Direct Oral Anticoagulants Versus Vitamin K Antagonists in Real-life Patients With Atrial Fibrillation. A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

Effect of tramadol and DOACs with special attention to dabigatran on concomitant use, on the risk of mayor bleeding using BIFAP database in Spain

BACKGROUND

Tramadol, a weak opioid, inhibits the reuptake of serotonin, a key feature on vascular homeostasis. A suspected interaction exists between dabigatran and tramadol, which might trigger an excess on risk of bleeding however, there is a gap in knowledge on this topic.

PURPOSE

To estimate the effects of tramadol, dabigatran and concomitant use on the risk of hospitalized major bleeds (Gastrointestinal bleeding and intra-extracranial bleeds).

METHODS

Among a validated established cohort of new users of oral anticoagulants for non-valvular atrial fibrillation (NVAF) aged 18 years or older, we identified all hospitalized bleed episodes (GIB and extra/intracranial bleeds) within 2008-2015. A nested case-control analysis was conducted using conditional logistic regression. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated for dabigatran, tramadol, and concomitant use. Several sensitivity analyses were carried out.

RESULTS

aORs (95%CIs) for current use of only dabigatran, only tramadol and concomitant users were 1.73 (1.37-2.18) and 1.38 (1.13-1.67) and 2.04 (0.74-5.67) compared with non-users of both drugs (>365 days). aORs for current continuers and non-continuer users of dabigatran were 1.36 (1.00-1.86) and 2.19 (1.61-2.98), respectively. For the latter, non-continuer users with a short duration of dabigatran cumulated the highest risk (3.36 [1.88-5.99]). There also was an increased risk with concomitant use of tramadol and rivaroxaban (2.24 [1.19-4.21]), or antagonist of vitamin K (1.30 [1.00-1.69]).

CONCLUSION

There was a trend towards and increased risk of excess bleeds when using concomitantly with dabigatran. The effect decreases with a narrower definition of current use.

Preferences for and use of oral anticoagulants for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation under real-world conditions in Germany: A survey among physicians

•

Based on a nationwide quantitative online survey among office-based physicians in Germany, we found a high divergence between preference for and use of treatment options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation.

•

In particular, vitamin K antagonists were used more often than preferred whereas non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants, on average, were used less often than preferred.

•

Oral anticoagulant attributes and patient characteristics related to efficacy and safety, as well as patients’ kidney function were most important when selecting a specific oral anticoagulant.

•

Federal and regional governance instruments likely influenced treatment decision-making process.

In Germany, there is little real-world evidence on physicians’ choice of oral anticoagulants (OACs). Our study aimed at assessing preferences for and prescribing patterns of treatment options for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation in clinical practice in Germany.

We conducted a nationwide quantitative online survey among office-based physicians in Germany. Physicians were asked about their preference for and use of treatment options as well as factors influencing their choice of a specific OAC.

A total of n = 953 physicians was surveyed in September and October 2020 (general physicians: 36.0%; internists: 37.3%; cardiologists: 23.7%; neurologists: 10.5%; multiple specialties possible). Preference and use were highest for non-vitamin K oral anticoagulants (NOACs); followed by vitamin K antagonists (VKAs). Most preferred OACs were apixaban (39.3%), rivaroxaban (28.5%) and edoxaban (14.7%). Most used OACs were apixaban (24.3%), rivaroxaban (21.2%) and phenprocoumon (21.4%). NOACs were preferred more often than used (85.6% > 68.6%). VKAs were preferred less often than used (9.6% < 23.5%). OAC attributes and patient characteristics related to efficacy and safety, as well as patients’ kidney function were most important when selecting a specific OAC. Federal and regional governance instruments likely influenced treatment decision-making.

We found a high divergence between preferences for and use of available treatment options in clinical practice. Further exploration of the importance of OAC attributes, patient characteristics as well as federal and regional governance instruments for physicians’ choice of a specific OAC may help to further optimize the healthcare of patients with atrial fibrillation in the long-term.

Intracranial Hemorrhage Following Anticoagulant Treatment in Denmark: Spontaneous Adverse Drug Reaction Reports Versus Real-World Data

INTRODUCTION

In Denmark, physicians are legally obliged to report serious adverse drug reactions (ADRs), such as intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) following anticoagulant (AC) treatment, to the Danish Medicines Agency. We were therefore puzzled to discover a high number of reports concerning ICHs following treatment with the direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban compared with warfarin. This was surprising, as all DOACs have been found to be associated with a lower risk of ICH compared with warfarin in phase III randomized controlled trials.

