Cryopreserved embryo transfer in an artificial cycle: is GnRH agonist down-regulation necessary?

Effect of GnRH agonist down-regulation combined with hormone replacement treatment on reproductive outcomes of frozen blastocyst transfer cycles in women of different ages

Objective

To investigate the effect of GnRH agonist (GnRH-a) down-regulation prior to hormone replacement treatment (HRT) to prepare the endometrium in frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycles in women of different ages.

Methods

This was a retrospective study, and after excluding patients with adenomyosis, endometriosis, severe endometrial adhesions, polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and repeated embryo implantation failures, a total of 4,091 HRT cycles were collected. Patients were divided into group A (<35 years old) and group B (≥35 years old), and each group was further divided into HRT and GnRHa-HRT groups. The clinical outcomes were compared between groups.

Results

There was no statistically significant difference in clinical outcomes between the HRT and GnRHa-HRT groups among women aged <35 years. In women of advanced age, higher rates of clinical pregnancy and live birth were seen in the GnRHa-HRT group. Logistic regression analysis showed that female age and number of embryos transferred influenced the live birth rate in FET cycles, and in women aged ≥ 35 years, the use of GnRH-a down-regulation prior to HRT improved pregnancy outcomes.

Conclusions

In elderly woman without adenomyosis, endometriosis, PCOS, severe uterine adhesions, and RIF, hormone replacement treatment with GnRH agonist for pituitary suppression can improve the live birth rate of FET cycles.

Pituitary Suppression with Gonadotropin-Releasing Hormone Agonist Prior to Artificial Endometrial Preparation in Frozen-Thawed Embryo Transfer Cycles: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Different Protocols and Infertile Populations

This study investigates the effect of GnRHa pretreatment on pregnancy outcomes in artificial endometrial preparation for frozen-thawed embryo transfer (AC-FET) cycles. A systematic review of English language studies published before 1 September 2022, was conducted, excluding conference papers and preprints. Forty-one studies involving 43,021 participants were analyzed using meta-analysis, with a sensitivity analysis ensuring result robustness. The study found that GnRHa pretreatment generally improved the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), implantation rate (IR), and live birth rate (LBR). However, discrepancies existed between randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational studies; RCTs showed no significant differences in outcomes for GnRHa-treated cycles. Depot GnRHa protocols outperformed daily regimens in LBR. Extended GnRHa pretreatment (two to five cycles) significantly improved CPR and IR compared to shorter treatment. Women with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) saw substantial benefits from GnRHa pretreatment, including improved CPR and LBR and reduced miscarriage rates. In contrast, no significant benefits were observed in women with regular menstruation. More rigorous research is needed to solidify these findings.

Pretreatment with a long-acting GnRH agonist for frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycles: how to improve live birth?

BACKGROUND

Whether pretreatment with gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) can improve the pregnancy outcomes in frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles is controversial. The inconsistencies in the results of different studies would be related to the characteristics of the included patients and the protocol of GnRHa use. In this study, we investigated the efficacy of pretreatment with a long-acting GnRH agonist in the early follicular phase of FET cycles and determined which population was suitable for the protocol.

RESULTS

We retrospectively included 630 and 1141 patients in the GnRHa FET and hormone replacement treatment (HRT) FET without GnRHa groups respectively, between October 2017 and March 2019 at a university-affiliated in vitro fertilization center. On the second or third day of menstruation, 3.75 mg of leuprorelin was administered. After 14 days, HRT was initiated for endometrial preparation. No significant differences were observed between the two groups in terms of patient characteristics. However, the GnRHa FET group showed a higher percentage of endometrium with a triple line pattern (94.8% vs 89.6%, p < 0.001) on the day of progesterone administration, with increased implantation (35.6% vs 29.8%, p = 0.005), clinical pregnancy (49.8% vs 43.3%, p = 0.008), and live birth rate (39.4% vs 33.7%, p = 0.016), than the HRT FET cycles with similar endometrial thickness, ectopic pregnancy and early miscarriage rates. Binary logistic regression analysis showed the GnRHa FET group to be associated with an increased chance of clinical pregnancy (P=0.028, odds ratio [OR] 1.32, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.03-1.70) and live birth (P=0.013, odds ratio [OR] 1.34, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.06-1.70) compared to the HRT FET without GnRHa group. After subgroup analysis, we found that the GnRHa FET group showed a significantly higher live birth rate in the subgroups of age < 40 years, primary infertility, with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS), and irregular menstruation.

CONCLUSIONS

Pretreatment with a long-acting GnRHa during the early follicular phase improved the live birth rate in FET cycles. Age < 40 years, primary infertility, PCOS, and irregular menstruation are effective indications for endometrial preparation with GnRHa pretreatment in FET cycles. However, further randomized controlled trials are required to verify these results.

