Management of Systemic-Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Towards a Better Prognosis in Patients with Systemic Sclerosis-Related Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension: Recent Developments and Perspectives

Precapillary pulmonary hypertension (PH) is a significant complication of systemic sclerosis (SSc). It represents one of the leading causes of morbidity and mortality, correlating with a significantly dismal prognosis and quality of life. Despite advancements in the management of patients with pulmonary arterial hypertension associated with SSc (SSc-PAH), no significant improvement has been reported in survival of patients with precapillary SSc-PH associated with extensive lung parenchyma disease. International expert consensus and guidelines for the management of PH recommend annual screening of SSc patients for early detection of pre-capillary PH. The implementation of screening algorithms capable of identifying patients with a high likelihood of developing PH could help limit unnecessary right-heart catheterization procedures and prevent significant delay in diagnosis. Furthermore, early initiation of up-front combination targeted therapy in patients with PAH has shown increase in survival rates, indicating that timely and aggressive medical therapy is key for stabilizing and even improving functional class, hemodynamic parameters and 6 min walking distance (6MWD) in this population. Further research is warranted into the benefit of PAH-targeted therapies in patients with PH associated with lung disease. Lastly, we discuss the potential role of immunosuppression using biologic agents in the therapeutic management of precapillary PH in SSc patients.

Prognostic and predictive markers of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease in a clinical trial and long-term observational cohort

OBJECTIVES

To explore prognostic and predictive markers of SSc-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) outcomes in a phase 3 trial (focuSSced) and prognostic markers in a real-world cohort (SMART).

METHODS

The focuSSced SSc-ILD subgroup included 68 of 106 placebo-treated and 68 of 104 tocilizumab-treated patients. The SMART cohort included 505 patients with SSc-ILD. Linear mixed-effect models were used to identify factors associated with change in forced vital capacity (FVC). Kaplan-Meier estimation and Cox regression were used for time-to-event analyses.

RESULTS

In placebo-treated focuSSced patients, sex was a significant prognostic factor for FVC decline; males had increased risk for absolute decline ≥10% in percent-predicted FVC (ppFVC) and 0.22% faster weekly FVC decline than females (P = 0.0001). FVC was 9.8% lower in patients with CRP >6 mg/ml vs those with CRP ≤6 mg/ml (P = 0.0059). Tocilizumab reduced the risk for ≥10% decline in ppFVC in patients who were male, had earlier disease (<2 years duration), had IL-6 levels <10 pg/ml, or had anti-topoisomerase antibodies (ATA). In the SMART cohort, prognostic factors for ppFVC <70% were male sex, ATA, and low baseline FVC. Males had 3.3% lower FVC 1 year after disease onset (P < 0.001) and 0.6% faster yearly decline (P = 0.03) than females.

CONCLUSION

Prognostic markers in SSc-ILD were similar between focuSSced and SMART. Male sex and inflammatory markers were associated with lower FVC but IL-6 ≥10 pg/ml was not predictive of response to tocilizumab.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02453256.

Proposed Response Parameters for Twelve-Month Drug Trial in Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis: Results of the Hamburg International Consensus Meetings

OBJECTIVE

Juvenile systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an orphan disease, associated with high morbidity and mortality. New treatment strategies are much needed, but clearly defining appropriate outcomes is necessary if successful therapies are to be developed. Our objective here was to propose such outcomes.

METHODS

This proposal is the result of 4 face-to-face consensus meetings with a 27-member multidisciplinary team of pediatric rheumatologists, adult rheumatologists, dermatologists, pediatric cardiologists, pulmonologists, gastroenterologists, a statistician, and patients. Throughout the process, we reviewed the existing adult data in this field, the more limited pediatric literature for juvenile SSc outcomes, and data from 2 juvenile SSc patient cohorts to assist in making informed, data-driven decisions. The use of items for each domain as an outcome measure in an open label 12-month clinical trial of juvenile SSc was voted and agreed upon using a nominal group technique.

RESULTS

After voting, the domains agreed on were global disease activity, skin, Raynaud's phenomenon, digital ulcers, musculoskeletal, cardiac, pulmonary, renal, and gastrointestinal involvement, and quality of life. Fourteen outcome measures had 100% agreement, 1 item had 91% agreement, and 1 item had 86% agreement. The domains of biomarkers and growth/development were moved to the research agenda.

CONCLUSION

We reached consensus on multiple domains and items that should be assessed in an open label, 12-month clinical juvenile SSc trial as well as a research agenda for future development.

Systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease: a conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive disease

OBJECTIVES

To establish a framework by which experts define disease subsets in systemic sclerosis associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).

METHODS

A conceptual framework for subclinical, clinical and progressive ILD was provided to 83 experts, asking them to use the framework and classify actual SSc-ILD patients. Each patient profile was designed to be classified by at least four experts in terms of severity and risk of progression at baseline; progression was based on 1-year follow-up data. A consensus was reached if ≥75% of experts agreed. Experts provided information on which items were important in determining classification.

RESULTS

Forty-four experts (53%) completed the survey. Consensus was achieved on the dimensions of severity (75%, 60 of 80 profiles), risk of progression (71%, 57 of 80 profiles) and progressive ILD (60%, 24 of 40 profiles). For profiles achieving consensus, most were classified as clinical ILD (92%), low risk (54%) and stable (71%). Severity and disease progression overlapped in terms of framework items that were most influential in classifying patients (forced vital capacity, extent of lung involvement on high resolution chest CT [HRCT]); risk of progression was influenced primarily by disease duration.

