1
|
Lawrence PT, Daniels AS, Tierney AJ, Sykes ECH, Mace CR. Ligand Shell Thickness of PEGylated Gold Nanoparticles Controls Cellular Uptake and Radiation Enhancement. ACS OMEGA 2024; 9:36847-36856. [PMID: 39220474 PMCID: PMC11360023 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.4c06568] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/16/2024] [Accepted: 07/25/2024] [Indexed: 09/04/2024]
Abstract
The drive to improve the safety and efficacy of radiotherapies for cancers has prompted the development of nanomaterials that can locally amplify the radiation dose at a tumor without damaging the surrounding healthy tissue. Gold nanoparticles (Au NPs), in particular, exhibit promising radiosensitizing properties under kilovolt X-ray exposure, although the precise mechanism behind this enhancement is not fully understood. While most studies recognize the involvement of factors such as core composition, size, shape, and ligand chemistry in the effectiveness of Au NPs for radiation-induced cancer treatment, there is a scarcity of direct assessments that connect the photophysical properties of the nanomaterial with the observed cellular or biological outcomes. Despite previous evidence of low-energy electron (LEE) emission from Au NPs and their potential to initiate biological damage, to our knowledge, no studies directly correlate the secondary LEE emission with radiation-induced cell death. In this study we assessed Au NPs functionalized with polyethylene glycol (PEG) ligands of varying molecular weights and lengths (1, 5, and 20 kDa PEG) as potential radiosensitizers of A549 lung cancer cells using kilovolt X-ray source potentials (33-130 kVp). We assessed NP internalization using mass cytometry, radiation dose enhancement using clonogenic survival assays, and secondary LEE emission using a retarding field analyzer. Results reveal a statistically significant difference in cellular uptake and radiation dose enhancement for 5 kDa PEG-Au NPs compared to formulations using 1 and 20 kDa PEG, while analysis of secondary LEE emission spectra demonstrated that differences in the length of the PEG ligand did not cause statistically significant attenuation of secondary LEE flux. Consequently, we inferred increased cellular uptake of NPs to be the cause for the observed enhancement in radiosensitivity for 5 kDa PEGylated Au NPs. The approach used in this study establishes a more complete workflow for designing and characterizing the performance of nanomaterial radiosensitizers, allowing for quantification of secondary LEEs and cellular uptake, and ultimately correlation with localized dose enhancement that leads to cell death.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Paul T. Lawrence
- Department of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States
| | - Avery S. Daniels
- Department of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States
| | - Allison J. Tierney
- Department of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States
| | - E. Charles H. Sykes
- Department of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States
| | - Charles R. Mace
- Department of Chemistry, Tufts University, Medford, Massachusetts 02155, United States
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Li WB, Stangl S, Klapproth A, Shevtsov M, Hernandez A, Kimm MA, Schuemann J, Qiu R, Michalke B, Bernal MA, Li J, Hürkamp K, Zhang Y, Multhoff G. Application of High-Z Gold Nanoparticles in Targeted Cancer Radiotherapy-Pharmacokinetic Modeling, Monte Carlo Simulation and Radiobiological Effect Modeling. Cancers (Basel) 2021; 13:5370. [PMID: 34771534 PMCID: PMC8582555 DOI: 10.3390/cancers13215370] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/29/2021] [Revised: 10/20/2021] [Accepted: 10/22/2021] [Indexed: 02/05/2023] Open
Abstract
High-Z gold nanoparticles (AuNPs) conjugated to a targeting antibody can help to improve tumor control in radiotherapy while simultaneously minimizing radiotoxicity to adjacent healthy tissue. This paper summarizes the main findings of a joint research program which applied AuNP-conjugates in preclinical modeling of radiotherapy at the Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technical University of Munich and Helmholtz Zentrum München. A pharmacokinetic model of superparamagnetic iron oxide nanoparticles was developed in preparation for a model simulating the uptake and distribution of AuNPs in mice. Multi-scale Monte Carlo simulations were performed on a single AuNP and multiple AuNPs in tumor cells at cellular and molecular levels to determine enhancements in the radiation dose and generation of chemical radicals in close proximity to AuNPs. A biologically based mathematical model was developed to predict the biological response of AuNPs in radiation enhancement. Although simulations of a single AuNP demonstrated a clear dose enhancement, simulations relating to the generation of chemical radicals and the induction of DNA strand breaks induced by multiple AuNPs showed only a minor dose enhancement. The differences in the simulated enhancements at molecular and cellular levels indicate that further investigations are necessary to better understand the impact of the physical, chemical, and biological parameters in preclinical experimental settings prior to a translation of these AuNPs models into targeted cancer radiotherapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Wei Bo Li
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (A.K.); (K.H.)
| | - Stefan Stangl
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München (TranslaTUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (M.S.); (A.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technishe Universität München (TUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Alexander Klapproth
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (A.K.); (K.H.)
