Racial and ethnic disparities in the provision of bystander CPR after witnessed out-of-hospital cardiac arrest in the United States

Diversity of CPR manikins for basic life support education: use of manikin sex, race and body shape - a scoping review

BACKGROUND

Cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) manikins typically appear white, lean and male. However, internationally, this does not represent the overall population or those who are at greatest risk of cardiac arrest. Diverse demographic groups including people of colour, women and obese people are known to be less likely to receive bystander CPR, public access defibrillation and suffer less favourable outcomes. It is plausible that failure to represent women, racially diverse and non-lean manikins can contribute to poor clinical outcomes in these populations. The aim of this scoping review was to summarise the current evidence for adaptations of manikins used for layperson Basic Life Support (BLS) training.

METHODS

We searched MEDLINE, Embase, PsycINFO, CINAHL, ERIC, Web of Science, Infromit, Scopus and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials to identify all empirical studies describing or evaluating CPR manikin diversity. Data on participant characteristics, manikin adaptations, study design, and key findings of included studies describing or evaluating CPR manikin diversity were extracted.

RESULTS

Initially, 2719 studies were identified, and 15 studies were finally included and were grouped into (1) studies analysing adaptions of 'standard' manikins used in training (n=11) and (2) studies evaluating CPR manikin diversity used for online learning and on social media (n=4). Six of the studies analysing different adaptations reported the influence of the manikins' sex on comfort in performing CPR, quality of chest compression, automated external defibrillator use and removing clothes; four the effects of obese manikins; and one an ethnically diverse manikin. Seven of the studies used do-it-yourself adaptions. Racial and gender diversity of CPR manikins found in educational videos was limited, with only 5% of educational videos featuring non-white manikins and 1% featuring female manikins.

CONCLUSION

Adaptations of manikins used for BLS CPR training for laypersons still do not represent the diversity of communities most people are living in, internationally. There are hints that using diverse racial manikins has the potential to improve engagement in CPR training. Reported barriers hindering the use of adapted manikins were high costs and availability of these manikins.

Disparities in Emergency Medical Services Termination of Resuscitation Practices for Patients with Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest

OBJECTIVES

There are well-described racial, ethnic, and gender-based inequities following out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). Few studies have analyzed disparities in emergency medical services (EMS) termination of resuscitation (TOR) practices. This purpose of this study was to identify inequities in duration of prehospital resuscitation prior to TOR.

METHODS

A retrospective cohort of adult (≥18 years-old), non-traumatic OHCA events in a single metropolitan, fire-based EMS system was evaluated. Duration of resuscitation prior to prehospital TOR was separately evaluated among racial/ethnic (Black, Hispanic, and White) and gender (female and male) groups using a multivariable linear regression model. Variables in the model included bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) provision, arrest witnessed status, initial rhythm (shockable versus non-shockable), and patient age. Multiple imputation was used to account for missing data entries where duration of resuscitation was not documented. Incidence of hospital transport between racial/ethnic and gender groups was also assessed.

RESULTS

Between February 1, 2020 and February 28, 2023, 3700 patients met inclusion criteria, of which 1,895 (51.2%) had field TOR and 1,328/1,895 had a documented time of TOR. When controlling for arrest witnessed status, bystander CPR provision, initial shockable rhythm, and subject age, Black race [24.1 min (95% confidence interval 21.2-27.0, p < 0.001)] and Hispanic ethnicity [23.7 min (95% CI 20.0-27.5, p = 0.03)] were associated with shorter duration of resuscitation compared to White race [25.8 min (95% CI 23.9-27.7)]. These racial inequities persisted when using multiple imputation modeling. There was no difference in duration of resuscitation between female [24.3 min (95% CI 22.4-26.2)] and male gender [24.7 min (95% CI 21.8-27.5), p = 0.46]. There were no differences in incidence of hospital transport.

CONCLUSIONS

This study identified inequities in prehospital termination of resuscitation practices following OHCA. Black and Hispanic patients, as compared to White patients, received approximately 2-min-shorter prehospital resuscitative efforts prior to TOR despite controlling for bystander CPR, witnessed status, initial rhythm, and patient age. There were no gender-based differences in prehospital duration of resuscitation.

Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest in Apparently Healthy, Young Adults

Importance

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest incidence in apparently healthy adults younger than 40 years ranges from 4 to 14 per 100 000 person-years worldwide. Of an estimated 350 000 to 450 000 total annual out-of-hospital cardiac arrests in the US, approximately 10% survive.

Observations

Among young adults who have had cardiac arrest outside of a hospital, approximately 60% die before reaching a hospital (presumed sudden cardiac death), approximately 40% survive to hospitalization (resuscitated sudden cardiac arrest), and 9% to 16% survive to hospital discharge (sudden cardiac arrest survivor), of whom approximately 90% have a good neurological status (Cerebral Performance Category 1 or 2). Autopsy-based studies demonstrate that 55% to 69% of young adults with presumed sudden cardiac death have underlying cardiac causes, including sudden arrhythmic death syndrome (normal heart by autopsy, most common in athletes) and structural heart disease such as coronary artery disease. Among young adults, noncardiac causes of cardiac arrest outside of a hospital may include drug overdose, pulmonary embolism, subarachnoid hemorrhage, seizure, anaphylaxis, and infection. More than half of young adults with presumed sudden cardiac death had identifiable cardiovascular risk factors such as hypertension and diabetes. Genetic cardiac disease such as long QT syndrome or dilated cardiomyopathy may be found in 2% to 22% of young adult survivors of cardiac arrest outside of the hospital, which is a lower yield than for nonsurvivors (13%-34%) with autopsy-confirmed sudden cardiac death. Persons resuscitated from sudden cardiac arrest should undergo evaluation with a basic metabolic profile and serum troponin; urine toxicology test; electrocardiogram; chest x-ray; head-to-pelvis computed tomography; and bedside ultrasound to assess for pericardial tamponade, aortic dissection, or hemorrhage. Underlying reversible causes, such as ST elevation myocardial infarction, coronary anomaly, and illicit drug or medication overdose (including QT-prolonging medicines) should be treated. If an initial evaluation does not reveal the cause of an out-of-hospital cardiac arrest, transthoracic echocardiography should be performed to screen for structural heart disease (eg, unsuspected cardiomyopathy) or valvular disease (eg, mitral valve prolapse) that can precipitate sudden cardiac death. Defibrillator implant is indicated for young adult sudden cardiac arrest survivors with nonreversible cardiac causes including structural heart disease and arrhythmia syndromes.

Conclusions and Relevance

Cardiac arrest in apparently healthy adults younger than 40 years may be due to inherited or acquired cardiac disease or noncardiac causes. Among young adults who have had cardiac arrest outside of a hospital, only 9% to 16% survive to hospital discharge. Sudden cardiac arrest survivors require comprehensive evaluation for underlying causes of cardiac arrest and cardiac defibrillator should be implanted in those with nonreversible cardiac causes of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.

Temporal Trends in Race and Sex Differences in Cardiac Arrest Mortality in the USA, 1999-2020

BACKGROUND

Cardiac arrest (CA) affects over 600,000 patients in the USA annually. Despite large-scale public health and educational initiatives, survival rates are lower in certain racial and socioeconomic groups.

METHODS

A county-level cross-sectional longitudinal study using death data of patients aged 15 years or more from the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's Wide-Ranging Online Data for Epidemiologic Research (WONDER) database from 1999 to 2020. CAs were identified using the International Classification of Diseases, tenth revision, clinical modification codes.

RESULTS

The CA-related deaths between 1999 and 2020 were 7,710,211 in the entire USA. The annual CA related age-adjusted mortality rates (CA-MR) declined through 2019 (132.9 to 89.7 per 100,000 residents), followed by an increase in 2020 (104.5 per 100,000). White patients constituted 82 % of all deaths and 51 % were female. The overall CA-MR during the study period was 104.48 per 100,000 persons. The CA-MR was higher for men as compared with women (123.5 vs. 89.7 per 100,000) and higher for Black as compared with White adults (154.4 vs. 99.1 per 100,000).

