Physiologic response to pre-arrest bolus dilute epinephrine in the pediatric intensive care unit

Systemically injected oxygen within rapidly dissolving microbubbles improves the outcomes of severe hypoxaemia in swine

Acute respiratory failure can cause profound hypoxaemia that leads to organ injury or death within minutes. When conventional interventions are ineffective, the intravenous administration of oxygen can rescue patients from severe hypoxaemia, but at the risk of microvascular obstruction and of toxicity of the carrier material. Here we describe polymeric microbubbles as carriers of high volumes of oxygen (350-500 ml of oxygen per litre of foam) that are stable in storage yet quickly dissolve following intravenous injection, reverting to their soluble and excretable molecular constituents. In swine with profound hypoxaemia owing to acute and temporary (12 min) upper-airway obstruction, the microbubble-mediated delivery of oxygen led to: the maintenance of critical oxygenation, lowered burdens of cardiac arrest, improved survival, and substantially improved neurologic and kidney function in surviving animals. Our findings underscore the importance of maintaining a critical threshold of oxygenation and the promise of injectable oxygen as a viable therapy in acute and temporary hypoxaemic crises.

Exploring the clinical relevance of vital signs statistical calculations from a new-generation clinical information system

New information on the intensive care applications of new generation 'high-density data clinical information systems' (HDDCIS) is increasingly being published in the academic literature. HDDCIS avoid data loss from bedside equipment and some provide vital signs statistical calculations to promote quick and easy evaluation of patient information. Our objective was to study whether manual records of continuously monitored vital signs in the Paediatric Intensive Care Unit could be replaced by these statistical calculations. Here we conducted a prospective observational clinical study in paediatric patients with severe diabetic ketoacidosis, using a Medlinecare® HDDCIS, which collects information from bedside equipment (1 data point per parameter, every 3-5 s) and automatically provides hourly statistical calculations of the central trend and sample dispersion. These calculations were compared with manual hourly nursing records for patient heart and respiratory rates and oxygen saturation. The central tendency calculations showed identical or remarkably similar values and strong correlations with manual nursing records. The sample dispersion calculations differed from the manual references and showed weaker correlations. We concluded that vital signs calculations of central tendency can replace manual records, thereby reducing the bureaucratic burden of staff. The significant sample dispersion calculations variability revealed that automatic random measurements must be supervised by healthcare personnel, making them inefficient.

A Narrative Review of Drug Therapy in Adult and Pediatric Cardiac Arrest

Drugs are used during cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) in association with chest compressions and ventilation. The main purpose of drugs during resuscitation is either to improve coronary perfusion pressure and myocardial perfusion in order to achieve return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). The aim of this up-to-date review is to provide an overview of the main drugs used during cardiac arrest (CA), highlighting their historical context, pharmacology, and the data to support them. Epinephrine remains the only recommended vasopressor. Regardless of the controversy about optimal dosage and interval between doses in recent papers, epinephrine should be administered as early as possible to be the most effective in non-shockable rhythms. Despite inconsistent survival outcomes, amiodarone and lidocaine are the only two recommended antiarrhythmics to treat shockable rhythms after defibrillation. Beta-blockers have also been recently evaluated as antiarrhythmic drugs and show promising results but further evaluation is needed. Calcium, sodium bicarbonate, and magnesium are still widely used during resuscitation but have shown no benefit. Available data may even suggest a harmful effect and they are no longer recommended during routine CPR. In experimental studies, sodium nitroprusside showed an increase in survival and favorable neurological outcome when combined with enhanced CPR, but as of today, no clinical data is available. Finally, we review drug administration in pediatric CA. Epinephrine is recommended in pediatric CA and, although they have not shown any improvement in survival or neurological outcome, antiarrhythmic drugs have a 2b recommendation in the current guidelines for shockable rhythms.

Community consultation in the pediatric intensive care unit for an exception from informed consent Trial: A survey of patient caregivers

Aim

To explore perspectives of families in the pediatric intensive care unit (PICU) about an emergency interventional trial on peri-arrest bolus epinephrine for acute hypotension using Exception From Informed Consent (EFIC).