Finding of the optimal preparation and timing of endometrium in frozen-thawed embryo transfer: a literature review of clinical evidence

Frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) has been a viable alternative to fresh embryo transfer in recent years because of the improvement in vitrification methods. Laboratory-based studies indicate that complex molecular and morphological changes in endometrium during the window of implantation after exogenous hormones with controlled ovarian stimulation may alter the interaction between the embryo and endometrium, leading to a decreased implantation potential. Based on the results obtained from randomized controlled studies, increased pregnancy rates and better perinatal outcomes have been reported following FET. Compared to fresh embryo transfer, fewer preterm deliveries, and reduced incidence of ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome were found after FETs, yet there is a trend of increased pregnancy-related hypertensive diseases in women receiving FET. Despite the increased application of FET, the search for the most optimal priming protocol for the endometrium is still undergoing. Three available FET protocols have been proposed to prepare the endometrium: i) natural cycle (true natural cycle and modified natural cycle) ii) artificial cycle (AC) or hormone replacement treatment cycle iii) mild ovarian stimulation (mild-OS) cycle. Emerging evidence suggests that the optimal timing for FET using warmed blastocyst transfer is the LH surge+6 day, hCG administration+7 day, and the progesterone administration+6 day in the true natural cycle, modified natural cycle, and AC protocol, respectively. Although still controversial, better clinical pregnancy rates and live birth rates have been reported using the natural cycle (true natural cycle/modified natural cycle) compared with the AC protocol. Additionally, a higher early pregnancy loss rate and an increased incidence of gestational hypertension have been found in FETs using the AC protocol because of the lack of a corpus luteum. Although the common clinical practice is to employ luteal phase support (LPS) in natural cycles and mild-OS cycles for FET, the requirement for LPS in these protocols remains equivocal. Recent findings obtained from RCTs do not support the routine application of endometrial receptivity testing to optimize the timing of FET. More RCTs with rigorous methodology are needed to compare different protocols to prime the endometrium for FET, focusing not only on live birth rate, but also on maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes.

Preparation of the endometrium for frozen embryo transfer: an update on clinical practices

Over the past decade, the application of frozen-thawed embryo transfer treatment cycles has increased substantially. Hormone replacement therapy and the natural cycle are two popular methods for preparing the endometrium. Hormone replacement therapy is now used at the discretion of the doctors because it is easy to coordinate the timing of embryo thawing and transfer with the schedules of the in-vitro fertilization lab, the treating doctors, and the patient. However, current results suggest that establishing a pregnancy in the absence of a corpus luteum as a result of anovulation may pose significant maternal and fetal risks. Therefore, a 'back to nature' approach that advocates an expanded use of natural cycle FET in ovulatory women has been suggested. Currently, there is increasing interest in how the method of endometrial preparation may influence frozen embryo transfer outcomes specifically, especially when it comes to details such as different types of ovulation monitoring and different luteal support in natural cycles, and the ideal exogenous hormone administration route as well as the endocrine monitoring in hormone replacement cycles. In addition to improving implantation rates and ensuring the safety of the fetus, addressing these points will allow for individualized endometrial preparation, also as few cycles as possible would be canceled.

Impact of an estrogen replacement regimen on live birth rate in frozen-thawed good-quality embryo transfer

OBJECTIVE

To assess the impact of an estrogen replacement regimen on frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle outcome.

METHODS

In the present retrospective cohort study, data of infertile women undergoing FET with good-quality embryos were reviewed. The first group received 2 mg of estradiol hemihydrate (EH) once daily for 6 to 7 days, then twice daily for 4 to 5 days, and then three times a day until embryo transfer. The second group received EH twice daily for 7 to 8 days, then three times a day. The third group received EH three times a day constantly. The main outcome measure was live birth rate.

RESULTS

In total, 394 FET cycles were included. The fixed 6-mg group required the highest estradiol hemihydrate dose. The duration of estrogen treatment was significantly longer in the first group. Maximal endometrial thickness was highest in the second group (10.2 ± 1.3 mm vs. 9.6 ± 1.4 mm vs. 8.6 ± 0.9 mm, respectively; P < 0.001). The clinical pregnancy rates in the groups were 41.1%, 55.2%, and 42.2%, respectively (P = 0.035). Live birth rates were 40.8%, 50.9%, and 48.1%, respectively (P = 0.320).

CONCLUSION

In FET cycles with hormone replacement therapy, a step-up 4-mg regimen provides thicker endometrium with optimal-dose estrogen in an adequate time frame. The tendency for increased clinical pregnancy and live birth rates is remarkable.

The effects of unexpected follicular growth and ovulation in artificial cycles: a retrospective cohort study of frozen, single-blastocyst transfer

OBJECTIVE

To study the effects of unexpected follicular development and ovulation in artificial cycles (ACs) on pregnancy outcomes.

DESIGN

A retrospective cohort study.

SETTING

A university-affiliated fertility center.

PATIENT(S)

A total of 1,427 patients who underwent a single, frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer with AC regimens from January 2014 to December 2020 at a university-affiliated fertility center were included.

INTERVENTION(S)

Unexpected follicular development and ovulation in ACs.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S)

Live birth rate (LBR), biochemical pregnancy rate, clinical pregnancy rate, and ongoing pregnancy rate.

RESULT(S)

A total of 161 patients with unexpected follicular development and ovulation in ACs (ovulation group) and 1,266 patients without growing follicles in ACs (control group) were enrolled. The patients in the ovulation group were older and had higher levels of serum follicle-stimulating hormone and lower levels of serum antimüllerian hormone. After propensity score matching, the baseline characteristics between the 2 groups were comparable and no significant difference was observed in the LBR (ovulation group, 39.0% vs. control group, 39.0%), biochemical pregnancy rate (ovulation group, 60.3% vs. control group, 58.2%), clinical pregnancy rate (ovulation group, 53.4% vs. control group, 50.7%), or ongoing pregnancy rate (ovulation group, 42.5% vs. control group, 40.4%). Moreover, the patients in the ovulation group showed a lower risk of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy (HDP) (1.6% vs. 15.3%). A subgroup analysis of women who delivered singleton live-born babies also demonstrated that unexpected follicular development and ovulation in ACs was associated with a decreased risk of HDP (adjusted odds ratio, 0.070; 95% confidence interval, 0.007-0.712) and an increased risk of large-for-gestational-age infants (adjusted odds ratio, 4.046; 95% confidence interval, 1.319-12.414).

