1
|
Liuba I, Sroubek J, Santangeli P. Management of ventricular tachycardia in patients with advanced heart failure. Prog Cardiovasc Dis 2025:S0033-0620(25)00060-X. [PMID: 40319995 DOI: 10.1016/j.pcad.2025.04.006] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/12/2025] [Accepted: 04/12/2025] [Indexed: 05/07/2025]
Abstract
Ventricular arrhythmias (VAs) are highly prevalent in patients with advanced heart failure (AHF), a condition characterized by severe signs and symptoms despite conventional HF therapy. The management of VAs in this setting remains challenging. Antiarrhythmic drug therapy options are limited and only amiodarone has demonstrated effectiveness in suppressing VA, albeit this agent is associated with a substantial risk of cardiac and noncardiac adverse effects. Catheter ablation is effective for the reduction of VAs in patients with AHF. Identification of patients at high risk for periprocedural hemodynamic decompensation has important implications in terms of procedural planning and improving patient safety and procedural outcomes. Herein, we review the current state of scientific evidence for the management of VA in patients with AHF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ioan Liuba
- Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Jakub Sroubek
- Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA
| | - Pasquale Santangeli
- Section of Cardiac Pacing and Electrophysiology, Heart and Vascular Institute, Cleveland Clinic, Cleveland, OH, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Srinivas Rao S, Uma Baskaran N, Cao J, Catalano OA, Brink JA, Cusack JC, Kambadakone AR. Imaging in Hyperthermic Intraperitoneal Chemotherapy. Radiographics 2025; 45:e240124. [PMID: 40310749 DOI: 10.1148/rg.240124] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 05/03/2025]
Abstract
Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) combined with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) (CRS-HIPEC) has revolutionized the management of peritoneal malignancies, pivoting from a palliative care approach to a treatment strategy tailored to improve overall survival. This procedure is based on the principle that local instillation of heated chemotherapeutic agents augments their cytotoxic effects, which target and eradicate microscopic disease. Imaging is integral to the management of patients undergoing HIPEC, having multiple roles that range from patient selection, preoperative assessment, and determining treatment effectiveness to postprocedural surveillance. Various imaging modalities can be used for radiologic assessment and include CT, dual-energy CT, MRI, fluorine 18-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT, and PET/MRI. A crucial step in assessing the feasibility of CRS-HIPEC is estimation of the peritoneal carcinomatosis index, which enables one to determine the total peritoneal disease burden and is essential for effective multidisciplinary management. Following HIPEC, the completeness of cytoreduction score and residual disease score provide a robust framework for assessing treatment efficacy and strategically guiding subsequent management and surveillance protocols. Imaging facilitates accurate evaluation of complications, as well as early recognition of residual or recurrent peritoneal disease. The authors provide a comprehensive overview of HIPEC therapy, focusing on the role of imaging in the management of patients with peritoneal malignancies, delving into the nuances of this procedure, and discussing crucial aspects related to patient selection, surgical complexity, and prediction of outcomes. ©RSNA, 2025 See the invited commentary by Wasif in this issue.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Shravya Srinivas Rao
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology (S.S.R., N.U.B., J.C., O.A.C., J.A.B., A.R.K.) and Department of Surgery (J.C.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass (O.A.C.)
| | - Nikitha Uma Baskaran
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology (S.S.R., N.U.B., J.C., O.A.C., J.A.B., A.R.K.) and Department of Surgery (J.C.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass (O.A.C.)
| | - Jinjin Cao
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology (S.S.R., N.U.B., J.C., O.A.C., J.A.B., A.R.K.) and Department of Surgery (J.C.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass (O.A.C.)
| | - Onofrio A Catalano
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology (S.S.R., N.U.B., J.C., O.A.C., J.A.B., A.R.K.) and Department of Surgery (J.C.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass (O.A.C.)
| | - James A Brink
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology (S.S.R., N.U.B., J.C., O.A.C., J.A.B., A.R.K.) and Department of Surgery (J.C.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass (O.A.C.)
| | - James C Cusack
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology (S.S.R., N.U.B., J.C., O.A.C., J.A.B., A.R.K.) and Department of Surgery (J.C.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass (O.A.C.)
| | - Avinash R Kambadakone
- From the Department of Radiology, Division of Abdominal Radiology (S.S.R., N.U.B., J.C., O.A.C., J.A.B., A.R.K.) and Department of Surgery (J.C.C.), Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit St, White 270, Boston, MA 02114-2696; and Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, Mass (O.A.C.)