OBJECTIVES

The primary aim of the study was to estimate the level of underreporting of ICH as an ADR following treatment with warfarin, dabigatran, rivaroxaban, and apixaban.

METHODS

This observational study covered a 5-year period (2014-2018). Using nationwide registries held by the Danish Health Data Authority, the number of users, exposure time in person-years, and related ICH events for each of the study drugs were estimated. Data on ADR-ICH reports were extracted from the interactive ADR overviews held by the Danish Medicines Agency.

RESULTS

From 2014 to 2018, 97.0% of the identified warfarin-related ICH events were not reported as ADRs. For the DOACs, the level of underreporting ranged from 88.8 to 90.8%.

CONCLUSION

We found a heavy and differentiated level of underreporting of ICH as an ADR following treatment with the four study drugs.

Low Molecular Weight Heparin Doses and Ventilator Airway Necessity in the COVID-19 Patients: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis

BACKGROUND: Anticoagulant therapy is recommendation for COVID-19 infection. However, the mechanical ventilation needed for COVID-19 is still high. AIM: The aim of the study was to determine comparison therapeutic and prophylactic dose LMWH for mechanical necessity in COVID-19 infection. METHODS: A systematic literature search articles online from studies published between 2020 and 2021 that met our inclusion criteria and were retrieved from scientific databases such as Cochrane, ProQuest, and PubMed. The primary measure was a composite bad outcome, which included mechanical ventilation, mortality. and bleeding risk. RESULTS: There were 3432 patients from seven study included in this meta-analysis for necessity of mechanical ventilation in COVID-19 patients that used prophylactic and therapeutic anticoagulants. Prophylactic dose of anticoagulant showed no difference for the need for mechanical ventilation necessity for COVID-19 patients (RR = 0.54; 95% CI = 0.20–1.48; p = 0.23). However, prophylactic anticoagulant showed more safe for bleeding incidence (RR = 0.27; 95% CI = 0.18–0.39; p = <0.00001) and reduce mortality (RR = 0.52; 95% CI = 0.46-0.58; p = <0.00001). CONCLUSION: LMWH anticoagulant dose not associated with reduce mechanical ventilation necessity but prophylactic dose prefers rather than therapeutic dose for reduce mortality and risk of bleeding.

Approaches to Assessing the Quality of Observational Studies of Clinical Practice Based on the Big Data Analysis

The article is devoted to the discussion of the problems of assessing the quality of observational studies in real clinical practice and determining their place in the hierarchy of evidence-based information. The concept of “big data” and the acceptability of using such a term to refer to large observational studies is being discussed. Data on the limitations of administrative and claims databases when performing observational studies to assess the effects of interventions are presented. The concept of confounding factors influencing the results of observational studies is discussed. Modern approaches to reducing the severity of bias in real-life clinical practice studies are presented. The criteria for assessing the quality of observational pharmacoepidemiological studies and the fundamental differences between such studies and randomized clinical trials are presented. The results of systematic reviews of real-life clinical trials to assess the effects of direct oral anticoagulants are discussed.

 

Mild Head Trauma (MHT) and Antiplatelet Therapy. Reply to Lorenzati et al. Comment on "Savioli et al. Mild Head Trauma: Is Antiplatelet Therapy a Risk Factor for Hemorrhagic Complications? Medicina 2021, 57, 357"

We read your data with interest, and we truly appreciate the similar experience [...].

Comparative effectiveness and safety of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonists in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation: a Canadian multicentre observational cohort study

BACKGROUND

Direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) have widely replaced warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation. Our objective was to compare the safety and effectiveness of DOACs (dabigatran, rivaroxaban, apixaban) versus warfarin for stroke prevention in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation in the Canadian setting.

METHODS

We conducted a population-based observational multicentre cohort study with propensity score matching and subsequent meta-analysis. We used health care databases from 7 Canadian provinces (British Columbia, Alberta, Saskatchewan, Manitoba, Ontario, Quebec and Nova Scotia). Patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation who initiated anticoagulation therapy in 2009-2017 were matched to an equal number who initiated warfarin. The primary outcome was the pooled hazard ratio (HR) for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization. Secondary outcomes included pooled HRs for major bleeding; a composite outcome of stroke, systemic embolization, major bleeding and all-cause mortality; and myocardial infarction. We modelled HRs using proportional hazard Cox regression with inverse probability of censoring weights, and estimated pooled HRs with random-effect meta-analyses.