CONCLUSION(S)

Women with unexpected follicular development and ovulation during single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer with AC regimens had a similar LBR and a reduced risk of HDP compared with those with routine AC regimens, and singleton neonates had an increased risk of being large for gestational age.

A Case of Sex Discordant Dichorionic Diamniotic Twins after Single Embryo Transfer and the Importance of Zygosity Testing

Single embryo transfer (SET) is a technique used in assisted reproductive treatment (ART) that is used to promote singleton pregnancies. To date, there are five reported cases of dizygotic twin pregnancies with mothers who underwent SET. Here, we present a sixth case of a dichorionic, diamniotic twin pregnancy with sex discordance. The patient is a 34-year-old woman with unexplained secondary infertility who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF) and frozen-thawed embryo transfer from a SET. The ultrasonographic images from the first and second trimester scans identified dichorionic, diamniotic twin gestations. The delivery was full term and postnatal genetic testing confirmed 46, XX, and 46, XY offspring. Pathology reports of the placental and membrane findings reported diamniotic, dichorionic twins. There was no zygosity testing conducted, thus it is unknown if the twins are monozygotic or dizygotic. Two possible etiologies for sex-discordant twins, in this case, are concurrent natural conception via breakthrough ovulation at the time of SET, or discordant postzygotic nondisjunction of a single embryo. Multiple gestations may still occur in the setting of SET and zygosity testing in these instances would better elucidate our understanding of this occurrence. Moreover, improved data on the zygosity of multiple gestations following SET may enhance patient counseling.

Impact of different endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer on pregnancy outcomes: a review

The use of frozen embryo transfer cycles has exponentially increased in the last few years. Optimization of endometrial preparation protocols before frozen embryo transfer is mandatory to further improve pregnancy outcomes. This review will focus on the existing literature with regard to the different available endometrial preparation protocols and their impact on pregnancy outcomes. More specifically, we will focus on programmed, natural, and stimulated frozen embryo transfer cycles. The studies performed on this topic are generally of low quality, and only a few well-performed randomized controlled trials have been published. To date, no strong evidence is available to support the use of 1 preparation method over another in terms of pregnancy outcomes. However, robust data have shown a clearly protective effect of natural frozen embryo transfer cycles against long-term obstetric complications, mainly hypertensive disorders of pregnancy and large for gestational age infants. The introduction of individualized luteal phase support in different endometrial preparation protocols is actually gaining a lot of attention and requires further investigation.

Frozen Blastocyst Embryo Transfer: Comparison of Protocols and Factors Influencing Outcome

Background: Various factors, including treatment protocols, can influence the outcomes of frozen embryo transfers (FETs). The study objectives were to compare different endometrial preparation protocols of FET cycles and to evaluate the factors, including the endometrial thickness (ET), that affect outcomes. Methods: This observational cohort study involved 5037 women undergoing FETs at eight tertiary clinics in the UK between January 2016 and March 2019. The endometrial preparation protocols used were natural cycle (NC-FETs), artificial hormone support cycle with oestradiol valerate but without pituitary downregulation (AC-FETs) and artificial hormone support cycle with agonist downregulation (ACDR-FETs). Results: The mean (±SD) ages across NC-FET, AC-FET and ACDR-FET groups were 36.5 (±4.2), 35.9 (±5.0) and 36.4(±4.9) years, respectively. LBRs were comparable (40.7%, 175/430; 36.8%, 986/2658; and 36.7%, 716/1949, respectively) across the three groups. Clinical pregnancy, implantation, multiple pregnancies, miscarriage and ectopic pregnancy rates were also similar. In the regression analysis of variables including age, duration of infertility, number of embryos transferred, protocol type and endometrial thickness, age was the only significant predictor of LBRs, although its predictive ability was poor (AUC: 0.55). With the overall LBR of the study population being 37.1%, the post-test probability of a live birth at an ET of <5 mm was 0%, and at 5–5.9, 6–6.9, 7–7.9 and 8–8.9 mm, the probabilities were 16.7%, 33.8%, 36.7% and 37.7%, respectively. The LBR remained above 35% up to the 14–14.9 mm range and then declined gradually to 23% for the 17–25 mm range. Conclusions: The FET outcomes were similar for the three protocols used for endometrial preparation. The protocol type and endometrial thickness were not predictive of FET outcomes; age was the only predictive variable, despite its low predictive ability.

Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review

Despite the worldwide increase in frozen embryo transfer, the search for the best protocol to prime endometrium continues. Well-designed trials comparing various frozen embryo transfer protocols in terms of live birth rates, maternal, obstetric and neonatal outcome are urgently required. Currently, low-quality evidence indicates that, natural cycle, either true natural cycle or modified natural cycle, is superior to hormone replacement treatment protocol. Regarding warmed blastocyst transfer and frozen embryo transfer timing, the evidence suggests the 6th day of progesterone start, LH surge+6 day and hCG+7 day in hormone replacement treatment, true natural cycle and modified natural cycle protocols, respectively. Time corrections, due to inter-personal differences in the window of implantation or day of vitrification (day 5 or 6), should be explored further. Recently available evidence clearly indicates that, in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles, there might be marked inter-personal variation in serum progesterone levels with an impact on reproductive outcomes, despite the use of the same dose and route of progesterone administration. The place of progesterone rescue protocols in patients with low serum progesterone levels one day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles is likely to be intensively explored in near future.

Effect of unplanned spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation on pregnancy outcomes in planned artificial frozen embryo transfer cycles: a propensity score matching study

STUDY QUESTION

Does unplanned spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation affect clinical outcomes after planned artificial frozen-thawed embryo transfer (AC-FET) cycles?

SUMMARY ANSWER

AC-FET and spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation events resulted in notably better pregnancy outcomes with a significantly higher implantation rate (IR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR) and live birth rate (LBR) and a significantly lower miscarriage rate.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

The AC-FET protocol without GnRH agonist administration is associated with a low incidence of follicular growth and ovulation. In the literature, authors often refer to these types of cycles with concern due to possibly impaired FET outcomes. However, the real impact of such cycles has yet to be elucidated due to the lack of existing data.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This was a retrospective clinical study involving 2256 AC-FET cycles conducted between January 2017 and August 2019. Propensity score (PS) matching was used to control for confounding variables.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Subjects were divided into two groups: a study group: cycles with spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation (the maximum diameter of follicles in any ovary was ≥14 mm and ovulation was confirmed by consecutive ultrasound examinations) and a control group featuring cycles without growing follicles (the maximum diameter of follicles in both ovaries were <10 mm). The study group was matched by PS with the control group at a ratio of 1:2. The study group consisted of 195 patients before PS matching and 176 patients after matching. The numbers of participants in the control group before and after PS matching were 2061 and 329, respectively.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

This analysis showed that patient age (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.05; 95% CI 1.01-1.09; P=0.010) and basal FSH level (aOR 1.06; 95% CI 1.01-1.11; P=0.012) were significantly and positively related with the spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation event. In addition, this event was negatively correlated with BMI (aOR 0.92; 95% CI 0.87-0.97; P=0.002), AMH level (aOR 0.66; 95% CI 0.59-0.74; P<0.001) and a high starting oestrogen dose (aOR 0.53; 95% CI 0.38-0.76 for 6 mg vs. 4 mg; P<0.001). Baseline characteristics were similar between groups after PS matching. Patients in the study group had a significantly higher IR (28.8% vs. 21.8%, P=0.016), CPR (44.9% vs. 33.4%, P=0.011), OPR (39.2% vs. 26.1%, P=0.002) and LBR (39.2% vs. 24.9%, P=0.001) and a lower miscarriage rate (12.7% vs. 25.5%, P=0.030), compared with those in the control group.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This was a retrospective study carried out in a single centre and was therefore susceptible to bias. In addition, we only analysed patients with normal ovulation patterns and excluded those with follicular growth but without ovulation. Further studies remain necessary to confirm our results.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

It is not necessary to cancel cycles that experience spontaneous follicular growth and ovulation. Our data support promising clinical outcomes after this event. Our findings are important as they can better inform clinicians and patients.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

This research was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (grant no. 81701507, 81801404, 81871210, 82071648), Natural Science Foundation of Jiangsu Province (grant no. BK20171126, BK20201123) and Jiangsu Province '333' project. The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Stimulated cycle versus artificial cycle for frozen embryo transfer in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome: a Meta-analysis

PURPOSE

Our aim is to conduct a meta-analysis comparing clinical outcomes between the mild ovarian stimulation cycle versus an artificial cycle (AC) for frozen embryo transfer (FET) in patients with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS).

METHODS

We systematically searched the databases of PubMed, EMBASE and the Cochrane Library from inception to January 2020. The outcomes were live birth rate (LBR), ongoing pregnancy rate (OPR), clinical pregnancy rate (CPR), embryo implantation rate (IR) and miscarriage rate (MR). The mild ovarian stimulation cycle and AC were compared according to risk ratios and 95% confidence intervals using a fixed or random effects model.

RESULTS

Four retrospective studies describing the clinical outcomes were included. We found no significant difference in LBR, OPR, CPR, IR or MR between the mild ovarian stimulation cycle and AC protocols, whereas a lower MR was found for the letrozole-stimulated cycle than the AC.

CONCLUSIONS

The letrozole-stimulated cycle for endometrial preparation in PCOS patients undergoing FET may lower the MR more than the AC. PCOS patients using the mild ovarian stimulation cycle for endometrial preparation undergoing FET had similar LBR, OPR, CPR and IR compared with the AC. The letrozole-stimulated protocol may be a reasonable choice for endometrial preparation before FET for women with PCOS.

