Dosimetric impact of interfraction prostate and seminal vesicle volume changes and rotation: A post-hoc analysis of a phase III randomized trial of MRI-guided versus CT-guided stereotactic body radiotherapy

Impact of bladder volume and bladder shape on radiotherapy consistency and treatment interruption in prostate cancer patients

BACKGROUND

To investigate the effect of bladder volume (BV) and bladder shape on consistency and treatment interruption in prostate cancer radiotherapy (RT).

METHODS

A total of 275 patients who underwent radical prostate cancer RT in our institution from April 2015 to December 2022 were enrolled. Bladder height, bladder width, and bladder length were defined and recorded. The receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves were used to evaluate the best cut-off point for bladder shape. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyze the relationship between setup errors and bladder shapes and BV.

RESULTS

Based on the ROC curves for 275 patients, the bladder shapes were classified into three: (a) the elongated bladder, (b) the spherical bladder, and (c) the oval bladder. Sixty-six prostate cancer patients (1611 CBCTs) were randomly selected proportionally. It was found that bladder shape has a greater impact on setup errors than BV (BV: OR = 1.470, p = 0.037; bladder shape: OR = 2.013, p < 0.001), and the setup error of the spherical bladder in anterior-posterior (AP) direction was greater than the others (p < 0.001). In addition, the shape consistency of the spherical bladder was the worst (43.0%) during RT. Compared with the inconsistent group, the group with the same bladder shape had higher consistency in BV(CBCT/CT) (p < 0.001), and a smaller setup error in the AP direction (p < 0.001). Similarly, the treatment interruption fractions were highest in spherical bladder RT.

CONCLUSIONS

More specific bladder filling requirements should be developed for different bladder shapes. More attention should be paid to the spherical bladder for precise RT.

Simulation of Focal Boosting in Online Adaptive MRI-Guided SBRT for Patients With Locally Advanced Prostate Cancer With Seminal Vesicle Involvement

PURPOSE

To evaluate the feasibility and accuracy of focal boosting in online adaptive MRI-guided stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for patients with prostate cancer (PCa) with seminal vesicle invasion (T3b) by analyzing the impact of intrafraction motion on the dose planned for the gross tumor volume (GTV) and clinical target volume (CTV).

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Data from 23 patients with T1-T3a PCa who received focal boosting SBRT on a 1.5T MR-Linac was used. A radiation oncologist replaced clinical GTVs with artificial GTVs representative for T3b tumor(s). For each MRI used for daily adaptation (MRIadapt), an automated treatment plan was generated (Df1-5) using the adapted contours. Patients were planned to receive 35 Gy to the CTV, with an isotoxic focal boost to the GTV up to 50 Gy. During each fraction, an additional MRI was acquired to assess intrafraction motion (MRIduring). Dose accumulation of all fractions was performed by deformable registration of MRIadapt, f2-5 to MRIadapt, f1 (DACC, planned). The Df1-5 were projected to their corresponding MRIduring, which were used to reconstruct DACC, delivered, likewise. Our results were compared to patients with tumor(s) without seminal vesicle invasion (T1-T3a).

RESULTS

The median (10th-90th percentile) D98%ACC, planned to the GTV, which correlates most strongly with outcome, was 41.1 Gy (40.1-43.0 Gy) in the plans for patients with artificial T3b tumors, compared to 43.0 Gy (40.4-47.2 Gy) in the plans for patients with T1-T3a tumors. The D98%ACC, delivered to the GTV, taking into account intrafraction motion, was 41.0 Gy (39.3-42.6 Gy) and 42.5 Gy (40.0-46.6 Gy) in the plans for the artificial and clinical GTVs, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

MRI-guidance can ensure high accuracy of focal boosting in patients with T3b disease. Because of the unfavorable location of the GTV, a lower boost dose was feasible compared to patients with T1-T3a PCa.

