[Algorithms to identify chronic inflammatory rheumatism and psoriasis in medico-administrative databases: A review of the literature]

Risk of Gastrointestinal Perforation in Patients With Rheumatic Diseases Exposed to Janus Kinase Inhibitors Versus Adalimumab: A Nationwide Cohort Study

OBJECTIVE

To compare the risk of gastrointestinal perforation (GIP), a rare but serious adverse event, in patients who a JAK inhibitor (JAKi; tofacitinib, baricitinib, upadacitinib, or filgotinib) versus adalimumab (tumor necrosis factor inhibitor) among a comprehensive real-world population of patients with rheumatic diseases.

METHODS

We conducted a nationwide population-based cohort study of the French national health data system, the exposed group that received a JAKi and the comparison group adalimumab. We included all individuals with a rheumatic disease who had their first dispensation of these treatments from July 2017 to December 2021. The primary endpoint was the occurrence of GIP (end of follow-up May 2022). Weighted hazard ratios (wHRs) were estimated with the inverse probability of treatment weighting method to account for confounding factors. Concomitant administration of systemic glucocorticoids, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and proton-pump inhibitors were time-varying variables.

RESULTS

The cohort included 39,758 patients: 12,335 and 27,423 in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab (mean age 58.2 and 47.3 years; female 76% and 58%; rheumatoid arthritis 85.3% and 27.3%, and psoriatic arthritis/axial spondyloarthritis 14.7% and 72.7%), respectively. During follow-up, 38 and 42 GIPs occurred in the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab groups; incidence rates were 2.1 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.5-2.8) and 1.1 (95% CI 0.8-1.5) per 1,000 person-years, respectively. Rates of GIP did not differ between the groups that received a JAKi and adalimumab: wHR 1.1 (95% CI 0.7-1.9; P = 0.65). Despite the lack of power in some subgroup analyses, results were consistent whatever the subgroup of a type of JAKi received or subgroup with a type of rheumatic disease.

CONCLUSION

In this nationwide cohort study, the rates of GIPs did not differ between groups of patients who received JAKi and adalimumab treatment. These results need to be confirmed in other observational studies.

Risk of serious infection associated with different classes of targeted therapies used in psoriatic arthritis: a nationwide cohort study from the French Health Insurance Database (SNDS)

OBJECTIVE

To assess the risk of serious infection associated with different targeted therapies for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) in real-world settings.

METHODS

This nationwide cohort study used the administrative healthcare database of the French health insurance scheme linked to the hospital discharge database to identify all adults with PsA who were new users of targeted therapies (adalimumab, etanercept, golimumab, certolizumab pegol, infliximab, secukinumab, ixekizumab, ustekinumab, and tofacitinib) from 1 January 2015 to 30 June 2021. The primary outcome was a serious infection (ie, requiring hospitalisation), in a time-to-event analysis using propensity score-weighted Cox models, with adalimumab as the comparator, estimating weighted HRs (wHRs) and their 95% CIs.

RESULTS

A total of 12 071 patients were included (mean age 48.7±12.7 years; 6965 (57.7%) women). We identified 367 serious infections (3.0% of patients), with a crude incidence rate of 17.0 per 1000 person-years (95% CI, 15.2 to 18.7). After inverse propensity score weighting and adjustment for time-dependent covariates and calendar year, risk of serious infection was significantly lower for new users of etanercept (wHR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.53 to 0.97) or ustekinumab (wHR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.35 to 0.93) than adalimumab new users. This risk was not statistically modified with the other targeted therapies.

CONCLUSIONS

The incidence of serious infection was low for PsA patients who were new users of targeted therapies in real-world settings. Relative to adalimumab new users, this risk was lower among new users of etanercept and ustekinumab and unmodified for the other molecules.

Polyhandicap, profound intellectual multiple disabilities : Concept and definition of a highly specific public health issue

OBJECTIVES

The concept of polyhandicap first emerged in the late '60s in France, with actually a consensus on its definition. This consensus has yet to be reached internationally. The absence of an international consensus on a definition and name for persons with polyhandicap limits progress in research and health planning for these people.