RESULTS

We included 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with a DOAC (40 503 dabigatran, 49 498 rivaroxaban and 38 272 apixaban) and 128 273 patients who initiated anticoagulation with warfarin. The pooled HR for ischemic stroke or systemic embolization comparing DOACs to warfarin was 1.02 (95% confidence interval [CI] 0.87 to 1.19). Direct oral anticoagulants were associated with lower rates of major bleeding (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.69 to 0.97), the composite outcome (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.74 to 0.89) and all-cause mortality (pooled HR 0.81, 95% CI 0.78 to 0.85).

INTERPRETATION

In this real-world study, DOACs were associated with similar risks of ischemic stroke or systemic embolization, and lower risks of bleeding and total mortality compared to warfarin. These findings support the use of DOACs for anticoagulation in nonvalvular atrial fibrillation.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

ClinicalTrials.gov, no. NCT03596502.

Cost-effectiveness of direct oral anticoagulants versus vitamin K antagonist in atrial fibrillation: A study protocol using Real-World Data from Catalonia (FantasTIC Study)

BACKGROUND

Anticoagulant therapy is used for stroke prevention and proved to be effective and safe in the long term. The study aims to analyse the cost-effectiveness relationship of using of direct-acting oral anticoagulants vs vitamin K antagonists to prevent ischaemic stroke in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation, including all the active ingredients marketed in Spain, prescribed for 2 years in the Primary Care service of the Institut Català de la Salut.

METHODS

Population-based cohort study, in which the cost of the 2 treatment groups will be evaluated. Direct costs (pharmacy, primary care, emergency and hospitalization) and indirect costs (lost productivity) will be included from a social perspective. Effectiveness (assessed as the occurrence of a health event, the 1 of primary interest being stroke) will be determined, with a 2-year time horizon and a 3% discount rate. The average cost of the 2 groups of drugs will be compared using a regression model to determine the factors with the greatest influence on determining costs. We will carry out a univariate ('one-way') deterministic sensitivity analysis.

DISCUSSION

We hope to provide relevant information about direct and indirect costs of oral anticoagulants, which, together with aspects of effectiveness and safety, could help shape the consensual decision-making of evaluating bodies.

Rates of Intracranial Hemorrhage in Mild Head Trauma Patients Presenting to Emergency Department and Their Management: A Comparison of Direct Oral Anticoagulant Drugs with Vitamin K Antagonists

Background and objectives: Anticoagulants are thought to increase the risks of traumatic intracranial injury and poor clinical outcomes after blunt head trauma. The safety of using direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) compared to vitamin K antagonists (VKAs) after intracranial hemorrhage (ICH) is unclear. This study aims to compare the incidence of post-traumatic ICH following mild head injury (MHI) and to assess the need for surgery, mortality rates, emergency department (ED) revisit rates, and the volume of ICH. Materials and Methods: This is a retrospective, single-center observational study on all patients admitted to our emergency department for mild head trauma from 1 January 2016, to 31 December 2018. We enrolled 234 anticoagulated patients, of which 156 were on VKAs and 78 on DOACs. Patients underwent computed tomography (CT) scans on arrival (T0) and after 24 h (T24). The control group consisted of patients not taking anticoagulants, had no clotting disorders, and who reported an MHI in the same period. About 54% in the control group had CTs performed. Results: The anticoagulated groups were comparable in baseline parameters. Patients on VKA developed ICH more frequently than patients on DOACs and the control group at 17%, 5.13%, and 7.5%, respectively. No significant difference between the two groups was noted in terms of surgery, intrahospital mortality rates, ED revisit rates, and the volume of ICH. Conclusions: Patients with mild head trauma on DOAC therapy had a similar prevalence of ICH to that of the control group. Meanwhile, patients on VKA therapy had about twice the ICH prevalence than that on the control group or patients on DOAC, which remained after correcting for age. No significant difference in the need for surgery was determined; however, this result must take into account the very small number of patients needing surgery.

Clinical profile and management of rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation in routine practice in Spain: data from six nationwide studies

AIMS

To analyze the clinical profile and management of patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation taking rivaroxaban in routine practice in Spain.

METHODS

Clinical data from the observational studies HEROIC (cardiology and hematology; n=1,727), EMIR (cardiology; n=1,493), BRONCE-AP (primary care; n=133), SILVER-AP (primary care; n=457), ALADIN (internal medicine and neurology; n=249), and ESPARTA (internal medicine; n=110) of patients taking rivaroxaban were analyzed. The clinical profile was compared with those of the XANTUS and ROCKET-AF studies.