Online Adaptive Five-Fraction Ablative Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer Using a Conventional Linear Accelerator

PURPOSE

To assess the dosimetric results of an online adaptive stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) program to treat patients with prostate cancer using a conventional linear accelerator.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Prostate SBRT with 5 fractions is performed at the Hospital Quirónsalud Barcelona using an online adaptive method previously described (Pract Radiat Oncol. 2022 Mar-Apr;12(2):e144-e152). A CBCT-based adaptive "plan-of-the-day" (POD) is generated for each treatment fraction, which consists of a single volumetric modulated arc therapy. A dosimetric evaluation of the PODs was performed for the first 20 patients and included analysis of the target (prostate), organs-at-risks (OARs), and patient-specific quality assurance (PSQA). Each of the PODs was also compared with the corresponding conventional image guided radiation therapy (IGRT) method. Finally, the adaptive treatment timing is analyzed for the 100 PODs in this study.

RESULTS

The online adaptive treatment method ensured optimal target coverage in all treatment fractions for all patients. However, the simulated IGRT plans did not result in adequate prostate coverage (V40 Gy ≥ 95%) in 70% of fractions. Small average differences between PODs and IGRT plans were found in the OARs. The dose sparing in the rectum and bladder provided by some simulated IGRT plans, was associated with a compromised prostate coverage. The PSQA resulted in an excellent agreement between the online-calculated plans and the independent dose checks performed for all 100 PODs. The average duration of the plan adaptation was 20.1 ± 6.1 minutes and the average overall session time including adaptation and treatment delivery was 26.0 ± 6.3 minutes.

CONCLUSIONS

The online adaptive program using a conventional linac to treat prostate cancer described in this study is clinically feasible and in adherence with the acceptance criteria set by the PACE B trial.

Treatment accuracy of standard linear accelerator-based prostate SBRT: the delivered dose assessment of patients treated within two major clinical trials using an in-house position monitoring system

Background and purpose

The purpose of this study was to assess the dosimetric improvements achieved in prostate stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) treatment within the PROMETHEUS and NINJA trials using an in-house real-time position monitoring system, SeedTracker.

Methods and materials

This study considered a total of 127 prostate SBRT patients treated in the PROMETHEUS (ACTRN12615000223538) and NINJA (ACTRN12618001806257) clinical trials. The SeedTracker position monitoring system was utilized for real-time position monitoring with a 3-mm position tolerance. The doses delivered to the clinical target volume (CTV), rectum, and bladder were assessed by incorporating the actual target position during treatment. The dose that would have been delivered without monitoring was also assessed by incorporating the observed position deviations.

Results

Treatment with position corrections resulted in a mean (range) CTV D99 difference of -0.3 (-1.0 to 0.0) Gy between the planned and delivered dose. Without corrections, this difference would have been -0.6 (-3.7 to 0.0) Gy. Not correcting for position deviations resulted in a statistically significant difference between the planned and delivered CTV D99 (p < 0.05). The mean (range) dose difference between the planned and delivered D2cc of the rectum and bladder for treatment with position corrections was -0.1 (-3.7 to 4.7) Gy and -0.1 (-1.7 to 0.5) Gy, respectively. Without corrections, these differences would have been -0.6 (-6.1 to 4.7) Gy and -0.2 (-2.5 to 0.9) Gy.

Conclusions

SeedTracker improved clinical dose volume compliance in prostate SBRT. Without monitoring and corrections, delivered dose would significantly differ from the planned dose.

Magnetic resonance image-guided adaptive radiotherapy enables safe CTV-to-PTV margin reduction in prostate cancer: a cine MRI motion study

Introduction

We aimed to establish if stereotactic body radiotherapy to the prostate can be delivered safely using reduced clinical target volume (CTV) to planning target volume (PTV) margins on the 1.5T MR-Linac (MRL) (Elekta, Stockholm, Sweden), in the absence of gating.

Methods

Cine images taken in 3 orthogonal planes during the delivery of prostate SBRT with 36.25 Gray (Gy) in 5 fractions on the MRL were analysed. Using the data from 20 patients, the percentage of radiotherapy (RT) delivery time where the prostate position moved beyond 1, 2, 3, 4 and 5 mm in the left-right (LR), superior-inferior (SI), anterior-posterior (AP) and any direction was calculated.

Results

The prostate moved less than 3 mm in any direction for 90% of the monitoring period in 95% of patients. On a per-fraction basis, 93% of fractions displayed motion in all directions within 3 mm for 90% of the fraction delivery time. Recurring motion patterns were observed showing that the prostate moved with shallow drift (most common), transient excursions and persistent excursions during treatment.

