Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament by means of the anatomical double-bundle technique using metal anchors

[Patellofemoral instability in children and adolescents]

Patellofemoral instability is a common and clinically relevant disorder of multifactorial causes. Several concomitant problems such as genua valga, hyperlaxity, injuries or sports-related overuse may contribute to the development of instability and recurrent patellar dislocations. A thorough diagnosis is of paramount importance to delineate every contributing factor. This includes radiographic modalities and advanced imaging such as magnetic resonance imaging or torsional analyses. The authors recommend non-operative management (including physiotherapy, gait and proprioceptive training, orthoses) and, whenever non-operative measures fail, surgical patellar stabilization using, e.g. MPFL reconstruction.

Medium to long-term outcomes of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction using the superficial quadriceps versus a hamstring autograft in patellar instability patients

Medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) reconstruction is a standard procedure in patellar dislocation patients. Superficial quadriceps autografts (QA) and hamstring autografts (HA) are popular graft choices in MPFL reconstruction with the lack of directly compared clinical studies between both methods. A total of 43 patellar instability patients, who underwent QA and HA for patellar stabilization at a specified center between 2012 and 2021, were retrospectively reviewed. 21 QA and 22 HA patients were 52.4% of males and 47.6% females with a median age of 25 years (range 12-58) in the QA group, while 63.6% were females with a median age of 21 years (range 14-58) in the HA group. The mean follow-up period was 46.9 months (range 24-77) in QA and 61 months (range 24-100) in the HA group. At the final follow-up, no complications were observed with either technique. No patients presented with recurrent dislocations after surgery. There was no statistically significant difference in postoperative mean Kujala scores (QA = 94.9+/- 4.1 and HA = 94.2+/- 8.0, p = 0.73) or the mean Lysholm scores (QA = 94.1+/- 5.0 and HA = 93.2+/- 7.0, p = 0.61).

Protocols of rehabilitation and return to sport, and clinical outcomes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with and without tibial tuberosity osteotomy: a systematic review

PURPOSE

No consensus exists on rehabilitation programmes after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction (MPFLR) with or without tibial tuberosity osteotomy (TTO). This systematic review examined the content and timeline of rehabilitation (weightbearing, range of motion [ROM] and exercise therapy) and return to sport (RTS), as well as patient-reported outcomes after MPFLR with or without TTO.

METHODS

The PubMed, Cochrane Library, Web of Sciences, CINAHL and SPORTDiscus databases were searched from inception to December 2021. Studies that reported postoperative rehabilitation programmes and patient-reported outcomes for patients aged ≥ 18 years who underwent MPFLR with or without concomitant TTO were included.

RESULTS

Eighty-five studies were included, 57 of which were case series and only one randomised controlled trial on rehabilitation programmes. Non-weightbearing was set within one week post-operatively in approximately 80% of weightbearing programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO. Joint immobilisation was set within one week post-operatively in 65.3% and 93.8% of programmes for MPFLR without and with TTO, respectively. Weightbearing and ROM (≤ 90°) restriction were within three weeks post-operatively for > 50% of the programmes. Quadriceps strengthening was the most cited exercise therapy (33 programmes), most often initiated within two weeks post-operatively. However, few other exercise programmes were cited (only nine programmes). RTS was mostly noted at six months post-operatively (35 programmes). The weighted mean Kujala score was 87.4 points.

CONCLUSION

Regardless of TTO addition to MPFLR, most studies restricted weightbearing and ROM only in the early post-operative period, with seemingly favourable clinical results. Limited information was available on post-operative exercise therapy.

Anatomical Double-Bundle Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction With Autologous Semitendinosus, a Single Patellar Tunnel Technique

Patellofemoral instability is one of the knee problems that can be found in up to 3% of knee injuries, especially in younger aged females. Recent biomechanical studies showed that the main soft tissue stabilizer for patellofemoral stability is the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). More than 200 articles on MPFL reconstruction have been published. Some surgical techniques create multiple holes in the patellar area that may increase the risk of patellar fractures. This technique that we present here attempts to reduce the chance of patella-related complications, while maintaining stability of the reconstructed construct, reducing the use of a lengthy tendon graft within the patella and covering the footprint at the border of the patella closed to the native anatomy of the MPFL.

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: analysis of outcomes and risk factors

Background

The medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is always damaged after patellar dislocation. In selected patients, MPFL reconstruction is necessary to restore a correct patellar tracking. Despite the large number of different techniques reported to reconstruct the MPFL, there is no consensus concerning the optimal procedure, and debates is still ongoing. The present study analysed the results after isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability. Furthermore, a subgroup analysis of patients presenting pathoanatomical risk factors was made.

