[Idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus: High incidence in people over 80 years of age]

Normal pressure hydrocephalus: Diagnostic delay

Introduction:

Normotensive hydrocephalus is a differential diagnosis in the evaluation of the dementia syndrome. The diagnostic protocols would allow detecting this pathology that has more effective treatment than other dementias.

Objective:

To describe a population with clinical suspicion of normal pressure hydrocephalus evaluated in a Colombian psychiatric hospital and discuss the possible reasons for its diagnostic and therapeutic delay.

Materials and methods:

We conducted a retrospective study of medical records to identify patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus during a 5-year period.

Results:

Thirty-five patients with suspected normal pressure hydrocephalus underwent diagnostic lumbar puncture and five of them were considered candidates for a peritoneal-venous shunt, but none underwent this surgical procedure. After three to six months of the lumbar puncture, the gait pattern improved in 22.8% of the patients, cognition in 22.8%, and sphincter control in 11.4%. Improvement was not sustained in the long term (1 year) in any of them.

Conclusion:

This study suggests the poor implementation of the protocols for evaluating patients with cognitive deficits and delays in the diagnosis of normal pressure hydrocephalus. A small number of patients were identified as candidates for treatment. Normal pressure hydrocephalus is a potentially reversible clinical entity with the placement of a peritoneal ventricular shunt, but delays in diagnosis and treatment have deleterious consequences for patients and their families.

A systematic review on the epidemiology of normal pressure hydrocephalus

BACKGROUND

The aim of this systematic review is to gather all available studies reporting prevalence and incidence rates of iNPH and to assess their methodological quality and consistency.

METHODS

All available studies published up to June 2019 were retrieved searching the databases PubMed, ISI Web of Science, and the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews. All included studies were qualitatively assessed by two independent reviewers using the MORE Checklist for Observational Studies of Incidence and Prevalence.

KEY RESULTS

Bibliographic searches and other sources yielded 659 records. A total of 28 studies were selected and applied the predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria. Fourteen studies were further excluded, and 14 studies (10 on prevalence and 6 on incidence) were included in the qualitative analysis. Results from the prevalence studies reported crude overall rates ranging from 10/100 000 to 22/100 000 for probable iNPH and 29/100 000 for possible iNPH, and age-specific rates ranging from 3.3/100 000 in people aged 50-59 to 5.9% in people aged ≥ 80 years. Results from incidence studies reported overall crude rates ranging from 1.8/100 000 to 7.3/100 000 per year, and age-specific rates ranging from 0.07/100 000/year in people aged < 60 years to 1.2/1000/year in people aged ≥ 70 years.

CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES

The high methodological and clinical heterogeneity of included studies does not allow drawing adequate conclusions on the epidemiology of iNPH. Further, high-quality, population-based studies should be carried out to allow for a better understanding of the epidemiology of this condition. Moreover, the implementation in current clinical practice of guidelines on the diagnosis and management of iNPH should also be endorsed.