Conclusion

A 3 mm CTV-PTV margin is safe to use for the treatment of 5 fraction prostate SBRT on the MRL, without gating. In the context of gating this work suggests that treatment time will not be extensively lengthened when an appropriate gating window is applied.

Prostate volume variation during 1.5T MR-guided adaptive stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and correlation with treatment toxicity

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate prostate volume change during daily-adaptive prostate SBRT on 1.5 T MR-linac and to correlate it with treatment toxicity.

METHODS

a series of patients affected by low-to-intermediate risk prostate cancer was treated by 5-fraction SBRT within a prospective study (Prot. n° 23748). Total dose was 35 Gy and 36.25 Gy delivered every day or on alternate days. Treatment toxicity was recorded with the following patient reported outcomes (PROMs): IPSS, ICIQ-SF, and EPIC-26.

RESULTS

254 patients were included in the analysis. Baseline median CTV volume was 55 cc (range 15.3-163.3). Mean prostate volume were 58.9 cc, and 62.7 cc at first and last fraction respectively (mean volume increase 6.4 %; p = <0.0001). We observed prostate swelling (mean 15.4 % increase) in 50 % of cases, stable volume (≤5% volume change) in 39 % of patients, and prostate shrinkage in 11 % of cases (mean 12.2 % reduction). Baseline CTV > 55 cc showed a trend towards higher CTV shrinkage (-10.5 % versus -14.5 %; p = 0.052). We found no correlation between CTV change and PROMs. Prostate swelling was generally compensated by the planned PTV expansion, even though the mean setup volume dropped from 47.4 cc to 38.9 cc at last fraction, with few cases not covered by initial setup margins.

CONCLUSION

The present study reported a significant prostate volume change during prostate SBRT on 1.5T MR-linac. We observed both prostate swelling in half of cases and few cases of prostate shrinkage. No correlations were found with PROMs in this population treatment with daily-adaptive strategy.

MRI-Guided Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer: Seeing is Believing

The advent of MRI guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) offers enormous promise in the treatment of prostate cancer. The MR-linac offers men the opportunity to receive daily MR imaging to guide and influence their radiotherapy treatment. This review focuses on the advantages that MRIgRT potentially offers as well as any potential disadvantages to MRIgRT that may have been recognized thus far. Ongoing clinical trials evaluating this novel treatment platform for the treatment of prostate cancer are also discussed.

Real-time motion management in MRI-guided radiotherapy: Current status and AI-enabled prospects

MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) is a highly complex treatment modality, allowing adaptation to anatomical changes occurring from one treatment day to the other (inter-fractional), but also to motion occurring during a treatment fraction (intra-fractional). In this vision paper, we describe the different steps of intra-fractional motion management during MRIgRT, from imaging to beam adaptation, and the solutions currently available both clinically and at a research level. Furthermore, considering the latest developments in the literature, a workflow is foreseen in which motion-induced over- and/or under-dosage is compensated in 3D, with minimal impact to the radiotherapy treatment time. Considering the time constraints of real-time adaptation, a particular focus is put on artificial intelligence (AI) solutions as a fast and accurate alternative to conventional algorithms.

Quantitative assessment of adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer using deep learning: Bladder dose as a decision criterion

BACKGROUND

Adaptive radiotherapy (ART) can incorporate anatomical variations in a reoptimized treatment plan for fractionated radiotherapy. An automatic solution to objectively determine whether ART should be performed immediately after the daily image acquisition is highly desirable.

PURPOSE

We investigate a quantitative criterion for whether ART should be performed in prostate cancer radiotherapy by synthesizing pseudo-CT (sCT) images and evaluating dosimetric impact on treatment planning using deep learning approaches.

METHOD AND MATERIALS

Planning CT (pCT) and daily cone-beam CT (CBCT) data sets of 74 patients are used to train (60 patients) and evaluate (14 patients) a cycle adversarial generative network (CycleGAN) that performs the task of synthesizing high-quality sCT from daily CBCT. Automatic delineation (AD) of the bladder is performed on the sCT using the U-net. The combination of sCT and AD allows us to perform dose calculations based on the up-to-date bladder anatomy to determine whether the original treatment plan (ori-plan) is still applicable. For positive cases that the patients' anatomical changes and the associated dose calculations warrant re-planning, we made rapid plan revisions (re-plan) based on the ori-plan.

