1
|
Marques M, Rodrigues P, Aibar J, Carvalho MJ, Plancha CE. Time to live birth: towards a common agreement. J Assist Reprod Genet 2023; 40:997-1001. [PMID: 37071319 PMCID: PMC10239416 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-023-02790-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 1] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/16/2023] [Accepted: 03/27/2023] [Indexed: 04/19/2023] Open
Abstract
The major purpose of a couple at the first infertility appointment is to get a healthy baby as soon as possible. From diagnosis and decision on which assisted reproduction technique (ART) and controlled ovarian stimulation, to the selection of which embryo to transfer, the dedicated team of physicians and embryologists puts all efforts to shorten the time to pregnancy and live birth. Time seems thus central in assisted reproduction, and we can conveniently use it as a measure of treatment efficiency. How can we measure time to live birth? What timelines do we need to consider to evaluate efficiency? In this paper, we will discuss the importance of "Time" as a fundamental parameter for measuring ART success.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mónica Marques
- Centro Médico de Assistência à Reprodução - CEMEARE, Lisbon, Portugal.
| | - Patrícia Rodrigues
- Centro Médico de Assistência à Reprodução - CEMEARE, Lisbon, Portugal
- Escola de Psicologia de Ciências da Vida, Universidade Lusófona de Humanidade E Tecnologia de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Juan Aibar
- Centro Médico de Assistência à Reprodução - CEMEARE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | | | - Carlos E Plancha
- Centro Médico de Assistência à Reprodução - CEMEARE, Lisbon, Portugal
- Inst. Histologia e Biol, Desenvolvimento, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Cerrillo M, Cecchino GN, Toribio M, García-Rubio MJ, García-Velasco JA. A randomized, non-inferiority trial on the DuoStim strategy in PGT-A cycles. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 46:536-542. [PMID: 36567150 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.11.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 6.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/05/2022] [Revised: 10/26/2022] [Accepted: 11/21/2022] [Indexed: 11/27/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Is the DuoStim strategy an effective alternative to two conventional ovarian stimulation cycles in poor-prognosis patients undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies (PGT-A) to improve euploidy rates and obtain the first euploid embryo in less time? DESIGN This randomized controlled trial was performed at IVI Madrid between June 2017 and December 2020 and included 80 patients with a suboptimal profile aged 38 or older undergoing PGT-A cycles. Patients were blindly randomized into two groups: 39 women underwent two ovarian stimulations in consecutive cycles (control group), whereas the double stimulation strategy was applied to 41 women (DuoStim group). The main outcome was the euploidy rate in each group. The secondary outcomes were the time it took to obtain a euploid embryo and the main cycle outcomes. RESULTS The baseline characteristics of the patients were similar. No differences were found between the control group and the DuoStim group in the mean days of stimulation (21.3 ± 1.6 versus 23.0 ± 1.4, P = 0.10), total gonadotrophins (4005 ± 450 versus 4245 ± 430, P = 0.43), metaphase II oocytes (8.7 ± 1.8 versus 6.8 ± 1.7, P = 0.15) or euploid embryos obtained (0.8 ± 0.4 versus 0.6 ± 0.4, P = 0.45). The euploid rate per randomized patient (ITT) was 16.1% in the control group versus 22.7% in the DuoStim group, with P-values of 0.371, and the euploidy rate per patient treated was 39.0% versus 45.7% in the control versus DuoStim groups. However, there was a significant difference in the average number of days it took to obtain a euploid blastocyst, favouring the DuoStim group (44.1 ± 2.0 versus 23.3 ± 2.8, P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS The use of the DuoStim strategy in poor-prognosis patients undergoing PGT-A cycles maintains a similar euploidy rate while reducing the time required to obtain a euploid blastocyst.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
| | - G N Cecchino
- Department of Reproductive Medicine, Mater Prime, São Paulo-SP, Brazil
| | | | | | - J A García-Velasco
- IVIRMA Madrid, Madrid 28023, Spain; Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain; IVI Foundation, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (IIS La Fe), Valencia, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Gunning MN, Christ JP, van Rijn BB, Koster MPH, Bonsel GJ, Laven JSE, Eijkemans MJC, Fauser BCJM. Predicting pregnancy chances leading to term live birth in oligo/anovulatory women diagnosed with PCOS. Reprod Biomed Online 2023; 46:156-163. [PMID: 36411204 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2022.09.024] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/09/2022] [Revised: 09/26/2022] [Accepted: 09/28/2022] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
RESEARCH QUESTION Which patient features predict the time to pregnancy (TTP) leading to term live birth in infertile women diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS)? DESIGN Prospective cohort follow-up study was completed, in which initial standardized phenotyping was conducted at two Dutch university medical centres from January 2004 to January 2014. Data were linked to the Netherlands Perinatal Registry to obtain pregnancy outcomes for each participant. All women underwent treatment according to a standardized protocol, starting with ovulation induction as first-line treatment. Predictors of pregnancies (leading to term live births) during the first year after PCOS diagnosis were evaluated. RESULTS A total of 1779 consecutive women diagnosed with PCOS between January 2004 and January 2014 were included. In the first year following screening, 659 (37%) women with PCOS attained a pregnancy leading to term birth (≥37 weeks of gestational age). A higher chance of pregnancy was associated with race, smoking, body mass index (BMI), insulin, total testosterone and sex hormone-binding globulin (SHBG) concentrations (c-statistic = 0.59). CONCLUSIONS Predictors of an increased chance of a live birth include White race, no current smoking, lower BMI, insulin and total testosterone concentrations, and higher SHBG concentrations. This study presents a nomogram to predict the chances of achieving a pregnancy (leading to a term live birth) within 1 year of treatment.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marlise N Gunning
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Jacob P Christ
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands; Cleveland Clinic Lerner College of Medicine, Cleveland Ohio, USA; Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of Washington Medical Center, SeattleWashington, USA.
