Evaluation of a wheelchair prototype with non-conventional, manual propulsion

Rehabilitation professional and user evaluation of an integrated push-pull lever drive system for wheelchair mobility

Wheeled mobility devices enable persons with limited mobility to maintain an independent lifestyle. Lever-drive propulsion options have been shown to increase wheeled mobility device efficiency while reducing physical strain on users. Despite these benefits, they have not been widely adopted for everyday use. Two novel lever-drive devices (RoScooter and RoTrike) provide an alternative to pushrim propulsion by using an integrated front-and-center push-pull lever mechanism. The objectives of this study were to assess the usability and performance of the lever-drive devices using both rehabilitation professional and user feedback. The study enrolled 17 rehabilitation professionals and 13 users who performed various mobility tasks to rate the performance of the RoScooter and RoTrike for ease of use, stability, safety, appearance, and comfort. Users were graded on their performance using a scoring system based on the Wheelchair Skills Test. Rehabilitation professionals suggested improvements in regard to adjustability, maneuverability, target population, and appearance, preferring the operations of the RoScooter to the RoTrike. Users reported that the devices were entertaining and easy to use, but improvements in adjustability, reversal methods, and operation options to appeal to a wider range of consumers are needed before lever-drive devices are suitable to replace or supplement current wheeled mobility devices.

Predicting manual wheelchair initiation movement with EMG activity during over ground propulsion

Context/Objective: This is a preliminary study of movement finalities prediction in manual wheelchairs (MWCs) from electromyography (EMG) data. MWC users suffer from musculoskeletal disorders and need assistance while moving. The purpose of this work is to predict the direction and speed of movement in MWCs from EMG data prior to movement initiation. This prediction could be used by MWC to assist users in their displacement by doing a smart electrical assistance based on displacement prediction.Design: Experimental study.Setting: Trained Subject LAMIH Laboratory.Participants: Eight healthy subjects trained to move in manual wheelchairs.Interventions: Subjects initiated the movement in three directions (front, right and left) and with two speeds (maximum speed and spontaneous speed) from two hand positions (on the thighs or on the handrim). A total of 96 movements was studied. Activation of 14 muscles was recorded bilaterally at the deltoid anterior, deltoid posterior, biceps brachii, pectoralis major, rectus abdominis, obliquus externus and erector spinae.Outcome Measures: Prior amplitude, prior time and anticipatory postural adjustments were measured. A hierarchical multi-class classification using logistic regression was used to create a cascade of prediction models. We performed a stepwise (forward-backward) selection of variables using the Bayesian information criterion. Percentages of well-classified movements have been measured through the means of a cross-validation.Results: Prediction is possible using the EMG parameters and allows to discriminate the direction / speed combination with 95% correct classification on the 6 possible classes (3 directions * 2 speeds).Conclusion: Action planning in the static position showed significant adaptability to the forthcoming parameters displacement. The percentages of prediction presented in this work make it possible to envision an intuitive assistance to the initiation of the MWC displacement adapted to the user's intentions.

Scoping review of propelling aids for manual wheelchairs

Manual wheelchair (MWC) users face a variety of obstacles limiting their participation. Different MWC models and new add-on components intended to improve propulsion may impact users' function and participation, although there is a lack of research on this topic. The aims of this study were to: 1) identify MWC propelling aids (PA) that are reported in the literature; 2) classify the outcomes used to evaluate the influence of PA according to the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health (ICF); and 3) summarize evidence for the influence of PA. A scoping review was conducted in 2017 using Pubmed, Medline, Embase, CINAHL, Compendex, IEEE Xplore, RESNA and ISS proceedings, Google, and Google Scholar. The content of each manuscript was assessed by two independent reviewers. A total of 28 PA (19 human-powered; 9 power-assisted) were identified from 163 manuscripts. The three most cited ICF subdomains were "Activity & Participation" (n = 125), "Body Function" (n = 100), and "Personal Factors" (n = 55). The findings suggest an overall positive influence of PA on various ICF domains/subdomains, but initial findings should be interpreted with caution. Confirmation of the effect and safety of PA requires higher levels of evidence.

Physiological parameters depending on two different types of manual wheelchair propulsion

OBJECTIVE

The purpose of this study was to compare aerobic parameters in the multistage field test (MFT) in hand rim wheelchair propulsion and lever wheelchair propulsion.

METHODS

Twenty-one men performed MFT using two different types of propulsion, i.e., lever and hand rim wheelchair propulsion. The covered distance and physiological variables (oxygen uptake (VO₂), minute ventilation (VE), carbon dioxide output (VCO₂), respiratory coefficient (RQ), and heart rate (HR)) were observed. Physiological variables were measured with Cosmed K5 system. Kolmogorov-Smirnov test, t-test, Wilcoxon test and effect sizes (ESs) were used to assess differences. Statistical significance was set at p < .05.