RESULTS

Overall, mean age was 74.9±9.4 years, CHA₂DS₂-VASc score was 3.7±1.5, and 43.2% had a HAS-BLED score ≥3. Patients included in the HEROIC and EMIR studies were older and more frequently had a creatinine clearance <50 mL/min and a higher thromboembolic risk than those in the XANTUS study, and patients included in the ALADIN study were older and had more prior cerebrovascular disease, but a lower thromboembolic risk than those in the ROCKET-AF trial. In those studies with available data, medication adherence and satisfaction with rivaroxaban were high.

CONCLUSION

Bearing in mind differences according to the clinical setting of each study, atrial fibrillation patients taking rivaroxaban in Spain were elderly and had a high thromboembolic risk. Medication adherence and satisfaction with rivaroxaban were high.

Non-Vitamin K Antagonist Oral Anticoagulants Versus Warfarin in Asians With Atrial Fibrillation: Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials and Real-World Studies

Background and Purpose- Several randomized trials and real-world studies have reported the efficacy and safety of non-vitamin K antagonist oral anticoagulants (NOACs) in Asian patients with atrial fibrillation; and therefore, this meta-analysis was aimed to compare the effects of NOACs with warfarin for atrial fibrillation stroke prevention in Asians. Methods- The PubMed and Embase databases were searched from January 2009 to February 2019 for studies on comparisons of NOACs versus warfarin in Asians. Risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were pooled using a random-effects model. Results- Five NOAC trials and 21 observational cohorts were included. For the NOAC trials, compared with warfarin, NOACs was associated with reduced risks of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.73; 95% CI, 0.59-0.90), all-cause death (RR, 0.83; 95% CI, 0.73-0.95), major bleeding (RR, 0.59; 95% CI, 0.48-0.72), and intracranial bleeding (RR, 0.36; 95% CI, 0.26-0.49). For the real-world data, compared with warfarin, NOACs was associated with decreased rates of stroke or systemic embolism (RR, 0.75; 95% CI, 0.68-0.82), ischemic stroke (RR, 0.70; 95% CI, 0.59-0.83), myocardial infarction (RR, 0.74; 95% CI, 0.58-0.93), all-cause death (RR, 0.67; 95% CI, 0.59-0.77), major bleeding (RR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.55-0.73), intracranial bleeding (RR, 0.50; 95% CI, 0.43-0.59), and gastrointestinal bleeding (RR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.51-0.84). The results did not change in the subgroup analyses based on the type and dose of NOACs. Conclusions- Based on published NOAC trials and real-world studies, the use of NOACs is noninferior to warfarin in Asians with atrial fibrillation irrespective of the NOAC type and dose.

Thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events in patients with atrial fibrillation: a prospective cohort study in UK primary and secondary care

BACKGROUND

Strong evidence on the long-term safety and efficacy of different types of anticoagulants would help clinicians to prevent thromboembolic events among patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) while minimising the risk of haemorrhages.

AIM

To estimate the risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events for patients with AF on antiplatelets or anticoagulants.

DESIGN AND SETTING

This was a cohort study using routinely collected UK primary and secondary care clinical data from patients with AF, aged ≥18 years, and with an indication to receive anticoagulation before April 2012.

METHOD

The risk of ischaemic stroke or transient ischaemic attack (TIA), coronary heart disease (CHD), peripheral artery disease (PAD), or gastrointestinal (GI) haemorrhage, between 1 April 2012 and 1 April 2017, was estimated using multivariate Cox regression models for patients on antiplatelets only, a combination of antiplatelets and vitamin K antagonists (VKAs), or novel oral anticoagulants (NOACs), and compared with those on VKAs only.

RESULTS

Compared with VKAs, antiplatelets were associated with a higher risk of stroke or TIA, hazard ratio (HR) 1.51, 95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.09 to 2.09, and GI haemorrhage, HR 1.79, 95% CI = 1.01 to 3.18. The risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events was similar for those on a combination of antiplatelets and VKAs, or those on VKAs only. The risk was also similar for those on NOACs or VKAs, except for CHD, where it was higher for patients on NOACs, HR 2.07, 95% CI = 1.35 to 3.19.

CONCLUSION

Anticoagulants are associated with lower risk of thromboembolic and haemorrhagic events among patients with AF than antiplatelets. More research is required on the risk associated with VKAs or NOACs.