Navigated versus conventional total knee arthroplasty: A prospective study at three years follow-up

The Alignment of the Tibial Component in Total Knee Arthroplasty: Is a Technology-Assisted System Better Than Conventional Instrumentation?

Background Technologies such as navigation and robotics are aimed at improving tibial alignment in total knee arthroplasties (TKA) and eliminating the errors resulting from the use of manual instrumentation. Methods This prospective study analyzed 130 arthroplasties in order to determine whether navigation can improve the frontal mechanical axis of the tibia and whether the postoperative angulation of this axis differs from the preoperative one. The mean patient age was 71.8 years, and the mean BMI was 31.17. Eighty-six patients were female. The same cemented TKA model and the same imageless navigation system were used in all cases. Results The mean postoperative tibial angle following implantation was 87.65°, without any statistically significant differences with respect to the previous angulation. However, navigation was seen to result in a nearly neutral tibial axis, a larger number of cases (41.5%-60.8% {p = 0.002}) aligned within the safe zone (90° ± 3°), a smaller number of outliers, and a clustering of values around the mean. Conclusions Navigation improves the frontal positioning of the tibial component in total knee arthroplasties but does not offer any advantages as compared with conventional instrumentation.

Postoperative limb alignment in total knee replacement. Conventional versus navigated versus robotic techniques

BACKGROUND

Our objective was to compare the coronal mechanical axis after total knee replacement (TKR) obtained in three groups of patients subjected to conventional, navigated, and robotic surgery.

METHODS

Retrospective analysis.

RESULTS

124 knees were included (36 conventional, 41 navigated, 47 robotic). No statistically significant differences were found between the postOp tibiofemoral angle of the conventional, navigated and robotic groups (p = 0.396). A repeated-measure analysis of preOp-to-postOp also found no significant differences (p = 0.387). There were no differences in the proportion of outliers (3-degree) found (p = 0.211). Nevertheless, a higher proportion of patients in the robotic group improved their mechanical alignment, as compared with conventional surgery (p = 0.023), although no differences were found when comparing with navigation (p = 0.121).

CONCLUSIONS

No statistically significant differences were found with respect to the postOp alignment achieved. However, statistically significant differences were detected between robotic and conventional surgery when considering the percentage of patients with improved limb alignment.

Robotic-assisted knee arthroplasty: an evolution in progress. A concise review of the available systems and the data supporting them

INTRODUCTION

A review of the data supporting robotic systems currently available is presented focussing on precision and reproducibility, radiological outcomes, clinical outcomes, and survivorship.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Scientific literature published on robotic systems for knee arthroplasty was reviewed using the reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines. Inclusion criteria were any study involving robotic-assisted UKA or TKA that reported precision of implant positioning or functional outcomes or range of motion or survivorship, including cadaveric or dry bone studies with a minimum of 6-month follow-up.

RESULTS

Thirty-nine studies were identified for robotic-assisted unicompartmental knee arthroplasty, and 24 studies for robotic-assisted total knee arthroplasty. Those that reported on radiological outcomes or cadaver studies consistently demonstrated improved precision with the use of robotic systems irrespective of the system. PROMS and survival data demonstrated equivalent short-term results. However, many studies reported outcomes inconsistently and few had long-term clinical follow-up or survivorship data.

CONCLUSIONS

This review adds to the body of evidence supporting improved precision and reproducibility with robotic assistance in knee arthroplasty. Despite intensive funding of research into robotic knee systems, there remains considerable heterogeneity in exposure and outcome analysis and few quality long-term studies demonstrating translation to better clinical outcomes and implant survivorship.

No influence of obesity on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer-navigated total knee arthroplasty using a gap balancing technique

OBJECTIVE

In obese patients, thick subcutaneous tissue can introduce errors during registration and leg weight can influence gap balancing in navigated TKA. Present study is done to determine if computer navigated TKA using a gap balancing technique can achieve consistent accuracy for limb and component alignment, and similar clinical and functional results in obese patients like in non-obese patients.

METHODS

We prospectively compared the radiological, clinical, and functional results of 78 knees in 57 non-obese patients and 79 knees in 58 obese patients who underwent computer-assisted TKA. Non-obese individuals were defined as those having BMI of <30 kg/m² and obese individuals as BMI ≥30 kg/m². The degree of knee deformity was calculated by Hip - Knee - Ankle (HKA) angle and clinical and functional assessment was done using the Knee Society Score - clinical knee score and Knee Society Score - function score, respectively. All these were documented before and at 6 months, 2 year, and 5 years after TKA.

RESULTS

The outlier rate of postoperative limb alignment (HKA angle) was 8.9% in the obese group which was not significantly different (p =1.00) from that of the non-obese group (7.7%). Mean clinical knee scores were not significantly different between the non-obese and obese groups preoperatively (58.8 vs 57.4, p = 0.14) and at 6 months (92.7 vs 91, p = 0.06), 2 years (91.4 vs 90, p = 0.07), and 5 years (92.4 vs 91.3, p = 0.1) post-surgery. Similarly, mean functional scores were not significantly different between the non-obese and obese groups preoperatively (50.9 vs 49.9, p = 0.31) and at 6 months (92.7 vs 90.9, p = 0.06), 2 years (91.3 vs 92, p = 0.44), and 5 years (90.6 vs 91.1, p = 0.51) post-surgery.

CONCLUSION

Obesity has no influence on mid-term clinical, functional, and radiological results after computer navigated TKA, done by gap balancing technique.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Therapeutic level II.