Negative Computed Tomography for Acute Pulmonary Embolism: Important Differential Diagnosis Considerations for Acute Dyspnea

Utilization of a Guideline-recommended Imaging Paradigm for Pregnant Patients With Suspicion of Pulmonary Embolism

PURPOSE

A dose reduction imaging paradigm utilizing chest x-ray (CXR) to triage between computed tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) and lung scintigraphy (LS) was introduced in 2001 and adopted in 2012 by the American Thoracic Society/Society of Thoracic Radiology (ATS) guideline for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy. We aimed to assess the utilization of this imaging paradigm preadoption and postadoption by the ATS guideline, and identify factors associated with its utilization.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This retrospective cohort study evaluated consecutive pregnant patients who received CTPA or LS for the evaluation of pulmonary embolism in pregnancy at 2 tertiary hospitals between September 2008 and March 2017, excluding 2012 for guideline release washout. Utilization of the imaging paradigm was defined per patient by the use of CXR before advanced imaging, with CTPA performed following positive CXR and LS performed following negative CXR. Multivariate analyses were performed to assess factors associated with utilization of the imaging paradigm. P <0.05 is considered significant.

RESULTS

Overall, 9.8% (63/643) of studies utilized the dose reduction imaging paradigm, 13.3% (34/256) before the guidelines, and 7.5% (29/387) after. Multivariable analysis showed that the dose reduction imaging paradigm utilization was higher for inpatients (odds ratio [OR]: 4.5) and outpatients (OR: 3.1) relative to the emergency department patients, and lower for second (OR: 0.3) and third (OR: 0.2) trimester patients, without significant differences by study priority, patient age, or patient race.

CONCLUSIONS

Guideline-recommended dose reduction imaging paradigm utilization was low, and decreased after guideline publication. Utilization varied by patient setting and trimester, which are potential targets for interventions to improve guideline compliance.

Evaluating cardiopulmonary function following acute pulmonary embolism

INTRODUCTION

Pulmonary embolism is a common cause of cardiopulmonary mortality and morbidity worldwide. Survivors of acute pulmonary embolism may experience dyspnea, report reduced exercise capacity, or develop overt pulmonary hypertension. Clinicians must be alert for these phenomena and appreciate the modalities and investigations available for evaluation.

AREAS COVERED

In this review, the current understanding of available contemporary imaging and physiologic modalities is discussed, based on available literature and professional society guidelines. The purpose of the review is to provide clinicians with an overview of these modalities, their strengths and disadvantages, and how and when these investigations can support the clinical work-up of patients post-pulmonary embolism.

EXPERT OPINION

Echocardiography is a first test in symptomatic patients post-pulmonary embolism, with ventilation/perfusion scanning vital to determination of whether there is chronic residual emboli. The role of computed tomography and magnetic resonance in assessing the pulmonary arterial tree in post-pulmonary embolism patients is evolving. Functional testing, in particular cardiopulmonary exercise testing, is emerging as an important modality to quantify and determine cause of functional limitation. It is possible that future investigations of the post-pulmonary embolism recovery period will better inform treatment decisions for acute pulmonary embolism patients.

COVID-19 pneumonia and its lookalikes: How radiologists perform in differentiating atypical pneumonias

Purpose

To examine the performance of radiologists in differentiating COVID-19 from non-COVID-19 atypical pneumonia and to perform an analysis of CT patterns in a study cohort including viral, fungal and atypical bacterial pathogens.

Methods

Patients with positive RT-PCR tests for COVID-19 pneumonia (n = 90) and non-COVID-19 atypical pneumonia (n = 294) were retrospectively included. Five radiologists, blinded to the pathogen test results, assessed the CT scans and classified them as COVID-19 or non-COVID-19 pneumonia. For both groups specific CT features were recorded and a multivariate logistic regression model was used to calculate their ability to predict COVID-19 pneumonia.

Results

The radiologists differentiated between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 pneumonia with an overall accuracy, sensitivity, and specificity of 88% ± 4 (SD), 79% ± 6 (SD), and 90% ± 6 (SD), respectively. The percentage of correct ratings was lower in the early and late stage of COVID-19 pneumonia compared to the progressive and peak stage (68 and 71% vs 85 and 89%). The variables associated with the most increased risk of COVID-19 pneumonia were band like subpleural opacities (OR 5.55, p < 0.001), vascular enlargement (OR 2.63, p = 0.071), and subpleural curvilinear lines (OR 2.52, p = 0.021). Bronchial wall thickening and centrilobular nodules were associated with decreased risk of COVID-19 pneumonia with OR of 0.30 (p = 0.013) and 0.10 (p < 0.001), respectively.

Conclusions

Radiologists can differentiate between COVID-19 and non-COVID-19 atypical pneumonias at chest CT with high overall accuracy, although a lower performance was observed in the early and late stage of COVID 19 pneumonia. Specific CT features might help to make the correct diagnosis.