RESULTS

The mean absolute error within the region-of-interests (i.e., body, bladder, fat, muscle) between the sCT and pCT are 41.2, 25.1, 26.5, and 29.0HU, respectively. Taking the calculated results of pCT doses as the standard, for PTV, the gamma passing rates of sCT doses at 1 mm/1%, 2 mm/2% are 87.92%, 98.78%, respectively. The Dice coefficients of the AD-contours are 0.93 on pCT and 0.91 on sCT. According to the result of dose calculation, we found when the bladder volume underwent a substantial change (79.7%), the bladder dose is still within the safe limit, suggesting it is insufficient to solely use the bladder volume change as a criterion to determine whether adaptive treatment needs to be done. After AD-contours of the bladder using sCT, there are two cases whose bladder doseD mean > 4000 cGy ${{\mathrm{D}}}_{{\mathrm{mean}}} > 4000{\mathrm{\ cGy}}$ . For the two cases, we perform re-planning to reduce the bladder dose toD mean = 3841 cGy ${{\mathrm{D}}}_{{\mathrm{mean}}} = 3841{\mathrm{\ cGy}}$ ,D mean = 3580 cGy ${{\mathrm{D}}}_{{\mathrm{mean}}} = 3580{\mathrm{\ cGy\ }}$ under the condition that the PTV meets the prescribed dose.

CONCLUSION

We provide a dose accurate adaptive workflow for prostate cancer patients by using deep learning approaches, and implement ART that adapts to bladder dose. Of note, the specific replanning criterion for whether ART needs to be performed can adapt to different centers' choices based on their experience and daily observations.

MRI-Guided Radiation Therapy for Prostate Cancer: The Next Frontier in Ultrahypofractionation

Technological advances in MRI-guided radiation therapy (MRIgRT) have improved real-time visualization of the prostate and its surrounding structures over CT-guided radiation therapy. Seminal studies have demonstrated safe dose escalation achieved through ultrahypofractionation with MRIgRT due to planning target volume (PTV) margin reduction and treatment gating. On-table adaptation with MRI-based technologies can also incorporate real-time changes in target shape and volume and can reduce high doses of radiation to sensitive surrounding structures that may move into the treatment field. Ongoing clinical trials seek to refine ultrahypofractionated radiotherapy treatments for prostate cancer using MRIgRT. Though these studies have the potential to demonstrate improved biochemical control and reduced side effects, limitations concerning patient treatment times and operational workflows may preclude wide adoption of this technology outside of centers of excellence. In this review, we discuss the advantages and limitations of MRIgRT for prostate cancer, as well as clinical trials testing the efficacy and toxicity of ultrafractionation in patients with localized or post-prostatectomy recurrent prostate cancer.

Tumor volume changes during stereotactic ablative radiotherapy for adrenal gland metastases under MRI guidance

PURPOSE

Gross tumor volume (GTV) changes during stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR) for adrenal tumors are not well characterized. We studied treatment-induced GTV changes during, and after, 5-fraction MR-guided SABR on a 0.35 T unit.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Details of patients treated for adrenal metastases using 5-fraction adaptive MR-SABR were accessed. GTV changes between simulation and first fraction (ΔSF1) and all fractions were recorded. Wilcoxon paired tests were used for intrapatient comparisons. Logistic and linear regression models were used for features associated with dichotomous and continuous variables, respectively.

RESULTS

Once-daily fractions of 8 Gy or 10 Gy were delivered to 70 adrenal metastases. Median simulation-F1 interval was 13 days; F1-F5 interval was 13 days. Median baseline GTVs at simulation and F1 were 26.6 and 27.2 cc, respectively (p < 0.001). Mean ΔSF1 was + 9.1% (2.9 cc) relative to simulation; 47% of GTVs decreased in volume at F5 versus F1. GTV variations of ≥ 20% occurred in 59% treatments at some point between simulation to end SABR, and these did not correlate with baseline tumor characteristics. At a median follow-up of 20.3 months, a radiological complete response (CR) was seen in 23% of 64 evaluable patients. CR was associated with baseline GTV (p = 0.03) and ΔF1F5 (p = 0.03). Local relapses were seen in 6%.