METHODS

This article describes the history of the emergence of the concept of polyhandicap in France and internationally.

RESULTS

The emergence of the concept and definition of polyhandicap is part of the history of the development of special education and care for children with disabilities started at the end of the 19th century and during the first half of the 20th century. In France, between 1970 and 2002, working groups composed of professionals and family associations gradually developed and refined the definition of polyhandicap, differentiating it from other clinical entities such as cerebral palsy. Internationally, the term polyhandicap is used in 4 European countries: in France where it first appeared, in Italy, in French-speaking Belgium, and in French-speaking Switzerland but also outside the EU. Various terms may be used around the world to describe clinical entities similar to polyhandicap; the most frequently used in the literature is the term Profound Intellectual and Multiple Disabilities (PIMD) or PIMD Spectrum which does not systematically refer to an early brain injury.

DISCUSSION

We are currently in the process of internationalizing the concept and definition of polyhandicap, and hopefully, as was the case for cerebral palsy in the 2000s, the various research teams working on this subject around the world will create collaborations and research networks targeting this specific population.

CONCLUSION

A consensus around a precise definition of polyhandicap is important to ensure that these people are recognized for their uniqueness and specific qualities and to provide them adapted care.

Difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis is associated with psoriasis, peripheral involvement and comorbidities: results of an observational nationwide study

OBJECTIVES

To determine the cumulative incidence and identify the factors associated with difficult-to-treat axial spondyloarthritis (D2T-axSpA) in French patients newly benefiting from the French 'long-term illness' (LTI) social security scheme for axial spondyloarthritis (axSpA).

METHODS

This national cohort study was based on the French National Medico-Administrative Database, SNDS, which contains data on hospitalisation, LTI and outpatient care consumption. All French patients newly receiving LTI benefits for ankylosing spondylitis (AS) between 2010 and 2013 were included in the study. In France, LTI is required to access biological/targeted synthetic DMARDs (b/tsDMARDs). The follow-up period ended on 31 December 2018. So-called D2T-axSpA was defined as the failure of three b/tsDMARDs or of two b/tsDMARDs with different modes of action. Comorbidities and extra-musculoskeletal manifestations were identified using previously described algorithms. Characteristics were compared between patients with D2T-axSpA and patients with non-D2T-axSpA who had received at least one b/tsDMARD with bivariate and multivariate analysis using logistic regression. Incidence rates of major cardiovascular event (MACE) and death were compared using competitive risk analysis.

RESULTS

22 932 patients were included. 10 798 (47.08%) patients received at least one bDMARD. None received tsDMARD. During follow-up, 2115 patients were classified as having D2T-axSpA, representing 19.59% of patients who received at least one bDMARD. In multivariate analysis, D2T-axSpA was significantly associated with female gender, peripheral involvement, psoriasis, hypertension and depression (p<0.001 for each case). There was no difference in the incidence of MACE (p=0.92) or death (p=0.87).

CONCLUSION

D2T-axSpA affects one in five patients exposed to bDMARDs in this national cohort. D2T-axSpA is more common in women and patients with peripheral involvement and/or comorbidities.

Impact of NSAIDs on 8-year cumulative incidence of major cardiovascular events in patients with ankylosing spondylitis: a nationwide study

OBJECTIVES

The objectives of this study were to describe the incidence of major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) in French patients newly benefiting from the French Long-term Illness scheme (LTI) for AS and to evaluate the effect of various treatments on the risk of MACE occurrence.

METHODS

This national cohort study was based on the French national medico-administrative database SNDS containing data on hospitalization, the LTI, and outpatient care consumption. All French patients newly receiving LTI benefits for AS from 2010 to 2013 were included. The final follow-up date was 31 December 2018. The occurrences of MACEs [stroke and myocardial infarction (MI)] and comorbidities were identified from algorithms previously described in the literature. Competitive risk analysis using propensity score and inverse weighting was performed to calculate cumulative incidence functions and to determine subhazard ratios (SHRs) for the various treatments of interest.