CONCLUSIONS

CA-MR in the overall population has declined, followed by an increase in 2020, which is likely the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic. There were also significant racial and sex differences in mortality rates.

Closing the Gap: Addressing Racial Bias in Bystander CPR Administration

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (BCPR) significantly improves survival rates for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA), yet racial disparities persist. Black and Hispanic individuals are markedly less likely to receive BCPR than White individuals, contributing to preventable deaths and inequities in survival outcomes. Structural factors such as educational barriers, implicit bias, and systemic racism contribute to these disparities. This article examines key contributors to racial disparities in BCPR administration and presents targeted, evidence-based solutions. Educational barriers, including limited CPR training access in historically marginalized communities, low health literacy, and language differences, impede knowledge acquisition and response readiness. Implicit bias among bystanders and first responders influences CPR administration, reinforcing disparities. To address these issues, a multifaceted approach is needed, emphasizing community engagement, culturally responsive training, bias awareness for emergency responders, and policy reforms. Strategies include subsidizing CPR training in underserved communities, developing multilingual and culturally tailored educational materials, integrating CPR instruction into school curricula, and incorporating bias awareness training into first responder certification programs. Additionally, policy interventions should ensure equitable resource allocation to support CPR training and emergency response infrastructure in high-risk communities. Reducing racial disparities in BCPR requires coordinated efforts from policymakers, public health officials, and community stakeholders. Implementing targeted interventions can improve CPR accessibility, enhance response equity, and ultimately reduce preventable mortality among historically disadvantaged populations.

Language barriers in emergency ambulance calls for cardiac arrest: Cases of missing vital information

In medical emergencies, phoning the ambulance service constitutes a high-stakes interaction. Call-takers rely on callers to provide information about the patient so they can promptly recognise the medical problem and take swift action to remedy it. When a language barrier exists between the call-taker and caller, this can add a further challenge, given that third-party interpreters are rarely engaged, especially for time-critical conditions such as cardiac arrest. Research in cardiac arrest calls has found that language barrier calls experience longer delays to critical points such as recognition of cardiac arrest and commencement of resuscitation. This study aimed to understand, in the absence of interpreters, the interactional challenges that emerged in language barrier emergency calls, as parties worked to communicate the nature of the medical problem. Based on a critical conversation analysis approach, we conducted fine-grained analysis of interactions in audio recordings and transcripts of 33 language barrier calls from an Australian ambulance service in 2019. We found that call takers regularly failed to recognise that the patient had a cardiac arrest. Non-fluent-English callers often provided vital information about the patient, which could have led to cardiac arrest recognition by the call-taker, however such information was missed if it was delivered in an unsolicited or atypical way. Opportunities to recognise cardiac arrest were also missed when call-takers did not probe further after such information was provided or did not provide enough interactional space for callers to complete their turns. We found that the main reason for delays in recognising cardiac arrest was a lack of mutual understanding, which most of the time seemed to remain unbeknownst to participants. The study makes recommendations for emergency medical dispatch centres to cater for language barrier calls, with the goal of fostering a more inclusive prehospital care system and addressing health disparities for non-fluent-English speakers.

Social determinants of health and their associations with outcomes in pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A national study of the NEMSIS database

Background

Social determinants of health (SDOH) impact health disparities, though little is known about the effects of SDOH on pediatric out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (POHCA).

Methods

This cross-sectional study utilized the NEMSIS Database to obtain nationwide POHCA data from 2021 to 2023. Outcomes included performance of bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), automated external defibrillator (AED) usage, and obtainment of return of spontaneous circulation (ROSC). SDOH data was obtained from the US Census Bureau and included minority race/ethnicities status, poverty levels, and educational attainment of the community where POCHAs occurred. Multivariable logistic regression and Cochran-Armitage trend tests were used to assess associations between SDOH and POHCA outcomes.

