Experiencia de una clínica de anticoagulación

Barriers in Access to Idarucizumab in Ischemic Stroke in a Middle-Income Country

Background and Purpose

Current stroke guidelines contraindicate the use of thrombolytics if oral anticoagulants are taken within 48 hours of symptom onset. Idarucizumab is an alternative for patients on dabigatran who experience an acute stroke, so that alteplase may be used. However, this treatment may not be readily available in low/middle-income countries. Our objective is to describe barriers to access to the administration of idarucizumab.

Methods

We applied a structured survey for health personnel, consulted databases of drug providers, and analyzed reports from the National Pharmacologic Surveillance Data to describe idarucizumab use and the related knowledge among prescribers and the drug distribution in health institutions in Colombia between January 2018 and January 2022.

Results

In total, 23.6% of the 337 interviewed physicians' hospitals had access to idarucizumab, and 34.9% of the physicians were unaware of the use of this medication for ischemic stroke. Only 11 private institutions had access to this medication in Colombia. Four male patients with atrial fibrillation received thrombolytics for acute stroke, and two required subsequent mechanical thrombectomy. No fatal complications during hospitalization were observed. Complications included hematuria, hemorrhagic transformation and groin hematoma. None required transfusion or further intervention. All had favorable mRS scores at the 90-day follow-up.

Conclusions

There are multiple barriers to access idarucizumab in Colombia. The main factors identified are the low medication availability in provincial hospitals and the low medical knowledge. However clinical results in this limited group are satisfactory. Stronger public policies are needed to guarantee optimal stroke treatment in patients on DOACs in Colombia.

Budget Impact Analysis of Anticoagulation Clinics in Patients with Atrial Fibrillation under Chronic Therapy with Oral Anticoagulants

OBJECTIVES

To assess budget impact of the implementation of an anticoagulation clinic (AC) compared to usual care (UC), in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF).

METHOD

A decision tree was designed to analyze the cost and events rates over a 1-year horizon. The patients were distributed according to treatment, 30% Direct Oral Anticoagulant (DOAC) regimens and the rest to warfarin. The thromboembolism and bleeding were derived from observational studies which demonstrated that ACs had important impact in reducing the frequency of these events compared with UC, due to higher adherence with DOACs and proportion of time in therapeutic range (TTR) with warfarin. Costs were derived from the transactional platform of Colombian government, healthcare authority reimbursement and published studies. The values were expressed in American dollars (USD). The exchanged rate used was COP $3.693 per dollar.

RESULTS

During 1 year of follow-up, in a cohort of 228 patients there were estimated 48 bleedings, 6 thromboembolisms in AC group versus 84 bleedings, and 12 thromboembolisms events in patients receiving UC. Total costs related to AC were $126 522 compared with $141 514 in UC. The AC had an important reduction in the cost of clinical events versus UC ($52 085 vs $110 749) despite a higher cost of care facilities ($74 436 vs $30 765). A sensibility analysis suggested that in the 83% of estimations, the AC produced savings varied between $27 078 and $135 391.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrated that AC compared with UC, produced an important savings in the oral anticoagulation therapy for patients with NVAF.