Antigen avoidance tests for diagnosis of chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Assessment of clinical relevance of antigen improves diagnostic accuracy of hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Exposure assessment is integral to the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Although the clinical relevance of exposed antigens is essential for the assessment, many of the previous guidelines or reports have only evaluated simple exposure histories or immunological tests. To overcome this problem, the Exposure Assessment Form (EAF) was developed as an assessment tool for classifying the exposure grade from G0 to G4. The EAF was modified from the description in the Japanese clinical practice guide 2022 for HP published by the Japanese Respiratory Society.

METHODS

One hundred and seventy-two consecutive patients with interstitial lung disease who underwent multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) at our hospital were retrospectively examined. We assessed whether the use of the EAF improved the diagnostic performance of the international guideline of HP. We also evaluated whether the exposure grade affected the prognosis of HP.

RESULTS

Even when a HP diagnosis was made with a confidence of 70% or higher according to the international guideline, less than half of these cases resulted in a final diagnosis of HP when the exposure grades were lower than G3. When the result of the EAF was integrated into the exposure definition of the international guideline, the specificity of the diagnostic performance improved, while sensitivity was maintained. Furthermore, HP patients with an exposure grade of G3 or higher showed a tendency to take a longer time to initiate medication.

CONCLUSIONS

This is the first study to evaluate the clinical relevance of possible antigens using the EAF. Assessing the exposure grade prevents overdiagnosis and improves the diagnostic performance of the international guideline.

Japanese clinical practice guide 2022 for hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Considering recently published two guidelines for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), the Japanese Respiratory Society (JRS) has now published its own Japanese clinical practice guide for HP. Major types of HP in Japan include summer-type, home-related, bird-related, farmer's lung, painter's lung, humidifier lung, and mushroom grower's lung. Identifying causative antigens is critical for increasing diagnostic confidence, as well as improving prognosis through appropriate antigen avoidance. This guide proposes a comprehensive antigen questionnaire including the outbreak sources reported in Japan. Drawing on the 2021 CHEST guideline, this guide highlights the antigen identification confidence level and adaptations for environmental surveys. The detection of specific antibodies against causative antigens is an important diagnostic predictor of HP. In Japan, the assessments of bird-specific IgG (pigeons, budgerigars) and the Trichosporon asahii antibody are covered by medical insurance. Although this guide adopts the 2020 ATS/JRS/ALAT guideline diagnostic criteria based on the combination of imaging findings, exposure assessment, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, and histopathological findings, it added some annotations to facilitate the interpretation of the content and correlate the medical situation in Japan. It recommends checking biomarkers; seasonal changes in the KL-6 concentration (increase in winter for bird-related HP/humidifier lung and in summer for summer-type HP) and high KL-6 concentrations providing a basis for the suspicion of HP. Antigen avoidance is critical for disease management of HP. This guide also addresses the pharmacological management of HP, highlighting the treatment strategy for fibrotic HP including combination therapies with anti-inflammatory/immunosuppressive and antifibrotic drugs.

Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis Diagnosed by a Re-evaluation with Bronchoalveolar Lavage at Disease Deterioration

A 79-year-old man was admitted with worsening cough, dyspnea, and increased ground-glass opacity on chest computed tomography (CT). He had been diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis given the absence of an identifiable cause of interstitial pneumonia, chest CT findings, and absence of lymphocytosis in bronchoalveolar lavage (BAL) fluid. Meticulous history taking revealed extensive exposure to inciting antigens contained in chicken fertilizer before symptom worsening. A re-evaluation with BAL showed lymphocytosis, and clinical improvement with antigen avoidance confirmed the diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP). A re-evaluation with BAL at disease deterioration after possible exposure to inciting antigen can facilitate a correct fHP diagnosis.

Multidisciplinary Discussion for Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis with a Positive Antigen Avoidance

Background

In the two fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (fHP) diagnostic guidelines, the multidisciplinary discussion (MDD) is required to be performed in diagnosis of fHP, as in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) diagnostic guideline. Although some patients with fHP can improve disease condition during antigen avoidance, which can facilitate the diagnosis of fHP, it is unclear if MDD is necessary in all patients with suspected fHP who improved an antigen avoidance.