| | - Bas B van Rijn
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands; Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Maria P H Koster
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Gouke J Bonsel
- Department of Obstetrics, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Joop S E Laven
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Erasmus University Medical Center, Rotterdam, the Netherlands
| | - Marinus J C Eijkemans
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary care, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands
| | - Bart C J M Fauser
- Department of Reproductive Medicine and Gynaecology, University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht, the Netherlands
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Strategy for embryo transfer to improve pregnancy outcomes in advanced maternal age. ZYGOTE 2022; 30:781-789. [PMID: 35860989 DOI: 10.1017/s0967199422000259] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/05/2022]
Abstract
The purpose of this retrospective study was to optimize the transplantation strategy for women of advanced maternal age to achieve live births within the shortest time. Data were collected from patients older than 40 years who underwent assisted reproductive therapy at our centre from 1 January 2009 to 31 December 2019. In total, 1023 cases of fresh cleavage embryo transfer (CET) cycles, 280 cases of frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer (FBT) cycles, and 26 cases of frozen-thawed CET (FCET) cycles were included. The main outcome was the live birth rate (LBR). The secondary outcomes were the clinical pregnancy rate (CPR) and neonatal outcomes. Multivariable logistic regression was performed to adjust for confounding factors. The blastocyst formation rate of patients older than 40 years was 23.5%, the freezing cycle rate was 19.8%, and the fresh-embryo transfer rate was 83.0%. The implantation rate, CPR, and LBR were significantly different among the CET, FCET, and FBT groups. There were no significant differences in multiple pregnancies and abortion rates among the groups, and neonatal outcomes were similar. Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that, compared with the CET group, LBR did not increase in the FCET group, whereas LBR increased in the FBT group. For patients older than 40 years when having approximately eight embryos after fertilization, blastocyst transfer can be considered after fully discussing the advantages and disadvantages of blastocyst culture. Alternatively, CET can be performed first, followed by FBT if the cleavage embryo transfer is unsuccessful.