Methods

We performed face-to-face interviews with families whose children were hospitalized in the PICU. A research team member provided an educational presentation about the planned trial and administered a survey with open- and closed-ended items. Analyses included descriptive statistics for quantitative data and thematic analysis for qualitative data.

Results

Sixty-seven participants contributed to 60 survey responses (53 individuals and 7 families for whom 2 family members participated). Most participants answered favorably toward the planned trial: 55/58 (95%) reported that the trial seemed "somewhat" or "very important"; 52/57 (91%) felt the use of EFIC was "somewhat" or "completely acceptable"; and 43/58 (74%) said they would be "somewhat" or "very likely" to allow their child to participate. Five themes emerged supporting participation in the planned trial: 1) trust in the clinical team; 2) familiarity with the study intervention (epinephrine); 3) study protocol being similar to standard care; 4) informed consent during an emergency was not feasible; and 5) importance of research. Barriers to potential participation included requests for additional time to decide about participating and misconceptions about study elements, especially eligibility.

Conclusions

Families of PICU patients generally supported plans for an emergency interventional trial using EFIC. Future inpatient EFIC studies may benefit from highlighting the themes identified here in their educational materials.

Peri-arrest bolus epinephrine practices amongst pediatric resuscitation experts

Aim

To describe current practices of peri-arrest bolus epinephrine use amongst pediatric resuscitation experts in a multinational survey.

Methods

A 9-question survey was developed and electronically distributed to pediatric critical care physicians who are site investigators for the Pediatric Resuscitation Quality Collaborative (pediRES-Q) network. Institutional demographics were collected through the American Hospital Association 2018 Annual Survey and linked to responses. Descriptive statistics were used to characterize closed-ended responses, and qualitative content analysis to analyze open-ended responses.

Results

Of the 63 collaborative members invited to participate, 49 (78%) responded, representing 35 institutions in 9 countries. Forty-six of the 49 respondents (94%) reported that they would consider using peri-arrest bolus epinephrine during critical situations in patients not requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation. Initial dosing strategies ranged from 0.1mcg/kg to 10mcg/kg, with the most commonly reported initial dose of 1mcg/kg by 25 of the 37 (68%) respondents who answered this question. Three of the 49 (6%) participants indicated that they would generally avoid using peri-arrest bolus epinephrine, citing lack of evidence to support its use.

Conclusions

In this multinational survey of pediatric resuscitation experts, endorsement of peri-arrest bolus epinephrine use was nearly universal, though a few clinicians cited lack of evidence to support this practice. There was a 100-fold difference in the range of initial weight-based doses reported, as well as a minority of clinicians who reported using non-weight-based dosing. Further research is needed to determine best practices, standardization of initial dosing, clinical factors that may warrant dosing modifications and associations with clinically important outcomes.

Efficacy of bolus-dose epinephrine to manage hypotension in the prehospital setting

PURPOSE

Hypotension in the Emergency Department (ED) and the prehospital setting has been associated with significant morbidity and mortality. Limited literature exists exploring the utilization of intravenous (IV) bolus-dose epinephrine (BDE) by Emergency Medical Services (EMS).

METHODS

A retrospective review evaluated patients transported to an academic medical center who had received IV BDE by a single urban EMS system from 2016 to 2020. The primary outcome was to assess the influence IV BDE had on systolic blood pressure (SBP). Secondary objectives were to assess changes in heart rate (HR), the impact of dose variability on SBP, and the incidence of severe hypertension (SBP > 220 mmHg).

RESULTS

A total of 55 patients who received 96 administrations of IV BDE were included in the analysis. The most common individual dose was 10 μg (76.0%) and 45.5% received multiple doses. The median weight-based dose of BDE was 0.14 μg/kg. A significant increase in SBP (median 14.0 mmHg) was noted among all patients following BDE administration compared with baseline (p < 0.001). No significant difference was found in HR following BDE compared with baseline (p = 0.375). Those that received a BDE dose >10 μg were noted to have a significantly greater rise in SBP than those that received 10 μg (30.0 mmHg vs. 11.0 mmHg; p = 0.022). Similarly, patients that received a dose ≥0.2 μg/kg had a significantly greater increase in SBP compared with those that received <0.2 μg/kg (30.0 mmHg vs. 10.0 mmHg; p = 0.048). There were no incidences of severe hypertension following therapy.