CONCLUSION

Frequent changes in adrenal GTVs during 5-fraction SABR delivery support the use of on-couch adaptive replanning. The likelihood of a radiological CR correlates with the baseline GTV and intra-treatment GTV decline.

Comparing adaptation strategies in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate cancer: Implications for treatment margins

PURPOSE

To quantify the difference in accuracy of adapt-to-position (ATP), adapt-to-rotation (ATR) and adapt-to-shape (ATS) workflows used in MRI-guided online adaptive radiotherapy for prostate carcinoma (PCa) by evaluating the margins required to accommodate intra-fraction motion of the clinical target volumes for prostate (CTVpros), prostate including seminal vesicles (CTVpros + sv) and gross tumor volume (GTV).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Clinical delineations of the CTVpros, CTVpros + sv and GTV of 24 patients with intermediate- and high-risk PCa, treated using ATS on a 1.5 T MR-Linac, were used for analysis. Delineations were available pre- and during beam-on. To simulate ATP and ATR workflows, we automatically generated the structures associated with these workflows using rigid transformations from the planning-MRI to the daily online MRIs. Clinical GTVs were analyzed as ATR GTVs and only ATP GTVs were simulated. Planning target volumes (PTVs) were generated with isotropic margins ranging 0.0-5.0 mm. The volumetric overlap was calculated between these PTVs and their corresponding clinical delineation on the MRI acquired during beam-on and averaged over all treatment fractions.

RESULTS

The PTV margin required to cover > 95% of the CTVpros was equal (2.5 mm) for all workflows. For the CTVpros + sv, this margin increased to 5.0, 4.0 and 3.5 mm in the ATP, ATR and ATS workflow, respectively. GTV coverage improved from ATP to ATR for margins up to 4.0 mm.

CONCLUSION

ATP, ATR and ATS workflows ensure equal coverage of the CTVpros for the current clinical margins. For the CTVpros + sv, ATS showed optimal performance. GTV coverage improves by additional adaptations to prostate rotations.

Clinical Applications of Magnetic Resonance-Guided Radiotherapy: A Narrative Review

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) represents a promising new image guidance technology for radiation treatment delivery combining an onboard MRI scanner with radiation delivery technology. By enabling real-time low-field or high-field MRI acquisition, it facilitates improved soft tissue delineation, adaptive treatment, and motion management. Now that MRgRT has been available for nearly a decade, research has shown the technology can be used to effectively shrink treatment margins to either decrease toxicity (in breast, prostate cancer, and pancreatic cancer) or facilitate dose-escalation and improved oncologic outcomes (in pancreatic and liver cancer), as well as enabling indications that require clear soft tissue delineation and gating (lung and cardiac ablation). In doing so, the use of MRgRT has the potential to significantly improve the outcomes and quality of life of the patients it treats. The present narrative review aims to describe the rationale for MRgRT, the current and forthcoming state of technology, existing studies, and future directions for the advancement of MRgRT, including associated challenges.

Advancing the treatment of localized prostate cancer with MR-guided radiotherapy

External beam radiotherapy (EBRT) is an important cornerstone in the treatment of localized prostate cancer. Current image-guided radiotherapy (IGRT) techniques allow for more accurate and precise delivery of radiation treatment by the use of imaging before each fraction. Magnetic resonance guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) is the next step in IGRT with hybrid systems combining linear accelerators with MRI-scanners. With MRgRT, it is possible to visualize pelvic anatomy in great detail and subsequently perform replanning of the radiation dose distribution before each radiotherapy fraction. This technique has the potential to increase the therapeutic window of EBRT, by improved normal tissue sparing due to margin reduction and more accurate target dose delivery. This is particularly promising for prostate cancer, with its biology lending itself to ultra-hypofractionation, reducing radiotherapy treatment to as little as five fractions. Also, recent studies have shown that focal dose escalation to the intraprostatic tumor to high ablative doses can substantially increase disease-free survival. In this article, we discuss these unique opportunities as well as the potential future benefits of MRgRT in prostate cancer treatment.

