Acting on the potentially reversible causes of traumatic cardiac arrest: Possible but not sufficient

Prehospital Management of Adults With Traumatic Out-of-Hospital Circulatory Arrest-A Joint Position Statement

The National Association of Emergency Medical Services Physicians (NAEMSP), American College of Surgeons Committee on Trauma (ACS-COT), and American College of Emergency Physicians (ACEP) believe that evidence-based, pragmatic, and collaborative protocols addressing the care of patients with traumatic out-of-hospital circulatory arrest (TOHCA) are needed to optimize patient outcomes and clinician safety. When the etiology of arrest is unclear, particularly without clear signs of life-threatening trauma, standard basic and advanced cardiac life support (BCLS/ACLS) treatments for medical cardiac arrest are appropriate. Traumatic circulatory arrest may result from massive hemorrhage, airway obstruction, obstructive shock, respiratory disturbances, cardiogenic causes, or massive head trauma. While resuscitation and/or transport is appropriate for some populations, it is appropriate to withhold or discontinue resuscitation attempts for TOHCA patients for whom these efforts are nonbeneficial. This position statement and resource document were written as an update to the 2013 joint position statements. NAEMSP, ACEP, and ACS-COT recommend.

Adherence to prehospital thoracostomy practice guidelines for traumatic cardiac arrest: A retrospective study

Objectives

The management of traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) focuses on the immediate treatment of reversible causes, including bilateral thoracostomy. In our prehospital emergency service, bilateral thoracostomy has been recommended since 2012 for the management of TCA. We sought to analyse the prehospital management and clinical course of patients with TCA, focusing on changes over time in the use of thoracostomy.

Methods

In this single-centre retrospective observational study, we included patients with TCA managed by physicians of the prehospital service of Lausanne University Hospital from 2012 to 2024. The primary outcome was the annual rate of bilateral thoracostomy. Secondary outcomes included the rate of additional on-site measures, such as pelvic binder placement and airway management, and follow-up at 48 h.

Results

Among 3206 cardiac arrests during the study period, 473 (15%) were TCAs. Among the 247 patients with resuscitation attempts, thoracostomy was judged as indicated in 223 (90%) and performed in 148 (66%). Twenty-seven (18%) patients who had a thoracostomy were alive on arrival at hospital, with 9 (6.1%) still alive at 48 h. The mean annual proportion of patients in whom a thoracostomy was performed was 68% (range 0-100%) and increased significantly over the years (p < 0.001).

Conclusions

The annual rate of thoracostomy in TCA patients increased significantly in the period 2012 to 2024. Larger studies are required to determine the impact of thoracostomy on survival.

Prehospital Trauma Compendium: Traumatic Pneumothorax Care - a position statement and resource document of NAEMSP

Emergency Medical Services (EMS) clinicians manage patients with traumatic pneumothoraces. These may be simple pneumothoraces that are less clinically impactful, or tension pneumothoraces that disturb perfusion, lead to shock, and impart significant risk for morbidity and mortality. Needle thoracostomy is the most common EMS treatment of tension pneumothorax, but despite the potentially life-saving value of needle thoracostomy, reports indicate frequent misapplication of the procedure as well as low rates of successful decompression. This has led some to question the value of prehospital needle thoracostomy and has prompted consideration of alternative approaches to management (e.g., simple thoracostomy, tube thoracostomy). EMS clinicians must determine when pleural decompression is indicated and optimize the safety and effectiveness of the procedure. Further, there is also ambiguity regarding EMS management of open pneumothoraces. To provide evidence-based guidance on the management of traumatic pneumothoraces in the EMS setting, NAEMSP performed a structured literature review and developed the following recommendations supported by the evidence summarized in the accompanying resource document.NAEMSP recommends:EMS identification of a tension pneumothorax must be guided by a combination of risk factors and physical findings, which may be augmented by diagnostic technologies.EMS clinicians should recognize the differences in the clinical presentation of a tension pneumothorax in spontaneously breathing patients and in patients receiving positive pressure ventilation.EMS clinicians should not perform pleural decompression in patients with simple pneumothoraces but should perform pleural decompression in patients with tension pneumothorax, if within the clinician's scope of practice.When within scope of practice, EMS clinicians should use needle thoracostomy as the primary strategy for pleural decompression of tension pneumothorax in most cases. EMS clinicians should take a patient-individualized approach to performing needle thoracostomy, influenced by factors known to impact chest wall thickness and risk for iatrogenic injury.Simple thoracostomy and tube thoracostomy may be used by highly trained EMS clinicians in select clinical settings with appropriate medical oversight and quality assurance.EMS systems must investigate and adopt strategies to confirm successful pleural decompression at the time thoracostomy is performed.Pleural decompression should be performed for patients with traumatic out-of-hospital circulatory arrest (TOHCA) if there are clinical signs of tension pneumothorax or suspicion thereof due to significant thoraco-abdominal trauma. Empiric bilateral decompression, however, is not routinely indicated in the absence of such findings.EMS clinicians should not routinely perform pleural decompression of suspected or confirmed simple pneumothorax prior to air-medical transport in most situations.EMS clinicians may consider placement of a vented chest seal in spontaneously breathing patients with open pneumothoraces.In patients receiving positive pressure ventilation who have open pneumothoraces, chest seals may be harmful and are not recommended.EMS physicians play an important role in developing curricula and leading quality management programs to both ensure that EMS clinicians are properly trained in the recognition and management of tension pneumothorax and to ensure that interventions for tension pneumothorax are performed appropriately, safely, and effectively.