CONCLUSIONS

Using our proposed conceptual framework, international experts were able to achieve a consensus on classifying SSc-ILD patients along the dimensions of disease severity, risk of progression and progression over time. Experts rely on similar items when classifying disease severity and progression: a combination of spirometry and gas exchange and quantitative HRCT.

Expert consensus on the management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare, complex, connective tissue disorder. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is common in SSc, occurring in 35-52% of patients and accounting for 20-40% of mortality. Evolution of therapeutic options has resulted in a lack of consensus on how to manage this condition. This Delphi study was initiated to develop consensus recommendations based on expert physician insights regarding screening, progression, treatment criteria, monitoring of response, and the role of recent therapeutic advances with antifibrotics and immunosuppressants in patients with SSc-ILD.

METHODS

A modified Delphi process was completed by pulmonologists (n = 13) and rheumatologists (n = 12) with expertise in the management of patients with SSc-ILD. Panelists rated their agreement with each statement on a Likert scale from - 5 (complete disagreement) to + 5 (complete agreement). Consensus was predefined as a mean Likert scale score of ≤  - 2.5 or ≥  + 2.5 with a standard deviation not crossing zero.

RESULTS

Panelists recommended that all patients with SSc be screened for ILD by chest auscultation, spirometry with diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide, high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT), and/or autoantibody testing. Treatment decisions were influenced by baseline and changes in pulmonary function tests, extent of ILD on HRCT, duration and degree of dyspnea, presence of pulmonary hypertension, and potential contribution of reflux. Treatment success was defined as stabilization or improvement of signs or symptoms of ILD and functional status. Mycophenolate mofetil was identified as the initial treatment of choice. Experts considered nintedanib a therapeutic option in patients with progressive fibrotic ILD despite immunosuppressive therapy or patients contraindicated/unable to tolerate immunotherapy. Concomitant use of nintedanib with MMF/cyclophosphamide can be considered in patients with advanced disease at initial presentation, aggressive ILD, or significant disease progression. Although limited consensus was achieved on the use of tocilizumab, the experts considered it a therapeutic option for patients with early SSc and ILD with elevated acute-phase reactants.

CONCLUSIONS

This modified Delphi study generated consensus recommendations for management of patients with SSc-ILD in a real-world setting. Findings from this study provide a management algorithm that will be helpful for treating patients with SSc-ILD and addresses a significant unmet need.

Transferability of radiomic signatures from experimental to human interstitial lung disease

Background

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) defines a group of parenchymal lung disorders, characterized by fibrosis as their common final pathophysiological stage. To improve diagnosis and treatment of ILD, there is a need for repetitive non-invasive characterization of lung tissue by quantitative parameters. In this study, we investigated whether CT image patterns found in mice with bleomycin induced lung fibrosis can be translated as prognostic factors to human patients diagnosed with ILD.

Methods

Bleomycin was used to induce lung fibrosis in mice (n_control = 36, n_experimental = 55). The patient cohort consisted of 98 systemic sclerosis (SSc) patients (n_ILD = 65). Radiomic features (n_histogram = 17, n_texture = 137) were extracted from microCT (mice) and HRCT (patients) images. Predictive performance of the models was evaluated with the area under the receiver-operating characteristic curve (AUC). First, predictive performance of individual features was examined and compared between murine and patient data sets. Second, multivariate models predicting ILD were trained on murine data and tested on patient data. Additionally, the models were reoptimized on patient data to reduce the influence of the domain shift on the performance scores.

Results

Predictive power of individual features in terms of AUC was highly correlated between mice and patients (r = 0.86). A model based only on mean image intensity in the lung scored AUC = 0.921 ± 0.048 in mice and AUC = 0.774 (CI95% 0.677-0.859) in patients. The best radiomic model based on three radiomic features scored AUC = 0.994 ± 0.013 in mice and validated with AUC = 0.832 (CI95% 0.745-0.907) in patients. However, reoptimization of the model weights in the patient cohort allowed to increase the model’s performance to AUC = 0.912 ± 0.058.

Conclusion

Radiomic signatures of experimental ILD derived from microCT scans translated to HRCT of humans with SSc-ILD. We showed that the experimental model of BLM-induced ILD is a promising system to test radiomic models for later application and validation in human cohorts.

Underdetection of Interstitial Lung Disease in Juvenile Systemic Sclerosis

OBJECTIVE

Utilizing data obtained from a prospective, international, juvenile systemic sclerosis (SSc) cohort, the present study was undertaken to determine if pulmonary screening with forced vital capacity (FVC) and diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLco) is sufficient to assess the presence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) in comparison to high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) in juvenile SSc.

METHODS

The juvenile SSc cohort database was queried for patients enrolled from January 2008 to January 2020 with recorded pulmonary function tests (PFTs) parameters and HRCT to determine the discriminatory properties of PFT parameters, FVC, and DLco in detecting ILD.

RESULTS

Eighty-six juvenile SSc patients had both computed tomography imaging and FVC values for direct comparison. Using findings on HRCT as the standard measure of ILD presence, the sensitivity of FVC in detecting ILD in juvenile SSc was only 40%, the specificity was 77%, and area under the curve (AUC) was 0.58. Fifty-eight juvenile SSc patients had both CT imaging and DLco values for comparison. The sensitivity of DLco in detecting ILD was 76%, the specificity was 70%, and AUC was 0.73.