Collapse
|
5
|
The effect of dual stimulation on ploidy rates in patients with poor ovarian response. JOURNAL OF SURGERY AND MEDICINE 2021. [DOI: 10.28982/josam.1017639] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/14/2022] Open
|
6
|
Mumusoglu S, Polat M, Ozbek IY, Bozdag G, Papanikolaou EG, Esteves SC, Humaidan P, Yarali H. Preparation of the Endometrium for Frozen Embryo Transfer: A Systematic Review. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:688237. [PMID: 34305815 PMCID: PMC8299049 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.688237] [Citation(s) in RCA: 36] [Impact Index Per Article: 12.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/30/2021] [Accepted: 06/23/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
Despite the worldwide increase in frozen embryo transfer, the search for the best protocol to prime endometrium continues. Well-designed trials comparing various frozen embryo transfer protocols in terms of live birth rates, maternal, obstetric and neonatal outcome are urgently required. Currently, low-quality evidence indicates that, natural cycle, either true natural cycle or modified natural cycle, is superior to hormone replacement treatment protocol. Regarding warmed blastocyst transfer and frozen embryo transfer timing, the evidence suggests the 6th day of progesterone start, LH surge+6 day and hCG+7 day in hormone replacement treatment, true natural cycle and modified natural cycle protocols, respectively. Time corrections, due to inter-personal differences in the window of implantation or day of vitrification (day 5 or 6), should be explored further. Recently available evidence clearly indicates that, in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles, there might be marked inter-personal variation in serum progesterone levels with an impact on reproductive outcomes, despite the use of the same dose and route of progesterone administration. The place of progesterone rescue protocols in patients with low serum progesterone levels one day prior to warmed blastocyst transfer in hormone replacement treatment and natural cycles is likely to be intensively explored in near future.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Sezcan Mumusoglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Mehtap Polat
- Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Gurkan Bozdag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Sandro C. Esteves
- Androfert, Andrology and Human Reproduction Clinic, Referral Center for Male Reproduction, Campinas, Brazil
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
| | - Peter Humaidan
- Department of Clinical Medicine, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark
- The Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital Resenvej 25, Skive, Denmark
| | - Hakan Yarali
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University School of Medicine, Ankara, Turkey
- Anatolia IVF and Women Health Centre, Ankara, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Polat M, Mumusoglu S, Yarali Ozbek I, Bozdag G, Yarali H. Double or dual stimulation in poor ovarian responders: where do we stand? Ther Adv Reprod Health 2021; 15:26334941211024172. [PMID: 34263172 PMCID: PMC8252377 DOI: 10.1177/26334941211024172] [Citation(s) in RCA: 3] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/10/2021] [Accepted: 05/06/2021] [Indexed: 12/16/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent advances in our recognition of two to three follicular waves of development in a single menstrual cycle has challenged the dogmatic approach of ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization starting in the early follicular phase. First shown in veterinary medicine and thereafter in women, luteal phase stimulation–derived oocytes are at least as competent as those retrieved following follicular phase stimulation. Poor ovarian responders still remain a challenge for many decades simply because they do not respond to ovarian stimulation. Performing follicular phase stimulation and luteal phase stimulation in the same menstrual cycle, named as double stimulation/dual stimulation, clearly increases the number of oocytes, which is a robust surrogate marker of live birth rate in in vitro fertilization across all female ages. Of interest, apart from one study, the bulk of evidence reports significantly higher number of oocytes following luteal phase stimulation when compared with follicular phase stimulation; hence, performing double stimulation/dual stimulation doubles the number of oocytes leading to a marked decrease in patient drop-out rate which is one of the major factors limiting cumulative live birth rates in such poor prognosis patients. The limited data with double stimulation/dual stimulation-derived embryos is reassuring for obstetric and neonatal outcome. The mandatory requirement of freeze-all and lack of cost-effectiveness data are limitations of this novel approach. Double stimulation/dual stimulation is an effective strategy when the need to obtain oocytes is urgent, including patients with malignant diseases undergoing oocyte cryopreservation and patients of advanced maternal age or with reduced ovarian reserve.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mehtap Polat
- Anatolia IVF and Women's Health Center, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Sezcan Mumusoglu
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | | | - Gurkan Bozdag
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey
| | - Hakan Yarali
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Hacettepe University Medical School, Ankara 06100, Turkey