Methods

In November 2020, the main electronic databases were accessed. All articles reporting the results of primary isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum 12-month follow-up were eligible.

Results

Data from a total of 1777 knees were collected. The mean age of the patients involved was 22.8 ± 3.4 years. The mean follow-up was 40.7 ± 25.8 months. Overall, the range of motion (+ 27.74; P < 0.0001) and all the other scores of interests improved at last follow-up: Kujala (+ 12.76; P = 0.0003), Lysholm (+ 15.69; P < 0.0001), Tegner score (+ 2.86; P = 0.006). Seventy-three of 1780 patients (4.1%) showed a positive apprehension test. Thirty of 1765 patients (1.7%) experienced re-dislocations, while 56 of 1778 patients (3.2%) showed persisting joint instability. Twenty-five of 1786 patients (1.4%) underwent revision surgeries.

Conclusion

Isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability provides reliable surgical outcomes. Patients with pathoanatomical predisposing factors reported worse surgical outcomes.

Lateral retinacular release combined with MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability: a systematic review

INTRODUCTION

The role of the lateral retinaculum in patellofemoral instability is still debated. Lateral retinacular release (LRR), has been extensively performed in combination with different surgical procedures, including reconstruction of medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL). Despite controversial indications, the results from these studies seem promising. The present study conducts a systematic review about current biomechanical and clinical evidence concerning the role of LRR in combination with MPFL reconstruction. We performed a comprehensive literature research, comparing the outcomes of MPFL reconstruction with and without LRR.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was performed in August 2020. All articles describing the outcome of isolated MPFL reconstruction alone or in combination with a LRR in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting data on patients with a minimum of 12-month follow-up were included. Only articles reporting quantitative data under the outcomes of interest were included.

RESULTS

A total of 63 articles were eligible for this systematic review, including 2131 knees. The mean follow-up was 40.87 ± 24.1 months. All scores of interests improved in favour of the combined group: Kujala + 3.8% (P = 0.01), Lysholm + 4.2% (P = 0.004), Tegner + 0.8 points (P = 0.04), IKDC + 9.8% (P = 0.02). The ROM was comparable between the two groups (P = 0.4). Similarity was found in terms of positivity to the apprehension test (P = 0.05), rate of complications (P = 0.1), re-dislocations (P = 0.8), and revision surgeries (P = 0.1).

CONCLUSION

There is no evidence that adding a lateral release impacts positively on the outcome of MPFL reconstruction.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

IV, Systematic review.

Update on Patellar Instability

Patellar instability is a multifactorial clinical condition that affects a significant number of patients and occurs due to morphological variations of the joint and patellofemoral alignment. The present literature review study aimed to identify and summarize current concepts on patellar instability, in relation to associated risk factors, diagnostic criteria, and the benefits and risks of conservative and surgical treatments. For this purpose, a search was conducted in the following electronic databases: MEDLINE (via Pubmed), LILACS and Cochrane Library. It is concluded that the accurate diagnosis depends on the detailed clinical evaluation, including the history and possible individual risk factors, as well as imaging exams. The initial treatment of patellar instability is still controversial, and requires the combination of conservative and surgical interventions, taking into consideration both soft tissues and bone structures, the latter being the most common reason for choosing surgical treatment, especially lateral patellar instability.

Graft choice for isolated MPFL reconstruction: gracilis versus semitendinosus

INTRODUCTION

After the first patellar dislocation, most patients report damage of the medio-patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) and surgical reconstruction is required. The purpose of this study is to systematically review current evidence and to clarify the role of the gracilis and semitendinosus tendons as graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

The present systematic review was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. The literature search was conducted in October 2019. All clinical trials using the semitendinosus and/or gracilis tendon grafts for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability were considered for inclusion. Only articles reporting a minimum of 12-month follow-up were considered. The PEDro score was used for the methodological quality assessment.

RESULTS

Data from 1491 procedures were collected. The mean follow-up was 36.12 months. There was comparability among the patient baseline. All the scores of interests (Kujala, Tegner, Lysholm) and range of motion scored better in the semitendinosus group. Moreover, in favour of the semitendinosus group, a statistically significant reduction of the revision surgeries and re-dislocations were evidenced. Apprehension test and persistent instability sensation found any statistical correlations.

CONCLUSION

Isolated MPFL reconstruction through semitendinosus tendon graft performed better than the gracilis in selected patients suffering from recurrent patellofemoral instability.