RESULTS

A significantly longer distance was observed in lever wheelchair propulsion than in hand rim wheelchair propulsion (1,194 and 649 m, respectively). VO_2max and RQ were higher in hand rim wheelchair propulsion. All physiological variables for the last (fifth) level of the test in hand rim propulsion were significantly higher than in lever wheelchair propulsion. ES was large for each observed difference.

CONCLUSION

The lever wheelchair propulsion movement is less demanding than hand rim wheelchair propulsion and longer distances can be achieved by the user. There is a need to check lever wheelchair propulsion in different types of field tests.

Mechanical efficiency of two commercial lever-propulsion mechanisms for manual wheelchair locomotion

The purpose of this study was to (1) evaluate the mechanical efficiency (ME) of two commercially available lever-propulsion mechanisms for wheelchairs and (2) compare the ME of lever propulsion with hand rim propulsion within the same wheelchair. Of the two mechanisms, one contained a torsion spring while the other used a roller clutch design. We hypothesized that the torsion spring mechanism would increase the ME of propulsion due to a passive recovery stroke enabled by the mechanism. Ten nondisabled male participants with no prior manual wheeling experience performed submaximal exercise tests using both lever-propulsion mechanisms and hand rim propulsion on two different wheelchairs. Cardiopulmonary parameters including oxygen uptake (VO2), heart rate (HR), and energy expenditure (En) were determined. Total external power (Pext) was measured using a drag test protocol. ME was determined by the ratio of Pext to En. Results indicated no significant effect of lever-propulsion mechanism for all physiological measures tested. This suggests that the torsion spring did not result in a physiological benefit compared with the roller clutch mechanism. However, both lever-propulsion mechanisms showed decreased VO2 and HR and increased ME (as a function of slope) compared with hand rim propulsion (p < 0.001). This indicates that both lever-propulsion mechanisms tested are more mechanically efficient than conventional hand rim propulsion, especially when slopes are encountered.

Comparison of metabolic cost, performance, and efficiency of propulsion using an ergonomic hand drive mechanism and a conventional manual wheelchair

OBJECTIVE

To compare the metabolic cost (oxygen uptake per unit time [V˙o2 consumption], heart rate, and number of pushes), performance (velocity and distance traveled), and efficiency (oxygen uptake per distance traveled [Vo2 efficiency]) of propulsion using a novel ergonomic hand drive mechanism (EHDM) and a conventional manual wheelchair (CMW).

DESIGN

Repeated-measures crossover design.

SETTING

Semicircular track.

PARTICIPANTS

Adult full-time manual wheelchair users with spinal cord injuries (N=12; mean age ± SD, 38.8±12.4y; mean body mass ± SD, 73.7±13.3kg; mean height ± SD, 173.6±11.1cm) who were medically and functionally stable and at least 6 months postinjury.

INTERVENTION

Participants propelled themselves for 3.5 minutes at a self-selected pace in a CMW and in the same chair fitted with the EHDM.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES

Velocity, distance traveled, number of pushes, V˙o2 consumption, Vo2 efficiency, and heart rate were compared by wheelchair condition for the last 30 seconds of each trial using paired t tests (α=.01).

RESULTS

The CMW condition resulted in more distance traveled (33.6±10.8m vs 22.4±7.8m; P=.001), greater velocity (1.12±0.4m/s vs .75±.30m/s; P=.001), and better Vo2 efficiency (.10±.03mL·kg(-1)·m(-1) vs .15±.03mL·kg(-1)·m(-1); P<.001) than the EHDM condition, respectively. No significant differences were found between the 2 conditions for number of pushes (27.5±5.7 vs 25.7±5.4; P=.366), V˙o2 consumption (6.43±1.9mL·kg(-1)·min(-1) vs 6.19±1.7mL·kg(-1)·min(-1); P=.573), or heart rate (100.5±14.5 beats per minute vs 97.4±20.2 beats per minute; P=.42).

CONCLUSIONS

The results demonstrate that metabolic costs did not differ significantly; however, performance and efficiency were sacrificed with the EHDM. Modifications to the EHDM (eg, addition of gearing) could rectify the performance and efficiency decrements while maintaining similar metabolic costs. Although not an ideal technology, the EHDM can be considered as an alternative mode of mobility by wheelchair users and rehabilitation specialists.

Design History and Advantages of a New Lever-Propelled Wheelchair Prototype

Wheelchair propulsion has been reported to be responsible for musculoskeletal pain in the upper extremities. Epidemiological studies have shown a high prevalence of shoulder complaints in paraplegic and quadriplegic spinal cord injured (SCI) people. It has been argued that the high incidence of shoulder complaints in SCI was the result of the weight-bearing or propulsion function of the upper extremity in those subjects.

This work aimed at proposing an alternative wheelchair propulsion technique based on the levers' system. The interface prototype-users, the wheelchair skills evaluation, the oxygen uptake and the cardiac frequency are investigated by an objective and subjective studies.

Our prototype is designed to be an attempt in the field of disabled athletes having some advantages of a non-conventional manual wheelchair propulsion technique, avoiding complications induced by the conventional one.