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Bühler KF, Fischer R, Verpillat P, Allignol A, Guedes S, Boutmy E, Bilger W, Richter E, D'Hooghe T. Comparative effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) versus highly purified urinary human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP) in assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments: a non-interventional study in Germany. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2021; 19:90. [PMID: 34134695 PMCID: PMC8207759 DOI: 10.1186/s12958-021-00768-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 2] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Grants] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/09/2021] [Accepted: 05/25/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND This study compared the effectiveness of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa; GONAL-f®) with urinary highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG HP; Menogon HP®), during assisted reproductive technology (ART) treatments in Germany. METHODS Data were collected from 71 German fertility centres between 01 January 2007 and 31 December 2012, for women undergoing a first stimulation cycle of ART treatment with r-hFSH-alfa or hMG HP. Primary outcomes were live birth, ongoing pregnancy and clinical pregnancy, based on cumulative data (fresh and frozen-thawed embryo transfers), analysed per patient (pP), per complete cycle (pCC) and per first complete cycle (pFC). Secondary outcomes were pregnancy loss (analysed per clinical pregnancy), cancelled cycles (analysed pCC), total drug usage per oocyte retrieved and time-to-live birth (TTLB; per calendar week and per cycle). RESULTS Twenty-eight thousand six hundred forty-one women initiated a first treatment cycle (r-hFSH-alfa: 17,725 [61.9%]; hMG HP: 10,916 [38.1%]). After adjustment for confounding variables, treatment with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP was associated with a significantly higher probability of live birth (hazard ratio [HR]-pP [95% confidence interval (CI)]: 1.10 [1.04, 1.16]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.08, 1.19]; relative risk [RR]-pFC [95% CI]: 1.09 [1.05, 1.15], ongoing pregnancy (HR-pP [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.04, 1.16]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.13 [1.08, 1.19]; RR-pFC [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.05, 1.15]) and clinical pregnancy (HR-pP [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.05, 1.14]; HR-pCC [95% CI]: 1.14 [1.10, 1.19]; RR-pFC [95% CI]: 1.10 [1.06, 1.14]). Women treated with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP had no statistically significant difference in pregnancy loss (HR [95% CI]: 1.07 [0.98, 1.17], were less likely to have a cycle cancellation (HR [95% CI]: 0.91 [0.84, 0.99]) and had no statistically significant difference in TTLB when measured in weeks (HR [95% CI]: 1.02 [0.97, 1.07]; p = 0.548); however, r-hFSH-alfa was associated with a significantly shorter TTLB when measured in cycles versus hMG HP (HR [95% CI]: 1.07 [1.02, 1.13]; p = 0.003). There was an average of 47% less drug used per oocyte retrieved with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP. CONCLUSIONS This large (> 28,000 women), real-world study demonstrated significantly higher rates of cumulative live birth, cumulative ongoing pregnancy and cumulative clinical pregnancy with r-hFSH-alfa versus hMG HP.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Klaus F Bühler
- Department of Gynaecology, Jena-University Hospital-Friedrich Schiller University, 07737, Jena, Germany
- Scientific-Clinical Centre for Endometriosis of the University Hospitals of Saarland, 66121, Saarbrücken, Germany
| | - Robert Fischer
- Gynecological Endocrinology and Reproductive Medicine, Fertility Centre Hamburg, 20095, Hamburg, Germany
| | - Patrice Verpillat
- Global Epidemiology, Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Arthur Allignol
- Global Epidemiology, Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Sandra Guedes
- Global Epidemiology, Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Emmanuelle Boutmy
- Global Epidemiology, Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Wilma Bilger
- Medical Affairs Fertility, Endocrinology and General Medicine, Merck Serono GmbH, an affiliate of Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany, Alsfelder Str. 17, 64289, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Emilia Richter
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, Research and Development, Merck KGaA, Frankfurter Strasse 250, 64293, Darmstadt, Germany.
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Laboratory of Endometrium, Endometriosis & Reproductive Medicine, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Oude Markt 13, 3000, Leuven, Belgium.
- Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Yale University Medical School, 333 Cedar St, New Haven, CT, 06510, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Coticchio G, Behr B, Campbell A, Meseguer M, Morbeck DE, Pisaturo V, Plancha CE, Sakkas D, Xu Y, D'Hooghe T, Cottell E, Lundin K. Fertility technologies and how to optimize laboratory performance to support the shortening of time to birth of a healthy singleton: a Delphi consensus. J Assist Reprod Genet 2021; 38:1021-1043. [PMID: 33599923 DOI: 10.1007/s10815-021-02077-5] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/02/2020] [Accepted: 01/18/2021] [Indexed: 12/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To explore how the assisted reproductive technology (ART) laboratories can be optimized and standardized to enhance embryo culture and selection, to bridge the gap between standard practice and the new concept of shortening time to healthy singleton birth. METHODS A Delphi consensus was conducted (January to July 2018) to assess how the ART laboratory could be optimized, in conjunction with existing guidelines, to reduce the time to a healthy singleton birth. Eight experts plus the coordinator discussed and refined statements proposed by the coordinator. The statements were distributed via an online survey to 29 participants (including the eight experts from step 1), who voted on their agreement/disagreement with each statement. Consensus was reached if ≥ 66% of participants agreed/disagreed with a statement. If consensus was not achieved for any statement, that statement was revised and the process repeated until consensus was achieved. Details of statements achieving consensus were communicated to the participants. RESULTS Consensus was achieved for all 13 statements, which underlined the need for professional guidelines and standardization of lab processes to increase laboratory competency and quality. The most important points identified were the improvement of embryo culture and embryo assessment to shorten time to live birth through the availability of more high-quality embryos, priority selection of the most viable embryos and improved cryosurvival. CONCLUSION The efficiency of the ART laboratory can be improved through professional guidelines on standardized practices and optimized embryo culture environment, assessment, selection and cryopreservation methodologies, thereby reducing the time to a healthy singleton delivery.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Giovanni Coticchio
- 9.baby Family and Fertility Center, Via Dante, 15, 40125, Bologna, Italy.