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Park EH, O'Donnell T, Fritz J. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Applications in Rheumatology. Rheum Dis Clin North Am 2025; 51:361-382. [PMID: 40246445 DOI: 10.1016/j.rdc.2025.01.009] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 04/19/2025]
Abstract
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged as a transformative tool in the past decade. Initially employed in gout within the field of rheumatology to distinguish and quantify monosodium urate crystals through its dual-material discrimination capability, DECT has since broadened its clinical applications. It now encompasses various rheumatic diseases, employing advanced techniques such as bone marrow edema assessment, iodine mapping, and collagen-specific imaging. This review article aims to examine the unique characteristics of DECT, discuss its strengths and limitations, illustrate its applications for accurately evaluating various rheumatic diseases in clinical practice, and propose future directions for DECT in rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Hae Park
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Geonjiro 20, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeollabukdo 54907, Republic of Korea
| | - Thomas O'Donnell
- CT Research Collaborations Siemens Healthineers, Malvern PA, USA
| | - Jan Fritz
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Srinivas Rao S, Ghosh S, Vardar BU, Pandey A, Uma Baskaran N, Panwar SS, Catalano OA, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Harisinghani MG, Brink JA, Kambadakone AR. Imaging in malignant peritoneal neoplasms. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2025; 50:1285-1306. [PMID: 39368001 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04595-z] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/21/2024] [Revised: 09/13/2024] [Accepted: 09/14/2024] [Indexed: 10/07/2024]
Abstract
Peritoneal malignancies encompass a diverse range of tumors originating within the peritoneum, including primary tumors such as mesothelioma and primary serous peritoneal carcinoma or secondary tumors resulting from the spread of cancers from gastrointestinal, gynecological, and extra-abdominal sources. The traditional approach of palliative care for these malignancies is being replaced by a multimodal strategies that integrates surgery with systemic or intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Notably, cytoreductive surgery combined with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy has shown significant improvements in survival rates. Imaging is crucial in the multidisciplinary management of these tumors, aiding in diagnosis, staging, restaging, and monitoring therapy response. It is also vital for appropriate patient selection, using the acronym "PAUSE", which involves assessing tumor burden via the peritoneal carcinomatosis index, evaluating patients pre- and post-therapy, detecting complications following therapy, and predicting treatment outcomes. This review explores the imaging manifestations of peritoneal malignancies, distinguishing them from various mimics, and underscores the importance of imaging modalities such as CT, MRI, PET/CT, and PET/MRI in effective decision-making and management.
