[Prognosis of post-irradiation soft-tissue sarcoma: case-control study]

Angiosarcoma associated with radiation therapy after treatment of breast cancer. Retrospective study on ten years

PURPOSE

The breast sarcoma induced by radiation therapy is rare but increasing, given the increased long-term survival of patients receiving radiation therapy. Fibrosarcoma, histiocytofibroma and angiosarcoma are the most common breast sarcoma. Angiosarcoma is the most common after breast cancer treated by radiation therapy, often diagnosed too late, with a severe prognosis and a high rate of recurrence. However, because of the low incidence of angiosarcoma associated with radiation therapy (AAR), the benefit of radiation therapy in breast cancer treatment outweighs the risk to develop angiosarcoma. The aim of this study is to evaluate these rare cases of AAR diagnosed in eastern Belgium in comparison to the data from the literature.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

Nine cases of AAR after radiation for breast ductal carcinoma were included in this retrospective study. AAR was diagnosed according to Cahan criteria between January 2007 and December 2016. Latency, incidence, management and prognosis are comparable to the literature.

RESULTS, CONCLUSION

The median latency was 10 (4-24) years, the incidence of AAR in the East Belgian area was 0.09% of the patients irradiated on the same period. Patients were treated by surgery with wide local excision with or without reconstructive surgery, without radiotherapy and chemotherapy treatment. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed median overall survival of 61.8 months, patient survival of 55.6% at one year and 29.6% at five years. With the constant progress of medicine and its technologies, it would be possible to limit the occurrence of AAR or to diagnose it at an earlier stage.

The impact of antecedent primary malignancy in soft tissue sarcoma patients

BACKGROUND

It is unclear whether antecedent primary malignancies (APMs) have any negative impact on the prognosis of soft tissue sarcoma (STS). We retrospectively reviewed STS patients with APMs (STS-APM) and compared their survival to those of STS only (STS-O).

METHODS

Twenty-one cases of STS-APM from 2008 to 2017 in our institution were analyzed. One hundred and seventy cases of STS-O at the same period were compared as a control group. Overall survival was estimated using Kaplan-Meier survival curves and prognostic factors were analyzed using logistic regression analyses and contingency table analyses.

RESULTS

As the final status of STS-APM patients, 12 patients were in disease-free survival, 5 were alive with disease, 3 have died of disease, and 1 has died of another disease. There was no case that died of APM. The 5-year overall survival rates were 88% in STS-APM and 78% in STS-O, showing no statistical significant ( p = 0.65). The 5-year overall survival rates in each stage of STS-APM and STS-O were 100/100% in stage I, 100/85% in stage II, 86/72% in stage III, and the 3-year overall survival rates were 67/51% in stage IV, with no statistical significance. With regard to prognostic factor, histological grade of STS was the only significant factor. Although antecedent radiotherapy tended to show a high odds ratio, the association was not statistically significant. Antecedent chemotherapy did not show any estimated prognostic risk.

CONCLUSIONS

Our study suggested that APM in STS patient would not be a negative prognostic factor.

Radiation-induced osteosarcoma of the maxilla and mandible after radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma

Background

The increasing incidence of radiation-induced osteosarcoma of the maxilla and mandible (RIOSM) has become a significant problem that can limit long-term survival. The purpose of this study was to analyze the association of clinicopathologic characteristics with treatment outcomes and prognostic factors of patients who developed RIOSM after undergoing radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC).

Methods

We reviewed the medical records of 53,760 NPC patients admitted to Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center during the period August 1964 to August 2012. Of these patients, 47 who developed RISOM and met inclusion criteria were included in this study. Two of these 47 patients refused treatment and were then excluded.

Results

For all patients treated for NPC at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center during the study period, the total incidence of RIOSM after radiotherapy was 0.084% (47/53,760). Two patients (4.4%) had metastases at the diagnosis of RIOSM. Thirty-nine of the 45 (86.7%) patients underwent surgery for RIOSM; most patients (24/39; 61.5%) who underwent resection had gross clear margins, with 15 patients (38.5%) having either a gross or microscopic positive margin. All patients died. The 1-, 2-, and 3-year overall survival (OS) rates for the entire cohort of 45 patients were 53.3%, 35.6% and 13.5%, respectively. The independent prognostic factors associated with high OS rate were tumor size and treatment type.

