases: Lessons from a Quarter Century

The utilization of stereotactic body radiation therapy for the treatment of liver metastasis has been widely studied and has demonstrated favorable local control outcomes. However, several predictive factors play a crucial role in the efficacy of stereotactic body radiation therapy, such as the number and size (volume) of metastatic liver lesions, the primary tumor site (histology), molecular biomarkers (e.g., KRAS and TP53 mutation), the use of systemic therapy prior to SBRT, the radiation dose, and the use of advanced technology and organ motion management during SBRT. These prognostic factors need to be considered when clinical trials are designed to evaluate the efficacy of SBRT for liver metastases.

Online verification of breath-hold reproducibility using kV-triggered imaging for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy

PURPOSE

To introduce a new technique for online breath-hold verification for liver stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) based on kilovoltage-triggered imaging and liver dome positions.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty-five liver SBRT patients treated with deep inspiration breath-hold were included in this IRB-approved study. To verify the breath-hold reproducibility during treatment, a KV-triggered image was acquired at the beginning of each breath-hold. The liver dome position was visually compared with the expected upper/lower liver boundaries created by expanding/contracting the liver contour 5 mm in the superior-inferior direction. If the liver dome was within the boundaries, delivery continued; otherwise, beam was held manually, and the patient was instructed to take another breath-hold until the liver dome fell within boundaries. The liver dome was delineated on each triggered image. The mean distance between the delineated liver dome to the projected planning liver contour was defined as liver dome position error edome . The mean and maximum edome of each patient were compared between no breath-hold verification (all triggered images) and with online breath-hold verification (triggered images without beam-hold).

RESULTS

Seven hundred thirteen breath-hold triggered images from 92 fractions were analyzed. For each patient, an average of 1.5 breath-holds (range 0-7 for all patients) resulted in beam-hold, accounting for 5% (0-18%) of all breath-holds; online breath-hold verification reduced the mean edome from 3.1 mm (1.3-6.1 mm) to 2.7 mm (1.2-5.2 mm) and the maximum edome from 8.6 mm (3.0-18.0 mm) to 6.7 mm (3.0-9.0 mm). The percentage of breath-holds with edome >5 mm was reduced from 15% (0-42%) without breath-hold verification to 11% (0-35%) with online breath-hold verification. online breath-hold verification eliminated breath-holds with edome >10 mm, which happened in 3% (0-17%) of all breath-holds.

CONCLUSION

It is clinically feasible to monitor the reproducibility of each breath-hold during liver SBRT treatment using triggered images and liver dome. Online breath-hold verification improves the treatment accuracy for liver SBRT.

Novel breath-hold liver target stereotactic ablative radiotherapy using the intrafraction diaphragm registration of kilovoltage projection streaming image with digitally reconstructed radiography of the planning computed tomography

Stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) is an emerging treatment option for patients with primary or metastatic liver tumors, particularly for those who are not eligible for surgery or transplantation. SABR is a high-precision radiation therapy that delivers a high dose of radiation to the tumor while minimizing the dose to the surrounding healthy tissues. However, the accurate targeting of the tumor is a crucial aspect of liver SABR, which requires real-time imaging and tracking of the liver and tumor motion during treatment. One of the motion management strategies for liver SABR is the repeated breath-hold technique, which involves the patient holding their breath multiple times during treatment delivery to reduce the movement of the liver and other organs due to breathing. This technique helps to improve the accuracy of the treatment and reduce the radiation dose to the healthy liver. The current study proposes a novel approach for multiple breath-hold volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for liver tumors, which uses the intrafraction diaphragm registration in real time to improve the accuracy and precision of the treatment. The proposed approach is based on real-time comparison of the diaphragmatic surface location between the digitally reconstructed radiography (DRR) and intrafraction kilovoltage projection streaming images (kV-PSI) having the same beam angles. The image cross-correlation between the DRR and the intrafraction kV-PSI provides a measure of the similarity between the two images and can be used to identify and track the diaphragm position during VMAT delivery. The proposed methodology consists of several steps, including planning CT and treatment planning, reference image reconstruction, and patient positioning and immobilization. The proposed approach has the potential to improve the accuracy and precision of liver cancer VMAT SABR, thereby increasing the efficacy of the treatment and reducing the risk of radiation exposure to surrounding healthy tissues.

