Endometriosis patients benefit from high serum progesterone in hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer cycles: a cohort study

Comparison of vaginal versus intramuscular progesterone in programmed cycles for frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in patients with endometriosis

BACKGROUND

Previous studies have shown that due to the presence of endometrium progesterone resistance in patients with endometriosis, it is considered that higher levels of progesterone may be required to achieve live birth during programmed frozen-thawed embryo transfer (FET) cycles. Currently, the optimal progesterone support in FET cycles remains a contentious issue, and it mainly focused on the general infertile population, without specific attention to infertile patients with endometriosis. This study aimed to compare the pregnancy outcomes between vaginal or intramuscular progesterone administration in patients with endometriosis, and to determine whether the stage of endometriosis moderates the differences.

METHODS

This retrospective cohort study included patients with endometriosis who underwent their first single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer in a programmed cycle from January 2018 to April 2024 at a university-affiliated reproductive medical center. According to the routes of luteal support, patients were divided into vaginal progesterone and intramuscular progesterone groups. Analyses were conducted using multivariate regression models and subgroup analysis. Interaction tests were employed to determine whether the revised American Society for Reproductive Medicine (r-ASRM) stages of endometriosis moderated the differences between the routes of progesterone administration and pregnancy outcomes.

RESULTS

A total of 825 programmed frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles were included in the analysis, with 362 cases using vaginal progesterone and 463 cases using intramuscular progesterone. In the overall cohort, clinical pregnancy rate of the vaginal progesterone group was 49.17%, comparable to 44.06% of the intramuscular progesterone group (aOR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.11). Similarly, there was no statistically significant difference in miscarriage rates between the two groups (16.85% versus 24.51%; aOR 1.57, 95% CI 0.90-2.75). In the subgroup analysis in patients classified as r-ASRM stages I-II, clinical pregnancy rate of vaginal progesterone group was significantly higher than that of intramuscular group (aOR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58-0.93, P = 0.011). Whereas, in patients with stages III-IV, no significant differences in pregnancy outcomes between the two groups were detected. Interaction tests between the routes of progesterone administration and r-ASRM stages were significant (P = 0.036).

CONCLUSIONS

In the first single frozen-thawed blastocyst transfer cycles for endometriosis patients with r-ASRM stages I-II, vaginal progesterone favours a higher clinical pregnancy rate compared to the intramuscular progesterone.

The First Lugano Workshop on the role of adenomyosis in ART

Adenomyosis is an important clinical condition with uncertain prevalence, and clinical focus on adenomyosis in patients undergoing assisted reproductive technology (ART) has increased during recent years. Recognizing the limited clinical knowledge on the impact of adenomyosis on ART outcomes, the First Lugano Adenomyosis Workshop was a symposium involving experts in the field of adenomyosis, covering basic research, imaging, surgery and infertility to highlight current advances and future research areas over a wide range of topics related to adenomyosis. Adenomyosis is characterized by altered oestrogen and progesterone signalling pathways. Although the criteria of the Morphological Uterus Sonographic Assessment (MUSA) Consortium apply to patients with infertility, the presence of direct signs and localization in the different myometrial layers, particularly the inner myometrium, need more focus. In addition to the MUSA criteria, clinical symptoms and the magnitude of uterine enlargement should also be considered. Whilst pre-treatment with gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist with or without an aromatase inhibitor in frozen embryo transfer cycles seems promising, many issues related to therapy remain unanswered. During the Workshop, therapeutic progress over the past decades as well as novel insights were presented and discussed. The role of this opinion paper is to stimulate discussion and spark further interest in adenomyosis and the role of adenomyosis in infertility.

Progesterone levels do not differ between patients with or without endometriosis/adenomyosis both in those who conceive after hormone replacement therapy-frozen embryo transfer cycles and those who do not

STUDY QUESTION

Do women with endometriosis who achieve a live birth (LB) after HRT-frozen embryo transfer (HRT-FET) have different progesterone levels on the day of transfer compared to unaffected women?

SUMMARY ANSWER

In women achieving a LB after HRT-FET, serum progesterone levels on the day of the transfer did not differ between patients with endometriosis and unaffected patients.

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

In HRT-FET, several studies have highlighted the correlation between serum progesterone levels at the time of FET and LB rates. In the pathophysiology of endometriosis, progesterone resistance is typically described in the eutopic endometrium. This has led to the hypothesis that women with endometriosis may require higher progesterone levels to achieve a LB, especially in HRT-FET cycles without a corpus luteum.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

We conducted an observational cohort study at the university-based reproductive medicine center of our institution, focusing on women who underwent a single autologous frozen blastocyst transfer after HRT using exogenous estradiol and micronized vaginal progesterone for endometrial preparation between January 2019 and December 2021. Women were included only once during the study period. Serum progesterone levels were measured on the morning of the FET by a single laboratory.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients were divided into groups based on whether they had endometriosis or not and whether they achieved a LB. The diagnosis of endometriosis was based on published imaging criteria (transvaginal sonography/magnetic resonance imaging) and/or confirmed histology. The primary outcome was progesterone levels on the day of the HRT-FET leading to a LB in patients with endometriosis compared to unaffected women. Subgroup analyses were performed based on the presence of deep infiltrating endometriosis or adenomyosis.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