RESULTS

Between 2010 and 2013, 22 929 patients were included [mean age 43.0 (s.d. 13.9) years, 44.9% mal]. The 8-year cumulative incidences of MACE, stroke, and MI were 1.81% (1.61-2.05), 0.97% (0.83-1.14), and 0.85% (0.71-1.04), respectively. NSAIDs [SHR: 0.39 (0.32-0.50), P < 0.001] and anti-TNF [SHR 0.61 (0.46-0.80), P < 0.001], but not anti-IL17 [2.10 (0.79-5.57)] were associated with a lower risk of MACE occurrence.

CONCLUSION

MACE incidence rates at 8 years are low in patients newly benefiting from LTI for AS. Our results support the hypothesis of a protective role of NSAIDs and anti-TNF in cardiovascular risk in these patients.

TNF-alpha inhibitors biosimilar use in France: a nationwide population-based study using the French National Health Data System

TNF-alpha inhibitors have revolutionized the therapeutic care in chronic inflammatory diseases. Several biosimilar products were commercialized at their patent expiry, substantially decreasing the cost of treatment. This longitudinal descriptive study aimed at assessing infliximab, etanercept and adalimumab biosimilar penetration rates using data of the French National Health Data System. A total of 207,118 new or prevalent users from the date of first biosimilar commercialization in France (respectively January 2015, May 2016 and October 2018) were included in the study and followed until September 30, 2021. Biosimilars represented respectively 78%, 46% and 53% of the overall initiations, and 94%, 66% and 60% last year's initiations. A total of 46%, 19% and 17% of originator product prevalent users switched for a biosimilar during the follow-up. Biosimilar penetration rate was much higher for infliximab than for its counterparts, due to its hospital delivery modality. Biosimilar initiation and originator-to-biosimilar switch tended to be observed more in rheumatology than in the other specialties. Biosimilar use was mostly consistent across patient socio-demographic characteristics. Biosimilar initiation rate increased rapidly from their market arrival and originator-to-biosimilar switch rate remained moderate, highlighting the need and usefulness of political action and biosimilar use tracking.

World mortality of ankylosing spondylitis, psoriatic arthritis and inflammatory bowel disease in 2015 and its evolution from 2001 to 2015

OBJECTIVE

There is little epidemiological data on global mortality in spondyloarthritis (SpA) and inflammatory bowel disease. We then determined mortality rates of ankylosing spondylitis (AS), psoriatic arthritis (PsA), Crohn's disease (CD) and ulcerative colitis (UC) both globally and by country, and to describe their evolution between 2001 and 2015.

METHODS

We used mortality data from the World Health Organisation (WHO), which shows the number of deaths classified by age, sex, and cause of death coded by ICD-10. Age-standardized mortality rates (ASMR) were constructed using the 2015 WHO reference population. Temporal trend analyses of ASMR were performed between 2001 and 2015 using joinpoint regression.

RESULTS

Global ASMR was for 0.13 [0.11-0.14] deaths per million inhabitants for AS, 0.04 [0.03-0.05] for PsA, 0.86 [0.82-0.89] for CD and 0.76 [0.73-0.79] for UC. The worldwide trend analysis showed no significant change in ASMR for AS, a statistically significant increase from 2004 to 2015 (mean annual percent change (APC): 5.94%, p<0.001) for PsA, and a statistically significant decrease from 2001 to 2015 for CD (mean APC: -0.82%, p<0.001) and UC (mean APC: -1.29%, p<0.001). Statistically significant geographical disparities were identified.

CONCLUSION

We found significant geographical disparities in SpA and IBD mortality across the world. Further studies seem to be needed to better understand the evolution of mortality over the last twenty years.

Management of bone fragility in patients with rheumatoid arthritis in France: An analysis of a national health insurance claims database

OBJECTIVES

Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) is considered a major risk factor for fragility fractures. We examined the quality of management of bone fragility in RA patients in a real-life setting.

METHODS

We performed a longitudinal case-control retrospective study in a 1/97th random sample of French health care claims database from 2014 to 2016 to determine the extent of bone fragility management in patients with RA compared with non-RA matched controls.