Single- versus double-bundle patellar graft insertion for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

The MPFL reconstruction is performed either via a single-bundle (SB) or double-bundle (DB) procedure. The purpose of this study is to perform a systematic review comparing SB versus DB graft for recurrent patellofemoral instability, to summarize current evidence, and to clarify the role of both techniques. We focused on clinical scores, physical examination, complications, revision surgeries, and failures.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In May of 2019 the main online databases were accessed. All the clinical studies treating isolated MPFL reconstruction for patellofemoral instability through a single and/or double-bundle graft were enrolled in the present systematic review. Only articles reporting primary isolated MPFL reconstruction, reporting a minimum of 12-months follow-up were considered for inclusion.

RESULTS

The scores of interest were in favour of the DB cohort: Kujala (+ 3.2, P = 0.03), Lysholm (+ 5.1, P = 0.001), Tegner (+ 0.3, P = 0.2), IKDC (+ 5.4, P = 0.01), VAS (+ 0.8, P = 0.3), ROM (+ 9.96, P = 0.04). In the DB graft, a reduction of overall complications (OR 0.59; P = 0.1), further surgeries (OR 0.64; P = 0.12) and re-dislocations (OR 0.61; P = 0.16) was observed. The SB group reported a reduction in the post-operative apprehension test (OR 2.42; P = 0.24).

CONCLUSION

Current study support the use of double-bundle tendon graft for isolated MPFL reconstruction in selected patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability.

Patellar fixation graft via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques during isolated MPFL reconstruction for recurrent patellofemoral instability: a systematic review of the literature

INTRODUCTION

There is still a lack of evidence concerning the patellar fixation of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) graft in selected patient with recurrent instability. The purpose of the present study was to investigate and compare clinical outcomes and further complications of isolated MPFL reconstruction via suture anchors versus tunnel techniques for recurrent patellofemoral instability.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This systematic review of the literature was conducted according to the PRISMA guidelines. In September 2019, the main databases were accessed. All the clinical trials performing isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability were included in the present study. Only articles fixing the MPFL graft through suture anchors and/ or patellar tunnel techniques were included in the analysis.

RESULTS

Data from 46 papers (1712 patients) were recorded. The mean follow-up was 40 ± 18 months. No differences were found in Kujala, Lysholm and Tegner score, International Knee Documentation Committee, visual analogic scale, range of motion and re-dislocation rate. The suture anchors fixation group detected reduced rate of apprehension test (OR: 0.6; p = 0.03), revision surgeries (OR: 0.4; p = 0.02) and anterior knee pain (OR: 0.05; p < 0.0001) and reduced not-classified complications (OR: 0.18; p < 0.0001).

CONCLUSION

Both the suture anchors and the bone-tunnels are a feasible option for isolated MPFL reconstruction in patients with recurrent patellofemoral instability. Patellar fixation via suture anchors evidenced a reduced rate of anterior knee pain, revision surgeries, apprehension test and an overall reduced complication compared to the bone-tunnel technique.

Medial Patellofemoral Ligament Reconstruction and Nonanatomic Stabilization Techniques in Skeletally Immature Patients

Patellar instability is a common cause of knee disability in children and adolescent, with a high recurrence rate. When conservative treatment fails, surgical options should be considered. The femoral insertion of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) is in close proximity to the distal femoral growth plate and precautions should be taken to avoid injuries to the physis. Anatomical features of the MPFL complex, with focus on the relationship between femoral MPFL attachment and femoral physis, are discussed together with surgical tips to avoid injuries to the growth plates. The aim of this article is to review the recent literature regarding MPFL reconstruction and other stabilization techniques for patellofemoral instability in skeletally immature patients, focusing on the different surgical options available. These can be classified as anatomical versus nonanatomical, proximal versus distal realignments, or based on the graft used: free graft and pedicled graft (quadriceps, patellar tendon, hamstring, and adductor magnus).

Isolated medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction significantly improved quality of life in patients with recurrent patella dislocation

PURPOSE

The purpose of this study was to measure the improvement in quality of life (QoL) following isolated anatomical double-bundle medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction.

METHODS

This is a single-centre, prospective study of 56 consecutive patients (57 knees) who underwent isolated MPFL reconstruction between 2014 and 2017. Functional outcome and QoL were assessed with the Kujala score and the EQ-5D-3L questionnaire, respectively. Objective outcomes were obtained through clinical examination at the latest follow-up assessing redislocation rate, patella apprehension test, patellar tilt, pain and range of motion.