Results

Query of the NEMSIS Database yielded 27,137 POHCAs. The odds of CPR performance and obtainment of ROSC were significantly higher (p < 0.001) in communities with lower levels of minority races/ethnicities. The odds of bystander CPR, AED usage, and obtainment of ROSC all increased significantly (p < 0.001) in the wealthiest communities compared to the poorest communities. The odds of bystander AED usage (p = 0.001) and ROSC (p = 0.003) were significantly higher in communities with the highest educational attainment. As the minority status and poverty level of the community increased and educational attainment decreased, there was a significant decreasing trend (p < 0.001) in performance of bystander CPR, AED usage, and obtainment of ROSC.

Conclusions

Community-level SDOH, including increasing community minority status, poverty levels, and decreasing educational attainment, are associated with less bystander CPR, AED usage, and ROSC obtainment in POHCAs. Understanding SDOH offers opportunities for public health interventions addressing disparities in POHCA outcomes.

Training experience is an important factor affecting willingness for bystander CPR and awareness of AED: a survey of residents from a province in Central China in 2023

Background

Bystander cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and the use of automated external defibrillators (AEDs) may improve survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of CPR training experience and sociodemographic characteristics on bystander CPR willingness and AED awareness.

Methods

In this study, a questionnaire survey was conducted among 3,569 residents in central China. Descriptive statistics, multiple linear regression and multivariate logistic regression modeling were used to investigate the effect of training experience and sociodemographic characteristics on knowledge of cardiac arrest first aid, awareness of AEDs, and willingness for bystander CPR.

Results

Of the 3,569 participants, nearly 52% were female, 69.6% were < 23 years old, 23.5% had CPR training and 22.1% had witnessed OHCA. Characteristics of increasing bystander CPR willingness included CPR training experience, male, witnessed OHCA but not acting, knowing whether family members have cardiac disease, older age (>40 years) and lower level of education. Farmers were the subgroup with the least awareness of AED and knowledge of first aid.

Conclusion

In China, CPR training experience was an important factor in improving bystanders' CPR willingness, AED awareness and knowledge of cardiac arrest first aid. Additionally, having witnessed OHCA also had a positive effect on bystander CPR willingness.

"Dead or Alive?" Assessment of the Binary End-of-Event Outcome Indicator for the NEMSIS Public Research Dataset

OBJECTIVES

The National Emergency Medical Services Information System (NEMSIS) provides a robust set of data to evaluate prehospital care. However, a major limitation is that the vast majority of the records lack a definitive outcome. This study aimed to evaluate the performance of a recently proposed method ("MLB" method) to impute missing end-of-EMS-event outcomes ("dead" or "alive") for patient care reports in the NEMSIS public research dataset.

METHODS

This study reproduced the recently published method for patient outcome imputation in the NEMSIS database and replicated the results for years 2017 through 2022 (n = 686,075). We performed statistical analyses leveraging an array of established performance metrics for binary classification from the machine learning literature. Evaluation metrics included overall accuracy, true positive rate, true negative rate, balanced accuracy, precision, F1 score, Cohen's Kappa coefficient, Matthews' coefficient, Hamming loss, the Jaccard similarity score, and the receiver operating characteristic/area under the curve.

RESULTS

Extended metrics show consistently good imputation performance from year-to-year but reveal weakness in accurately indicating the minority class: e.g., after adjustments for conflicting labels, "dead" prediction accuracy is 77.7% for 2018 and 61.8% over the six-year NEMSIS sub-sample, even though overall accuracy is 98.8%. Slight over-fitting is also present.

CONCLUSIONS

This study found that the recently published MLB method produced reasonably good "dead" or "alive" indicators. We recommend reporting of True Positive Rate ("dead" prediction accuracy) and True Negative Rate ("alive" prediction accuracy) when applying the imputation method for analyses of NEMSIS data. More attention by EMS clinicians to complete documentation of target NEMSIS elements can further improve the method's performance.