Objective

To investigate the diagnosis of fHP via MDD with positive antigen avoidance tests (AATs) and the clinical diagnosis with positive AATs.

Methods

A single-center, retrospective study was conducted. Between 2012 and 2019, patients with fHP were enrolled in the study. Patients in the MDD diagnostic group consisted of patients diagnosed with MDD, including histopathology findings and positive ATTs, and patients in the clinical diagnostic group were diagnosed by two respiratory physicians and had positive ATTs.

Results

AAT was performed on 72 of 219 patients, and 58 had positive AATs. The study included 37 patients in the MDD diagnosis group and 21 patients in the clinical diagnosis group. No significant differences in overall survival (OS) were detected between the two groups (HR: 1.99 [95% CI: 0.82‒4.83], p = 0.127). The conducting MDD was not a risk factor for OS; only <79% forced vital capacity was a risk factor in the multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis. No significant difference in annual changes of forced vital capacity, diffusion of the lung for carbon monoxide and Krebs von den Lungen-6 between the MDD diagnostic and the clinical diagnostic groups were observed (p = 0.41, 0.79, and 0.81, respectively).

Conclusion

In patients with positive AATs, the disease progression of the MDD diagnostic and the clinical diagnostic groups were similar. Therefore, MDD could not be necessary in all patients with suspected fHP who had positive AATs.

Minoxidil-induced lung disease, masquerading as hypersensitivity pneumonitis

We report the case of a 71-year-old male with essential thrombosis who presented with ground-glass lung opacity with a mosaic pattern on computed tomography, which resolved spontaneously with hospitalization. This was confused with a case of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), which later turned out to be a drug-induced lung disease caused by surreptitiously administered minoxidil. This case emphasizes the importance of obtaining a correct medication history to make an accurate diagnosis, and this is the first report of minoxidil causing HP-like pulmonary illness.

Impact of antigen avoidance test for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in stable phase

BACKGROUND

The antigen avoidance has been used in the diagnosis and treatment of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP); however, its usefulness in stable fibrotic HP is controversial.

OBJECTIVE

To investigate the usefulness of the antigen avoidance test in patients with fibrotic HP in stable phase.

METHODS

The antigen avoidance test was conducted during a 2-week hospitalization comparing clinical parameters at admission and before discharge. A retrospective review of patients who underwent surgical lung biopsy or transbronchial lung cryobiopsy, who were diagnosed with fibrotic HP by multi-disciplinary discussion, and whose disease progression was stable for more than two months before the antigen avoidance test was done.

RESULTS

Between 2016 and 2021, 40 patients met the criteria, and 17 (43%) patients had a positive antigen avoidance test. The patients with positive in the antigen avoidance test had significantly greater annual forced vital capacity (FVC) decline than those with negative before the test (- 6.5% vs. - 0.3%, p = 0.045). The patients with positive antigen avoidance test had less annual FVC decline than those with negative in the year following the test (0.8% vs. - 5.0%, p = 0.048). The differences in annual improvement were found for serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 between the positive and negative patients in the year following the test (- 27% vs. - 5%, p = 0.049). In multivariate Cox hazard regression analysis, a negative result of the antigen avoidance test was a risk factor for death or acute exacerbation of fibrotic HP (HR = 0.26 [95% CI: 0.07-0.90], p = 0.034).

CONCLUSIONS

In fibrotic HP patients in stable phase, the antigen avoidance test under a 2-week hospitalization was valuable in predicting prognosis.

Pediatric hypersensitivity pneumonitis: literature update and proposal of a diagnostic algorithm

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a rare disease in childhood with the prevalence of 4 cases per 1 million children and an incidence of 2 cases per year. The average age of diagnosis at pediatric age is approximately 10 years. The pathogenesis of HP is characterized by an immunological reaction caused by recurrent exposure to triggering environmental agents (mostly bird antigens in children). The clinical picture of HP is complex and variable in children, often presenting in subacute forms with cough and exertion dyspnea. A diagnosis of HP should be considered in patients with an identified exposure to a triggering antigen, respiratory symptoms, and radiologic signs of interstitial lung disease. Blood tests and pulmonary function tests (PFT) support the diagnosis. Bronchoscopy (with bronchoalveolar lavage and tissue biopsy) may be needed in unclear cases. Antigen provocation test is rarely required. Of note, the persistence of symptoms despite various treatment regimens may support HP diagnosis. The avoidance of single/multiple triggers is crucial for effective treatment. No evidence- based guidelines for treatment are available; in particular, the role of systemic glucocorticoids in children is unclear. With adequate antigen avoidance, the prognosis in children with HP is generally favorable.