Single and double embryo transfer provide similar live birth rates in frozen cycles

Research question: Do live birth rates (LBRs) differ in frozen cycles of women who received single versus double embryo transfer?Design: Retrospective cohort study including women who underwent their first frozen embryo transfer (FET) in a tertiary referral University Hospital between 2009-2014.Results: 3601 patients were included in the analysis with 1936 (53.8%) having a single embryo transfer (SET) and 1665 (46.2%) having a double embryo transfer (DET). Overall, 657/3601 (18.24%) had a live birth. LBR were similar between SET and DET either for cleavage [100/757 (13.1%) versus 153/1032 (14.8%), p = .33] or blastocyst stage FET [256/1179 (21.7%) versus 148/633 (23.4%), p = .4). Ongoing pregnancy rates were comparable between DET and SET [316/1665 (18.9%) versus 359/1936 (18.5%)]. Multiple delivery rates were significantly higher in women with DET compared to SET [53/316 (16.7%) versus 7/359 (1.9%), p < .001]. Multivariate logistic regression analysis allowing adjustment for relevant confounders showed that the number of embryos transferred in the frozen cycle was not related to LBR.Conclusions: This is the largest study providing evidence that both SET and DET may result in similar LBR, albeit multiple pregnancy rates are significantly lower in case of SET. Therefore, SET should be the main strategy in women undergoing FET.

Gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist combined with hormone replacement therapy does not improve the reproductive outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle in elderly patients: a retrospective study

BACKGROUND

With the rapid development of whole embryo freezing technology, more and more frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) was used in assisted reproductive technology. However, the best FET program for elderly women has not been finalized. We intended to explore the reproductive outcomes of traditional hormone replacement treatment and a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa) combined with hormone replacement treatment in the frozen-thawed embryo transfer cycle of elderly patients.

METHODS

In this retrospective analysis, we analyzed 1264 elderly patients (aged 38 years or older) who underwent FET at three reproductive centers between 2015 and 2017. According to the endometrial preparation protocol, we divided the patients into a GnRHa combined with hormone replacement treatment (GnRHa-HRT) group and traditional hormone replacement treatment (HRT) group. The clinical pregnancy, ongoing pregnancy, live birth, and abortion rates were compared between groups.

RESULTS

One-way analysis of variance of the two groups revealed no significant difference in the clinical (33.58% vs. 37.15%) and ongoing pregnancy rates (19.40% vs. 25.10%) between the GnRHa-HRT and HRT groups. The live birth rate (17.54% vs. 24.10% p = 0.0229) of the GnRHa-HRT group was lower than that of the HRT group, whereas the abortion rate (45.56% vs. 32.97% p = 0.0252) was higher than that of the HRT group. However, multivariate analysis showed no significant difference in the live birth rate (p = 0.1333) or abortion rate (p = 0.1881) between the GnRHa-HRT and HRT groups. The number of embryos transferred, level of the embryo, and age and ovarian reserve of the patient significantly affected final reproductive outcomes.

CONCLUSION

A GnRH agonist combined with hormone replacement therapy did not improve the reproductive outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo cycles in elderly patients.

Do we need to measure progesterone in oocyte donation cycles? A retrospective analysis evaluating cumulative live birth rates and embryo quality

STUDY QUESTION

Does late follicular-phase elevated serum progesterone (LFEP) during ovarian stimulation for oocyte donation have an impact on embryo quality (EQ) and cumulative live birth rate (CLBR)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

LFEP does not have an influence on EQ nor CLBR in oocyte donation cycles.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Ovarian stimulation promotes the production of progesterone (P) which, when elevated during the follicular phase, has been demonstrated to have a deleterious effect in autologous fresh IVF outcomes. While there is robust evidence that this elevation results in impaired endometrial receptivity, the impact on EQ remains a matter of debate. The oocyte donation model is an excellent tool to assess the effects of LFEP on EQ from those on endometrium receptivity separately. Previous studies in oocyte donation cycles investigating the influence of elevated P on pregnancy outcomes in oocyte recipients showed conflicting results.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a retrospective analysis including all GnRH antagonist down-regulated cycles for fresh oocyte donation taking place in a tertiary referral university hospital between 2010 and 2017. A total of 397 fresh donor-recipient cycles were included. Each donor was included only once in the analysis and could be associated to a single recipient.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The sample was stratified according to serum P levels of ≤1.5 and &gt;1.5 ng/mL on the day of ovulation triggering. The primary endpoint of the study was the top-quality embryo rate on Day 3, and the secondary outcome measure was CLBR defined as a live-born delivery beyond 24 weeks.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Three hundred ninety-seven fresh oocyte donation cycles were included in the analysis, of which 314 (79%) had a serum P ≤ 1.5 ng/mL and 83 (20.9%) had a serum P &gt; 1.5 ng/mL. The average age of the oocyte donors was 31.4 ± 4.7 and 29.9 ± 4.5 years, respectively, for normal and elevated P (P = 0.017). The mean number of oocytes retrieved was significantly higher in the elevated P group with 16.6 ± 10.6 vs 11.5 ± 6.9 in the P ≤ 1.5 group (P &lt; 0.001).

In parallel, the total number of embryos on Day 3, as well as the number of good-quality embryos at this stage, was significantly higher in the elevated P group (6.6 ± 5.6 vs 4.15 ± 3.5 and 8.7 ± 6.3 vs 6.1 ± 4.4; respectively, P &lt; 0.001). However, maturation and fertilization rates did not vary significantly between the two study groups and neither did the top- and good-quality embryo rate and the embryo utilization rate, all evaluated on Day 3 (P = 0.384, P = 0.405 and P = 0.645, respectively). A multivariable regression analysis accounting for P groups, age of the donor, number of retrieved oocytes and top-quality embryo rate as potential confounders showed that LFEP negatively influenced neither the top-quality embryo rate nor the CLBR.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This is an observational study based on a retrospective data analysis. Better extrapolation of the results could be validated by performing a prospective trial. Furthermore, this study was focused on oocyte donation cycles and hence the results cannot be generalized to the entire infertile population.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This is the first study providing evidence that LFEP does not influence CLBR and is adding strong evidence to the existing literature that LFEP does not harm EQ in oocyte donation programs.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

Not applicable.