Dosimetric Impact of Intrafraction Prostate Motion and Interfraction Anatomical Changes in Dose-Escalated Linac-Based SBRT

The dosimetric impact of intrafraction prostate motion and interfraction anatomical changes and the effect of beam gating and motion correction were investigated in dose-escalated linac-based SBRT. Fifty-six gated fractions were delivered using a novel electromagnetic tracking device with a 2 mm threshold. Real-time prostate motion data were incorporated into the patient's original plan with an isocenter shift method. Delivered dose distributions were obtained by recalculating these motion-encoded plans on deformed CTs reflecting the patient's CBCT daily anatomy. Non-gated treatments were simulated using the prostate motion data assuming that no treatment interruptions have occurred. The mean relative dose differences between delivered and planned treatments were -3.0% [-18.5-2.8] for CTV D99% and -2.6% [-17.8-1.0] for PTV D95%. The median cumulative CTV coverage with 93% of the prescribed dose was satisfactory. Urethra sparing was slightly degraded, with the maximum dose increased by only 1.0% on average, and a mean reduction in the rectum and bladder doses was seen in almost all dose metrics. Intrafraction prostate motion marginally contributed in gated treatments, while in non-gated treatments, further deteriorations in the minimum target coverage and bladder dose metrics would have occurred on average. The implemented motion management strategy and the strict patient preparation regimen, along with other treatment optimization strategies, ensured no significant degradations of dose metrics in delivered treatments.

Quality-of-Life Outcomes and Toxicity Profile Among Patients With Localized Prostate Cancer After Radical Prostatectomy Treated With Stereotactic Body Radiation: The SCIMITAR Multicenter Phase 2 Trial

PURPOSE

Postoperative radiation therapy (RT) is an underused standard-of-care intervention for patients with prostate cancer and recurrence/adverse pathologic features after radical prostatectomy. Although stereotactic body RT (SBRT) is a well-studied and convenient option for definitive treatment, data on the postprostatectomy setting are extremely limited. The purpose of this study was to evaluate short-term physician-scored genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities and patient-reported outcomes after postprostatectomy SBRT.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

The SCIMITAR trial was a phase 2, dual-center, open-label, single-arm trial that enrolled patients with postoperative prostate-specific antigen >0.03 ng/mL or adverse pathologic features. Coprimary endpoints were 4-year biochemical recurrence-free survival, physician-scored acute and late GU and GI toxicities by the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (version 4.03) scale, and patient-reported quality-of-life (QOL) outcomes, as represented by the Expanded Prostate Cancer Index-26 and the International Prostate Symptom Score. Patients received SBRT 30 to 34 Gy/5 fractions to the prostate bed ± bed boost ± pelvic nodes with computed tomography (CTgRT) or magnetic resonance imaging guidance (MRgRT) in a nonrandomized fashion. Physician-scored toxicities and patient-reported QOL outcomes were collected at baseline and at 1, 3, and 6 months of follow-up. Univariable and multivariable analyses were performed to evaluate predictors of toxicities and QOL outcomes.

RESULTS

One hundred participants were enrolled (CTgRT, n = 69; MRgRT, n = 31). The median follow-up was 29.5 months (CTgRT: 33.3 months, MRgRT: 22.6 months). The median (range) prostate bed dose was 32 (30-34) Gy. Acute and late grade 2 GU toxicities were both 9% while acute and late grade 2 GI toxicities were 5% and 0%, respectively. Three patients had grade 3 toxicity (n = 1 GU, n = 2 GI). No patient receiving MRgRT had grade 3 GU or grade ≥2 GI toxicity. Compared with CTgRT, MRgRT was associated with a 30.5% (95% confidence interval, 11.6%-49.5%) reduction in any-grade acute GI toxicity (P = .006). MRgRT was independently associated with improved any-grade GI toxicity and improved bowel QOL.

CONCLUSIONS

Postprostatectomy SBRT was well tolerated at short-term follow-up. MRgRT may decrease GI toxicity. Longer toxicity and/or efficacy follow-up and randomized studies are needed.