Collapse
|
5
|
Cao J, Mroueh N, Lennartz S, Mercaldo ND, Pisuchpen N, Kongboonvijit S, Srinivas Rao S, Yuenyongsinchai K, Pierce TT, Sertic M, Chung R, Kambadakone AR. Multi-reader multiparametric DECT study evaluating different strengths of iterative and deep learning-based image reconstruction techniques. Eur Radiol 2025; 35:885-896. [PMID: 39046499 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-024-10974-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/19/2024] [Revised: 05/17/2024] [Accepted: 07/04/2024] [Indexed: 07/25/2024]
Abstract
OBJECTIVES To perform a multi-reader comparison of multiparametric dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) images reconstructed with deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) and standard-of-care adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V). METHODS This retrospective study included 100 patients undergoing portal venous phase abdominal CT on a rapid kVp switching DECT scanner. Six reconstructed DECT sets (ASIR-V and DLIR, each at three strengths) were generated. Each DECT set included 65 keV monoenergetic, iodine, and virtual unenhanced (VUE) images. Using a Likert scale, three radiologists performed qualitative assessments for image noise, contrast, small structure visibility, sharpness, artifact, and image preference. Quantitative assessment was performed by measuring attenuation, image noise, and contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR). For the qualitative analysis, Gwet's AC2 estimates were used to assess agreement. RESULTS DECT images reconstructed with DLIR yielded better qualitative scores than ASIR-V images except for artifacts, where both groups were comparable. DLIR-H images were rated higher than other reconstructions on all parameters (p-value < 0.05). On quantitative analysis, there was no significant difference in the attenuation values between ASIR-V and DLIR groups. DLIR images had higher CNR values for the liver and portal vein, and lower image noise, compared to ASIR-V images (p-value < 0.05). The subgroup analysis of patients with large body habitus (weight ≥ 90 kg) showed similar results to the study population. Inter-reader agreement was good-to-very good overall. CONCLUSION Multiparametric post-processed DECT datasets reconstructed with DLIR were preferred over ASIR-V images with DLIR-H yielding the highest image quality scores. CLINICAL RELEVANCE STATEMENT Deep-learning image reconstruction in dual-energy CT demonstrated significant benefits in qualitative and quantitative image metrics compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V. KEY POINTS Dual-energy CT (DECT) images reconstructed using deep-learning image reconstruction (DLIR) showed superior qualitative scores compared to adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction-V (ASIR-V) reconstructed images, except for artifacts where both reconstructions were rated comparable. While there was no significant difference in attenuation values between ASIR-V and DLIR groups, DLIR images showed higher contrast-to-noise ratios (CNR) for liver and portal vein, and lower image noise (p value < 0.05). Subgroup analysis of patients with large body habitus (weight ≥ 90 kg) yielded similar findings to the overall study population.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjin Cao
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Nayla Mroueh
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Simon Lennartz
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
- Institute for Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, University Cologne, Faculty of Medicine and University Hospital Cologne, Kerpener Straße 62, 50937, Cologne, Germany
| | - Nathaniel D Mercaldo
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Nisanard Pisuchpen
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
- Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Sasiprang Kongboonvijit
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
- Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Shravya Srinivas Rao
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Kampon Yuenyongsinchai
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
- Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Theodore T Pierce
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Madeleine Sertic
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Ryan Chung
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Avinash R Kambadakone
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
6
|
García-Figueiras R, Baleato-González S. Quantitative multi-energy CT in oncology: State of the art and future directions. Eur J Radiol 2025; 182:111840. [PMID: 39581021 DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2024.111840] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/14/2024] [Revised: 11/03/2024] [Accepted: 11/17/2024] [Indexed: 11/26/2024]
Abstract
Multi-energy computed tomography (CT) involves acquisition of two or more CT measurements with distinct energy spectra. Using the differential attenuation of tissues and materials at different X-ray energies, multi-energy CT allows distinction of tissues and materials. Multi-energy technology encompasses different types of CT systems, such as dual-energy CT and photon-counting CT, that can use information from the energy and type of material present in acquired images to create multiple datasets. These scanners have overcome many of the limitations of conventional CT, making it possible to improve the diagnostic performance of CT and expand its use to new applications through better tissue characterization and multiple quantitative parameters. Quantitative imaging biomarkers based on multi-energy CT have enormous potential in oncologic imaging, from the diagnosis and characterization of tumor phenotypes to the evaluation of the response to treatment. Nevertheless, implementing these techniques in clinical practice remains challenging. This article reviews the basic principles underlying multi-energy CT and the most recent technical developments in these systems together with their advantages and limitations to establish the value of quantitative imaging derived from multi-energy CT in the field of oncology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Roberto García-Figueiras
- Department of Radiology, Oncologic Imaging, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain.