Heterogeneity Among Poor Ovarian Responders According to Bologna Criteria Results in Diverging Cumulative Live Birth Rates

Research Question: Does reproductive outcome differ among the various subgroups of poor ovarian responders according to the Bologna criteria? Design: This was a retrospective, cohort study including poor ovarian responders according to Bologna criteria, undergoing an ICSI cycle from January 2011 until December 2017. Patients were divided into four groups: (1) age ≥ 40 years and abnormal ovarian response test, (2) age ≥ 40 years, abnormal ovarian reserve test and one previous poor response to stimulation, (3) age ≥ 40 years and one previous poor response, (4) abnormal ovarian reserve test and one previous poor response. Result(s): Overall, 846 cycles in 706 Bologna poor ovarian responders were included: 310 cycles in group 1, 169 in group 2, 52 in group 3, and 315 in group 4. There were significant differences in age, antral follicle count, antimüllerian hormone, cycle cancellation rates, and number of retrieved oocytes between the four groups. Live birth and cumulative live birth rate differed significantly between groups and were highest in Group 4 [Live birth rate: 7.4% (1) vs. 4.1% (2) vs. 5.8% (3) vs. 13.4% (4), p = 0.001 and Cumulative live birth rate: 8.3% (1) vs. 4.1 % (2) vs. 9.6% (3) vs. 16.8% (4) p < 0.001]. The multivariate GEE analysis revealed that the number of MIIs and the Bologna criteria pattern were the variables which were significantly associated with cumulative live birth rate. Conclusion(s): Poor ovarian responders represent a heterogeneous population. The young subpopulation has a better clinical prognosis in terms of fresh and cumulative live birth rate.

Impact of Serum Estradiol Levels Prior to Progesterone Administration in Artificially Prepared Frozen Embryo Transfer Cycles

Background: The need for endocrine monitoring in artificial cycles for frozen embryo transfer (FET) remains unclear and, more specifically, the value of the late-proliferative phase serum estradiol (E2) levels is with conflicting evidence in current literature. Objective: To investigate whether artificial FET cycles require endocrine monitoring for the serum E2 level prior to initiation of exogenous progesterone administration after an endometrial thickness of 6.5 mm has been reached. Design: One thousand two hundred and twenty-two (n = 1,222) artificial FETs performed in a tertiary center between 2010 and 2015 were subdivided into 3 groups according to the following late-proliferative serum E2 level percentiles: ≤p10 (E2 ≤144 pg/ml; n = 124), p11-p90 (E2 from 145 to 438 pg/ml; n = 977) and >p90 (E2 >439 pg/ml; n = 121). A mixed-effects multilevel multivariable regression analysis was performed to assess the potential effect of the late-proliferative E2 level on the live birth rate (LBR). Results: The level of late-proliferative circulating E2 showed no significant difference in terms of LBR after FET. Specifically, the multivariable regression model demonstrated a LBR of 19.5% for the p11-p90 reference group, compared to 24.4% for the ≤p10 (p = 0.251) and 19.5% for the >p90 group (p = 0.989). Conclusion: In this large retrospective dataset, no association was observed between late-proliferative phase serum E2 levels and LBR following FET in artificially prepared cycles. Although, caution is warranted due to the retrospective nature of the analysis and the potential for unmeasured confounding, we argue that monitoring of the late-proliferative serum E2 levels and using them to guide clinical decision-making (e.g., medication step-up, cycle prolongation or cancelation) may be of questionable value.

Comparison of the clinical outcome of frozen-thawed embryo transfer with and without pretreatment with a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist

Objective

To describe the clinical outcomes of frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) with artificial preparation of the endometrium, using a combination of estrogen (E2) and progesterone (P4) with or without a gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonist (GnRHa), and the modified natural cycle (MNC) with human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) trigger.

Methods

In this retrospective study, we evaluated 187 patients during 3 years (February 2012–April 2015). The patients were allocated to the following treatment groups: group A, comprising 113 patients (181 cycles) who received GnRHa+E2+P4; group B, comprising 49 patients (88 cycles) who received E2+P4; and group C, comprising 25 patients (42 cycles) who received hCG+P4. The inclusion criteria were regular menstrual cycles (length 24–35 days) and age 21–45 years.

Results

The primary outcome of the study — implantation rate (IR) per embryo transferred — was not statistically different among the 3 groups. Similar results were found for the IRs with fetal heartbeat per embryo transferred (68/181 [37.6%] in group A vs. 22/88 [25.0%] in group B vs. 14/42 [33.3%] in group C) and for the live birth rates (LBRs) per embryo transferred (56/181 [30.9%] in group A vs. 18/88 [20.5%] in group B vs. 11/42 [26.2%] in group C).

Conclusion

Although the pregnancy outcomes were better in the hormone therapy with GnRHa group, hormone therapy FET with GnRHa for pituitary suppression did not result in significantly improved IRs and LBRs when compared with hormone therapy FET without GnRHa or MNC FET.

