Analysis of nasal air conditioning in subjects with unilateral cleft lip nasal deformity

Comparing Patient-Reported Outcomes with Computational Fluid Dynamics-Derived Nasal Airflow After Nasal Airway Surgery: Prioritizing the Patient's Perception of Nasal Obstruction

Background: Some patients report persistent nasal obstruction after surgical treatment despite objective improvement. Objective: To compare patients' perceptions of nasal obstruction after surgery with objective nasal airflow as determined by computational fluid dynamics (CFD) modeling: (1) Is perception driven by a more symptomatic side? (2) Can symptom improvement be predicted with CFD modeling? Methods: Pre/postoperative Nasal Obstruction Symptom Evaluation (NOSE) and visual analog scale (VAS) score were collected for patients undergoing nasal obstruction surgery. Pre/postoperative computed tomography was used to generate patient-specific airway models for CFD simulation at 15 L/min resting inspiration. Results: Ten patients (22-53 years, seven men and three women) underwent septoplasty, turbinate reduction, and/or rhinoplasty. Postoperative NOSE was most correlated with postoperative VAS score from the "affected" side (R2 = 0.59, p < 0.01), and postoperative NOSE was strongly predicted by a two-parameter model using parameters only from the "affected" side (R2 = 0.84, adjusted R2 = 0.80, p < 0.01). Conclusion: The postoperative state of the initially "affected" side drives outcomes after nasal obstruction surgery. Surgeries should prioritize improving the "affected" side. A two-parameter model using the VAS and nasal airflow from only the "affected" side strongly predicts NOSE and is promising for the future using virtual planning to individualize procedures to optimize outcome.

Nasal airway obstruction in patients with cleft lip nasal deformity: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

Cleft lip nasal deformity (CLND)-associated nasal airway obstruction (CL-NAO) may be inadequately characterized, with its functional implications subsequently underappreciated and neglected. The purpose of this systematic review is to (1) summarize the available assessment results in CL-NAO, (2) evaluate the reliability of current assessment tools, and (3) identify ongoing gaps and inconsistencies for future study.

METHODS

A systematic search of the MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Scopus databases was performed for articles studying CL-NAO. Articles focusing on noncleft populations or surgical techniques were excluded. Extracted data included information about study design, patient demographics, medical history, and assessment scores.

RESULTS

Twenty-six articles met criteria for inclusion. Assessments included patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), anatomic characterizations of CLND, and nasal airflow and resistance studies. Objective assessments were generally more reliable than subjective assessments in CLND. Unilateral CLND was better represented in the literature than bilateral CLND. For unilateral CLND, the cleft side was more obstructed than the noncleft side, with stereotyped patterns of anterior nasal deformity but varied middle and posterior deformity patterns. Overall, there was considerable heterogeneity in study design regarding stratification of CLND cohorts by age, cleft phenotype and laterality, and surgical history.

CONCLUSIONS

A wide range of subjective and objective assessment tools were used to characterize CL-NAO, including PROMs, anatomic measurements, and airflow and resistance metrics. Overall, objective assessments of CL-NAO were more reliable than subjective surveys, which may have resulted from variable expectations regarding nasal patency in the CLND population combined with large heterogeneity in study design.

Improvement in nasal airway obstruction after secondary rhinoplasty for cleft lip: A systematic review

BACKGROUND

The purpose of the study was to comprehensively review the improvement in nasal airway obstruction after secondary rhinoplasty for cleft lip.

METHODS

The search was conducted on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus databases for relevant studies published within the past twenty years. Inclusion criteria encompassed patients undergoing secondary rhinoplasty with cleft lip nasal deformity and some evaluation of the nasal outcome.

RESULTS

A thorough analysis of available studies identified 29 articles that met the inclusion criteria for final assessment. Seven (24.1%) studies were classified as Therapeutic Ⅱ (T II) according to the American Society of Plastic Surgeons level of evidence scale, while the majority were categorized as T III (17.2%), T IV (51.7%), and T V (6.9%). Subjective methods were employed in 21 articles to measure nasal ventilation outcomes, whereas 8 studies utilized objective methods. Overall findings from all included studies consistently indicated an improvement in nasal ventilation post-surgery.

CONCLUSIONS

Although there is no consensus regarding the impact of secondary rhinoplasty on nasal airway obstruction in cleft lip patients, this review suggests that it can effectively alleviate such obstructions. We conducted an anatomical analysis to investigate the impact of various surgical techniques on nasal ventilation to provide recommendations for postoperative ventilation assessment.