1
|
Pierrard J, Deheneffe S, Dechambre D, Sterpin E, Geets X, Van Ooteghem G. Markerless liver online adaptive stereotactic radiotherapy: feasibility analysisCervantes. Phys Med Biol 2024; 69:095015. [PMID: 38565128 DOI: 10.1088/1361-6560/ad39a1] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2023] [Accepted: 04/02/2024] [Indexed: 04/04/2024]
Abstract
Objective. Radio-opaque markers are recommended for image-guided radiotherapy in liver stereotactic ablative radiotherapy (SABR), but their implantation is invasive. We evaluate in thisin-silicostudy the feasibility of cone-beam computed tomography-guided stereotactic online-adaptive radiotherapy (CBCT-STAR) to propagate the target volumes without implanting radio-opaque markers and assess its consequence on the margin that should be used in that context.Approach. An emulator of a CBCT-STAR-dedicated treatment planning system was used to generate plans for 32 liver SABR patients. Three target volume propagation strategies were compared, analysing the volume difference between the GTVPropagatedand the GTVConventional, the vector lengths between their centres of mass (lCoM), and the 95th percentile of the Hausdorff distance between these two volumes (HD95). These propagation strategies were: (1) structure-guided deformable registration with deformable GTV propagation; (2) rigid registration with rigid GTV propagation; and (3) image-guided deformable registration with rigid GTV propagation. Adaptive margin calculation integrated propagation errors, while interfraction position errors were removed. Scheduled plans (PlanNon-adaptive) and daily-adapted plans (PlanAdaptive) were compared for each treatment fraction.Main results.The image-guided deformable registration with rigid GTV propagation was the best propagation strategy regarding tolCoM(mean: 4.3 +/- 2.1 mm), HD95 (mean 4.8 +/- 3.2 mm) and volume preservation between GTVPropagatedand GTVConventional. This resulted in a planning target volume (PTV) margin increase (+69.1% in volume on average). Online adaptation (PlanAdaptive) reduced the violation rate of the most important dose constraints ('priority 1 constraints', 4.2 versus 0.9%, respectively;p< 0.001) and even improved target volume coverage compared to non-adaptive plans (PlanNon-adaptive).Significance. Markerless CBCT-STAR for liver tumours is feasible using Image-guided deformable registration with rigid GTV propagation. Despite the cost in terms of PTV volumes, daily adaptation reduces constraints violation and restores target volumes coverage.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Julien Pierrard
- UCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Stéphanie Deheneffe
- Radiation Oncology Department, CHU-UCL-Namur, Site Sainte-Elisabeth, B-5000 Namur, Belgium
| | - David Dechambre
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Edmond Sterpin
- UCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
- KU Leuven, Department of Oncology, Laboratory of Experimental Radiotherapy, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium
| | - Xavier Geets
- UCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| | - Geneviève Van Ooteghem
- UCLouvain, Institut de Recherche Experimentale et Clinique (IREC), Center of Molecular Imaging, Radiotherapy and Oncology (MIRO), B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
- Radiation Oncology Department, Cliniques Universitaires Saint-Luc, B-1200 Brussels, Belgium
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prime S, Schiff JP, Hosni A, Stanescu T, Dawson LA, Henke LE. The Use of MR-Guided Radiation Therapy for Liver Cancer. Semin Radiat Oncol 2024; 34:36-44. [PMID: 38105091 DOI: 10.1016/j.semradonc.2023.10.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/19/2023]
Abstract
The role of radiotherapy in the management of primary and metastatic liver malignancies has expanded in recent years due to advances such as IGRT and SBRT. MRI-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) has arisen as an excellent option for the management of hepatocellular carcinoma, cholangiocarcinoma, and liver metastases due to the ability to combine improved hepatic imaging with conformal treatment planning paradigms like adaptive radiotherapy and advanced motion management techniques. Herein we review the data for MRgRT for liver malignancies, as well as describe workflow and technical considerations for the 2 commercially available MRgRT delivery platforms.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sabrina Prime
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO
| | - Joshua P Schiff
- Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Department of Radiation Oncology, St. Louis, MO
| | - Ali Hosni
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Teodor Stanescu
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Laura A Dawson
- Radiation Medicine Program, Princess Margaret Cancer Centre, Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada
| | - Lauren E Henke
- University Hospitals/Case Western Reserve University, Department of Radiation Oncology, Cleveland, OH.
| |
Collapse
|