Comorbidities, risk factors and maternal/perinatal outcomes in oocyte donation pregnancies

Obstetric and maternal outcomes of IVF and oocyte donation pregnancies among women ages 40-45-a large cohort study

PURPOSE

To analyze the perinatal and maternal outcomes of women ranging in age from 40 to 45 years who gave birth after in vitro fertilization or oocyte donation, compared to spontaneous conception.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study used electronic data from a national healthcare service from 2000 through 2019. Three groups were compared: spontaneous pregnancy (SC), in vitro fertilization (IVF) utilizing autologous oocytes, and pregnancies resulting from oocyte donation (OD). The primary study outcomes were preterm labor (PTL) before 37 weeks of gestation, and infants classified as small for gestational age (SGA).

RESULTS

The cohort included 26,379 SC, 2237 IVF pregnancies, and 300 OD pregnancies for women ages 40-45 years at delivery. Women with OD or IVF had a higher incidence of PTL < 37 weeks compared to women with SC (19.7% vs. 18% vs. 6.9%, p = 0.001), PTL < 34 (7% vs. 4.5% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.001), PTL < 32 (3.7 vs. 2.1 vs. 0.6, p = 0.001). A multivariable logistic regression for PTL < 37 weeks demonstrated that age (OR = 1.18) and hypertensive diseases (OR = 3.4) were statistically significant factors. The OD group had a lower rate of SGA compared to SC (1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.001), while the IVF group had a higher rate of SGA compared to SC (9.1% vs. 4.3%, p = 0.001). Hypertensive diseases in pregnancy were significantly higher among the OD group and the IVF group compared to SP pregnancies (3.3% vs. 1%, p = 0.002; 2.3% vs. 1%, p = 0.001, respectively).

CONCLUSIONS

Women ages 40-45 undergoing IVF or OD have a greater risk of PTL, possibly due to higher rates of hypertensive disorders of pregnancy.

Long-term outcomes for children conceived by assisted reproductive technology

Worldwide, more than 10 million children have been born after assisted reproduction technology (ART), comprising up to 7.9% of children born in Europe and up to 5.1 % of children born in the US in 2018. The short-term outcome for children born after ART is well-known from numerous publications, with higher rates of preterm birth and low birth weight in children born after fresh embryo transfer and higher rates of large for gestational age and high birth weight in children born after frozen embryo transfer compared with children born after spontaneous conception. Higher rates of birth defects in children born after ART have also been shown consistently over time. Studies on long-term health outcomes after ART are scarcer but suggest an increased risk of altered blood pressure and cardiovascular function in children born after ART. In this review, we summarize long-term health outcomes in children born after ART and discuss whether the increased health risks are associated with intrinsic maternal or paternal factors related to subfertility or ART treatments per se. Finally, we speculate where the future will bring us regarding ART treatment strategies and the safety of the mother and child.

Risk of stillbirth in singleton gestations following in vitro methods of conception: a systematic review and meta-analysis

BACKGROUND

In vitro methods of conception are associated with adverse perinatal outcomes. It is unclear if the risk of stillbirth is increased also.

OBJECTIVE

This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to estimate the risk of stillbirth in singleton gestations following in vitro methods of conception compared to non-in vitro conceptions.

SEARCH STRATEGY

A comprehensive search in PubMed, Embase, CINAHL, and Cochrane Library was undertaken from database inception to February 2021, with backward citation tracking.

SELECTION CRITERIA

Eligible studies included randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, or case-control studies that assessed stillbirth following in vitro fertilisation and/or intracytoplasmic sperm injection in comparison to non-in vitro methods of conception, including spontaneous conceptions, intrauterine insemination, and ovarian stimulation.

DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS

The Newcastle-Ottawa Scale was used to assess risk of bias. A summary odds ratio (OR) for stillbirth following in vitro methods of conception compared to non-in vitro methods was calculated using a random-effects model for meta-analysis.

MAIN RESULTS

Thirty-three cohort studies met inclusion criteria. There was an increased risk of stillbirth with in vitro methods: OR 1.41 (95% CI 1.20-1.65); however, the crude baseline risk of stillbirth was low (4.44/1000 total births). Subgroup analysis did not demonstrate an increased risk when in vitro methods were compared to conception without in vitro methods in the context of subfertility.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to non-in vitro conceptions, in vitro conceptions have an increased risk of stillbirth. However, there is insufficient evidence to demonstrate whether this risk is associated with in vitro techniques or underlying subfertility.

TWEETABLE ABSTRACT

This meta-analysis found an increased risk of stillbirth in singletons from in vitro methods of conception.