CONCLUSION

The performance of PFTs in juvenile SSc to detect underlying ILD was quite limited. Specifically, the FVC, which is one of the main clinical parameters in adult SSc to detect and monitor ILD, would miss ~60% of children who had ILD changes on their accompanying HRCT. The DLco was more sensitive in detecting potential abnormalities on HRCT, but with less specificity than the FVC. These results support the use of HRCT in tandem with PFTs for the screening of ILD in juvenile SSc.

Interstitial Lung Disease Associated With Autoimmune Rheumatic Diseases: Checklists for Clinical Practice

Background: Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are often associated with rheumatic diseases. Their early diagnosis and management are not only difficult, but also crucial, because they are associated with major morbidity and mortality and can be the first cause of death in autoimmune rheumatic diseases (ARDs). Objectives: By using methodologies, such as Nominal Group Technique (NGT) and Delphi Survey, the aims of this study were (1) to measure consensus between pulmonologists, radiologists, and rheumatologists experienced in the management of ARD-ILD; (2) to highlight the importance of a multidisciplinary approach; and (3) to provide clinicians with a practical tool aimed at improving the prompt recognition and follow-up of ILD associated with ARDs and of any possible rheumatic conditions underlying ILD. Results: During the NGT round, the Steering Committee defined 57 statements to be used in the Delphi survey. A total of 78 experts participated in the Delphi survey, namely 28 pulmonologists, 33 rheumatologists, and 17 radiologists. During this round, consensus on agreement was reached in 47 statements, while disagreement was not reached in any statements. A secondary questionnaire was drafted by the Steering Committee to obtain clearer indications on ILD-ARD "red-flags" and follow-up. Delphi Panelists took part also in the second-questionnaire survey. Answers from both surveys were used to draft two checklists of "red flags" sign or symptom suggestive of ILD and ARD, respectively, and two checklists on identification and monitoring of rheumatoid arthritis (RA) and systemic sclerosis (SSc) ILD. Limitations: This study is a consensus work, which cannot produce empiric data, and is limited to the Italian scenario. Conclusions: This work showed a high level of agreement, but also shows some divergent opinions between different experts. This underlines the importance of a multidisciplinary approach. Eventually, we believe the drafted checklists can help clinicians in the diagnosis and follow-up of ILD-ARD.

Computed tomography-based radiomics decodes prognostic and molecular differences in interstitial lung disease related to systemic sclerosis

Background

Radiomic features calculated from routine medical images show great potential for personalised medicine in cancer. Patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc), a rare, multiorgan autoimmune disorder, have a similarly poor prognosis due to interstitial lung disease (ILD). Here, our objectives were to explore computed tomography (CT)-based high-dimensional image analysis (“radiomics”) for disease characterisation, risk stratification and relaying information on lung pathophysiology in SSc-ILD.

Methods

We investigated two independent, prospectively followed SSc-ILD cohorts (Zurich, derivation cohort, n=90; Oslo, validation cohort, n=66). For every subject, we defined 1355 robust radiomic features from standard-of-care CT images. We performed unsupervised clustering to identify and characterise imaging-based patient clusters. A clinically applicable prognostic quantitative radiomic risk score (qRISSc) for progression-free survival (PFS) was derived from radiomic profiles using supervised analysis. The biological basis of qRISSc was assessed in a cross-species approach by correlation with lung proteomic, histological and gene expression data derived from mice with bleomycin-induced lung fibrosis.

Results

Radiomic profiling identified two clinically and prognostically distinct SSc-ILD patient clusters. To evaluate the clinical applicability, we derived and externally validated a binary, quantitative radiomic risk score (qRISSc) composed of 26 features that accurately predicted PFS and significantly improved upon clinical risk stratification parameters in multivariable Cox regression analyses in the pooled cohorts. A high qRISSc score, which identifies patients at risk for progression, was reverse translatable from human to experimental ILD and correlated with fibrotic pathway activation.

Conclusions

Radiomics-based risk stratification using routine CT images provides complementary phenotypic, clinical and prognostic information significantly impacting clinical decision making in SSc-ILD.

CT-based radiomics decodes phenotypic, prognostic and molecular differences in SSc-ILD, and predicts progression-free survival with a significant impact on future clinical decision making in SSc-ILDhttps://bit.ly/3zPaMOn

Systemic Sclerosis: Highlighting Respiratory Complications and Significance of Early Screening

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is an autoimmune disease that leads the patient to have a diverse clinical presentation encompassing several systems and a worse prognosis, mainly when complications arise. Most SSc-related deaths are caused by pulmonary hypertension (PH) and interstitial lung disease (ILD). This article focuses on pulmonary artery hypertension (PAH) and ILD as pulmonary consequences of SSc. We examined the grave effects regarding SSc's respiratory complications, which are concealed by the disease's clinical heterogeneity. In this article, we briefly reviewed the discussion of clinical features and management and the mortality associated with the sequelae. We further addressed the benefits and significance of screening for the disease and associated respiratory complications in SSc patients in this study.

Review for best practice in clinical rheumatology juvenile systemic sclerosis - Updates and practice points

Juvenile systemic sclerosis (jSSc) is a rare, severe autoimmune disease associated with life-threatening multiorgan inflammatory-driven fibrosis. Recognition early in the disease process, when treatment is more effective, is critical. We outline insights from the authors, who specialize and host jSSc cohorts, combined with recent literature review combining available juvenile-onset and applicable adult-onset studies regarding SSc evaluation, which can be extrapolated to children. Practice tips are provided for each main organ system.

