Safety of in-hospital early rehabilitation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Insufficient Pulmonary Rehabilitation Uptake After Severe Exacerbation of COPD: A Multicentre Study in the South West Region of France

Purpose

Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) is a type of multidisciplinary care strongly recommended after severe exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Recently, a national French study reported a very low rate of PR uptake (8.6%); however, important clinical data were missing. Here, we aimed to identify the main factors associated with insufficient PR uptake after hospitalisation for COPD exacerbation.

Patients and Methods

This multicentre retrospective study included patients hospitalised with COPD exacerbation between 1 January 2017 and 31 December 2018, as identified by both coding and a detailed review of medical records. PR was defined as inpatient care in a specialised centre or unit within 90 days of discharge. Multivariate logistic regression was used to identify associations between PR uptake and patient characteristics, such as comorbidities, non-invasive ventilation (NIV), inhaled treatment, and forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV1).

Results

Among the 325 patients admitted for severe COPD exacerbation, 92 (28.3%) underwent PR within 90 days of discharge. In univariate analysis, relative to those who underwent PR, patients without PR had significantly more comorbidities, were less often treated with triple bronchodilator therapy or NIV, and had a higher FEV1. In multivariate analysis, variables independently associated with the lack of PR uptake were the presence of comorbidities (adjusted odds ratio (aOR) = 1.28 [1.10-1.53], p = 0.003) and a higher FEV1 (aOR = 1.04 [1.02-1.06], p < 0.001). There was no significant correlation between PR uptake and departmental PR centre capacity (notably, some departments had no PR facilities).

Conclusion

These data highlight the lack of PR in the early stages of COPD. Collaboration among all healthcare providers involved in patient management is crucial for improved PR uptake.

Pulmonary Rehabilitation Programmes Within Three Days of Hospitalization for Acute Exacerbation of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis

Objective

To evaluate the efficacy and safety of early pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) (ie, <3 days of hospitalization) in patients with acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (AECOPD).

Methods

Embase, Web of Science, PubMed and Cochrane Library were searched from their inception to 1 April 2021. Randomized controlled trials were included if they observed the efficacy of early PR in AECOPD patients. Study selection, data extraction, risk of bias and quality of evidence were assessed by two researchers independently. Assessment of the risk of bias and eidence quality were evaluated by the Cochrane Collaboration’s tool and Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development and Evaluation system, respectively.

Results

Fourteen trials (829 participants) were identified. Significant improvement was found in the 6-minute walk distance (6MWD; mean difference (MD): 69.64; 95% CI: 40.26 to 99.01; Z = 4.65, P < 0.0001, low quality). In the subgroup analysis, the exercise-training group showed marked improvement (MD: 96.14; 95% CI: 20.24 to 172.04; Z = 2.48, P = 0.001). The Saint George’s Respiratory Questionnaire (SGRQ) total score was low (MD: −12.77; 95% CI: −16.03 to −9.50; Z = 7.67, P < 0.0001, moderate quality). Significant effects were not found for the duration of hospital stay, quadriceps muscle strength or five times sit to stand test. Only one serious adverse event was reported in experimental group, which was not associated with early PR.

Conclusion

PR initiated <3 days of hospitalization may increase exercise capacity and improve quality of life, but the results should be interpreted prudently and dialectically, and the role of early PR in AECOPD needs further exploration.