Non-pharmacological treatment of refractory angina: The coronary sinus reducer, the new kid on the block

Coronary sinus Reducer device for the treatment of refractory angina: A multicenter initial experience

INTRODUCTION

The coronary sinus Reducer (CSR) device has emerged as a complementary therapy in patients with severe angina refractory to optimal medical therapy and not amenable to revascularization. Our aim was to assess the safety and efficacy of the CSR in a real-world setting.

METHODS

Twenty-six patients with refractory angina (RA) and evidence of myocardial ischemia attributable to the left coronary artery considered unsuitable for revascularization were treated with the CSR at two centers between May 2017 and July 2019. Safety endpoints were procedural success and complications. Efficacy endpoints, assessed at six-month follow-up, were reduction in CCS class, improvement in quality of life (QoL) assessed using the short version of the Seattle Angina Questionnaire (SAQ-7), and reduction in antianginal therapy.

RESULTS

Twenty-three patients had end-stage coronary artery disease without revascularization targets and three had microvascular disease without epicardial stenosis. Procedural success was achieved in 23 patients, with two device/procedure-related complications and one anatomically-related failure to deliver the device. A total of 25 patients had the device implanted and entered the efficacy analysis. Eighteen patients (75.0%) had a reduction of at least one CCS class, 41.7% had a reduction of at least two classes, and 16.7% became asymptomatic, with a mean reduction in CCS class of 1.3±0.2 (p=0.001) at six-month follow-up. All SAQ-7 domains improved, notably physical limitation (p=0.001), angina frequency (p=0.005) and QoL (p=0.006). There was a mean reduction in anti-ischemic drugs from 3.4±1.1 to 2.9±1.2 (p=0.010).

CONCLUSION

In this real-world, multicenter experience, implantation of the CSR was associated with improvement in angina and QoL in patients with RA.

Coronary venous therapy to improve microvascular dysfunction

The coronary circulation is a complex system in which vascular resistances are determined by an interplay of forces in at least three compartments: the epicardial, the microvascular, and the venous district. Cardiologists, and particularly interventional cardiologists, normallly place the focus of their attention on diseases of the epicardial coronary circulation as possible causes of coronary syndromes and neglect the importance of the other two compartments of coronary circulation. The study of the coronary microcirculation, an increasingly recognized source of ischemia, has long been disregarded, but is witnessing a revival since the (re-)introduction of diagnostic tools in the better equipped catheterization laboratories. Unfortunately, to date our understanding of coronary microvascular disease remains incomplete and the numerous proposed classifications fail to reflect its complexity. Further, no specific therapy for these disorders is available. The coronary venous circulation is an even more neglected third vascular district. Its role in regulating coronary resistances is almost completely unexplored, but inital evidence suggests that the modulation of venous pressure might help improve coronary perfusion. Coronary sinus interventions are a group of invasive techniques (both surgical and catheter-based) that are designed to treat ischaemic heart disease by increasing coronary venous pressure and therefore redistributing coronary blood flow towards the endocardium. In this review paper, we revise the role of these interventions with particular focus on acute and chronic coronary microvascular disease.