Emergency reflex action drill for traumatic cardiac arrest in a simulated pre-hospital setting; a one-group pre-post intervention study

BACKGROUND

Emergency Reflex Action Drills (ERADs) are meant to decrease stress-associated cognitive demand in high urgency situations. The aim of this study was to develop and test an ERAD for witnessed traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA), an event in which potentially reversible causes need to be systematically addressed and treated in a short period of time. We hypothesize that this ERAD (the TCA-Drill) helps ground Emergency Medical Services (EMS) nurses in overcoming performance decline during this specific high-pressure situation.

METHODS

This was a prospective, experimental one-group pre-post intervention study. Ground EMS nurses participated in a session of four simulated scenarios, with an in-between educational session to teach the TCA-Drill. Scenarios were video recorded, after which adherence and time differences were analyzed. Self-confidence on clinical practice was measured before and after the scenarios.

RESULTS

Twelve ground EMS nurses participated in this study. Overall median time to address reversible causes of TCA decreased significantly using the TCA-Drill (132 vs. 110 s; p = 0.030) compared with the conventional ALS strategy. More specifically, participants adhering to the TCA-Drill showed a significantly lower time needed for hemorrhage control (58 vs. 37 s; p = 0.012). Eight of 12 (67 %) ground EMS nurses performed the ERAD without protocol deviations. Reported self-confidence significantly increased on 11 of the 13 surveyed items.

CONCLUSIONS

The use of an ERAD for TCA (the TCA-Drill) significantly reduces the time to address reversible causes for TCA without delaying chest compressions in a simulated environment and can be easily taught to ground EMS nurses and increases self-confidence.

IMPLICATIONS FOR CLINICAL PRACTICE

The use of an ERAD for TCA (the TCA-Drill can significantly reduce the time to address reversible causes for TCA without delaying chest compression. This drill can be easily taught to ground EMS nurses and increases their self-confidence in addressing TCA-patients.

Impact of the 2015 European guidelines for resuscitation on traumatic cardiac arrest outcomes and prehospital management: A French nationwide interrupted time-series analysis

AIM

To evaluate the impact of the 2015 European Resuscitation Council (ERC) guidelines on patient outcomes following traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) and on advanced life support interventions carried out by physician-staffed ambulances.

METHODS

Data of TCA patients aged ≥18 years were extracted from the French nationwide cardiac arrest registry. A pre- (2011-2015) and a post-publication period (2016-2020) were defined. In the guidelines, a specific TCA management algorithm was introduced to prioritise the treatment of reversible causes. Its impact was evaluated using adjusted interrupted time series analysis.

RESULTS

4,980 patients were treated (2,145 during the pre-publication period and 2,739 during the post-publication period). There was no significant change in the rates of prehospital ROSC (22.4% vs. 20.2%, p = 0.07 in the pre- and post- intervention respectively), survival (1.4% vs. 1.4%, p = 0.87) or good neurological outcome (71.4% vs. 66.7%, p = 0.93) or in the incidence of organ donation (1.6% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.50). There were nonsignificant changes in the adjusted temporal trend for ROSC (aOR 0.88; 95% CI [0.77; 1.00]), survival (aOR 1.34; 95% CI [0.83;2.17]), good neurological outcome (aOR 1.57; 95% CI [0.82;3.05]), and organ donation (aOR 1.06; 95% CI [0.71;1.60]). The use of intraosseous catheters (13.0% vs. 19.2%, p < 0.001), external haemorrhage control measures (23.9% vs. 64.8%, p < 0.001), bilateral chest decompression (13.7% vs. 16.5%, p = 0.009), and packed red cell transfusion (2.7% vs. 6.5%, p < 0.001) increased in the post-publication period.

CONCLUSIONS

Despite the increased frequency of trauma rescue interventions performed by on-scene physicians, no change in patient-centred outcomes was associated with the publication of the 2015 ERC guidelines in France.

Cardiac Arrest Management in the Workplace: Improving but Not Enough?