| | - Sandra Baleato-González
- Department of Radiology, Oncologic Imaging, Hospital Clínico Universitario de Santiago de Compostela, Choupana s/n, 15706, Santiago de Compostela, Spain
| |
Collapse
|
7
|
Asmundo L, Rizzetto F, Srinivas Rao S, Sgrazzutti C, Vicentin I, Kambadakone A, Catalano OA, Vanzulli A. Dual-energy CT applications on liver imaging: what radiologists and radiographers should know? A systematic review. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:3811-3823. [PMID: 38811447 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04380-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/05/2024] [Revised: 05/06/2024] [Accepted: 05/11/2024] [Indexed: 05/31/2024]
Abstract
PURPOSE This review aims to provide a comprehensive summary of DECT techniques, acquisition workflows, and post-processing methods. By doing so, we aim to elucidate the advantages and disadvantages of DECT compared to conventional single-energy CT imaging. METHODS A systematic search was conducted on MEDLINE/EMBASE for DECT studies in liver imaging published between 1980 and 2024. Information regarding study design and endpoints, patient characteristics, DECT technical parameters, radiation dose, iodinated contrast agent (ICA) administration and postprocessing methods were extracted. Technical parameters, including DECT phase, field of view, pitch, collimation, rotation time, arterial phase timing (from injection), and venous timing (from injection) from the included studies were reported, along with formal narrative synthesis of main DECT applications for liver imaging. RESULTS Out of the initially identified 234 articles, 153 met the inclusion criteria. Extensive variability in acquisition parameters was observed, except for tube voltage (80/140 kVp combination reported in 50% of articles) and ICA administration (1.5 mL/kg at 3-4 mL/s, reported in 91% of articles). Radiation dose information was provided in only 40% of articles (range: 6-80 mGy), and virtual non-contrast imaging (VNC) emerged as a common strategy to reduce the radiation dose. The primary application of DECT post-processed images was in detecting focal liver lesions (47% of articles), with predominance of study focusing on hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) (27%). Furthermore, a significant proportion of the articles (16%) focused on enhancing DECT protocols, while 15% explored metastasis detection. CONCLUSION Our review recommends using 80/140 kVp tube voltage with 1.5 mL/kg ICA at 3-4 mL/s flow rate. Post-processing should include low keV-VMI for enhanced lesion detection, IMs for tumor iodine content evaluation, and VNC for dose reduction. However, heterogeneous literature hinders protocol standardization.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Luigi Asmundo
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Francesco Rizzetto
- Postgraduate School of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy.
| | - Shravya Srinivas Rao
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Cristiano Sgrazzutti
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Ilaria Vicentin
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Onofrio Antonio Catalano
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA, USA
| | - Angelo Vanzulli
- Department of Radiology, ASST Grande Ospedale Metropolitano Niguarda, Piazza Ospedale Maggiore 3, 20162, Milan, Italy
- Department of Oncology and Hemato-Oncology, Università degli Studi di Milano, via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Park EH, O'Donnell T, Fritz J. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography Applications in Rheumatology. Radiol Clin North Am 2024; 62:849-863. [PMID: 39059976 DOI: 10.1016/j.rcl.2024.02.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 07/28/2024]
Abstract
Dual-energy computed tomography (DECT) has emerged as a transformative tool in the past decade. Initially employed in gout within the field of rheumatology to distinguish and quantify monosodium urate crystals through its dual-material discrimination capability, DECT has since broadened its clinical applications. It now encompasses various rheumatic diseases, employing advanced techniques such as bone marrow edema assessment, iodine mapping, and collagen-specific imaging. This review article aims to examine the unique characteristics of DECT, discuss its strengths and limitations, illustrate its applications for accurately evaluating various rheumatic diseases in clinical practice, and propose future directions for DECT in rheumatology.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Eun Hae Park
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA; Department of Radiology, Research Institute of Clinical Medicine of Jeonbuk National University-Biomedical Research Institute of Jeonbuk National University Hospital, Geonjiro 20, Deokjin-gu, Jeonju, Jeollabukdo 54907, Republic of Korea