RESULTS

Compared to their non-RA controls (n=4652), RA patients (n=1008; mean age: 61.1years; methotrexate: 69.7%; other conventional disease-modifying antirheumatic drugs (cDMARDs): 26.8%; biologic: 26.0%; corticosteroids: 36.9%) had more reimbursements for bone mineral density (BMD) measurements (21.6 vs. 9.2%; OR=2.7 [2.3; 3.3]; P<0.01) and for bisphosphonates (7.1 vs. 3.6%, OR=2.0 [1.5; 2.7]; P<0.05). In patients exposed to corticosteroids, RA patients underwent more BMD assessments than non-RA controls (28.0 vs. 18.8%; OR=1.7 [1.3; 2.2]; P<0.05). RA patients exposed to corticosteroids were more likely to sustain fracture than non-exposed RA patients (5.7 vs. 2.4%, P<0.01). In addition, only when comparing patients exposed to corticosteroids, was there statistical evidence of an association between RA and an increased fracture rate (6.2 vs. 3.5%, P<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Patients with RA exposed to corticosteroids are at high risk of fracture. Patients with RA had more bone fragility management than controls.

Psoriasis-related treatment exposure and hospitalization or in-hospital mortality due to COVID-19 during the first and second wave of the pandemic: cohort study of 1 326 312 patients in France

Background

Data on treatment exposures for psoriasis and poor COVID‐19 outcomes are limited.

Objectives

To assess the risk of hospitalization or in‐hospital mortality due to COVID‐19 by treatment exposure in patients with psoriasis.

Methods

All adults with psoriasis registered in the French national health‐insurance (Système National des Données de Santé, SNDS) database between 2008 and 2019 were eligible. Two study periods were considered: 15 February to 30 June 2020 and 1 October 2020 to 31 January 2021, the first and second waves of the COVID‐19 pandemic in France, respectively. Patients were classified according to their baseline treatment: biologics, nonbiologics, topicals or no treatment. The primary endpoint was hospitalization for COVID‐19 using Cox models with inverse probability of treatment weighting. The secondary endpoint was in‐hospital mortality due to COVID‐19.

Results

We identified 1 326 312 patients with psoriasis (mean age 59 years; males, 48%). During the first study period, 3871 patients were hospitalized for COVID‐19 and 759 (20%) died; during the second period 3603 were hospitalized for COVID‐19 and 686 (19%) died. In the propensity score‐weighted Cox models, risk of hospitalization for COVID‐19 was associated with exposure to topicals or nonbiologics [hazard ratio (95% confidence interval): 1·11 (1·04–1·20) and 1·27 (1·09–1·48), respectively] during the first period, and with all exposure types, during the second period. None of the exposure types was associated with in‐hospital mortality due to COVID‐19.

Conclusions

Systemic treatments for psoriasis (including biologics) were not associated with increased risk of in‐hospital mortality due to COVID‐19. These results support maintaining systemic treatment for psoriasis during the pandemic.

Whatis already known about this topic?

Almost all chronic diseases have emerged as risk factors for hospitalization for COVID‐19 and poor COVID‐19 outcomes.

Multimorbidity is frequent in psoriasis. In France, psoriasis was found to be associated with increased risk of hospitalization for COVID‐19 but not in‐hospital mortality due to COVID‐19.

Biologics are associated with an increased risk of infection. Few data have been published on the course of COVID‐19 in patients with psoriasis receiving biologics.

Whatdoes this study add?

Systemic treatments for psoriasis (including nonbiologics and biologics) were not associated with an increased risk of in‐hospital mortality due to COVID‐19.

Our results did not support a prophylactic effect of long‐term use of biologics on risk of hospitalization for COVID‐19 or in‐hospital mortality.

These results provide evidence supporting the continuity of care for psoriasis and maintaining systemic treatment for psoriasis during the pandemic.

Linked Comment: S. Cazzaniga and L. Naldi. Br J Dermatol 2022; 186:7–8.

Plain language summary available online