| | - Barry Behr
- Division of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA
| | | | | | - Dean E Morbeck
- Fertility Associates, Auckland, New Zealand
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Faculty of Medical and Health Sciences, University of Auckland, Auckland, New Zealand
| | - Valerio Pisaturo
- Reproductive Medicine Department, International Evangelical Hospital, Genoa, Italy
| | - Carlos E Plancha
- Inst. Histologia e Biologia do Desenvolvimento, Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de Lisboa and CEMEARE, Lisbon, Portugal
| | - Denny Sakkas
- Boston IVF, Waltham, MA, USA
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
| | - Yanwen Xu
- Reproductive Medicine Center, The First Affiliated Hospital, Sun Yat-Sen University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Thomas D'Hooghe
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, USA
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, R&D Biopharma, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Department of Development and Regeneration, Biomedical Sciences Group, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
| | - Evelyn Cottell
- Global Medical Affairs Fertility, R&D Biopharma, Merck KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
| | - Kersti Lundin
- Reproductive Medicine, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, Gothenburg, Sweden
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Mahony MC, Hayward B, Mottla GL, Richter KS, Beall S, Ball GD, D’Hooghe T. Recombinant Human Follicle-Stimulating Hormone Alfa Dose Adjustment in US Clinical Practice: An Observational, Retrospective Analysis of a Real-World Electronic Medical Records Database. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne) 2021; 12:742089. [PMID: 34956077 PMCID: PMC8696034 DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2021.742089] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/15/2021] [Accepted: 11/16/2021] [Indexed: 11/13/2022] Open
Abstract
PURPOSE To determine the pattern of dose adjustment of recombinant human follicle-stimulating hormone alfa (r-hFSH-alfa) during ovarian stimulation (OS) for assisted reproductive technology (ART) in a real-world setting. METHODS This was an observational, retrospective analysis of data from an electronic de-identified medical records database including 39 clinics in the USA. Women undergoing OS for ART (initiated 2009-2016) with r-hFSH-alfa (Gonal-f® or Gonal-f RFF Redi-ject®) were included. Assessed outcomes were patients' baseline characteristics and dosing characteristics/cycle. RESULTS Of 33,962 ART cycles, 13,823 (40.7%) underwent dose adjustments: 23.4% with ≥1 dose increase, 25.4% with ≥1 dose decrease, and 8.1% with ≥1 increase and ≥1 decrease. Patients who received dose adjustments were younger (mean [SD] age 34.8 [4.58] years versus 35.9 [4.60] years, p<0.0001) and had lower BMI (25.1 [5.45] kg/m2 versus 25.5 [5.45] kg/m2, p<0.0001) than those who received a constant dose. The proportion of patients with non-normal ovarian reserve was 38.4% for those receiving dose adjustment versus 51.9% for those with a constant dose. The mean (SD) number of dose changes/cycle was 1.61 (0.92) for cycles with any dose adjustment, 1.72 (1.03) for cycles with ≥1 dose increase, 2.77 (1.00) for cycles with ≥1 dose increase and ≥1 decrease (n=2,755), and 1.88 (1.03) for cycles with ≥1 dose decrease. CONCLUSIONS Dose adjustment during OS is common in clinical practice in the USA and occurred more often in younger versus older patients, those with a high versus non-normal ovarian reserve or those with ovulation disorders/polycystic ovary syndrome versus other primary diagnoses of infertility.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Mary C. Mahony
- North America Medical Affairs, EMD Serono, Inc. (an affiliate of Merck KGaA), Rockland, MA, United States
| | - Brooke Hayward
- North America Medical Affairs, EMD Serono, Inc. (an affiliate of Merck KGaA), Rockland, MA, United States
| | - Gilbert L. Mottla
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center, Rockville, MD, United States
| | | | - Stephanie Beall
- Obstetrics and Gynecology, Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Shady Grove Fertility Reproductive Science Center, Rockville, MD, United States
| | - G. David Ball
- Seattle Reproductive Medicine, Seattle, WA, United States
| | - Thomas D’Hooghe
- Merck Healthcare KGaA, Darmstadt, Germany
- Reproductive Medicine, Department of Development and Regeneration, Organ Systems, Group Biomedical Sciences, KU Leuven (University of Leuven), Leuven, Belgium
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Yale University, New Haven, CT, United States
- *Correspondence: Thomas D’Hooghe,