A total of 1784 patients were included. The mean age of the women was 35.1 ± 4.1 (SD) years. Five hundred and sixty women had endometriosis, while 1224 did not. About 179/560 (32.0%) with endometriosis and 381/1224 (31.2%) without endometriosis achieved a LB. Among women who achieved a LB after HRT-FET, there was no significant difference in the mean progesterone level on the day of the HRT-FET between those with endometriosis and those without (13.6 ± 4.3 ng/ml vs 13.2 ± 4.4 ng/ml, respectively; P = 0.302). In the subgroup of women with deep infiltrating endometriosis (n = 142) and adenomyosis (n = 100), the mean progesterone level was 13.1 ± 4.1 ng/ml and 12.6 ± 3.7 ng/ml, respectively, with no significant difference compared to endometriosis-free patients. After adjusting for BMI, parity, duration of infertility, tobacco use, and geographic origin, neither the presence of endometriosis (coefficient 0.38; 95% CI: -0.63 to 1.40; P = 0.457) nor the presence of adenomyosis (coefficient 0.97; 95% CI: -0.24 to 2.19; P = 0.114) was associated with the progesterone level on the day of HRT-FET. Among women who did not conceive, there was no significant difference in the mean progesterone level on the day of the HRT-FET between those with endometriosis and those without (P = 0.709).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

The primary limitation of our study is associated with its observational design. Extrapolating our results to other laboratories or different routes and/or dosages of administering progesterone also requires validation.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

This study shows that patients diagnosed with endometriosis do not require higher progesterone levels on the day of a frozen blastocyst transfer to achieve a LB in hormonal replacement therapy cycles.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

None declared.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER

N/A.

Predictive Role of Progesterone Levels for IVF Outcome in Different Phases of Controlled Ovarian Stimulation for Patients With and Without Endometriosis: Expert View

The study aimed to review the role of basal, trigger, and aspiration day progesterone levels (PLs) as predictors of in vitro fertilization (IVF) success for patients with and without endometriosis. A non-systematic review was conducted by searching papers published in English during the period of 1990-2023 in MEDLINE and PubMed, Embase, The Cochrane Library (Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Methodology Register), and Web of Science. The most widely used IVF predictor success was the trigger day progesterone serum level. Many studies utilize the threshold level of 1.5-2.0 ng/ml. However, the predictive power of only progesterone level failed to show high sensitivity and specificity. Contrary, progesterone level on the trigger day combined with the number of mature retrieved oocytes had the highest predictive power. High baseline progesterone level was associated with poor IVF outcomes. Research on progesterone and IVF success in patients with endometriosis is limited but indicates that endometriosis patients seem to benefit from higher progesterone concentrations (≥ 37.1 ng/ml) in IVF cycles. Currently, there is limited data for a definitive insight into the mportance of progesterone in the estimation of IVF success. Nonetheless, this summarized evidence could serve as up-to-date guidance for the role of progesterone in the prediction of IVF outcomes, both in patients with and without endometriosis.

The adenomyosis/endometriosis IVF patient - call for clinical focus

Endometriosis and adenomyosis are distinct clinical conditions that carry the same pathophysiological features. In recent years the clinical focus on assisted reproductive technology patients with either condition (E/A) has increased, in the recognition that this subgroup of patients might need special attention to obtain reproductive success. Endometriosis and adenomyosis are characterized by a disruption of progesterone and oestrogen signalling pathways, resulting in local oestrogen dominance and progesterone resistance at the receptor level. Recent scientific evidence suggests that the endometrial progesterone receptor resistance encountered in E/A patients can be overcome by a freeze-all policy, followed by down-regulating circulating oestradiol concentrations prior to frozen embryo transfer (FET), in combination with an increase in exogenous luteal phase progesterone supplementation in hormonal replacement therapy (HRT) FET cycles. Specifically, for adenomyosis patients who do not respond to gonadotrophin-releasing hormone agonist down-regulation in terms of a decrease in circulating oestradiol concentrations, a small case series has suggested that the addition of an aromatase inhibitor for 21 days prior to HRT-FET is a valid option. Endometriosis and adenomyosis are hormonally active diseases, which need to be treated by controlling local hyperoestrogenism and progesterone resistance. Based on physiology and recent preliminary clinical data, the authors of this opinion paper wish to stimulate discussion and spark interest in research in E/A patients.