| | - Thomas O'Donnell
- CT Research Collaborations Siemens Healthineers, Malvern PA, USA
| | - Jan Fritz
- Division of Musculoskeletal Radiology, Department of Radiology, NYU Grossman School of Medicine, New York, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Cao J, Srinivas-Rao S, Mroueh N, Anand R, Kongboonvijit S, Sertic M, Shenoy-Bhangle AS, Kambadakone A. Cholangiocarcinoma imaging: from diagnosis to response assessment. Abdom Radiol (NY) 2024; 49:1699-1715. [PMID: 38578323 DOI: 10.1007/s00261-024-04267-y] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/22/2024] [Revised: 02/21/2024] [Accepted: 02/22/2024] [Indexed: 04/06/2024]
Abstract
Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), a highly aggressive primary liver cancer arising from the bile duct epithelium, represents a substantial proportion of hepatobiliary malignancies, posing formidable challenges in diagnosis and treatment. Notably, the global incidence of intrahepatic CCA has seen a rise, necessitating a critical examination of diagnostic and management strategies, especially due to presence of close imaging mimics such as hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) and combined hepatocellular carcinoma-cholangiocarcinoma (cHCC-CCA). Hence, it is imperative to understand the role of various imaging modalities such as ultrasound, computed tomography (CT), and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), elucidating their strengths, and limitations in diagnostic precision and staging accuracy. Beyond conventional approaches, there is emerging significance of functional imaging tools including positron emission tomography (PET)-CT and diffusion-weighted (DW)-MRI, providing pivotal insights into diagnosis, therapeutic assessment, and prognostic evaluation. This comprehensive review explores the risk factors, classification, clinical features, and role of imaging in the holistic spectrum of diagnosis, staging, management, and restaging for CCA, hence serving as a valuable resource for radiologists evaluating CCA.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Jinjin Cao
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Shravya Srinivas-Rao
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Nayla Mroueh
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Roshni Anand
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Sasiprang Kongboonvijit
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
- Department of Radiology, King Chulalongkorn Memorial Hospital, Thai Red Cross Society, Faculty of Medicine, Chulalongkorn University, Bangkok, 10330, Thailand
| | - Madeleine Sertic
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Anuradha S Shenoy-Bhangle
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA
| | - Avinash Kambadakone
- Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, 55 Fruit Street, White 270, Boston, MA, 02114-2696, USA.
| |
Collapse
|
10
|
Zanon C, Pepe A, Cademartiri F, Bini C, Maffei E, Quaia E, Stellini E, Di Fiore A. Potential Benefits of Photon-Counting CT in Dental Imaging: A Narrative Review. J Clin Med 2024; 13:2436. [PMID: 38673712 PMCID: PMC11051238 DOI: 10.3390/jcm13082436] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/03/2024] [Revised: 04/01/2024] [Accepted: 04/19/2024] [Indexed: 04/28/2024] Open
Abstract
Background/Objectives: Advancements in oral imaging technology are continually shaping the landscape of dental diagnosis and treatment planning. Among these, photon-counting computed tomography (PCCT), introduced in 2021, has emerged as a promising, high-quality oral technology. Dental imaging typically requires a resolution beyond the standard CT systems achievable with the specialized cone-beam CT. PCCT can offer up to 100 µm resolution, improve soft-tissue contrast, and provide faster scanning times, which are crucial for detailed dental diagnosis and treatment planning. Using semiconductor detectors, PCCT produces sharper images and can potentially reduce the number of scans required, thereby decreasing patient radiation exposure. This review aimed to explore the potential benefits of PCCT in dental imaging. Methods: This review analyzed the literature on PCCT in dental imaging from January 2010 to February 2024, sourced from PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science databases, focusing on high-resolution, patient safety, and diagnostic efficiency in dental structure assessment. We included English-language articles, case studies, letters, observational studies, and randomized controlled trials while excluding duplicates and studies unrelated to PCCT's application in dental imaging. Results: Studies have highlighted the superiority of PCCT in reducing artifacts, which are often problematic, compared to conventional CBCT and traditional CT scans, due to metallic dental implants, particularly when used with virtual monoenergetic imaging and iterative metal artifact reduction, thereby improving implant imaging. This review acknowledges limitations, such as the potential for overlooking other advanced imaging technologies, a narrow study timeframe, the lack of real-world clinical application data in this field, and costs. Conclusions: PCCT represents a promising advancement in dental imaging, offering high-resolution visuals, enhanced contrast, and rapid scanning with reduced radiation exposure.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chiara Zanon