Dosimetric Comparison Study Between Free Breathing and Breath Hold Techniques in Patients Treated by Liver-Directed Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy

Background Breathing motion management is the key to delivering stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for liver lesions. This study aimed to compare the dosimetric parameters of liver SBRT using two different techniques: free breathing and breath hold. Method The study included 11 patients with liver metastases or hepatocellular carcinoma who underwent liver-directed SBRT. A dosimetric comparison was performed using dose-volume histogram analysis, evaluating parameters such as the maximum dose to 5 cc of bowel volume, mean liver dose (MLD), and liver V20 and V30. Statistical analyses were performed to compare results. Results The findings revealed that the breath hold technique resulted in significantly lower doses to the bowel and smaller volumes of normal liver tissue receiving 20 Gy (V20) and 30 Gy (V30) than the free breathing. Although there was no statistically significant difference in the MLD between the two techniques, the breath hold technique resulted in a lower MLD. Conclusion This dosimetric comparison study suggests that the breath hold technique is associated with lower radiation exposure to the bowel and normal liver tissues. Although this may not be feasible for all patients, it may be an appropriate procedure for selected individuals. Further research is needed to validate these findings in different patient populations and explore their impact on clinical outcomes and patient-reported quality of life.

The Role of Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy in the Management of Liver Metastases

The liver is a common site for metastatic spread for various primary tumor histologies. Stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) is a non-invasive treatment technique with broad patient candidacy for the ablation of tumors in the liver and other organs. SBRT involves focused, high-dose radiation therapy delivered in one to several treatments, resulting in high rates of local control. Use of SBRT for ablation of oligometastatic disease has increased in recent years and emerging prospective data have demonstrated improvements in progression free and overall survival in some settings. When delivering SBRT to liver metastases, clinicians must balance the priorities of delivering ablative tumor dosing while respecting dose constraints to surrounding organs at risk (OARs). Motion management techniques are crucial for meeting dose constraints, ensuring low rates of toxicity, maintaining quality of life, and can allow for dose escalation. Advanced radiotherapy delivery approaches including proton therapy, robotic radiotherapy, and real-time MR-guided radiotherapy may further improve the accuracy of liver SBRT. In this article, we review the rationale for oligometastases ablation, the clinical outcomes with liver SBRT, tumor dose and OAR considerations, and evolving strategies to improve liver SBRT delivery.

Quantifying 6D tumor motion and calculating PTV margins during liver stereotactic radiotherapy with fiducial tracking

Objective

Our study aims to estimate intra-fraction six-dimensional (6D) tumor motion with rotational correction and the related correlations between motions of different degrees of freedom (DoF), as well as quantify sufficient anisotropic clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins during stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of liver cancer with fiducial tracking technique.

Methods

A cohort of 12 patients who were implanted with 3 or 4 golden markers were included in this study, and 495 orthogonal kilovoltage (kV) pairs of images acquired during the first fraction were used to extract the spacial position of each golden marker. Translational and rotational motions of tumor were calculated based on the marker coordinates by using an iterative closest point (ICP) algorithm. Moreover, the Pearson product-moment correlation coefficients (r) were applied to quantify the correlations between motions with different degrees of freedom (DoFs). The population mean displacement (MP¯), systematic error (Σ) and random error (σ) were obtained to calculate PTV margins based on published recipes.

Results

The mean translational variability of tumors were 0.56, 1.24 and 3.38 mm in the left-right (LR, X), anterior-posterior (AP, Y), and superior-inferior (SI, Z) directions, respectively. The average rotational angles θX , θY and θZ around the three coordinate axes were 0.88, 1.24 and 1.12, respectively. (|r|&gt;0.4) was obtainted between Y -Z , Y - θZ , Z -θZ and θX - θY . The PTV margins calculated based on 13 published recipes in X, Y, and Z directions were 1.08, 2.26 and 5.42 mm, and the 95% confidence interval (CI) of them were (0.88,1.28), (1.99,2.53) and (4.78,6.05), respectively.

Conclusions

The maximum translational motion was in SI direction, and the largest correlation coefficient of Y-Z was obtained. We recommend margins of 2, 3 and 7 mm in LR, AP and SI directions, respectively.