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Blockeel C, Campbell A, Coticchio G, Esler J, Garcia-Velasco JA, Santulli P, Pinborg A. Should we still perform fresh embryo transfers in ART? Hum Reprod 2020; 34:2319-2329. [PMID: 31803911 DOI: 10.1093/humrep/dez233] [Citation(s) in RCA: 22] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/29/2019] [Revised: 09/02/2019] [Indexed: 12/12/2022] Open
Abstract
An increasing number of researchers have alluded to the potential benefit of deferring the transfer of embryos produced during assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) away from ovarian stimulation, using cryopreservation to enable this. The scientific evidence that may justify this recent trend in the use of the so-called 'freeze-all strategy' includes early, mostly small randomised controlled trials that have demonstrated an increase in live birth rates after elective embryo cryopreservation in certain patient populations, as well as evidence from cohort studies and retrospective analyses. What are the risks and benefits of freeze-all strategies in ART, who are the patients in whom it is likely to be advantageous, and does the current evidence allow us to identify situations when deciding that a fresh embryo transfer would be counter-productive? ART professionals are often faced with challenging clinical decisions regarding the best course of treatment for their patient. The purpose of this opinion paper is to provide a clinical guide for whether to perform a fresh embryo transfer or to opt for freezing all embryos in specific situations.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Christophe Blockeel
- Centre for Reproductive Medicine, Universitair Ziekenhuis Brussel, Brussels, Belgium.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Zagreb School of Medicine, Zagreb, Croatia
| | | | | | - John Esler
- Queensland Fertility Group, Toowoomba Specialist Centre, Toowoomba, Queensland, Australia
| | - Juan A Garcia-Velasco
- Instituto Valenciano de Infertilidad (IVI-RMA), Madrid, Spain.,Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Rey Juan Carlos University, Madrid, Spain
| | - Pietro Santulli
- Université Paris Descartes, Assistance Publique - Hôpitaux de Paris (AP-HP), Hôpital Universitaire Paris Centre (HUPC), Paris, France.,Faculté de Médecine, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France.,Department of Gynecology Obstetrics II and Reproductive Medicine (Professor Chapron), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire (CHU) Cochin, Paris, France.,Department of Development, Reproduction and Cancer, Institut Cochin, INSERM U1016 (Professor Batteux), Université Paris Descartes, Sorbonne Paris Cité, Paris, France
| | - Anja Pinborg
- Fertility Clinic, Rigshospitalet, Copenhagen University Hospital, Copenhagen, Denmark
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Assessment and management of the risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection in an IVF laboratory. Reprod Biomed Online 2020; 41:385-394. [PMID: 32693991 PMCID: PMC7320666 DOI: 10.1016/j.rbmo.2020.06.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 23] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/26/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/19/2020] [Indexed: 12/20/2022]
Abstract
Research question The study set out to identify corrective measures aimed at reducing the risk of aerosol-mediated viral infection within an IVF laboratory. Design A failure modes and effect analysis (FMEA) was conducted by a multidisciplinary IVF team. A schematic representation of new protocols and procedures adopted during COVID-19 emergency has been defined, including directives about the behaviour to adopt when entering the clinic and the laboratory, in case of face-to-face contact with patients and between staff members. In addition, the risk of cross-contamination between samples belonging to different patients during cell handling and manipulation has been evaluated. Potential failure modes for each phase of the emergency have been analysed, focusing on possible sources of error. Risk priority numbers have been calculated as products of Occurrence × Severity × Detection scores. Results Except for cell–cell contamination, which was considered highly unlikely, failure modes during patient–staff, staff–staff and staff–cell interactions were estimated as carrrying a moderate to high risk of infection. The main corrective measures entailed precautionary logistic measures, the implementation of additional personal protective equipment and changes in the IVF laboratory procedures and scheduling of the daily routine. Some procedures were also revised, aiming to increase staff's awareness and caution. Conclusions Standard laboratory protocols are insufficient to face a virus whose transmission is aerosol mediated. The measures outlined in this FMEA should thus be considered not only for facing this pandemic, but also for the future to promptly manage any aerosol-mediated virus infection, whose impact on the management of an IVF laboratory might be less severe than COVID-19 although not completely negligible.