Challenges in the Diagnosis and Management of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: A Practical Review of Current Approaches

Recent advances in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis include improved diagnostic guidance, systematic assessments of immunosuppressive therapy, and the recent availability of antifibrotic therapy (nintedanib) for those with progressive disease. A standardized approach to diagnosis may lead to better inclusion criteria for future therapeutic protocols and delineation of disease or treatment response predictors for real-world management. This review will highlight current diagnostic and treatment challenges and remaining knowledge gaps or areas of uncertainty, with a practical overview of supporting evidence and its clinical implications. Exposure history, serologic testing for antigen sensitivity, bronchoalveolar lavage lymphocytosis, histopathology, and radiologic findings will be covered in the diagnosis section, with immunosuppression, antifibrotic therapy, lung transplantation, and disease prognosis in the treatment and management section.

Role of serum surfactant protein-D as a prognostic predictor in fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis

BACKGROUND

Serum Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) and surfactant protein-D (SP-D) are candidate diagnostic and activity markers for fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), although their correlation with prognosis remains unclear. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic usefulness of serum KL-6 and SP-D in patients with fibrotic HP.

METHODS

This was a retrospective medical record review of 185 patients with fibrotic HP at a single center from 2005 to 2019. The baseline and minimum serum KL-6 and SP-D levels over two years were recorded. The contribution of KL-6 and SP-D levels to the incidence of progressive fibrosing interstitial lung disease (PF-ILD) and mortality were evaluated using multivariate analysis.

RESULTS

The respective baseline and minimum levels were 1441 and 808 U/ml for KL-6 and 254 and 132 ng/mL for SP-D. A high minimum SP-D level was significantly associated with a high incidence of PF-ILD by logistic regression, independent of baseline forced vital capacity and honeycombing. Similarly, a high minimum SP-D level was significantly associated with high mortality by Cox proportional hazard model analysis. The stratified minimum SP-D levels of <100, 100-200, and >200 revealed significantly distinct groups in the entire cohort, with PF-ILD incidence rates of 28%, 48%, and 74% and median survival times of 120, 74, and 45 months, respectively.

CONCLUSIONS

High minimum SP-D levels over two years were correlated with an unfavorable prognosis in our cohort. Patient with consistently high SP-D levels during the clinical course may have a poor prognosis and be a candidate for early treatment intensification.

Antigen avoidance and environmental inhalation challenge for successful diagnosis of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis mimicking idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis

A 77-year-old man was initially diagnosed with idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) and treated with anti-fibrotic nintedanib. Despite undergoing anti-fibrotic treatment for one year, his condition remained unstable. The patient was admitted to our hospital for exertional dyspnea. We performed an exposure assessment, including 2-week antigen avoidance and an environmental inhalation challenge, and successfully re-diagnosed him with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP), known as chronic farmer's lung. Adding oral glucocorticoids to the nintedanib treatment improved his condition. Although antigen avoidance and environmental inhalation challenge tests are not standardized, they may be useful for diagnosing fibrotic HP when properly applied.

•

Clinical features of fibrotic HP and IPF are often indistinguishable.

•

Antigen avoidance is crucial in the diagnosis and management of fibrotic HP.

•

Environmental inhalation challenge is useful when applied properly.

•

The seasonal change of clinical parameters helps suspecting fibrotic HP.

Barriers to antigen detection and avoidance in chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis in the United States

Background

Chronic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (CHP) is an interstitial lung disease (ILD) caused by long term exposure to an offending antigen. Antigen avoidance is associated with improved outcomes. We are unable to identify the antigen source in approximately half of patients. When an antigen is successfully identified, patients have difficulty with avoidance.

Methods

We conducted three structured group discussions with US based ILD specialists utilizing the nominal group technique (NGT). Participants listed barriers to antigen detection and avoidance in CHP. Each participant ranked what they perceived to be the top three barriers in the list in terms of importance. The master list of barriers was consolidated across the three groups into themes that were prioritized based on receiving the highest rankings by participants.

