The impact of sleep quality on health, participation and employment outcomes in people with spinal cord injury: Analyses from a large cross-sectional survey

The Sir Ludwig Guttmann lecture 2023: psychosocial factors and adjustment dynamics after spinal cord injury

STUDY DESIGN

Narrative review OBJECTIVES: Sir Ludwig Guttmann realised spinal cord injury (SCI) rehabilitation should incorporate more than a biomedical approach if SCI patients were to adjust to their injury and achieve productive social re-integration. He introduced components into rehabilitation he believed would assist his patients build physical strength as well as psychological resilience that would help them re-engage with their communities. We pay tribute to Sir Ludwig by presenting research that has focussed on psychosocial factors that contribute to adjustment dynamics after SCI.

SETTING

Not applicable.

METHODS

Five factors with a psychosocial source will be examined, featured in my research, namely psychological distress, cognitive impairment, pain catastrophizing, sleep disorder and fatigue. A multifactorial model of adjustment will be examined.

RESULTS

Evidence shows these factors can be significant barriers to adjustment and reciprocally related to self-efficacy and life decisions. A theoretical rehabilitation framework/model is presented called the SCI Adjustment Model (SCIAM), that explains the process of adjustment dynamics. It describes how multifactorial factors contribute to adjustment in a non-linear process over time.

CONCLUSIONS

Key clinical messages include: (i) adjustment dynamics will be enhanced if viewed through the lens of a multifactorial model that clarifies how multiple psychosocial factors can combine and act as barriers or facilitators to adjustment; (ii) judiciously using this information, assess and then strategize to reduce the influence of barriers or strengthen facilitators during SCI rehabilitation and beyond, and (iii) integrate psychosocial guidelines and a person-centred approach into SCI rehabilitation to achieve treatment goals.

Paradoxical breathing during sleep is associated with increased sleep apnea and reduced ventilatory capacities in high-level spinal cord injury

Sleep-disordered breathing is highly prevalent in individuals with high-level spinal cord injury. In addition, chest mechanics are known to be altered, leading to paradoxical breathing. Here we investigated the interaction between paradoxical breathing and sleep quality in these patients, and its association with measurements of respiratory function, hypercapnic ventilatory response and peak exercise ventilation. Home-based polysomnography was performed in 13 patients with spinal cord injury (C4 to T4) untreated for sleep-disordered breathing. We defined paradoxical breathing as counterphase between thoracic and abdominal movements during slow-wave and rapid eye movement sleep. Sleep quality, pulmonary function, hypercapnic ventilatory responses and peak exercise ventilation were compared between those with and without paradoxical breathing. Half of individuals presented with nocturnal paradoxical breathing. Despite similar age, body mass index, injury level, time since injury, and respiratory function, those with paradoxical breathing had higher apnea-hypopnea index (13 ± 8 versus 5 ± 3 events per hr) and average sleep heart rate (67 ± 12 versus 54 ± 4 bpm; p < 0.05). Moreover, paradoxical breathing was associated with lower hypercapnic ventilatory response (slope: 0.35 ± 0.17 versus 0.96 ± 0.38) and lower peak exercise ventilation (33 ± 4 versus 48 ± 12 L min-1; p < 0.05). Nocturnal respiratory muscle desynchronization could play a role in the pathophysiology of sleep apnea, and could relate to low ventilatory responses to both hypercapnia and exercise in high-level spinal cord injury. Polysomnography may be an important diagnostic tool for these patients for whom therapeutic approaches should be considered to treat this abnormality.