The aim was to describe out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) occurring in the workplace of a large emergency network, and compare the evolution of their management in the last 15 years. A retrospective study based on data from the Northern Alps Emergency Network compared characteristics of OHCA between cases in and out the workplace, and between cases occurring from January 2004 to December 2010 and from January 2011 to December 2017. Among the 15,320 OHCA cases included, 320 occurred in the workplace (2.1%). They were more often in younger men, and happened more frequently in an area with access to public defibrillation, had more often a shockable rhythm, had a cardiopulmonary resuscitation started by a bystander more frequently, and had a better outcome. Cardiopulmonary resuscitation started by a bystander was the only chain of survival link that improved for cases occurring after December 2010. Workplace OHCA seems to be managed more effectively than others; however, only a slight survival improvement was observed, suggesting that progress is still needed.

Prehospital care for traumatic cardiac arrest in the US: A cross-sectional analysis and call for a national guideline

AIM

We describe emergency medical services (EMS) protocols and prehospital practice patterns related to traumatic cardiac arrest (TCA) management in the U.S.

METHODS

We examined EMS management of TCA by 1) assessing variability in recommended treatments in state EMS protocols for TCA and 2) analyzing EMS care using a nationwide sample of EMS activations. We included EMS activations involving TCA in adult (≥18 years) patients where resuscitation was attempted by EMS. Descriptive statistics for recommended and actual treatments were calculated and compared between blunt and penetrating trauma using χ² and independent 2-group Mann-Whitney U tests.

RESULTS

There were 35 state EMS protocols publicly available for review, of which 16 (45.7%) had a specific TCA protocol and 17 (48.5%) had a specific termination of resuscitation protocol for TCA. Recommended treatments varied. We then analyzed 9,565 EMS activations involving TCA (79.1% blunt, 20.9% penetrating). Most activations (93%) were managed by advanced life support. Return of spontaneous circulation was achieved in 25.5% of activations, and resuscitation was terminated by EMS in 26.4% of activations. Median prehospital scene time was 16.4 minutes; scene time was shorter for penetrating mechanisms than blunt (12.0 vs 17.0 min, p < 0.001). Endotracheal intubation was performed in 32.0% of activations, vascular access obtained in 66.6%, crystalloid fluids administered in 28.8%, and adrenaline administered in 60.1%.

CONCLUSION

Actual and recommended approaches to EMS treatment of TCA vary nationally. These variations in protocols and treatments highlight the need for a standardized approach to prehospital management of TCA in the U.S.

Prehospital predictors for return of spontaneous circulation in traumatic cardiac arrest

BACKGROUND

Traumatic cardiac arrests (TCAs) are associated with high mortality and the majority of deaths occur at the prehospital scene. The aim of the present study was to assess, in a prehospital physician-led emergency medical system, the factors associated with sustained return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC) in TCA, including advanced life procedures. The secondary objectives were to assess factors associated with 30-day survival in TCA, evaluate neurological recovery in survivors, and describe the frequency of organ donation among patients experiencing a TCA.

METHODS

We conducted a retrospective study of all TCA patients included in the French nationwide cardiac arrest registry from July 2011 to November 2020. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was used to identify factors independently associated with ROSC.

RESULTS

A total of 120,045 out-of-hospital cardiac arrests were included in the registry, among which 4,922 TCA were eligible for analysis. Return of spontaneous circulation was sustained on-scene in 21.1% (n = 1,037) patients. Factors significantly associated with sustained ROSC were not-asystolic initial rhythms (pulseless electric activity (odds ratio [OR], 1.81; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.40-2.35; p < 0.001), shockable rhythm (OR, 1.83; 95% CI, 1.12-2.98; p = 0.016), spontaneous activity (OR, 3.66; 95% CI, 2.70-4.96; p < 0.001), and gasping at the mobile medical team (MMT) arrival (OR, 1.40; 95% CI, 1.02-1.94; p = 0.042). The MMT interventions significantly associated with ROSC were as follows: intravenous fluid resuscitation (OR, 3.19; 95% CI, 2.69-3.78; p < 0.001), packed red cells transfusion (OR, 2.54; 95% CI, 1.84-3.51; p < 0.001), and external hemorrhage control (OR, 1.74; 95% CI, 1.31-2.30; p < 0.001). Among patients who survived (n = 67), neurological outcome at Day 30 was favorable (cerebral performance categories 1-2) in 72.2% cases (n = 39/54) and 1.4% (n = 67/4,855) of deceased patients donated one or more organ.

CONCLUSION

Sustained ROSC was frequently achieved in patients not in asystole at MMT arrival, and higher ROSC rates were achieved in patients benefiting from specific advanced life support interventions. Organ donation was somewhat possible in TCA patients undergoing on-scene resuscitation.

LEVEL OF EVIDENCE

Prognostic and epidemiologic, Level III.

Resuscitation highlights in 2021

BACKGROUND

This review is the latest in a series of regular annual reviews undertaken by the editors and aims to highlight some of the key papers published in Resuscitation during 2021.

METHODS

Hand-searching by the editors of all papers published in Resuscitation during 2021. Papers were selected based on then general interest and novelty and were categorised into themes.

RESULTS

98 papers were selected for brief mention.

CONCLUSIONS

Resuscitation science continues to evolve and incorporates all links in the chain of survival.