Reducing PTV margins for prostate SBRT with motion compensation and gating techniques

The purpose of this study is to investigate the dosimetric accuracy of prostate SBRT when motion is considered. To account for target movement, motion compensation and gating techniques were investigated with PTV margins reduced to 2 mm. To allow for dosimetric measurements a Delta4 phantom, Gafchromic film, and Hexamotion motion platform were utilized. Four motion files were utilized that represent a range of motions. Analysis of measured prostate motions for fifteen patients was performed to ensure detected motions were similar to those previously reported and motion files utilized were suitable. Five patient plans were utilized to allow for the effects of MLC and target motion interplay to be investigated. For both motion compensation and gating techniques, plans were delivered to the stationary phantom and for each of four motion types with/without compensation/gating enabled. Using a 3%, 2 mm and 80% threshold gamma criteria, film measurements had an average pass rate of 80.5% for uncorrected deliveries versus 96.0% for motion compensated deliveries. For gated techniques average pass rates increased from 89.9% for uncorrected to 94.8% with gating enabled. Measurements with the Delta4 arrays were analyzed with a 3%, 2 mm and 10% threshold dose. An average pass rate of 83.8% was measured for uncorrected motions versus 94.8% with motion compensation. For the gated technique an average pass rate of 87.2% was found for uncorrected motions versus 96.9% with gating enabled. These results show that very high gamma pass rates are achievable when motion compensation or gating techniques are applied. When target motion is not accounted for shifts up to 5 mm in planned versus delivered isodose distributions were found. However, when motion compensation, or gated techniques were applied, much smaller differences between planned and delivered isodose distributions were found. With these techniques dose delivery accuracy is greatly improved, allowing for PTV margins to be reduced.

Prostate Volume Changes during Extreme and Moderately Hypofractionated Magnetic Resonance Image-guided Radiotherapy

AIMS

Prostate morphological changes during external beam radiotherapy are poorly understood. Excellent soft-tissue visualisation offered by magnetic resonance image-guided radiotherapy (MRIgRT) provides an opportunity to better understand such changes. The aim of this study was to quantify prostate volume and dimension changes occurring during extreme and moderately hypofractionated schedules.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Forty prostate cancer patients treated on the Unity 1.5 Tesla magnetic resonance linear accelerator (MRL) were retrospectively reviewed. The cohort comprised patients treated with 36.25 Gy in five fractions (n = 20) and 60 Gy in 20 fractions (n = 20). The volume of the delineated prostates on reference planning computed tomography (fused with MRI) and daily T2-weighted 2-min session images acquired on Unity were charted. Forty planning computed tomography and 500 MRL prostate volumes were evaluated. The mean absolute and relative change in prostate volume during radiotherapy was compared using a paired t-test (P value <0.01 considered significant to control for multiple comparisons). The maximum dimension of the delineated prostate was measured in three isocentric planes.

RESULTS

Significant prostate volume changes, relative to MRL imaging fraction 1 (MRL#1), were seen at all time points for the five-fraction group. The peak mean relative volume increase was 21% (P < 0.001), occurring at MRL#3 and MRL#4 after 14.5 and 21.75 Gy, respectively. Prostate expansion was greatest in the superior-inferior direction; the peak mean maximal extension was 5.9 mm. The maximal extension in the left-right and anterior-posterior directions measured 1.1 and 2.2 mm, respectively. For the 20-fraction group, prostate volume increased relative to MRL#1, for all treatment time points. The mean relative volume increase was 11% (P < 0.001) at MRL#5 after 12 Gy, it then fluctuated between 8 and 13%. From MRL#5 to MRL#20, the volume increase was significant (P < 0.01) for 12 of 16 time points calculated. The peak mean maximal extension in the superior-inferior direction was 3.1 mm. The maximal extension in the left-right and anterior-posterior directions measured 1.7 and 3.7 mm, respectively.

CONCLUSION

Significant prostate volume and dimension changes occur during extreme and moderately hypofractionated radiotherapy. The extent of change was greater during extreme hypofractionation. MRIgRT offers the opportunity to reveal, quantify and correct for this deformation.

Urethral Interfractional Geometric and Dosimetric Variations of Prostate Cancer Patients: A Study Using an Onboard MRI

Purpose

For a cohort of prostate cancer patients treated on an MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) system, we retrospectively analyzed urethral interfractional geometric and dosimetric variations based on onboard MRIs acquired at different timepoints and evaluated onboard prostatic urethra visualization for urethra-focused online adaptive RT.