Natural variability in the disease course of SSc-ILD: implications for treatment

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) affects approximately 50% of patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc) and is the leading cause of death in SSc. Our objective was to gain insight into the progression of SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD). Using data from longitudinal clinical trials and observational studies, we assessed definitions and patterns of progression, risk factors for progression, and implications for treatment. SSc-ILD progression was commonly defined as exceeding specific thresholds of lung function worsening and/or increasing radiographic involvement. One definition used in several studies is decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) of ≥10%, or ≥5-10% plus a decline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide ≥15%. Based on these criteria, 20-30% of patients in observational cohorts develop progressive ILD, starting early in the disease course and progressing at a highly variable rate.Risk factors such as age, FVC, extent of fibrosis and presence of anti-topoisomerase I antibodies can help predict progression of SSc-ILD, though composite risk scores may offer greater predictive power. Whilst the variability of the disease course in SSc-ILD makes risk stratification of patients challenging, the decision to initiate, change or stop treatment should be based on a combination of the current disease state and the speed of progression.

STRATUS: A Phase II Study of Abituzumab in Patients With Systemic Sclerosis-associated Interstitial Lung Disease

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the effects of abituzumab in systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD).

METHODS

STRATUS was a phase II, double-blind, parallel-group, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT02745145). Adults (≤ 75 yrs) with SSc-ILD on stable mycophenolate were randomized (2:2:1) to receive intravenous abituzumab 1500 mg, abituzumab 500 mg, or placebo every 4 weeks for 104 weeks. The primary endpoint was the annual rate of change in absolute forced vital capacity.

RESULTS

STRATUS was terminated prematurely due to slow enrollment (n = 75 screened, n = 24 randomized), precluding robust analysis of efficacy. Abituzumab was well tolerated; no new safety signals were detected.

CONCLUSION

Further investigation of abituzumab for treatment of SSc-ILD is required.

Interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is an umbrella term for lung disease characterised by inflammation and fibrosis of the interstitium. ILD can be idiopathic or secondary to connective tissue disorders, drugs or environmental exposures. Before labelling it as idiopathic we have to rule out secondary causes. ILD is one of the most common extra-articular manifestations of connective tissue diseases (CTDs), causing significant morbidity and mortality. Patients with pre-existing CTD can develop ILD; some patients develop ILD against the background of either one or two clinical features of a CTD or isolated auto-antibody positivity. The current terminology for such an entity is interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features (IPAF). The current criterion is based on three domains: clinical, serologic and morphologic. To satisfy the IPAF classification criteria, one needs to satisfy the mandatory criterion with one feature from two of the three domains. Classifying patients with this criterion helps in early initiation of immunosuppression and in monitoring them closely for development of features of a well defined CTD. There are a few limitations like the clinical domain being more skewed towards systemic sclerosis and in˜flammatory myositis, exclusion of antineutrophilic cytoplasmic antibody (ANCA) and cytoplasmic pattern in antinuclear antibody (ANA). There are no clear protocols for treatment of IPAF and most of the data has been extrapolated from the management of systemic sclerosis (SSc) ILD and idiopathic non-specific c interstitial pneumonia (NSIP). Progressive disease in spite of treatment demands stronger immunosuppressive agents. Studies on the role of antifibrotics in IPAF are underway, with few small studies showing positive outcomes. There are con˜flicting reports on the survival and outcome of the IPAF cohort. Certain studies suggest that they have better survival compared with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) though other studies contradict this statement.

Increased prevalence of small airways dysfunction in patients with systemic sclerosis as determined by impulse oscillometry

OBJECTIVES

The prevalence and clinical implications of small airways involvement in SSc are still to be fully elucidated. The goal of the present work is to assess the prevalence of small airways dysfunction by impulse oscillometry and to determine whether it correlates with selected disease-related features and respiratory-related quality of life.

METHODS

Ninety-four SSc patients and 93 healthy controls were studied by impulse oscillometry measurements. Small airways dysfunction was defined as the difference between resistance at low frequency, i.e. 5 Hz, and resistance at high frequency, i.e. 20 Hz, termed 'R5-R20', ⩾0.07 kPa/l/s. The St George's Respiratory Questionnaire was used to measure health impairment in SSc patients. Radiological features of small airways disease and parenchymal abnormalities on high resolution CT chest scans were jointly assessed by two thoracic radiologists.

RESULTS

Small airways dysfunction was present in 21.5% of the SSc patient cohort, with a prevalence almost 5-fold higher compared with controls, and it was significantly associated with worse respiratory-related quality of life. Radiological features consistent with small airways abnormalities were detected in 25% of SSc patients, mostly in the absence of interstitial lung changes. Combining functional and radiological evaluations, one-third of the SSc cohort showed at least one feature of small airways involvement, which was associated with the lcSSc phenotype and with longer disease duration.

CONCLUSION

The current study strengthens the hypothesis that small airway dysfunction might be a feature of SSc-related lung involvement, providing the first data on its significant impact on respiratory-related quality of life. A full assessment of lung function in SSc patients should include impulse oscillometry as a complementary technique, due to potential clinical and therapeutic implications.

