488 hand surgeries with local anesthesia with epinephrine, without a tourniquet, without sedation, and without an anesthesiologist

13 years of hand surgery without an anesthesiologist. An analysis of efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists

<b><br>Introduction:</b> The assistance of anaesthesiologist is considered an inseparable part of most surgical procedures, with the exception of a small proportion of minor procedures performed under local anaesthesia. In hand surgery, a vast majority of procedures, even those lasting several hours, can be carried out under regional (brachial plexus block) or local (infiltration) anaesthesia. These can be delivered by the surgeons themselves, allowing the surgeries to be carried out without the assistance of anesthesiologists.</br> <b><br>Aim:</b> The aim of this study was to analyze the efficacy and safety of presurgical anesthesia as delivered by surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists in the course of hand surgery procedures performed within the institution headed by the author of this article.</br> <b><br>Material and methods:</b> The analysis was based on the records of anesthesia protocols filled out by the surgeons who delivered the anesthesia and who operated on the patients. The variables considered included the efficacy of anesthesia and the anesthesia-related adverse effects and complications.</br> <b><br>Results:</b> Over a period of 13 years (2010-2022), a total of 24,703 surgeries were delivered; of these, 22,228 (91%) surgeries were carried out without anesthesiologists, with anesthesia being delivered by the surgeon him/herself. The efficacy of these procedures (local anasthesia and brachial plexus blocks combined) was 99%. A total of 631 (2.8%) anesthesia-related adverse reactions were recorded, most of them being transient, requiring immediate interventions and not leading to any serious sequelae. In only 17 cases (0.07%), adverse effects resulted in cancellation and rescheduling of the elective surgery.</br> <b><br>Conclusions:</b> Pre-surgical anesthesia as delivered prior to hand surgery procedures by the surgeons without the assistance of anesthesiologists is effective and safe while being associated with numerous benefits for patients, surgeons and the health care system's budget.</br>.

BENEFITS OF THE WALANT TECHNIQUE AGAINST THE COVID-19 PANDEMIC

Objective:

Evaluate the experience of private and public health services with the WALANT procedure in the COVID-19 pandemic.

Methods:

This is a retrospective, multicenter longitudinal study gathering cases of hand surgery subjected to the WALANT technique in the Hospitals Dr. Radamés Nardini and IFOR during the COVID-19 pandemic (August 2020). As a parameter, the verbal numerical rating scale for twenty patients referring to the preoperative, intraoperative and postoperative periods was applied.

Results:

The patients did not feel any pain during surgery, which showed the efficiency of the anesthetic technique in its purpose.

Conclusion:

The results indicate the WALANT technique as beneficial when facing the COVID-19 pandemic, as the main differential of the technique is that it is applied by a well-trained orthopedic hand surgeon.Level of Evidence IV, Case Series.

Diagnosis and Treatment of Trigger Finger in Brazil - A Cross-Sectional Study

Objective  The present paper aims to evaluate the therapeutic planning for trigger finger by Brazilian orthopedists. Methods  This is a cross-sectional study with a population composed of participants from the 2018 Brazilian Congress on Orthopedics and Traumatology (CBOT-2018, in the Portuguese acronym), who answered a questionnaire about the conduct adopted for trigger finger diagnosis and treatment. Results  A total of 243 participants were analyzed, with an average age of 37.46 years old; most participants were male (88%), with at least 1 year of experience (55.6%) and from Southeast Brazil (68.3%). Questionnaire analysis revealed a consensus on the following issues: diagnosis based on physical examination alone (73.3%), use of the Quinnell classification modified by Green (58.4%), initial nonsurgical treatment (91.4%), infiltration of steroids combined with an anesthetic agent (61.7%), nonsurgical treatment time ranging from 1 to 3 months (52.3%), surgical treatment using the open approach (84.4%), mainly the transverse open approach (51%), triggering recurrence as the main nonsurgical complication (58%), and open surgery success in > 90% of the cases (63%), with healing intercurrences (54%) as the main complication. There was no consensus on the remaining variables. Orthopedists with different practicing times disagree on treatment duration ( p  = 0.013) and on the complication rate of open surgery ( p  = 0.010). Conclusions  Brazilian orthopedists prefer to diagnose trigger finger with physical examination alone, to classify it according to the Quinnell method modified by Green, to institute an initial nonsurgical treatment, to perform infiltrations with steroids and local anesthetic agents, to sustain the nonsurgical treatment for 1 to 3 months, and to perform the surgical treatment using a transverse open approach; in addition, they state that the main nonsurgical complication was triggering recurrence, and report open surgery success in > 90% of the cases, with healing intercurrences as the main complication.

Wide-Awake Surgery With Local Anesthesia and Epinephrine Is Safe

Hand and upper extremity surgery performed with the patient wide awake involves the use of a local anesthetic and epinephrine. Controversy persists as to whether epinephrine is safe for use in the hand. The goal of this study was to evaluate the safety of epinephrine in hand and upper extremity surgery. The hypothesis was that epinephrine is safe and can be used for a wide breadth of surgical procedures of the hand and upper extremity. A 4-year retrospective chart review was conducted of consecutive patients undergoing wide-awake surgery performed by 2 surgeons at a single institution. All procedures were performed with local anesthesia and epinephrine. Data collected included patient demographics, procedure volume, procedure type, surgical setting, and complications related to epinephrine use. During the study period, 4054 consecutive patients underwent 4287 wide-awake procedures with local anesthesia and epinephrine. Average patient age was 59 years, and 64% of patients were female. No complications occurred as a result of the use of epinephrine, and no tissue necrosis, phentolamine reversal, anaphylaxis, or readmissions occurred. No patients required conversion to general anesthesia or monitored anesthesia care. This analysis of more than 4000 consecutive patients undergoing wide-awake hand and upper extremity surgery with epinephrine confirmed that epinephrine use is safe, with no reported cases of tissue necrosis, reversal, readmission, anaphylaxis, or anesthetic conversion. Epinephrine is safe for use in the hand and upper extremity for patients undergoing wide-awake hand surgery with a local anesthetic. [Orthopedics. 2020;43(6):e529-e532.].

Carpal Tunnel Syndrome Surgery: What You Should Know

Carpal tunnel release (CTR) surgery continues to evolve. Carpal tunnel syndrome remains a primarily clinical diagnosis, although ultrasound has supplemented electrodiagnostic testing as a confirmatory tool. Magnetic resonance imaging of the carpal tunnel has also showed some promise as an alternative method for the examination of the median nerve. Open CTR surgery remains the traditional, and most popular, method of CTR. Wide-Awake, with Local Anesthesia only, and No Tourniquet CTR has emerged as a means to decrease cost and improve pain control and convenience for patients. Endoscopic CTR is increasing in popularity due to its more rapid recovery. The safety profile of endoscopic CTR has improved, and recent studies show similar rates of major complications between open and endoscopic techniques. Nonsurgeon operated ultrasound-guided techniques for release of the transverse carpal ligament have emerged. While promising in early studies, the current evidence in their favor is limited in terms of patient numbers and direct comparison with other techniques. The outcomes of CTR continue to be excellent. Recent research has demonstrated that nerve conduction continues to recover postoperatively over a longer period of time than previously believed. Patient psychological factors play a significant role in outcomes after surgery but do not appear to limit the improvement provided by intervention.