Antinuclear Antibody Testing for the Diagnosis of Systemic Lupus Erythematosus

State of the art: the treatment of systemic lupus erythematosus

PURPOSE OF REVIEW

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a systemic autoimmune disease with dysregulated cells in the immune system. The disease affects organs like kidneys, nervous system, joints, and skin. To manage SLE effectively, novel treatments targeting immune system components have been developed. This review investigates the therapeutic potential of existing targeted therapies and explores future innovative approaches for well tolerated, personalized treatment.

RECENT FINDINGS

SLE treatment involves cytokine targets and specific immunologic pathways, with even small molecules involved.

SUMMARY

The advanced therapeutic options in SLE management give clinicians more tools to control disease activity according to personalized medicine.

DNA methylation of IFI44L as a potential blood biomarker for childhood-onset systemic lupus erythematosus

BACKGROUND

IFN-induced protein 44-like (IFI44L) promoter methylation has been demonstrated to serve as an effective blood diagnostic biomarker for adult-onset SLE. However, its utility as a diagnostic marker for childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) remains to be verified.

METHODS

Initially, we conducted a differential analysis of gene methylation and mRNA expression patterns in cSLE whole blood samples obtained from the public GEO database to determine IFI44L gene expression and assess the methylation status at its CpG sites. Subsequently, we collected clinical whole blood samples from 49 cSLE patients and 12 healthy children, employing an HRM-qPCR-based IFI44L methylation detection technique to evaluate its diagnostic efficacy in pediatric clinical practice.

RESULTS

A total of 26 hypomethylated, highly expressed genes in cSLE were identified by intersecting differentially expressed genes (DEGs) and differentially methylation genes (DMGs). GO enrichment analysis for these 26 genes indicated a robust association with type I IFN. Among the overlapping genes, IFI44L exhibited the most pronounced differential expression and methylation. In subsequent clinical validation experiments, IFI44L methylation was confirmed as an effective blood-based diagnostic biomarker for cSLE, achieving an AUC of 0.867, a sensitivity of 0.753, and a specificity of 1.000.

CONCLUSIONS

IFI44L methylation is a promising blood biomarker for cSLE.

IMPACT

IFI44L promoter methylation was reported to serve as a highly sensitive and specific diagnostic marker for adult-onset SLE. However, the diagnostic efficacy of IFI44L in childhood-onset SLE (cSLE) still remains to be confirmed. In this study, we utilized bioinformatics analysis and conducted clinical experiments to demonstrate that IFI44L methylation can also serve as a promising blood biomarker for cSLE. The findings of this study can facilitate the diagnosis of cSLE and broaden our understanding of its molecular mechanisms, with a particular focus on those related to type I interferons.

Clinical value of chemiluminescence method for detection of antinuclear antibody profiles

BACKGROUND

Antinuclear antibodies (ANAs) are crucial in diagnosing autoimmune diseases, mainly systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE). This study aimed to compare the performance of chemiluminescence assay (CLIA) and line immunoassay (LIA) in detecting ANAs in patients with autoimmune diseases, evaluate their diagnostic accuracy for SLE, and develop a novel diagnostic model using CLIA-detected antibodies for SLE. Specimens from patients with autoimmune diseases and physical examination specimens were collected to parallel detect specific antibodies. Individual antibodies' diagnostic performance and a model combining multiple antibodies were assessed. The findings provide valuable insights into improving the diagnosis of SLE through innovative approaches.

AIM

To compare the performance of CLIA and LIA in detecting ANAs in patients with autoimmune diseases, assess their accuracy for SLE, and develop a novel diagnostic model using CLIA-detected antibodies for SLE.

METHODS

Specimens have been obtained from 270 patients with clinically diagnosed autoimmune disorders, as well as 130 physical examination specimens. After that, parallel detection of anti-double-stranded DNA (dsDNA) antibody, anti-histone (Histone) antibody, anti-nucleosome (Nuc) antibody, anti-Smith (Sm) antibody, anti-ribosomal P protein (Rib-P) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome A (Ro60) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome A (Ro52) antibody, anti-sicca syndrome (SSB) antibody, anti-centromere protein B (Cenp-B) antibody, anti-DNA topoisomerase 1 (Scl-70) antibody, anti-histidyl tRNA synthetase (Jo-1) antibody, and anti-mitochondrial M2 (AMA-M2) antibody was performed using CLIA and LIA. The detection rates, compliance rates, and diagnostic performance for SLE were compared between the two methodologies, followed by developing a novel diagnostic model for SLE.

RESULTS

CLIA and LIA exhibited essentially comparable detection rates for anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-Histone antibody, anti-Nuc antibody, anti-Sm antibody, anti-Rib-P antibody, anti-Ro60 antibody, anti-Ro52 antibody, anti-SSB antibody, anti-Cenp-B antibody, anti-DNAScl-70 antibody, anti-Jo-1 antibody and anti-AMA-M2 antibody (P > 0.05). The two methods displayed identical results for the detection of anti-dsDNA antibody, anti-Histone antibody, anti-Nuc antibody, anti-Sm antibody, anti-Ro60 antibody, anti-Ro52 antibody, anti-SSB antibody, anti-Cenp-B antibody, anti-Scl-70 antibody, and anti-AMA-M2 antibody (Kappa > 0.7, P < 0.05), but showed a moderate agreement for the detection of anti-Rib-P antibody and anti-Jo-1 antibody (Kappa = 0.671 and 0.665; P < 0.05). In addition, the diagnostic performance of these antibodies detected by both methods was similar for SLE. The diagnostic model's area under the curve values, sensitivity, and specificity, including an anti-dsDNA antibody and an anti-Ro60 antibody detected by CLIA, were 0.997, 0.962, and 0.978, respectively. These values were higher than the diagnostic performance of individual antibodies.

CONCLUSION

CLIA and LIA demonstrated excellent overall consistency in detecting ANA profiles. A diagnostic model based on CLIA-detected antibodies can successfully contribute to developing a novel technique for detecting SLE.