1
|
Pfeufer D, Kammerlander C, Stadler C, Roth T, Blauth M, Neuerburg C, Böcker W, Zeckey C, Lechleitner M, Gosch M. Multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation improves the long-term functional status of geriatric hip-fracture patients. Eur J Med Res 2020; 25:31. [PMID: 32778164 PMCID: PMC7418419 DOI: 10.1186/s40001-020-00433-2] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 2.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/08/2020] [Accepted: 07/27/2020] [Indexed: 02/07/2023] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND As the world population ages, the number of hip-related fractures in the elderly is steadily increasing. These fractures generate a major worldwide healthcare problem and frequently lead to deterioration of life quality, mobility and independence in activity of daily life of geriatric patients. At present, many studies have investigated and proved benefits of multidisciplinary orthogeriatric care for elderly hip-fracture patients. Only few studies however, have analyzed treatment concepts for those patients directly following discharge from hospital in specialized rehabilitation centers. The aim of this study was to evaluate effects of a multidisciplinary inpatient rehabilitation on the short- and long-term functional status of geriatric patients who suffered from hip fracture. METHODS A total of 161 hip-fracture patients aged 80 years and above, or additionally 70 years and above suffering from age-typical multimorbidity were included in this study. Patients who had an initial Barthel Index lower than 30 points were excluded from this study, as most of these patients were not able to attend a therapy at the rehabilitation center due to a poor functional status. The patients were separated into two subgroups dependent on the availability of treatment spots at the rehabilitation center. No other item was used to discriminate between the groups. Group A (n = 95) stayed an average of 21 days at an inpatient rehabilitation center that specialized in geriatric patients. Group B (n = 66) underwent the standard postoperative treatment and were sent home with further treatment by their general practitioner, nursing staff and physiotherapists. To evaluate the patients' functional status over the course of time we used the Barthel Index, which was evaluated for every patient on the day of discharge, as well as during checkups after 3, 6 and 12 months. RESULTS The average Barthel Index at the day of discharge was 57.79 ± 14.92 points for Group A and 56.82 ± 18.76 points for Group B (p = 0.431). After 3 months, the average Barthel Index was 82.43 points for Group A and 73.11 points for group B (p = 0.005). In the 6-month checkup Group A's average Barthel Index was 83.95 points and Group B's was 74.02 points (p = 0.002). After 12 months, patients from Group A had an average Barthel Index of 81.21 while patients from Group B had an average Barthel Index of 69.85 (p = 0.005). CONCLUSION The results of this study reveal a significantly better outcome concerning both, short-term and long-term functional status after 3, 6 and 12 months for geriatric hip-fracture patients, who underwent an inpatient treatment in a rehabilitation center following the initial therapy.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Daniel Pfeufer
- Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.
| | - Christian Kammerlander
- Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Stadler
- Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany.,Department for Orthopedics and Traumatology, Kepler University Hospital, Johannes Kepler University Linz, Linz, Austria
| | - Tobias Roth
- Department of Trauma Surgery, Medical University of Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Michael Blauth
- Depuy Synthes, Luzernstrasse 21, 4528, Zuchwil, Switzerland.,Department for Trauma Surgery, Medical University Innsbruck, Innsbruck, Austria
| | - Carl Neuerburg
- Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Wolfgang Böcker
- Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Christian Zeckey
- Department of General, Trauma and Reconstructive Surgery, University Hospital Ludwig-Maximilians-University (LMU) Munich, Munich, Germany
| | - Monika Lechleitner
- Department for Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Hospital Hochzirl, Zirl, Austria
| | - Markus Gosch
- Department of Medicine 2/Geriatrics, Paracelsus Medical University, General Hospital Nuremberg, Nuremberg, Germany
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Prognostic Factors for All-Cause Mortality in Thai Patients with Fragility Fracture of Hip: Comorbidities and Laboratory Evaluations. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2020; 56:medicina56060311. [PMID: 32599880 PMCID: PMC7353872 DOI: 10.3390/medicina56060311] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 05/16/2020] [Revised: 06/18/2020] [Accepted: 06/22/2020] [Indexed: 12/31/2022]
Abstract
Background and Objectives: Although the types of comorbidities and laboratory evaluations are major factors associated with mortality after hip fractures, there have been no studies of the association of these factors and mortality in Thai hip-fracture patients. This study aimed to identify prognostic factors associated with mortality after a hip fracture in the Thai population, including types of comorbidities, treatment-related factors, and laboratory evaluations. Materials and Methods: This five-year retrospective study was conducted in a tertiary care hospital in Thailand. A total of 775 Thai patients who had been admitted with a hip fracture resulting from a simple fall were identified using the International Classification of Disease 10 codes, and a review of their medical charts was conducted. Associations between general factors, comorbidities, laboratory evaluations, treatment factors including type of treatment, and time to death were analyzed using the Cox proportional hazard regression and the hazard ratio (HR). Results: The overall mortality rate of hip fracture patients was 13.94%. Independent prognostic factors found to be significantly associated with mortality were nonoperative treatment (HR = 3.29, p < 0.001), admission glomerular filtration rate (GFR) < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2 (HR = 3.40, p < 0.001), admission hemoglobin concentration <10 g/dL. (HR = 2.31, p < 0.001), chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (HR = 2.63, p < 0.001), dementia or Alzheimer’s disease (HR = 4.06, p < 0.001), and active malignancy (HR = 6.80, p < 0.001). Conclusion: The types of comorbidities and laboratory evaluation findings associated with mortality in Thai patients with hip fractures include chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder, dementia or Alzheimer’s disease, active malignancy, admission GFR < 30 mL/min/1.73 m2, and admission hemoglobin concentration <10 g/dL. The risks of mortality for Thai hip-fracture patients with these comorbidities or laboratory evaluation findings were 2.5, 4, 7, 3.5, and 2.5 times higher, respectively, than patients without those factors.
Collapse
|