Escalation triggers and expected responses in obstetric early warning systems used in UK consultant-led maternity units

Comparing elective and emergency caesarean section by using bioimpedance method

BACKGROUND

There are limited studies focusing on hemodynamic changes between elective and emergent C/S cases. We considered that a better understanding of the alterations and physiological reactions in both situations with non-invasive novel technologies might be useful in managing maternal and fetal sides.

METHODS

In this prospective observational study, non-invasive hemodynamic changes were observed by using the whole-body impedance method using the NICaS™ device. CO, cardiac index (CI), stroke volume (SV), stroke index (SI), total peripheric resistance (TPR), and cardiac reserve (GGI) parameters were evaluated with a non-invasive method. Measurements were done initiating before surgery, 9 times of 5 min intervals.

RESULTS

All 95 patients finished the study. 47 cesarean sections were in the elective group, 48 were in the emergent group. SV in 4.5.6. time intervals were statistically increased in the elective group (p values: SvMl4: 0.025, SvMl5: 0.049, SvMl6: 0.044) (p < 0.05). SI in the second-time interval was statistically increased in the emergent group (p-value SI2: 0.047) (p < 0.05). SI in the 4th time interval was statistically increased in the elective group (p-value SI4: 0.047) (p < 0.05). CO measurements were not statistically different between groups in all time intervals for all comparisons. CI in the second time interval was statistically decreased in the elective group (p-value CI2: 0.012) (p < 0.05). GGI in the 4th time interval was statistically increased in the elective group (p-value GGI4: 0.035) (p < 0.05). TPRI in the second time interval was statistically increased in the elective group (p-value TPRI 2: 0.014) (p < 0.05).

CONCLUSIONS

Understanding normal hemodynamic values before, during, and after C/S is feasible and might help the clinician assess patients' cardiac performance with a reliable noninvasive technique. NICaS might be a reliable tool to evaluate patients' baseline values and diagnose complications earlier during the surgery.

Early warning systems in maternity care: protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of maternity care providers' views and experiences

Background: Early warning systems (EWS) have been widely adopted for use in maternity settings internationally. The idea in using these systems is early recognition of potential or actual clinical deterioration in pregnant or postpartum women, and escalation of care. Barriers to successful implementation and use of EWS, however, have been identified. If EWS are to be applied consistently, a greater understanding of the views and experiences of EWS from the perspectives of those using and applying EWS in maternity practice is needed. This protocol describes a qualitative evidence synthesis of maternity care providers' (midwives, obstetricians, and allied maternity care professionals) views and experiences of EWS use and application in practice. Methods: Studies will be included in the review if they report on maternity care providers use and application of EWS in any birth setting. Qualitative studies and studies of mixed methods design, where qualitative data can be extracted separately, will be included. To source relevant literature the electronic databases of MEDLINE, CINHAL, Web of Science Core Collection (incorporating Social Science Citation Index) and Maternity and Infant Care (MIDIRS), from date of inception, will be searched. The methodological quality of the included studies will be appraised using the 12-criteria of the assessment tool developed by the Evidence for Policy and Practice Information and Co-ordinating Centre. Thematic synthesis will be used for synthesising the qualitative data from included studies. The confidence in the findings will be assessed using the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation-Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research. Conclusions: The findings of this qualitative evidence synthesis may provide valuable information on the barriers, challenges, and facilitators for EWS use based on the experiences of those directly involved in EWS application in maternity care provision. PROSPERO registration: CRD42021235137 (08/04/2021).