Collapse
|
13
|
Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Petriglia C, Conforti A, Alviggi C, Ubaldi N, Ledda S, Ferrero S, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. DuoStim - a reproducible strategy to obtain more oocytes and competent embryos in a short time-frame aimed at fertility preservation and IVF purposes. A systematic review. Ups J Med Sci 2020; 125:121-130. [PMID: 32338123 PMCID: PMC7721001 DOI: 10.1080/03009734.2020.1734694] [Citation(s) in RCA: 28] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/08/2019] [Accepted: 02/21/2020] [Indexed: 12/15/2022] Open
Abstract
Recent evidence suggests that follicular development occurs in a wave-like model during the ovarian cycle, where up to three cohorts of follicles are recruited to complete folliculogenesis. This understanding overtakes the previous dogma stating that follicles grow only during the follicular phase of the menstrual cycle. Therefore, in in vitro fertilization (IVF), novel protocols regarding ovarian stimulation have been theorized based on the use of gonadotrophins to prompt the growth of antral follicles at any stage of the menstrual cycle. These unconventional protocols for ovarian stimulation aim at a more efficient management of poor-prognosis patients, otherwise exposed to conflicting outcomes after conventional approaches. DuoStim appears among these unconventional stimulation protocols as one of the most promising. It combines two consecutive stimulations in the follicular and luteal phases of the same ovarian cycle, aimed at increasing the number of oocytes retrieved and embryos produced in the short time-frame. This protocol has been suggested for the treatment of all conditions requiring a maximal and urgent exploitation of the ovarian reserve, such as oncological patients and poor responders at an advanced maternal age. At present, data from independent studies have outlined the consistency and reproducibility of this approach, which might also reduce the drop-out between consecutive failed IVF cycles in poor-prognosis patients. However, the protocol must be standardized, and more robust studies and cost-benefit analyses are needed to highlight the true clinical pros and cons deriving from DuoStim implementation in IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Cecilia Petriglia
- Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Cagliari, Policlinico Universitario Duilio Casula, Monserrato, Cagliari, Italy
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Nicolò Ubaldi
- Catholic University of the Sacred Heart, Rome, Italy
| | - Sergio Ledda
- Department of Veterinary Medicine, University of Sassari, Sassari, Italy
| | - Susanna Ferrero
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
14
|
Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Conforti A, Schimberni M, Giuliani M, D'Alessandro P, Colamaria S, Alviggi C, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Luteal phase after conventional stimulation in the same ovarian cycle might improve the management of poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria: a case series. Fertil Steril 2019; 113:121-130. [PMID: 31837743 DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2019.09.012] [Citation(s) in RCA: 38] [Impact Index Per Article: 7.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/19/2019] [Revised: 09/04/2019] [Accepted: 09/09/2019] [Indexed: 10/25/2022]
Abstract
OBJECTIVE To assess the clinical contribution of luteal-phase stimulation (LPS) to follicular-phase stimulation (FPS) in a single ovarian cycle (DuoStim) for poor responder patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria. DESIGN Observational study (years 2015-2017) including women satisfying ≥2 of the following characteristics: maternal age ≥40 years and/or ≤3 oocytes retrieved after previous conventional stimulation and/or reduced ovarian reserve (i.e., antral follicle count <7 follicles or antimüllerian hormone <1.1 ng/mL). The LPS was started regardless of the outcome of the FPS. SETTING Private in vitro fertilization center. PATIENT(S) A total of 100 of 297 patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria chose to undergo DuoStim. INTERVENTION(S) The FPS and LPS with the same antagonist protocol and agonist trigger, intracytoplasmic sperm injection with ejaculated sperm, preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidies, and vitrified-warmed euploid single blastocyst transfer. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S) The contribution of LPS to the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) per intention-to-treat (ITT). RESULT(S) Patients (100) underwent FPS (maternal age, 42.1 ± 1.4 y; previous in vitro fertilization cycles with ≤3 collected oocytes, 0.7 ± 0.9; antral follicle count, 3.8 ± 1.2 follicles; and antimüllerian hormone, 0.56 ± 0.3 ng/mL). Ninety-one patients completed DuoStim. All patients were included in the analysis. More oocytes were obtained after LPS with similar developmental and chromosomal competence as paired FPS-derived ones. The CLBR per ITT increased from 7% after FPS to 15% after DuoStim. Conversely, the CLBR per ITT among the 197 patients that chose a conventional controlled ovarian stimulation strategy was 8%, as only 17 patients who were not pregnant returned for a second stimulation after the first attempt (drop-out rate, 81%). CONCLUSION(S) The LPS-derived oocytes increased the CLBR per ITT in a single ovarian cycle in patients fulfilling the Bologna criteria. The DuoStim strategy is promising to manage this thorny population of patients, especially to avoid discontinuation after a first failed attempt.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Vaiarelli
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A., Centers for Reproductive Medicine, BioRoma, Rome, Rome, Italy.