- Department of Radiology, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Alessia Pepe
- Department of Radiology, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Filippo Cademartiri
- Department of Radiology, Fondazione Toscana Gabriele Monasterio, 56124 Pisa, Italy
| | - Costanza Bini
- Department of Radiology, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | | | - Emilio Quaia
- Department of Radiology, University of Padua, 35128 Padova, Italy
| | - Edoardo Stellini
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, Division of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| | - Adolfo Di Fiore
- Department of Neuroscience, School of Dentistry, Division of Prosthodontics and Digital Dentistry, University of Padova, 35122 Padova, Italy
| |
Collapse
|
11
|
Abu-Omar A, Murray N, Ali IT, Khosa F, Barrett S, Sheikh A, Nicolaou S, Tamburrini S, Iacobellis F, Sica G, Granata V, Saba L, Masala S, Scaglione M. Utility of Dual-Energy Computed Tomography in Clinical Conundra. Diagnostics (Basel) 2024; 14:775. [PMID: 38611688 PMCID: PMC11012177 DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14070775] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/29/2024] [Revised: 03/25/2024] [Accepted: 03/27/2024] [Indexed: 04/14/2024] Open
Abstract
Advancing medical technology revolutionizes our ability to diagnose various disease processes. Conventional Single-Energy Computed Tomography (SECT) has multiple inherent limitations for providing definite diagnoses in certain clinical contexts. Dual-Energy Computed Tomography (DECT) has been in use since 2006 and has constantly evolved providing various applications to assist radiologists in reaching certain diagnoses SECT is rather unable to identify. DECT may also complement the role of SECT by supporting radiologists to confidently make diagnoses in certain clinically challenging scenarios. In this review article, we briefly describe the principles of X-ray attenuation. We detail principles for DECT and describe multiple systems associated with this technology. We describe various DECT techniques and algorithms including virtual monoenergetic imaging (VMI), virtual non-contrast (VNC) imaging, Iodine quantification techniques including Iodine overlay map (IOM), and two- and three-material decomposition algorithms that can be utilized to demonstrate a multitude of pathologies. Lastly, we provide our readers commentary on examples pertaining to the practical implementation of DECT's diverse techniques in the Gastrointestinal, Genitourinary, Biliary, Musculoskeletal, and Neuroradiology systems.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ahmad Abu-Omar
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Nicolas Murray
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Ismail T. Ali
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Faisal Khosa
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Sarah Barrett
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Adnan Sheikh
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Savvas Nicolaou
- Department of Emergency Radiology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver General Hospital, Vancouver, BC V5Z 1M9, Canada (I.T.A.)
| | - Stefania Tamburrini
- Department of Radiology, Ospedale del Mare-ASL NA1 Centro, Via Enrico Russo 11, 80147 Naples, Italy
| | - Francesca Iacobellis
- Department of General and Emergency Radiology, A. Cardarelli Hospital, Via A. Cardarelli 9, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Giacomo Sica
- Department of Radiology, Monaldi Hospital, Azienda Ospedaliera dei Colli, 80131 Naples, Italy;
| | - Vincenza Granata
- Division of Radiology, Istituto Nazionale Tumori IRCCS Fondazione Pascale—IRCCS Di Napoli, 80131 Naples, Italy
| | - Luca Saba
- Medical Oncology Department, AOU Cagliari, Policlinico Di Monserrato (CA), 09042 Monserrato, Italy
| | - Salvatore Masala
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (S.M.)
| | - Mariano Scaglione
- Department of Medicine, Surgery and Pharmacy, University of Sassari, Viale S. Pietro, 07100 Sassari, Italy; (S.M.)
- Department of Radiology, Pineta Grande Hospital, 81030 Castel Volturno, Italy
- Department of Radiology, James Cook University Hospital, Marton Road, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK
| |
Collapse
|