Predictors of progression in systemic sclerosis patients with interstitial lung disease

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a systemic autoimmune disease affecting multiple organ systems, including the lungs. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the leading cause of death in SSc.

There are no valid biomarkers to predict the occurrence of SSc-ILD, although auto-antibodies against anti-topoisomerase I and several inflammatory markers are candidate biomarkers that need further evaluation. Chest auscultation, presence of shortness of breath and pulmonary function testing are important diagnostic tools, but lack sensitivity to detect early ILD. Baseline screening with high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) is therefore necessary to confirm an SSc-ILD diagnosis. Once diagnosed with SSc-ILD, patients' clinical courses are variable and difficult to predict, although certain patient characteristics and biomarkers are associated with disease progression. It is important to monitor patients with SSc-ILD for signs of disease progression, although there is no consensus about which diagnostic tools to use or how often monitoring should occur. In this article, we review methods used to define and predict disease progression in SSc-ILD.

There is no valid definition of SSc-ILD disease progression, but we suggest that either a decline in forced vital capacity (FVC) from baseline of ≥10%, or a decline in FVC of 5–9% in association with a decline in diffusing capacity of the lung for carbon monoxide of ≥15% represents progression. An increase in the radiographic extent of ILD on HRCT imaging would also signify progression. A time period of 1–2 years is generally used for this definition, but a decline over a longer time period may also reflect clinically relevant disease progression.

Lung function tests and chest imaging help predict who has SSc-associated ILD and whether it will progress. In the absence of standardised methods for doctors, we recommend a strategy that combines both lung function tests and chest imaging.http://bit.ly/2uK9ZD2

Patient and Physician Perspectives on Systemic Sclerosis-Associated Interstitial Lung Disease

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease is challenging to diagnose and treat. Patients and physicians can perceive the disease differently and have different views on its management. Communication issues between them can lead to suboptimal disease management. Despite a clear need for improvement in the speed and accuracy of the diagnostic workup, the heterogeneity of clinical symptoms renders the process long and challenging. When considering treatment options, physicians may be more focused on the evidence supporting a particular treatment or on a patient's pulmonary function test results, as opposed to the realities of the patient's difficulties with symptoms or the psychosocial effects of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Disease management plans should be determined by the patient's own preferences and goals as well as the objective clinical situation. Health care providers must consider their patients as partners on a journey in which treatment decisions are reached jointly. This review will focus on the perspectives of physicians and patients in relation to the diagnosis and management of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. Similarities and differences in these perspectives will be identified, and strategies for achieving optimal disease management will be proposed.

Treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: Lessons from clinical trials

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease remains a leading cause of mortality. Despite decades of clinical trials, the treatment effects of disease modifying anti-rheumatic drugs continue to be modest and there remains a great need for therapies that attenuate and hopefully ameliorate parenchymal lung disease. In this review, we highlight the key clinical trials that have shaped the management strategies employed by the authors, providing their strength of recommendation based on level of evidence. We also review lessons learned in more recent years, suggesting a benefit in targeting patients with subclinical interstitial lung disease with high risk for progression early in the disease course, as well as the benefit seen in a large clinical trial leading to the first Food and Drug Administration-approved treatment for systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease. These lessons come in a context of heterogeneity of patient populations and response to therapy, as well as the inherent constraints of time-limited studies to detect meaningful outcomes for patients.

Therapeutic Options for the Treatment of Interstitial Lung Disease Related to Connective Tissue Diseases. A Narrative Review

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the most serious pulmonary complications of connective tissue diseases (CTDs) and it is characterized by a deep impact on morbidity and mortality. Due to the poor knowledge of CTD-ILD’s natural history and due to the difficulties related to design of randomized control trials, there is a lack of prospective data about the prevalence, follow-up, and therapeutic efficacy. For these reasons, the choice of therapy for CTD-ILD is currently very challenging and still largely based on experts’ opinion. Treatment is often based on steroids and conventional immunosuppressive drugs, but the recent publication of the encouraging results of the INBUILD trial has highlighted a possible effective and safe use of antifibrotic drugs as a new therapeutic option for these subjects. Aim of this review is to summarize the available data and recent advances about therapeutic strategies for ILD in the context of various CTD, such as systemic sclerosis, idiopathic inflammatory myopathy and Sjogren syndrome, systemic lupus erythematosus, mixed connective tissue disease and undifferentiated connective tissue disease, and interstitial pneumonia with autoimmune features, focusing also on ongoing clinical trials.

Ongoing clinical trials and treatment options for patients with systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

SSc is a rare CTD that affects multiple organ systems, resulting in substantial morbidity and mortality. Evidence of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is seen in ∼80% of patients with SSc. Currently there is no approved disease-modifying treatment for ILD and few effective treatment options are available. CYC is included in treatment guidelines, but it has limited efficacy and is associated with toxicity. MMF is becoming the most commonly used medication in clinical practice in North America and the UK, but its use is not universal. Newer agents targeting the pathogenic mechanisms underlying SSc-ILD, including fibrotic and inflammatory pathways, lymphocytes, cell-cell and cell-extracellular membrane interactions, hold promise for better treatment outcomes, including improved lung function, patient-related outcomes and quality of life. Here we review ongoing trials of established and novel agents that are currently recruiting patients with SSc-ILD.

Circulating lung biomarkers in idiopathic lung fibrosis and interstitial lung diseases associated with connective tissue diseases: Where do we stand?

Interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are complex diseases with various courses where personalized medicine is highly expected. Biomarkers are indicators of physiological, pathological processes or of pharmacological response to therapeutic interventions. They can be used for diagnosis, risk-stratification, prediction and monitoring of treatment response. To better delineate the input and pitfalls of biomarkers in ILDs, we performed a systematic review and meta-analysis of literature in MEDLINE and Embase databases from January 1960 to February 2019. We focused on circulating biomarkers as having the highest generalizability. Overall, 70 studies were included in the review and 20 studies could be included in the meta-analysis. This review highlights that ILD associated with connective tissue diseases (CTD-ILD) and idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) share common biomarkers, suggesting common pathophysiological pathways. KL-6 and SP-D, could diagnose lung fibrosis in both IPF and CTD-ILD, with KL-6 having the strongest value (OR: 520.95[110.07-2465.58], p<0.001 in IPF and OR:26.43[7.15-97.68], p<0.001 in CTD-ILD), followed by SPD (OR: 33.81[3.20-357.52], p = 0.003 in IPF and 13.24 [3.84-45.71] in SSc-ILD), MMP7 appeared as interesting for IPF diagnosis (p<0.001), whereas in SSc, CCL18 was associated with ILD diagnosis. Both CCL18 and KL-6 were predictive for the outcomes of ILDs, with higher predictive values for CCL18 in both IPF (OR:10.22[4.72-22.16], p<0.001 and in SSc [2.62[1.71-4.03], p<0.001). However, disease specific biomarkers are lacking and large longitudinal studies are needed before the translational use of the potential biomarkers in clinical practice. With the recent availability of new effective therapies in ILDs, further studies should assess response to treatment.

Interstitial Lung Disease in Systemic Sclerosis: Focus on Early Detection and Intervention

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a progressive and often devastating disease characterized by autoimmune dysfunction, vasculopathy, and fibrosis. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is identified in the majority of patients with SSc and is the leading cause of SSc-related mortality. Although clinical manifestations and ILD severity vary among patients, lung function typically declines to the greatest extent during the first 3-4 years after disease onset. We aim to provide an overview of SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD) with a focus on current and emerging tools for early diagnosis of ILD and current and novel treatments under investigation. Early detection of ILD provides the opportunity for early therapeutic intervention, which could improve patient outcomes. Thoracic high-resolution computed tomography is the most effective method of identifying ILD in patients with SSc; it enables detection of mild lung abnormalities and plays an important role in monitoring disease progression. Cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil are the most commonly prescribed treatments for SSc-ILD. Recently, nintedanib (an antifibrotic) was approved by the Food and Drug Administration for patients with SSc-ILD; it is indicated for slowing the rate of decline in pulmonary function. However, there is a need for additional effective and well-tolerated disease-modifying therapy. Ongoing studies are evaluating other antifibrotics and novel agents. We envision that early detection of lung involvement, combined with the emergence and integration of novel therapies, will lead to improved outcomes in patients with SSc-ILD.

[Treatment of systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease]

BACKGROUND

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a fibrosing autoimmune disease of the connective tissue. In addition to skin fibrosis, pulmonary involvement and interstitial lung disease (ILD) in particular are the most common and severe manifestations of SSc. The disease is associated with a substantial risk of morbidity and mortality, especially in progressive ILD. In the last 5 years new treatment concepts for SSc-ILD have been investigated in numerous clinical studies.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This review is based on a literature search in PubMed, focusing on the most relevant papers published up to the end of 2018 with the keywords "SSc" and "treatment".

RESULTS

The treatment of SSc-ILD has changed over the last few years due to the results of many clinical studies. The updated guidelines of the European League Against Rheumatism (EULAR) recommend the use of cyclophosphamide or hematopoietic stem cell transplantation. Data for a positive influence on SSc-ILD are also available for mycophenolate, tocilizumab and anabasum. Because of the pathophysiological similarities to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, the use of the antifibrotic agents nintedanib and pirfenidone is currently being investigated in randomized, multicenter clinical trials and could be a novel and promising therapeutic strategy.

CONCLUSION

Current drug studies may provide innovative therapeutic perspectives for SSc-ILD and could significantly improve the prognosis of affected patients in the future.

Rituximab therapy is more effective than cyclophosphamide therapy for Japanese patients with anti-topoisomerase I-positive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

Systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) is the most frequent cause of death for SSc but there is still no sufficient treatment available. Although cyclophosphamide (CYC) therapy is a common treatment which has shown statistical efficacy against SSc-ILD to date, its effects are temporary and not enough. Rituximab (RTX), the anti-CD20 monoclonal antibody, has recently shown efficacy in many autoimmune diseases. In SSc-ILD, RTX is also considered to be one of the novel treatment candidates. However, studies of SSc-ILD in Japanese treated with RTX have only a few case reports. Therefore, in this study, we retrospectively compared nine patients treated with RTX and 30 patients treated with CYC to investigate the efficacy of RTX treatment for Japanese anti-topoisomerase I-positive SSc-ILD patients. At the 24-month evaluation, the improvement rates of percent predicted of forced vital capacity and percent predicted of diffusing capacity of the lung carbon monoxide in the RTX-treated group were significantly higher than those in the CYC-treated group (20.6 ± 8.8% vs 1.1 ± 3.9%; P < 0.05 and 34.0 ± 6.0% vs -1.5 ± 2.8%; P < 0.01, respectively). In addition, skin thickness scores also showed a marked improvement from 13.5 points before the start of treatment to 5.8 points after 24 months by RTX therapy (P < 0.05). These results suggest that RTX treatment is more effective for Japanese SSc-ILD patients than CYC treatment. In the future, it is expected that large-scale clinical trials will show the usefulness of RTX treatment for SSc-ILD.