Methods

Twenty-six prostate cancer patients were prospectively scanned on a 0.35-T MRgRT system using an optimized T2-weighted HASTE sequence at simulation and final fraction. Two radiation oncologists (RO1 and RO2) contoured the urethras on all HASTE images. The simulation and final fraction HASTE images were rigidly registered, and urethral interobserver and interfractional geometric variation was evaluated using the 95th percentile Hausdorff distance (HD95), mean distance to agreement (MDA), center-of-mass shift (COMS), and DICE coefficient. For dosimetric analysis, simulation and final fraction HASTE images were registered to the 3D bSSFP planning MRI and 3D bSSFP final setup MRI, respectively. Both ROs’ urethra contours were transferred from HASTE images for initial treatment plan optimization and final fraction dose estimation separately. Stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) plans, 40 Gy in 5 fractions, were optimized to meet clinical constraints, including urethral V42Gy ≤0.03 cc, on the planning MRI. The initial plan was then forward calculated on the final setup MRI to estimate urethral dose on the final fraction and evaluate urethral dosimetric impact due to anatomy change.

Results

The average interobserver HD95, MDA, COMS, and DICE were 2.85 ± 1.34 mm, 1.02 ± 0.36 mm, 3.16 ± 1.61 mm, and 0.58 ± 0.15, respectively. The average interfractional HD95, MDA, COMS, and DICE were 3.26 ± 1.54 mm, 1.29 ± 0.54 mm, 3.34 ± 2.01 mm, and 0.49 ± 0.18, respectively. All patient simulation MRgRT plans met all clinical constraints. For RO1 and RO2, 23/26 (88%) and 21/26 (81%) patients’ final fraction estimated urethral dose did not meet the planned constraint. The average urethral V42Gy change was 0.48 ± 0.58 cc.

Conclusion

Urethral interfractional motion and anatomic change can result in daily treatment violating urethral constraints. Onboard MRI with good visualization of the prostatic urethra can be a valuable tool to help better protect the urethra through patient setup or online adaptive RT.

Magnetic resonance imaging-guided radiotherapy for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer: Trade-off between planning target volume margin and online plan adaption

Magnetic resonance-guided radiotherapy with daily plan adaptation for intermediate- and high-risk prostate cancer is time and labor intensive. Fifty adapted plans with 3 mm planning target volume (PTV)-margin were compared with non-adapted plans using 3 or 5 mm margins. Adequate (V95% ≥ 95%) prostate coverage was achieved in 49 fractions with 5 mm PTV without plan adaptation, however, coverage of the seminal vesicles (SV) was insufficient in 15 of 50 fractions. There was no insufficient coverage for prostate and SV using plan adaptation with 3 mm. Hence, daily adaptation is recommended to obtain adequate SV-coverage when using 3 mm PTV.

Radiation-induced prostate swelling during SBRT of the prostate

BACKGROUND

Reduced planning target volume (PTV) margins are commonly used in stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of the prostate. In addition, MR-only treatment planning is becoming more common in prostate radiotherapy and compared to CT-MRI-based contouring results in notable smaller clinical target volume (CTV). Tight PTV margins coupled with MR-only planning raise a concern whether the margins are adequate enough to cover possible volumetric changes of the prostate. The aim of this study was to evaluate the volumetric change of the prostate and its effect on PTV margin during 5x7.25 Gy SBRT of the prostate.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

Twenty patients were included in the study. Three MRI scans, first prior to treatment (baseline), second after third fraction (mid-treatment) and third after fifth fraction (end-treatment) were acquired for each patient. Prostate contours were delineated on each MRI scan and used to assess the prostate volume and maximum prostate diameter on left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP) and superior-inferior (SI) directions at baseline, mid- and end-treatment.

RESULTS

Median (IQR) change in the prostate volume relative to the baseline was 12.0% (3.1, 17.7) and 9.2% (2.0, 18.9) at the mid- and end-treatment, respectively, and the change was statistically significant (p = 0.004 and p = 0.020, respectively). Compared to the baseline, median increase in the maximum LR, SI and AP prostate diameters were 0.8, 2.3 and 1.5 mm at mid-treatment, and 0.5, 2.5 and 2.3 mm at end-treatment, respectively.

CONCLUSION

If prostate contouring is based solely on MRI (e.g., in MR-only protocol), additional margin of 1-2 mm should be considered to account for prostate swelling. The study is part of clinical trial NCT02319239.