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A., Centers for Reproductive Medicine, BioRoma, Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | | | - Maddalena Giuliani
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A., Centers for Reproductive Medicine, BioRoma, Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Pietro D'Alessandro
- Clinica Ruesch, G.EN.E.R.A. Centers for Reproductive Medicine, Naples, Italy
| | - Silvia Colamaria
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A., Centers for Reproductive Medicine, BioRoma, Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples, Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A., Centers for Reproductive Medicine, BioRoma, Rome, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo Maria Ubaldi
- Clinica Valle Giulia, G.EN.E.R.A., Centers for Reproductive Medicine, BioRoma, Rome, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
15
|
Wiweko B. Cutting Edge of Reproductive Medicine. FERTILITY & REPRODUCTION 2019. [DOI: 10.1142/s2661318219300071] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/18/2022] Open
Abstract
Background: Louise Brown’s delivery in 1978 was the mark of a successful IVF program that has now been in practice for more than 40 years. The technology has delivered more than 8 million babies. Many breakthrough innovations were established to answer the problem in ART services. Optimizing ART biomarkers and cross border reproductive care have become a rising issue in ART services. Disruptive innovation disrupts the existing condition and takes the lead in the new market, including to change our patient behavior in health services. National health services addressed new issues about the impact of 4.0 industrial revolution on health workforce and our daily practices. Every disruptive innovation today is enhanced by a combination of physical, digital, and biological domain. The advancement in the area of the internet of things, artificial intelligence, virtual reality, nanotechnology, cloud computing, big data, deep learning, machine learning, robotics, and gene editing could potentially support us to innovate. And to improve the quality and outcome of ART, the introduction of the latest technology, such as robotics and artificial intelligence, has become an essential approach. A recent study discovered that the use of artificial intelligence would remove the embryologist’s subjectivity and improve the way we choose the best embryo for implantation. The next challenging issue in ART is improving the success rate through optimizing noninvasive biomarkers development. Many biological products such as blood, tissue, organ fluid can be assessed and considered to be used as IVF biomarkers. Proteomic tools were used and are needed to analyze a sample from subjects before it was created as a biomarker for improving the IVF services quality. Conclusion: The development of IVF over 40 years has brought about many distinct achievements in the laboratory and in clinic. Industrial revolution 4.0 has generated many innovations that have helped improve the quality of ART services, including AUGMENT social egg freezing, artificial intelligence, and genome editing. In this era, precision medicine looks very promising for bridging the gap and increasing the accuracy and efficacy of promotive, preventive, diagnostic, and treatment approaches in reproductive medicine.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Budi Wiweko
- Faculty of Medicine Universitas Indonesia – Dr. Cipto Mangunkusumo General Hospital, Jakarta, Indonesia
| |
Collapse
|
16
|
Vaiarelli A, Cimadomo D, Argento C, Ubaldi N, Trabucco E, Drakopoulos P, Venturella R, Conforti A, Alviggi C, Rienzi L, Ubaldi FM. Double stimulation in the same ovarian cycle (DuoStim) is an intriguing strategy to improve oocyte yield and the number of competent embryos in a short timeframe. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2019; 71:372-376. [PMID: 30848112 DOI: 10.23736/s0026-4784.19.04390-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.8] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/08/2022]
Abstract
Proper ovarian stimulation regimens are crucial for any patient undergoing in-vitro fertilization (IVF). However, maximizing the oocyte yield in advanced maternal age patients with poor or suboptimal response is still a challenge. In fact, no standard treatment has been outlined yet to manage these women. Across the last years, an improved efficiency of the IVF units via blastocyst culture, vitrification and reliable embryo selection approaches paved the way to the investigation of novel unconventional stimulation protocols, like double stimulation in a single ovarian cycle (DuoStim). DuoStim, by conjugating follicular phase stimulation (FPS) and luteal phase stimulation (LPS) in the same ovarian cycle, allows to maximize the number of oocytes obtained in a short timeframe, a precious outcome when we aim at shortening time to pregnancy. In this regard, LPS seems to contribute to conventional stimulation with more oocytes with a comparable competence as FPS, retrieved per ovarian cycle. Although any stimulation protocol which exploits anovulatory waves of follicular growth needs a thorough investigation, no evidence has been produced to question the safety of DuoStim, which to date represents the most intriguing strategy to treat poor prognosis in IVF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Alberto Vaiarelli
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy -
| | - Danilo Cimadomo
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Cindy Argento
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | | | | | | | - Roberta Venturella
- Department of Experimental and Clinical Medicine, Magna Graecia University, Catanzaro, Italy
| | - Alessandro Conforti
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Carlo Alviggi
- Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Science and Odontostomatology, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy
| | - Laura Rienzi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| | - Filippo M Ubaldi
- G.EN.E.R.A. Center for Reproductive Medicine, Clinica Valle Giulia, Rome, Italy
| |
Collapse
|