Conclusions

RISOM after radiotherapy for NPC is aggressive and often eludes early detection and timely intervention. Surgery combined with postoperative chemotherapy might be an effective treatment to improve patient survival.

Prognosis of Fibrosarcoma in Patients With and Without a History of Radiation for Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma

PURPOSE

To determine whether radiation-induced fibrosarcoma (RIF) in patients with a history of radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) was associated with an inferior prognosis compared to sporadic fibrosarcoma of the head and neck.

METHODS

Forty-two patients with RIF who previously received radiotherapy for NPC and 124 patients with sporadic fibrosarcoma of the head and neck were identified between January 1965 and December 2013 at our institution. Information on clinicopathologic characteristics and treatment was abstracted from medical records. The primary end point was disease-specific survival (DSS).

RESULTS

The median latency from NPC diagnosis to RIF diagnosis was 9.9 years (range 3.1-36.8 years). RIF was diagnosed at an older age than sporadic fibrosarcoma. Treatment modality was significantly different between the two groups, with only 64.3 % of the RIF group receiving surgery ± adjuvant treatment versus 91.1 % in the sporadic fibrosarcoma group (P < 0.001). Patients with RIF had poorer 5-year DSS compared to the sporadic fibrosarcoma group (36.2 vs. 50.4 %; P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis of the combined group indicated that patient group (P = 0.032), tumor, node, metastasis classification system stage (P = 0.019), histologic grade (P = 0.046) and treatment modality (P < 0.001) were independent variables affecting DSS.

CONCLUSIONS

Compared to patients with sporadic fibrosarcoma, NPC survivors who develop RIF are older at diagnosis of fibrosarcoma and have an inferior prognosis.

Why do patients with radiation-induced sarcomas have a poor sarcoma-related survival?

BACKGROUND

This study aims to provide reasons for the poor sarcoma-related survival in patients with radiation-induced sarcoma (RIS).

METHODS

We performed a case-control study comparing sarcoma-related survival of 98 patients with RIS to that of 239 sporadic high-grade malignant sarcomas.

RESULTS

The cumulative sarcoma-related 5-year survival was 32% (95% confidence interval (CI): 22-42) for patients with RIS vs 51% (95% CI: 44-58) for controls (P<0.001). Female gender, central tumour site and incomplete surgical remission were significantly more frequent among RIS patients than in controls. In multivariate analysis incomplete surgical remission (hazard ratio (HR) 4.48, 95% CI: 3.08-6.52), metastases at presentation (HR 2.93, 95% CI: 1.95-4.41), microscopic tumour necrosis (HR 1.88, 95% CI: 1.27-2.78) and central tumour site (HR 1.71, 95% CI: 1.18-2.47) remained significant adverse prognostic factors, but not sarcoma category (RIS vs sporadic).

CONCLUSION

The poor prognosis of RIS patients are not due to the previous radiotherapy per se, but related to the unfavourable factors - central tumour site, incomplete surgical remission, microscopic tumour necrosis and the presence of metastases, the two former factors overrepresented in RIS.

Radiation-induced olfactory neuroblastoma: a new etiology is possible

PURPOSE

Radiation-induced olfactory neuroblastoma (ONB) is an uncommon neoplasm that is generally associated with a poor prognosis. We describe a new case of olfactory neuroblastoma in a patient previously treated for astrocytoma with holocranial radiotherapy 9 years ago.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

We reviewed the medical records of four patients with radiation-induced olfactory neuroblastoma between 2001 and 2009.

RESULTS

This work supports the idea that ONB can be induced by radiation.

CONCLUSIONS

As radiotherapy is a standard treatment in other tumors, clinicians must be aware of the possibility of a second tumor induced by radiation.

Postirradiation osteosarcoma of the maxilla: a case report and current review of literature

Background. Radiation-induced sarcomas are well-known potential late sequelae of radiation therapy. They are of rare occurrence in jaw bones and are even rarer in the maxilla. Case report. We report a case of radiation-induced osteosarcoma involving the maxilla in a patient treated with radiotherapy for nasopharyngeal carcinoma 14 years ago. Despite neoadjuvant chemotherapy, surgical treatment could not be performed, and the patient received palliative chemotherapy. Conclusions. Radiation-induced osteosarcomas are aggressive and often elude early detection and timely intervention, rapidly leading to early demise of afflicted patients. Long-term patient follow-up and a high index of suspicion are crucial for timely intervention.