Results

Twenty-five physicians participated; 56% had experience caring for CHP patients for ≥ 16 years. Sixty barriers to antigen detection were categorized into seven themes of which the top three were: 1. unclear significance of identified exposures; 2. gaps in clinical knowledge and testing capabilities; 3. there are many unknown and undiscovered antigens. Twenty-eight barriers to antigen avoidance were categorized into five themes of which the top three were: 1. patient limitations, financial barriers and lack of resources; 2. individual patient beliefs, emotions and attachments to the antigen source; and 3. gaps in clinical knowledge and testing capabilities.

Conclusions

This study uncovered challenges at the individual patient, organizational, and societal levels and ranked them in terms of level of importance. These findings provide information to guide development and validation of multidisciplinary support and interventions geared towards antigen identification and avoidance in CHP.

Supplementary Information

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12931-021-01817-6.

Granulomatous Sarcoidosis Mimics

Many granulomatous diseases can mimic sarcoidosis histologically and in terms of their clinical features. These mimics include infectious granulomatous diseases, granulomatous reactions to occupational and environmental exposures, granulomatous drug reactions, vasculitides and idiopathic granulomatous conditions. It is important to distinguish sarcoidosis from these mimics, as a misdiagnosis of these diseases may have serious consequences. This manuscript reviews numerous sarcoidosis mimics and describes features of these diseases that may allow them to be differentiated from sarcoidosis. Distinguishing features between sarcoidosis and its mimics requires a careful review of the medical history, symptoms, demographics, radiographic findings, histologic features, and additional laboratory data. Understanding the clinical characteristics of sarcoidosis and its mimics should lead to more accurate diagnoses and treatment of granulomatous disorders that should improve the care of these patients. As the diagnostic criteria of sarcoidosis are not standardized, it is possible that some of these sarcoidosis mimics may represent varied clinical presentations of sarcoidosis itself.

Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this analysis is to provide evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion, and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus. A diagnostic algorithm is provided, using supporting data from the recommendations where possible, along with expert consensus to help physicians gauge the probability of HP.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality.

INTERPRETATION

Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Criteria are presented to facilitate diagnosis of HP. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis.

Executive Summary: Diagnosis and Evaluation of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis: CHEST Guideline and Expert Panel Report

BACKGROUND

The purpose of this summary is to provide a synopsis of evidence-based and consensus-derived guidance for clinicians to improve individual diagnostic decision-making for hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and decrease diagnostic practice variability.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

Approved panelists developed key questions regarding the diagnosis of HP using the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, and Outcome) format. MEDLINE (via PubMed) and the Cochrane Library were systematically searched for relevant literature, which was supplemented by manual searches. References were screened for inclusion and vetted evaluation tools were used to assess the quality of included studies, to extract data, and to grade the level of evidence supporting each recommendation or statement. The quality of the evidence was assessed using the GRADE (Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation) approach. Graded recommendations and ungraded consensus-based statements were drafted and voted on using a modified Delphi technique to achieve consensus.

RESULTS

The systematic review of the literature based on 14 PICO questions resulted in 14 key action statements: 12 evidence-based, graded recommendations, and 2 ungraded consensus-based statements. All evidence was of very low quality.

INTERPRETATION

Diagnosis of HP should employ a patient-centered approach and include a multidisciplinary assessment that incorporates the environmental and occupational exposure history and CT pattern to establish diagnostic confidence prior to considering BAL and/or lung biopsy. Additional research is needed on the performance characteristics and generalizability of exposure assessment tools and traditional and new diagnostic tests in modifying clinical decision-making for HP, particularly among those with a provisional diagnosis.