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München (TranslaTUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (M.S.); (A.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technishe Universität München (TUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Maxim Shevtsov
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München (TranslaTUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (M.S.); (A.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technishe Universität München (TUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
- Personalized Medicine Centre, Almazov National Medical Research Centre, 2 Akkuratova Str., 197341 Saint Petersburg, Russia
- Laboratory of Biomedical Nanotechnologies, Institute of Cytology of the Russian Academy of Sciences (RAS), Tikhoretsky Ave., 4, 194064 Saint Petersburg, Russia
| | - Alicia Hernandez
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München (TranslaTUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (M.S.); (A.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technishe Universität München (TUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| | - Melanie A. Kimm
- Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Technische Universität München (TUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, 81675 Munich, Germany;
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81337 Munich, Germany;
| | - Jan Schuemann
- Physics Division, Department of Radiation Oncology, Massachusetts General Hospital (MGH) & Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA 02114, USA;
| | - Rui Qiu
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China;
| | - Bernhard Michalke
- Research Unit Analytical BioGeoChemistry, Helmholz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), 85764 Neuherberg, Germany;
| | - Mario A. Bernal
- Gleb Wataghin Institute of Physics, State University of Campinas, Campinas 13083-859, SP, Brazil;
| | - Junli Li
- Department of Radiology, University Hospital, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, 81337 Munich, Germany;
| | - Kerstin Hürkamp
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München-German Research Center for Environmental Health (GmbH), 85764 Neuherberg, Germany; (A.K.); (K.H.)
| | - Yibao Zhang
- Key Laboratory of Carcinogenesis and Translational Research (Ministry of Education), Department of Radiation Oncology, Peking University Cancer Hospital & Institute, Beijing 100142, China;
| | - Gabriele Multhoff
- Center for Translational Cancer Research, Technische Universität München (TranslaTUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Einsteinstr. 25, 81675 Munich, Germany; (S.S.); (M.S.); (A.H.)
- Department of Radiation Oncology, Technishe Universität München (TUM), Klinikum Rechts der Isar, Ismaningerstr. 22, 81675 Munich, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Rabus H, Li WB, Villagrasa C, Schuemann J, Hepperle PA, de la Fuente Rosales L, Beuve M, Di Maria S, Klapproth AP, Li CY, Poignant F, Rudek B, Nettelbeck H. Intercomparison of Monte Carlo calculated dose enhancement ratios for gold nanoparticles irradiated by X-rays: Assessing the uncertainty and correct methodology for extended beams. Phys Med 2021; 84:241-253. [PMID: 33766478 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 16] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/09/2020] [Revised: 02/24/2021] [Accepted: 03/01/2021] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
Results of a Monte Carlo code intercomparison exercise for simulations of the dose enhancement from a gold nanoparticle (GNP) irradiated by X-rays have been recently reported. To highlight potential differences between codes, the dose enhancement ratios (DERs) were shown for the narrow-beam geometry used in the simulations, which leads to values significantly higher than unity over distances in the order of several tens of micrometers from the GNP surface. As it has come to our attention that the figures in our paper have given rise to misinterpretation as showing 'the' DERs of GNPs under diagnostic X-ray irradiation, this article presents estimates of the DERs that would have been obtained with realistic radiation field extensions and presence of secondary particle equilibrium (SPE). These DER values are much smaller than those for a narrow-beam irradiation shown in our paper, and significant dose enhancement is only found within a few hundred nanometers around the GNP. The approach used to obtain these estimates required the development of a methodology to identify and, where possible, correct results from simulations whose implementation deviated from the initial exercise definition. Based on this methodology, literature on Monte Carlo simulated DERs has been critically assessed.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- H Rabus
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany; European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) e.V, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - W B Li
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) e.V, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - C Villagrasa
- Institut de Radioprotection et de Sûreté Nucléaire, Fontenay-Aux-Roses, France; European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) e.V, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - J Schuemann
- Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, MA, USA; European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) e.V, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - P A Hepperle
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany; Leibniz Universität Hannover, Hannover, Germany
| | | | - M Beuve
- Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) e.V, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - S Di Maria
- Centro de Ciências e Tecnologias Nucleares, Instituto Superior Técnico, Universidade de Lisboa, Bobadela LRS, Portugal; European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) e.V, Neuherberg, Germany
| | - A P Klapproth
- Institute of Radiation Medicine, Helmholtz Zentrum München - German Research Center for Environmental Health, Neuherberg, Germany; TranslaTUM, Klinikum rechts der Isar, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany
| | - C Y Li
- Department of Engineering Physics, Tsinghua University, Beijing, China; Nuctech Company Limited, Beijing, China
| | - F Poignant
- Institut de Physique des 2 Infinis, Université Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Villeurbanne, France; NASA Langley Research Center, Hampton, VA, USA
| | - B Rudek
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany; Massachusetts General Hospital & Harvard Medical School, Department of Radiation Oncology, Boston, MA, USA; Perlmutter Cancer Center, NYU Langone Health, New York City, NY, USA
| | - H Nettelbeck
- Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, Braunschweig and Berlin, Germany; European Radiation Dosimetry Group (EURADOS) e.V, Neuherberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|