Epidemiology of systemic sclerosis and systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease

Background: Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is one of the leading causes of mortality in patients with systemic sclerosis (SSc). To further understand this patient population, we present the first systematic review on the epidemiology of SSc and SSc-associated ILD (SSc-ILD).

Methods: Bibliographic databases and web sources were searched for studies including patients with SSc and SSc-ILD in Europe and North America (United States and Canada). The systematic review was limited to publications in English, German, French, Spanish, Italian, and Portuguese, published between January 1, 2000 and February 29, 2016. For all publications included in the review, the methodologic quality was assessed. For each dimension and region, data availability in terms of quantity and consistency of reported findings was evaluated.

Results: Fifty publications reporting epidemiologic data (prevalence, incidence, demographic profile, and survival and mortality) were included; 39 included patients with SSc and 16 included patients with SSc-ILD. The reported prevalence of SSc was 7.2–33.9 and 13.5–44.3 per 100,000 individuals in Europe and North America, respectively. Annual incidence estimates were 0.6–2.3 and 1.4–5.6 per 100,000 individuals in Europe and North America, respectively. Associated ILD was present in ~35% of the patients in Europe and ~52% of the patients in North America. In Europe, a study estimated the prevalence and annual incidence of SSc-ILD at 1.7–4.2 and 0.1–0.4 per 100,000 individuals, respectively. In both Europe and North America, SSc-ILD was diagnosed at a slightly older age than SSc, with both presentations of the disease affecting 2–3 times more women than men. Ten-year survival in patients with SSc was reported at 65–73% in Europe and 54–82% in North America, with cardiorespiratory manifestations (including ILD) associated with poor prognosis.

Conclusion: This systematic review confirms that SSc and SSc-ILD are rare, with geographic variation in prevalence and incidence.

Interstitial lung disease associated with systemic sclerosis (SSc-ILD)

Background

Systemic sclerosis (SSc) is a rare connective tissue disease with a heterogeneous clinical course. Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a common manifestation of SSc and a leading cause of death.

Main body

All patients newly diagnosed with SSc should receive a comprehensive clinical evaluation, including assessment of respiratory symptoms, a high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) scan of the chest, and pulmonary function tests. ILD can develop in any patient with SSc, including those with pulmonary hypertension, but the risk is increased in those with diffuse (rather than limited) cutaneous SSc, those with anti-Scl-70/anti-topoisomerase I antibody, and in the absence of anti-centromere antibody. While it can occur at any time, the risk of developing ILD is greatest early in the course of SSc, so patients should be monitored closely in the first few years after diagnosis. An increased extent of lung fibrosis on HRCT and a low forced vital capacity (FVC) are predictors of early mortality. While not all patients will require treatment, current approaches to the treatment of progressive SSc-ILD focus on immunosuppressant therapies, including cyclophosphamide and mycophenolate mofetil. In patients with severe and/or rapidly progressive disease, both haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and lung transplantation have been successfully used. A number of medications, including the two drugs approved for the treatment of idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), are under active investigation as potential new therapies for SSc-ILD.

Conclusions

Physicians managing patients with SSc should maintain a high level of suspicion and regularly monitor for ILD, particularly in the first few years after diagnosis.

Pharmacological management of progressive-fibrosing interstitial lung diseases: a review of the current evidence

A proportion of patients with interstitial lung diseases (ILDs) are at risk of developing a progressive-fibrosing phenotype, which is associated with a deterioration in lung function and early mortality. In addition to idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF), fibrosing ILDs that may present a progressive phenotype include idiopathic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia, connective tissue disease-associated ILDs, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, unclassifiable idiopathic interstitial pneumonia, ILDs related to other occupational exposures and sarcoidosis. Corticosteroids and/or immunosuppressive therapies are sometimes prescribed to patients with these diseases. However, this treatment regimen may not be effective, adequate on its own or well tolerated, suggesting that there is a pressing need for efficacious and better tolerated therapies. Currently, the only approved treatments to slow disease progression in patients with IPF are nintedanib and pirfenidone. Similarities in pathobiological mechanisms leading to fibrosis between IPF and other ILDs that may present a progressive-fibrosing phenotype provide a rationale to suggest that nintedanib and pirfenidone may be therapeutic options for patients with the latter diseases.

This review provides an overview of the therapeutic options currently available for patients with fibrosing ILDs, including fibrosing ILDs that may present a progressive phenotype, and explores the status of the randomised controlled trials that are underway to determine the efficacy and safety of nintedanib and pirfenidone.

Aside from IPF, there are no proven therapies for other ILDs with a progressive-fibrosing phenotype that are effective and have tolerable adverse effects. Clinical studies evaluating the benefits of antifibrotic therapy in these populations are underway.http://ow.ly/40yL30mOs0q

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: challenges in early diagnosis and management

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is a group of lung diseases characterized by thickening of the interstitium surrounding pulmonary alveolar walls. It is related to specific radiographic features in lung imaging and/or the presence of restrictive disorders in pulmonary function tests (PFTs). ILD is one of the leading causes of death in systemic sclerosis patients. Major risk factors of ILD associated with SSc (SSc-ILD) include male sex, diffuse type of cutaneous SSc and presence of anti-Scl-70 antibodies.