Identification and Remediation of Environmental Exposures in Patients With Interstitial Lung Disease: Evidence Review and Practical Considerations

A relationship between inhalational exposure to materials in the environment and development of interstitial lung disease (ILD) is long recognized. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an environmentally -induced diffuse parenchymal lung disease. In addition to hypersensitivity pneumonitis, domestic and occupational exposures have been shown to influence onset and progression of other ILDs, including idiopathic interstitial pneumonias such as idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis. A key component of the clinical evaluation of patients presenting with ILD includes elucidation of a complete exposure history, which may influence diagnostic classification of the ILD as well as its management. Currently, there is no standardized approach to environmental evaluation or remediation of potentially harmful exposures in home or workplace environments for patients with ILD. This review discusses evidence for environmental contributions to ILD pathogenesis and draws on asthma and occupational medicine literature to frame the potential utility of a professional evaluation for environmental factors contributing to the development and progression of ILD. Although several reports suggest benefits of environmental assessment for those with asthma or certain occupational exposures, lack of information about benefits in broader populations may limit application. Determining the feasibility, long-term outcomes, and cost-effectiveness of environmental evaluation and remediation in acute and chronic ILDs should be a focus of future research.

Exposure assessment in hypersensitivity pneumonitis: a comprehensive review and proposed screening questionnaire

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis is an immune-mediated inflammatory lung disease characterised by the inhalation of environmental antigens leading to acute and chronic lung injury. Along with suggestive clinical and radiological findings, history and timing of suspected antigen exposure are important elements for diagnostic confidence. Unfortunately, many diagnoses remain tentative and based on vague and imprecise environmental or material exposure histories. To date, there has not been a comprehensive report highlighting the frequency and type of environmental exposure that might lead to or support a more systematic approach to antigen identification. We performed a comprehensive literature review to identify and classify causative antigens and their associated environmental contexts or source materials, with emphasis on the extent of the supportive literature for each exposure type. Eligible publications were those that reported unique inciting antigens and their respective environments or contexts. A clinical questionnaire was then proposed based on this review to better support diagnosis of hypersensitivity pneumonitis when antigen testing or other clinical and radiological variables are inconclusive or incomplete.

Granulomatous lung disease: clinical aspects

INTRODUCTION

Granulomatous lung diseases (GLD) are heterogeneous group of diseases that can be broadly categorized as infectious or noninfectious. This distinction is extremely important, as the misdiagnosis of a GLD can have serious consequences. In this manuscript, we describe the clinical manifestations, histopathology, and diagnostic approach to GLD. We propose an algorithm to distinguish infectious from noninfectious GLD.

AREAS COVERED

We have searched PubMed and Medline database from 1950 to December 2019, using multiple keywords as described below. Major GLDs covered include those caused by mycobacteria and fungi, sarcoidosis, hypersensitivity pneumonitis, and vasculidities.

EXPERT OPINION

The cause of infectious GLD is usually identified through microbiological culture and molecular techniques. Most noninfectious GLD are diagnosed by clinical and laboratory criteria, often with exclusion of infectious pathogens. Further understanding of the immunopathogenesis of the granulomatous response may allow improved diagnosis and treatment of GLD.

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) is a complex syndrome caused by the inhalation of a variety of antigens in susceptible and sensitized individuals. These antigens are found in the environment, mostly derived from bird proteins and fungi. The prevalence and incidence of HP vary widely depending on the intensity of exposure, the geographical area and the local climate. Immunopathologically, HP is characterized by an exaggerated humoral and cellular immune response affecting the small airways and lung parenchyma. A complex interplay of genetic, host and environmental factors underlies the development and progression of HP. HP can be classified into acute, chronic non-fibrotic and chronic fibrotic forms. Acute HP results from intermittent, high-level exposure to the inducing antigen, usually within a few hours of exposure, whereas chronic HP mostly originates from long-term, low-level exposure (usually to birds or moulds in the home), is not easy to define in terms of time, and may occur within weeks, months or even years of exposure. Some patients with fibrotic HP may evolve to a progressive phenotype, even with complete exposure avoidance. Diagnosis is based on an accurate exposure history, clinical presentation, characteristic high-resolution CT findings, specific IgG antibodies to the offending antigen, bronchoalveolar lavage and pathological features. Complete antigen avoidance is the mainstay of treatment. The pharmacotherapy of chronic HP consists of immunosuppressive drugs such as corticosteroids, with antifibrotic therapy being a potential therapy for patients with progressive disease.

Changes in serum KL-6 levels during short-term strict antigen avoidance are associated with the prognosis of patients with fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by avian antigens

BACKGROUND

Bird-related hypersensitivity pneumonitis (BRHP) is the most common type of fibrotic hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP). Antigen avoidance (AA) is a key step in the diagnosis and management of HP, but not all fibrotic HP patients improve through AA. Because of the poor prognosis of fibrotic HP, predictive biomarkers to identify patients showing rapid progression during AA are urgently needed.