Luteal phase support in assisted reproductive technology

Infertility affects one in six couples, with in vitro fertilization (IVF) offering many the chance of conception. Compared to the solitary oocyte produced during the natural menstrual cycle, the supraphysiological ovarian stimulation needed to produce multiple oocytes during IVF results in a dysfunctional luteal phase that can be insufficient to support implantation and maintain pregnancy. Consequently, hormonal supplementation with luteal phase support, principally exogenous progesterone, is used to optimize pregnancy rates; however, luteal phase support remains largely 'black-box' with insufficient clarity regarding the optimal timing, dosing, route and duration of treatment. Herein, we review the evidence on luteal phase support and highlight remaining uncertainties and future research directions. Specifically, we outline the physiological luteal phase, which is regulated by progesterone from the corpus luteum, and evaluate how it is altered by the supraphysiological ovarian stimulation used during IVF. Additionally, we describe the effects of the hormonal triggers used to mature oocytes on the degree of luteal phase support required. We explain the histological transformation of the endometrium during the luteal phase and evaluate markers of endometrial receptivity that attempt to identify the 'window of implantation'. We also cover progesterone receptor signalling, circulating progesterone levels associated with implantation, and the pharmacokinetics of available progesterone formulations to inform the design of luteal phase support regimens.

Rectal progesterone administration secures a high ongoing pregnancy rate in a personalized Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer (HRT-FET) protocol: a prospective interventional study

STUDY QUESTION

Can supplementation with rectal administration of progesterone secure high ongoing pregnancy rates (OPRs) in patients with low serum progesterone (P4) on the day of blastocyst transfer (ET)?

SUMMARY ANSWER

Rectally administered progesterone commencing on the ET day secures high OPRs in patients with serum P4 levels below 35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml).

WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY

Low serum P4 levels at peri-implantation in Hormone Replacement Therapy Frozen Embryo Transfer (HRT-FET) cycles impact reproductive outcomes negatively. However, studies have shown that patients with low P4 after a standard vaginal progesterone treatment can obtain live birth rates (LBRs) comparable to patients with optimal P4 levels if they receive additionalsubcutaneous progesterone, starting around the day of blastocyst transfer. In contrast, increasing vaginal progesterone supplementation in low serum P4 patients does not increase LBR. Another route of administration rarely used in ART is the rectal route, despite the fact that progesterone is well absorbed and serum P4 levels reach a maximum level after ∼2 h.

STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION

This prospective interventional study included a cohort of 488 HRT-FET cycles, in which a total of 374 patients had serum P4 levels ≥35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml) at ET, and 114 patients had serum P4 levels <35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml). The study was conducted from January 2020 to November 2022.

PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS

Patients underwent HRT-FET in a public Fertility Clinic, and endometrial preparation included oral oestradiol (6 mg/24 h), followed by vaginal micronized progesterone, 400 mg/12 h. Blastocyst transfer and P4 measurements were performed on the sixth day of progesterone administration. In patients with serum P4 <35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml), 'rescue' was performed by rectal administration of progesterone (400 mg/12 h) starting that same day. In pregnant patients, rectal administration continued until Week 8 of gestation, and oestradiol and vaginal progesterone treatment continued until Week 10 of gestation.

MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE

Among 488 HRT-FET single blastocyst transfers, the mean age of the patients at oocyte retrieval (OR) was 30.9 ± 4.6 years and the mean BMI at ET 25.1 ± 3.5 kg/m2. The mean serum P4 level after vaginal progesterone administration on the day of ET was 48.9 ± 21.0 nmol/l (15.4 ± 6.6 ng/ml), and a total of 23% (114/488) of the patients had a serum P4 level lower than 35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml). The overall, positive hCG rate, clinical pregnancy rate, OPR week 12, and total pregnancy loss rate were 66% (320/488), 54% (265/488), 45% (221/488), and 31% (99/320), respectively. There was no significant difference in either OPR week 12 or total pregnancy loss rate between patients with P4 ≥35 nmol/l (11 ng/ml) and patients with P4 <35 nmol/l, who received rescue in terms of rectally administered progesterone, 45% versus 46%, P = 0.77 and 30% versus 34%, P = 0.53, respectively. OPR did not differ whether patients had initially low P4 and rectal rescue or were above the P4 cut-off. Logistic regression analysis showed that only age at OR and blastocyst scoring correlated with OPR week 12, independently of other factors like BMI and vitrification day of blastocysts (Day 5 or 6).

LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION

In this study, vaginal micronized progesterone pessaries, a solid pessary with progesterone suspended in vegetable hard fat, were used vaginally as well as rectally. It is unknown whether other vaginal progesterone products, such as capsules, gel, or tablet, could be used rectally with the same rescue effect.

WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS

A substantial part of HRT-FET patients receiving vaginal progesterone treatment has lowserum P4. Adding rectally administered progesterone in these patients increases the reproductive outcome. Importantly, rectal progesterone administration is considered convenient, and progesterone pessaries are easy to administer rectally and of low cost.

STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S)

Gedeon Richter Nordic supported the study with an unrestricted grant as well as study medication. B.A. has received unrestricted grant from Gedeon Richter Nordic and Merck and honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, IBSA and Marckyrl Pharma. P.H. has received honoraria for lectures from Gedeon Richter, Merck, IBSA and U.S.K. has received grant from Gedeon Richter Nordic, IBSA and Merck for studies outside this work and honoraria for teaching from Merck and Thillotts Pharma AB and conference expenses covered by Merck. The other co-authors have no conflict of interest to declare.

TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER (25)

EudraCT no.: 2019-001539-29.