SSc-ILD is challenging to diagnose at an early stage as the symptoms are non-specific. The greatest risk of its development is during the 4–5 years after the initial diagnosis of systemic sclerosis. Clinical vigilance at the time, including regular pulmonary function tests and/or high-resolution com-puted tomography (HRCT), is needed. The aim of this paper is to summarize the current knowledge on early diagnostic methods and progression risk factors for SSc-ILD.

Interstitial lung disease in systemic sclerosis: progress in screening and early diagnosis

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) is the major determinant of morbidity and mortality in systemic sclerosis (SSc). In highly selected SSc patients, it was recently shown that stem cell therapy early in the disease course improved survival and reduced the extent of ILD, providing a rationale for early ILD detection strategies in this disease. Here, we review recent progress on ILD screening and early diagnosis in SSc.

RECENT FINDINGS

Two studies showed that over 60% of unselected SSc cases with ILD by high-resolution computer tomography (HRCT) had normal range pulmonary function tests (PFTs); indicating poor performance of PFTs for ILD screening purposes. Serial, paired HRCT and PFT analyses indicated that screening by HRCT at baseline predicted risk for lung fibrosis development, progression rate of fibrosis and PFT decline. Analyses of circulating biomarkers, like CCL18, and nonradiating lung imaging modalities, like ultrasound and MRI, showed promise as tools for early ILD detection; but further work is needed.

SUMMARY

Prospective cohort data indicated poor performance of PFT as a stand-alone method for ILD screening. Lung HRCT appeared promising, but radiation is an issue. Promising biomarker data indicate the possibility of new ILD screening algorithms in SSc.

Connective tissue disease associated interstitial pneumonia: a challenge for both rheumatologists and pulmonologists

Interstitial lung disease (ILD) can be either idiopathic, the result of exposure or may be associated with extrapulmonary diseases. Among the latter, connective tissue diseases (CTDs) make up the largest part. The identification, follow-up and treatment of CTD-associated ILD (CTD-ILD) are a challenge for every physician as ILD can occur before, during and after the diagnosis of CTD. Early detection of pulmonary involvement is an essential task for the treating rheumatologist and recognition of the underlying CTD can pose a challenge for the treating pulmonologist. Multidisciplinary engagement towards the patient is therefore indispensable for optimal clinical care. (Sarcoidosis Vasc Diffuse Lung Dis 2017; 34: 326-335).

Ventilation distribution and small airway function in patients with systemic sclerosis

BACKGROUND

Despite the importance of traditional pulmonary function tests (PFTs) in managing systemic sclerosis (SSc), many patients with pulmonary disease diagnosed by computed tomography (CT) present with normal PFTs.

OBJECTIVE

To evaluate the efficacy of the nitrogen single-breath washout (N₂SBW) test in diagnosing SSc and to correlate N₂SBW parameters with the PFT indexes used in the follow-up of these patients, clinical data, and CT findings.

METHODS

Cross-sectional study in which 52 consecutive SSc patients were subjected to spirometry, body plethysmography, analysis of the diffusing capacity for carbon monoxide (DLCO), analysis of respiratory muscle strength, N₂SBW testing, and CT analysis.

RESULTS

Twenty-eight patients had a forced vital capacity (FVC) that was <70% of the predicted value. In the N₂SBW test, 44 patients had a phase III slope (Phase III slope_N2SBW) that was >120% of the predicted value, while 15 patients had a closing volume/vital capacity (CV/VC) that was >120% of the predicted value. A significant difference in Phase III slope_N2SBW was observed when the patients with predominant traction bronchiectasis and honeycombing were compared to the patients with other CT patterns (p<0.0001). The Phase III slope_N2SBW was correlated with FVC (r_s=-0.845, p<0.0001) and DLCO (r_s=-0.600, p<0.0001), and the CV/VC was correlated with FVC (r_s=-0.460, p=0.0006) and residual volume/total lung capacity (r_s=0.328, p=0.017).

CONCLUSION

Ventilation heterogeneity is a frequent finding in SSc patients that is associated with restrictive damage, changes in pulmonary diffusion, and CT patterns. In addition, approximately one-third of the patients presented with findings that were compatible with small airway disease.

A case report: The efficacy of pirfenidone in a Chinese patient with progressive systemic sclerosis-associated interstitial lung disease: A CARE-compliant article

Systemic sclerosis (SSc)-associated interstitial lung disease (SSc-ILD) has become the leading SSc-related cause of death. Although various types of immunosuppressive therapy have been attempted for patients with SSc-ILD, no curative or effective treatment strategies for SSc-ILD have been developed. Therefore, management of patients with SSc-ILD remains a challenge. Here, we report a Chinese, female, SSc-ILD patient who was negative for Scl-70 and showed an excellent response to pirfenidone without obvious adverse effects. She had been suffered from dry cough and exertional dyspnea for 2 months. The chest computed tomography manifestation was consistent with a pattern of fibrotic nonspecific interstitial pneumonia. The pulmonary function test showed isolated impaired diffusion. After 11 weeks of administration of pirfenidone, the dry cough and dyspnea had disappeared. Both of the lung shadows and the pulmonary diffusion function were improved. Pirfenidone might be an effective option for early SSc-ILD treatment. A well-controlled clinical trial is expected in the future.