1
|
Pinto A. Uterine Smooth Muscle Tumors: An Overview. Adv Anat Pathol 2024; 31:397-410. [PMID: 38647238 DOI: 10.1097/pap.0000000000000446] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/25/2024]
Abstract
Uterine smooth muscle tumors are a heterogeneous group of mesenchymal neoplasms with multiple histologic variants and distinct biological behaviors. Pathologic classification (benign, uncertain malignant potential, malignant) relies on the evaluation of mitotic index, necrosis, and degree of cytologic atypia, with different thresholds based on each subtype. Immunohistochemistry and other ancillary studies may be necessary to establish the diagnosis in a subset of cases, given the morphologic overlap with other mesenchymal neoplasms, including low-grade and high-grade endometrial stromal tumors, inflammatory myofibroblastic tumors, and PEComa. Recent advances in molecular diagnostics have refined the classification of smooth muscle tumors, but most cases are diagnosed purely on histologic grounds.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Andre Pinto
- Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Miami, Miami, FL
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Raffone A, Raimondo D, Neola D, Travaglino A, Raspollini A, Giorgi M, Santoro A, De Meis L, Zannoni GF, Seracchioli R, Casadio P, Guida M. Diagnostic Accuracy of Ultrasound in the Diagnosis of Uterine Leiomyomas and Sarcomas. J Minim Invasive Gynecol 2024; 31:28-36.e1. [PMID: 37778636 DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2023.09.013] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 5.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/25/2023] [Revised: 08/08/2023] [Accepted: 09/26/2023] [Indexed: 10/03/2023]
Abstract
BACKGROUND Differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas is challenging. Ultrasound shows an uncertain role in the clinical practice given that pooled estimates about its diagnostic accuracy are lacking. OBJECTIVES To assess the accuracy of ultrasound in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas. DATA SOURCES A systematic review was performed searching 5 electronic databases (MEDLINE, Web of Sciences, Google Scholar, Scopus, and ClinicalTrial.gov) from their inception to June 2023. METHODS OF STUDY SELECTION All peer-reviewed observational or randomized clinical trials that reported an unbiased postoperative histologic diagnosis of uterine leiomyoma or uterine sarcoma that also comprised a preoperative ultrasonographic evaluation of the uterine mass. TABULATION, INTEGRATION, AND RESULTS Sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative likelihood ratios, diagnostic odds ratio, and area under the curve on summary receiver operating characteristic were calculated for each included study and as pooled estimate, with 95% confidence interval (CI); 972 women (694 with uterine leiomyomas and 278 with uterine sarcomas) were included. Ultrasound showed pooled sensitivity of 0.76 (95% CI, 0.70-0.81), specificity of 0.89 (95% CI, 0.87-0.92), positive and negative likelihood ratios of 6.65 (95% CI, 4.45-9.93) and 0.26 (95% CI, 0.07-1.0) respectively, diagnostic odds ratio of 23.06 (95% CI, 4.56-116.53), and area under the curve of 0.8925. CONCLUSIONS Ultrasound seems to have only a moderate diagnostic accuracy in the differential diagnosis between uterine leiomyomas and sarcomas, with a lower sensitivity than specificity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Antonio Raffone
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raffone, Raspollini, and Seracchioli); Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy (Drs. Raffone, Neola, and Guida)
| | - Diego Raimondo
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raimondo, Raspollini, De Meis, Seracchioli, and Casadio).
| | - Daniele Neola
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy (Drs. Raffone, Neola, and Guida)
| | - Antonio Travaglino
- Unit of Pathology, Department of Medicine and Technological Innovation, University of Insubria, Varese, Italy (Dr. Travaglino)
| | - Arianna Raspollini
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raffone, Raspollini, and Seracchioli); Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raimondo, Raspollini, De Meis, Seracchioli, and Casadio)
| | - Matteo Giorgi
- Department of Molecular and Developmental Medicine, Obstetrics and Gynecological Clinic, University of Siena, Siena, Italy (Dr. Giorgi)
| | - Angela Santoro
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy (Drs. Santoro and Zannoni)
| | - Lucia De Meis
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raimondo, Raspollini, De Meis, Seracchioli, and Casadio)
| | - Gian Franco Zannoni
- Gynecopathology and Breast Pathology Unit, Department of Woman's Health Science, Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic, Rome, Italy (Drs. Santoro and Zannoni)
| | - Renato Seracchioli
- Department of Medical and Surgical Sciences (DIMEC), University of Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raffone, Raspollini, and Seracchioli); Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raimondo, Raspollini, De Meis, Seracchioli, and Casadio)
| | - Paolo Casadio
- Division of Gynaecology and Human Reproduction Physiopathology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria di Bologna, Bologna, Italy (Drs. Raimondo, Raspollini, De Meis, Seracchioli, and Casadio)
| | - Maurizio Guida
- Gynecology and Obstetrics Unit, Department of Neuroscience, Reproductive Sciences and Dentistry, School of Medicine, University of Naples Federico II, Naples, Italy (Drs. Raffone, Neola, and Guida)
| |
Collapse
|