METHODS

From a retrospective review of the medical records of 1941 patients with interstitial lung disease, 75 cases of fibrotic BRHP confirmed by a provocation test or surgical lung biopsy were identified. To identify potential prognostic markers obtained at or around diagnosis, physiological and serological variables at diagnosis and the relative changes in those variables during strict AA were evaluated. Cox proportional hazards models with log-rank testing were used to compare the associations between these variables and survival.

RESULTS

Univariate analyses showed that gender, smoking status, and the relative change in the serum levels of Krebs von den Lungen-6 (KL-6) were associated with prognosis (P = 0.02, 0.04, and 0.02, respectively), but the presence of honeycombing and the forced vital capacity were not associated with survival. The relative change in KL-6 levels (greater than vs. less than a 10% decrease) was significantly associated with survival in a stratified analysis (73.9 vs. 34.9 months; P = 0.04).

CONCLUSIONS

The relative change in KL-6 levels is associated with the prognosis of patients with fibrotic BRHP independent of previously identified prognostic biomarkers. This finding could help pulmonologists identify fibrotic BRHP patients that are likely to show rapid progression.

Arc-welders' pneumoconiosis with atypical radiological and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid findings: A case report

Arc-welders’ pneumoconiosis (AWP) is an occupational lung disease and has nonspecific symptoms typically with the patterns of centrilobular and/or branching opacities on chest high-resolution computed tomography (HRCT) which are similar to those of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) and/or respiratory tract infections. Therefore, the differential diagnosis is often difficult if they are not suspected.

We report a case of AWP which was initially suspected to be pulmonary tuberculosis because of the chest HRCT findings: centrilobular opacities distributed predominantly on the right lobe. On detailed review of the work history, however, the patient was found to be involved in welding. Prussian blue staining of the lung tissues and the bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) ferritin analysis were useful for the final diagnosis and the appropriate treatment for AWP. The atypical lymphocytosis in BALF in this case suggested the involvement of HP in the pathogenesis due to the occupational sensitization to causal antigens.

To the best of our knowledge, this is the first case report of AWP showing features of HP. AWP should be noted even in patients with the typical patterns of centrilobular opacities on chest HRCT. Medical history, iron staining of lung tissues, and the BALF ferritin analysis would be useful for the diagnosis of these patients. The BALF findings are sometimes indeterminate for the diagnosis because the occupational sensitization to causal antigens might be involved in some cases of AWP.

Imaging of Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis

The management of hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) depends on early identification of the disease process, which is complicated by its nonspecific clinical presentation in addition to variable and diverse laboratory and radiologic findings. HP is the result of exposure and sensitization to myriad aerosolized antigens. HP develops in the minority of antigenic exposures, and conversely has been documented in patients with no identifiable exposure, complicating the diagnostic algorithm significantly. Prompt diagnosis and early intervention are critical in slowing the progression of irreversible parenchymal damage, and additionally in preserving the quality of life of affected patients.

Occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis: an EAACI position paper

The aim of this document was to provide a critical review of the current knowledge on hypersensitivity pneumonitis caused by the occupational environment and to propose practical guidance for the diagnosis and management of this condition. Occupational hypersensitivity pneumonitis (OHP) is an immunologic lung disease resulting from lymphocytic and frequently granulomatous inflammation of the peripheral airways, alveoli, and surrounding interstitial tissue which develops as the result of a non-IgE-mediated allergic reaction to a variety of organic materials or low molecular weight agents that are present in the workplace. The offending agents can be classified into six broad categories that include bacteria, fungi, animal proteins, plant proteins, low molecular weight chemicals, and metals. The diagnosis of OHP requires a multidisciplinary approach and relies on a combination of diagnostic tests to ascertain the work relatedness of the disease. Both the clinical and the occupational history are keys to the diagnosis and often will lead to the initial suspicion. Diagnostic criteria adapted to OHP are proposed. The cornerstone of treatment is early removal from exposure to the eliciting antigen, although the disease may show an adverse outcome even after avoidance of exposure to the causal agent.