Health inequalities in cardiopulmonary resuscitation and use of automated electrical defibrillators in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest

Out of hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA) outcomes can be improved by strengthening the chain of survival, namely prompt cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED). However, provision of bystander CPR and AED use remains low due to individual patient factors ranging from lack of education to socioeconomic barriers and due to lack of resources such as limited availability of AEDs in the community. Although the impact of health inequalities on survival from OHCA is documented, it is imperative that we identify and implement strategies to improve public health and outcomes from OHCA overall but with a simultaneous emphasis on making care more equitable. Disparities in CPR delivery and AED use in OHCA exist based on factors including sex, education level, socioeconomic status, race and ethnicity, all of which we discuss in this review. Most importantly, we discuss the barriers to AED use, and strategies on how these may be overcome.

Racial and ethnic disparities in bystander resuscitation for out-of-hospital cardiac arrests

INTRODUCTION

Bystander-provided cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CRP) influences the survival rates of out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCAs). Disparities on bystander resuscitation measures between Black, Hispanic, Asians and Non-Hispanic White OHCAs is unclear. Examining racial and ethnic differences in bystander resuscitations is essential to better target interventions.

METHODS

15,542 witnessed OHCAs were identified between April 1, 2011, and June 30, 2015 using the Resuscitation Outcomes Consortium Epidemiologic Registry 3, a multi-center, controlled trial about OHCAs in the United States and Canada. Multivariable logistic regression model was used to analyze the differences in bystander resuscitation (bystander CRP [B-CPR], CPR plus ventilation, automated external defibrillators/defibrillator application [B-AED/D], or delivery of shocks) and clinical outcomes (death at the scene or en route, return of spontaneous circulation upon first arrival at the emergency department [ROSC-ED], survival until ED discharge [S-ED], survival until hospital discharge [S-HOS], and favorable neurological outcome at discharge) between Black, Hispanic, or Asian victims and Non-Hispanic White victims.

RESULTS

Compared to OHCA victims in Non-Hispanic Whites, Black, Hispanic, and Asians were less likely to receive B-CPR (adjusted OR: 0.79; 95 % CI: 0.63-0.99), and B-AED/D (adjusted OR: 0.80; 95 % CI: 0.65-0.98) in public locations. And, Black, Hispanic, and Asian OHCAs were less likely to receive bystander resuscitation in street/highway locations and public buildings, and less likely to have better clinical outcomes, including ROSC-ED, S-ED and S-HOS.

CONCLUSION

Black, Hispanic and Asian victims with witnessed OHCAs are less likely to receive bystander resuscitation and more likely to get worse outcomes than Non-Hispanic White victims.

Out-of-hospital cardiac arrest outcomes when law enforcement arrives before emergency medical services

BACKGROUND

Law enforcement (LE) professionals are often dispatched to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests (OHCA) to provide early cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and automated external defibrillator (AED) application with mixed evidence of a survival benefit. Our objective was to comprehensively evaluate LE care in OHCA.

METHODS

This is a secondary analysis of adults with non-traumatic OHCA not witnessed by EMS and without bystander AED use from 2018-2021. Our primary outcome was survival with Cerebral Perfusion Category score ≤ 2 (functional survival). Our exposures included: LE On-scene Only (without providing care); LE CPR Only (without applying an AED); LE Ideal Care (ensuring CPR and AED application). Our control group had no LE arrival before EMS. We performed multivariable logistic regression analyses adjusting for confounders and stratified our analyses by patients with and without bystander CPR.

RESULTS

There were 2569 adult, non-traumatic OHCAs from 2018-2021 meeting inclusion criteria. There were no differences in the odds of functional survival for LE On-scene Only (adjusted odds ratio [95% CI]: 1.28 [0.47-3.45]), LE CPR Only (1.26 [0.80-1.99]), or LE Ideal Care (1.36 [0.79-2.33]). In patients without bystander CPR, LE Ideal Care had significantly higher odds of functional survival (2.01 [1.06-3.81]) compared to no LE on-scene, with no significant associations for LE On-scene Only or LE CPR Only. There were no significant differences by LE care in patients already receiving bystander CPR.

CONCLUSIONS

LE arrival before EMS and ensuring both CPR and AED application is associated with significantly improved functional survival in OHCA patients not already receiving bystander CPR.