CONCLUSION

The utilization of IV BDE in the prehospital setting for acute hypotension resulted in a significant rise in SBP. A dose-response relationship was noted both in terms of a flat-based dose and a weight-based dose, with higher doses yielding a greater change in SBP. Additional investigations are necessary to further explore the most appropriate dose of this agent in this setting and its influence, if any, on clinical outcomes.

Reducing Cardiac Arrests in the PICU: Initiative to Improve Time to Administration of Prearrest Bolus Epinephrine in Patients With Cardiac Disease

OBJECTIVES

To evaluate the effectiveness of a quality-improvement initiative in reducing cardiac arrests in infants and children in the cardiac ICU.

DESIGN

Prospective observational before-after cohort study.

SETTING

Single pediatric cardiac ICU in the United Kingdom.

PATIENTS

All patients less than 18 years old admitted to the ICU.

INTERVENTION

Initial interdisciplinary training in cardiac arrest prevention followed by clinical practice change whereby patients with high-risk myocardium were identified on daily rounds. High-risk patients had bolus epinephrine preordered and prepared for immediate administration in the event of acute hypotension.

MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS

Interrupted time series analysis was used to compare the cardiac arrest rate in the 18 months before and 4.5 years after implementation. Mean monthly cardiac arrest rate was 17.2 per 1,000 patient days before and 7.6 per 1,000 patient days after the initiative (56% decrease). Patient characteristics and ICU interventions were similar in the control and intervention periods. In the time series analysis, monthly cardiac arrest rate in the ICU decreased by 12.4 per 1,000 patient days (95% CI, -1.5 to -23.3; p = 0.03) immediately following the intervention, followed by a nonsignificant downward trend of 0.36 per 1,000 patient days per month (95% CI, -1.3 to 0.6; p = 0.44). Bolus epinephrine was administered during 110 hypotension events in 77 patients (eight administrations per 1,000 ICU days); responder rate was 77%. There were no significant changes in ICU and hospital mortality.

CONCLUSIONS

Implementation of the initiative led to a significant, sustained reduction in ICU cardiac arrest rate.

Human Errors and Adverse Hemodynamic Events Related to "Push Dose Pressors" in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND

Though the use of small bolus doses of vasopressors, termed "push dose pressors," has become common in emergency medicine, data examining this practice are scant. Push dose pressors frequently involve bedside dilution, which may result in errors and adverse events. The objective of this study was to assess for instances of human error and adverse hemodynamic events during push dose pressor use in the emergency department.

METHODS

This was a structured chart and video review of all patients age ≥ 16 years undergoing resuscitation and receiving push dose pressors from a single center from January 2010 to November 2017. Push dose pressors were defined as intended intravenous boluses of phenylephrine (any dose) or epinephrine (≤ 100 mcg).

RESULTS

A total of 249 patients were analyzed. Median age was 60 years (range, 16-97), 58% were male, 49% survived to discharge. Median initial epinephrine dose was 20 mcg (n = 139, IQR 10-100, range 1-100); median phenylephrine dose was 100 mcg (n = 110, IQR 100-100, range 25-10,000). Adverse hemodynamic events occurred in 98 patients (39%); 30 in the phenylephrine group (27%; 95% CI, 19-36%), and 68 in the epinephrine group (50%; 95% CI, 41-58%). Human errors were observed in 47 patients (19%), including 7 patients (3%) experiencing dosing errors (all overdoses; range, 2.5- to 100-fold) and 43 patients (17%) with a documentation error. Only one dosing error occurred when a pharmacist was present.

CONCLUSIONS

Human errors and adverse hemodynamic events were common with the use of push dose pressors in the emergency department. Adverse hemodynamic events were more common than in previous studies. Future research should determine if push dose pressors improve outcomes and if so, how to safely implement them into practice.