Frozen embryo transfer: a review on the optimal endometrial preparation and timing

STUDY QUESTION

What is the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for a frozen embryo transfer (FET)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Although the optimal endometrial preparation protocol for FET needs further research and is yet to be determined, we propose a standardized timing strategy based on the current available evidence which could assist in the harmonization and comparability of clinic practice and future trials.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Amid a continuous increase in the number of FET cycles, determining the optimal endometrial preparation protocol has become paramount to maximize ART success. In current daily practice, different FET preparation methods and timing strategies are used.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This is a review of the current literature on FET preparation methods, with special attention to the timing of the embryo transfer.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Literature on the topic was retrieved in PubMed and references from relevant articles were investigated until June 2017.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The number of high quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is scarce and, hence, the evidence for the best protocol for FET is poor. Future research should compare both the pregnancy and neonatal outcomes between HRT and true natural cycle (NC) FET. In terms of embryo transfer timing, we propose to start progesterone intake on the theoretical day of oocyte retrieval in HRT and to perform blastocyst transfer at hCG + 7 or LH + 6 in modified or true NC, respectively.

LIMITATIONS REASONS FOR CAUTION

As only a few high quality RCTs on the optimal preparation for FET are available in the existing literature, no definitive conclusion for benefit of one protocol over the other can be drawn so far.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Caution when using HRT for FET is warranted since the rate of early pregnancy loss is alarmingly high in some reports.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

S.M. is funded by the Research Fund of Flanders (FWO). H.T. and C.B. report grants from Merck, Goodlife, Besins and Abbott during the conduct of the study.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

Not applicable.

Do ARTs affect the incidence of monozygotic twinning?

STUDY QUESTION

Does the manipulation of gametes or embryos during ARTs increase the risk for monozygotic twinning (MZT)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Frozen embryo transfer (ET) is associated with a lower MZT rate, while blastocyst culture is associated with an increased risk of monozygotic pregnancy.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Monozygotic twins have a higher risk for perinatal complications. Although an increased incidence of monozygotic pregnancies after ART has been previously reported, data regarding the possible impact of different laboratory procedures are conflicting.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

All clinical pregnancies after single ET carried out in our centre between 2004 and 2013 (n = 6096) were retrospectively analysed for the incidence of MZT. The effect of different laboratory procedures on the incidence of MZT was evaluated.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

The following ART risk factors were assessed: maternal age, type of ET (fresh versus frozen), zona pellucida (ZP) manipulation (specifically, ICSI, embryo biopsy and assisted hatching), use of donor oocytes, embryo stage at time of ET (cleavage, compaction, early or advanced blastocyst) and culture media.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

The overall MZT rate was 2.2% (136/6096). Frozen ET was associated with a significant reduction in MZT incidence (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) 0.48, 95% CI 0.29-0.80), while blastocyst transfer (early or advanced blastocyst) was associated with a significant increase in MZT risk (aOR 2.70, 95% CI 1.36-5.34; aOR 2.05, 95% CI 1.29-3.26, respectively). No significant differences were found between the MZT and singleton (non-MZT) groups regarding maternal age, the use of different ZP manipulation techniques, not type of culture media used.

LIMITATION, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This study is limited by its retrospective nature and the fact that monozygosity was not confirmed by genetic testing. Furthermore, since monozygotic pregnancy is a rare event, other ART parameters that may influence its incidence could not be assessed during our analysis.

WIDER IMPLICATION OF THE FINDINGS

Our findings warrant future studies designed to investigate the association between specific ART procedures and MZT, namely the potential risk of blastocyst transfer to increase MZT.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

No external funding was used for this study. There are no conflicts of interest.

Preparation of endometrium for frozen embryo replacement cycles: a systematic review and meta-analysis

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the best protocol to prepare endometrium for frozen embryo replacement (FER) cycles.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis. Following PubMed and OvidSP search, a total of 1166 studies published after 1990 were identified following removal of duplicates. Following exclusion of studies not matching our inclusion criteria, a total of 33 studies were analyzed. Primary outcome measure was live birth. The following protocols, including true natural cycle (tNC), modified natural cycle (mNC), artificial cycle (AC) with or without suppression, and mild ovarian stimulation (OS) with gonadotropin (Gn) or aromatase inhibitor (AI), were compared.

RESULTS

No statistically significant difference for both clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted between tNC and mNC groups. When tNC and AC without suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in clinical pregnancy rate in favor of tNC, whereas it failed to reach statistical significance for live birth. When tNC and AC with suppression groups are compared, there was a statistically significant difference in live birth rate favoring the latter. Similar pregnancy outcome was noted among mNC versus AC with or without suppression groups. Similarly, no difference in clinical pregnancy and live birth was noted when ACs with or without suppression groups are compared.

CONCLUSIONS

There is no consistent superiority of any endometrial preparation for FER. However, mNC has several advantages (being patient-friendly; yielding at least equivalent or better pregnancy rates when compared with tNC and AC with or without suppression; may not require LPS). Mild OS with Gn or AI may be promising.

A fresh look at the freeze-all protocol: a SWOT analysis

The 'freeze-all' strategy with the segmentation of IVF treatment, namely with the use of a GnRH antagonist protocol, GnRH agonist triggering, the elective cryopreservation of all embryos by vitrification and a frozen-thawed embryo transfer in a subsequent cycle, has become more popular. However, the approach still encounters drawbacks. In this opinion paper, a SWOT (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats) analysis sheds light on the different aspects of this strategy.