RESULTS

The median Kujala score increased from 60 (range 31-96) to 92 (range 34-100) at latest follow-up (p < 0.001). The median EQ-5D index also increased, from 0.69 (range 0.10-1) at baseline to 1 (range 0.16-1) at latest follow-up (p < 0.001), as well as the median EQ-5D VAS from 75 (range 20-95) to 92 (range 40-100) (p < 0.001). Four dimensions of the EQ-5D were significantly improved except for the anxiety/depression scores. Female patients reported lower scores at baseline and at latest follow-up, for all three outcomes (Kujala, EQ-5D index, EQ-5D VAS), however there was no evidence that gender negatively impacted on the benefit of surgery. The re-dislocation rate was 0%. Apprehension and patellar tilt test were negative in all patients and no flexion deficit was identified at latest follow-up. Two patients had tenderness along the reconstruction requiring femoral screw removal in one of them.

CONCLUSIONS

Isolated anatomical double-bundle aperture MPFL reconstruction, offered significantly improved short-term QoL along with excellent functional outcome. Female patients scored lower, but this did not affect the overall outcome. Including QoL tools in the assessment of ligament reconstruction operations, such as the MPFL, can provide more accurate understanding of the overall patient benefit.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

II.

A new minimally invasive surgical technique for medial retinaculum repair following traumatic patellar dislocation

A new surgical method is introduced offering a less invasive approach to reattach the medial retinaculum following acute patellar dislocation. This retrospective analysis comprised 12 cases of medial retinacular repair in 10 patients. The surgical technique achieved reinforced reattachment of the torn region of the medial retinaculum for improved patellar support and stabilization. During follow-up, no recurrent patellar dislocations occurred, except where one patient reported a subjective feeling of patellar dislocation. The average Kujala score for our sample group after 2 years was 89.2. A plethora of methods are described in the literature to repair a tear to the medial patellofemoral ligament, which attaches at the superomedial patella. However, it is our contention that traumatic patellar dislocation invariably results in osteochondral avulsion at the inferomedial patella, refuting medial patellofemoral ligament involvement, and, rather, implicating the inferior aspect of the deep layer of medial retinaculum. Our surgical technique enables stable fixation of the region, decreasing the rate of recurrent dislocations. No grafts are used, permitting tendinous and ligamentous anatomy to remain intact. We further postulate that performing a CT examination preoperatively may reduce time between diagnosis and surgery, in addition to locating fracture sites more precisely.

[Improved technique for perforation of patella combined with suture anchor and non-tourniquet for repairing acute rupture of the bone tendon junction of quadriceps tendon]

Objective

To investigate effectiveness of a improved technique for perforation of patella combined with suture anchor and non-tourniquet for repairing acute rupture of the bone tendon junction of quadriceps tendon.

Methods

Between June 2010 and June 2016, 15 patients with acute rupture of the bone tendon junction of quadriceps tendon were treated with the improved technique for perforation of patella combined with suture anchor and non-tourniquet. Of them, 14 were male and 1 was female, aged from 19 to 74 years (mean, 44 years). Seven cases were sports injuries, 5 cases were caused by slipping, and 3 cases were caused by violent trauma. The duration of quadriceps tendon rupture ranged from 3 hours to 3 days (median, 2 days). The right side was involved in 9 cases, and the left side in 6 cases. All of the cases were closed injuries. The patients had no sequelae of limb dysfunction and no limb joint surgery in the past. All the patients received anteroposterior and lateral X-ray films of the knee joint and patella axial films during follow-up. Knee function of the patients after operation was evaluated by Lysholm scoring system and Kujala scoring system.

Results

The operation time was 50-60 minutes (mean, 55 minutes). The intraoperative blood loss was 50-150 mL, with an average of 87 mL. Primary healing of incision was obtained in all patients without complications. All patients were followed up 12-24 months (mean, 18 months). At 1 year after operation, the knee joint function of all patients recovered well; the knee Lysholm score was 92-96, with an average of 94 and the patellofemoral joint Kujala score was 90-95, with an average of 93. There was no re-rupture of quadriceps tendon or loosening of internal fixation during follow-up. According to the lateral and axial X-ray films at 1 year after operation, the patella depth index, femur trochlea depth, sulcus angle, and Insall-Salvati index were 3.62-4.09 (mean, 3.84), 4.45-6.50 (mean, 5.56), 137-145° (mean, 142°), and 0.90-1.18 (mean, 1.06). The lateral patellofemoral angle increased, and the patellar tilt angle and the patella lateral shift distance reduced, all showing significant differences when compared with preoperative ones ( P<0.05).

Conclusion

The improved technique for perforation of patella combined with suture anchor and non-tourniquet for repairing acute rupture of the bone tendon junction of quadriceps tendon can reconstruct a stable patellofemoral joint, increase the strength of fixing, disperse stress effectively and evenly, and increase the area for tendon-bone healing.