Conventional ovarian stimulation and single embryo transfer for IVF/ICSI. How many oocytes do we need to maximize cumulative live birth rates after utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos?

STUDY QUESTION

What is the impact of ovarian response on cumulative live birth rates (LBR) following utilization of all fresh and frozen embryos in women undergoing their first ovarian stimulation cycle, planned to undergo single embryo transfer (SET).

SUMMARY ANSWER

Cumulative LBR significantly increases with the number of oocytes retrieved.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Several studies have addressed the issue of the optimal number of oocytes retrieved following controlled ovarian stimulation (COS) for IVF/ICSI and demonstrated that ovarian response is independently related to LBR following IVF/ICSI. The vast majority of studies pertained only to the outcome of the fresh IVF cycle and did not evaluate the cumulative LBR following the transfer of all fresh and frozen-thawed embryos after a single ovarian stimulation, which is the most meaningful outcome for the infertile patient.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This study is a large cohort analysis of retrospective data from January 2009 to December 2013 in a tertiary medical centre, at the Centre for Reproductive Medicine at the University Hospital of Brussels.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

This study included 1099 eligible consecutive women 18-40 years old undergoing their first IVF cycle and planned to undergo SET in their fresh cycle. All patients were treated with a conventional starting gonadotrophin dose of 150-225 IU recombinant FSH (rFSH) in a fixed GnRH antagonist protocol. Vitrification was used as cryopreservation method. To evaluate the impact of oocyte yield on fresh LBR and on cumulative LBR after utilization of all cryopreserved embryos, patients were categorized into four groups according to the number of oocytes retrieved: 1-3 (Group A), 4-9 (Group B), 10-15 (Group C) or >15 oocytes (Group D).

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Regarding LBR in the fresh IVF/ICSI cycles, unadjusted results did not show any significant difference when comparing either high (>15 oocytes) versus normal (10-15 oocytes) (P = 0.65), or normal (10-15) versus suboptimal (4-9 oocytes) responders (P = 0.2). LBR in the fresh cycles were significantly higher (P < 0.05) in high, normal and suboptimal responders when compared with the low ovarian responder group (1-3 oocytes). Moderate-severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome occurred in 11 out of 1099 patients (1%). The cumulative LBR significantly increased with the number of oocytes retrieved (χ(2) test for trend P < 0.001). High responders (>15 oocytes) demonstrated a significantly higher LBR not only versus poor (0-3 oocytes) (P < 0.001) and suboptimal (4-9) responders (P < 0.001), but also versus women with normal (10-15) ovarian response (P = 0.014). Finally, although suboptimal responders had a better outcome compared with poor ovarian responders (P = 0.002), this group had a significantly lower cumulative LBR compared with normal ovarian responders (P = 0.02). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that the ovarian response category remained an independent predictive factor (P < 0.001) for cumulative LBR.

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

This is a cohort analysis based on retrospective data collection. Despite our robust methodological approach, the presence of biases related to retrospective design cannot be excluded. High responders may inherently have had a better prognosis. In addition, we cannot provide any guidance for patients undergoing either multiple embryo transfers or treated with higher gonadotrophin doses.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

Women undergoing COS for their first IVF/ICSI cycle and SET should be informed that, although the number of oocytes retrieved does not affect LBR in the fresh cycle, the higher the oocyte yield, the higher the probability to achieve a live birth after utilization of all cryopreserved embryos. Large cohort studies are needed in order to confirm our results of cumulative LBR in different ovarian stimulation settings with higher stimulation doses.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTERESTS

No external funding was used for this study. No conflicts of interest are declared.

Agonist depot versus OCP programming of frozen embryo transfer: a retrospective analysis of freeze-all cycles

PURPOSE

In segmented ART treatment or so-called 'freeze-all' strategy fresh embryo transfer is deferred, embryos cryopreserved, and the embryo transferred in a subsequent frozen embryo transfer (FET) cycle. The purpose of this cohort study was to compare a GnRHa depot with an oral contraceptive pill (OCP) programming protocol for the scheduling of an artificial cycle FET (AC-FET) after oocyte pick-up (OPU).

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study was conducted on prospectively performed segmented ART cycles performed between September 2014 and April 2015. The pregnancy, treatment duration, and cycle cancellation outcomes of 170 OCP programmed AC-FET cycles were compared with 241 GnRHa depot programmed AC-FET cycles.

RESULTS

No significant difference was observed in the per transfer pregnancy and clinical pregnancy rates between the OCP and GnRHa groups, 72.0 versus 77.2 %, and 57.8 versus 64.3 %, respectively. Furthermore, the early pregnancy loss rate was non-significantly different between the OCP and GnRH protocol groups, 19.8 versus 16.7 %, respectively. However, nine (5.29 %) cycles were cancelled due to high progesterone in the OCP protocol group, while no cycles were cancelled in the GnRHa protocol group and the time taken between OPU and FET was 19 days longer (54.7 vs 35.6 days) in the OCP protocol compared to the GnRHa protocol.

CONCLUSIONS

The results of this AC-FET programming study suggests that the inclusion of GnRHa depot cycle programming into a segmented ART treatment will ensure pregnancy, while significantly reducing treatment duration and cycle cancellation.