Impact d’une évaluation des pratiques professionnelles sur la pertinence des prescriptions d’inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons à l’hôpital

Intervention study for the reduction of medication errors in elderly trauma patients

OBJECTIVE

To analyse the impact of a set of measures designed by a working group to reduce medication errors (MEs) during the care transition of elderly trauma patients. The secondary objectives were to classify MEs and determine their location.

METHODS

A 43-month pre-post prospective intervention study in a university hospital. A working group was set up in the Trauma Service. A pharmacist analysed the pharmacotherapeutic processes of all patients admitted to the Trauma Service in different healthcare locations from Monday to Friday. To detect MEs, the pharmacist reviewed this process at the following points: reconciliation, prescription, validation, dispensing, and administration records. Errors were classified according to the Ruiz Jarabo classification. Subsequently, the working group designed a set of measures that were implemented with the incorporation into the Acute Care Team and the intervention of a pharmacist. Data on MEs were again collected in a post-implementation phase.

RESULTS

There was a statistically significant reduction in MEs between phases. A total of 132 (31.3%) patients experienced MEs during the pre-implementation phase and 75 (16.2%) during the post-implementation phase. Among the measures implemented, the incorporation of the pharmacist to the team, as well as training sessions and design of medication protocols. During the pre-implementation and post-implementation phases, the ME rates were respectively as follows: reconciliation 31.6% (172) vs 14.8% (91); prescription 7.7% (79) vs 1.9% (23); dispensing 1% (10) vs 0.3% (3); administration record 0.4% (4) vs 0.0% (0); and validation 0.3% (3) vs 0.1% (1). There were significant reductions in reconciliation, prescription, and dispensing errors. The majority of the MEs occurred in the Trauma Service.

CONCLUSIONS

The implementation of specific measures by a Multidisciplinary Safety Group reduced MEs in the care transition of elderly trauma patients, particularly those MEs that occurred during reconciliation. The greatest reduction in MEs occurred in the Trauma Service.

Upper gastrointestinal safety of oral bisphosphonate in hospitalized patients

Oral bisphosphonates are effective medications for the prevention of fractures in people suffering from osteoporosis. They are associated with gastrointestinal adverse reactions the most severe being an esophageal ulcer. It is unclear if oral bisphosphonates have a similar gastrointestinal safety profile in the hospital setting as in the community setting because hospitalized patients are often bedridden which may hinder proper drug administration.

INTRODUCTION

To evaluate the incidence of upper gastrointestinal symptoms in hospitalized patients taking oral bisphosphonate.

METHODS

This single-center prospective cohort study included hospitalized adult patients actively taking risedronate or alendronate. Upper gastrointestinal symptoms were actively assessed at the baseline and 1 to 5 h following the administration of the oral bisphosphonate.

RESULTS

A total of 298 patients were included in the study. The mean age was 64 ± 15 years. During the follow-up period, gastric and esophageal symptoms affected 32 patients (10.7%). Epigastric burning, dysphagia, and regurgitation were reported in 4.4% (n = 13), 3% (n = 9), 2.7 (n = 8), and 2.3% (n = 7) patients, respectively. Heartburn, retro-sternal pain, and odynophagia were observed in 1.7% (n = 5), 1.7% (n = 5), and 0.3% (n = 1) patients.

CONCLUSION

The incidence of adverse reaction was similar to that reported in community trials. The administration of oral bisphosphonate in hospitalized patients does not represent an additional risk for upper gastrointestinal adverse events. Treatment should be optimized during the hospital stay to improve the pharmacological management of osteoporosis.

[Evaluation of the implantation of a de-prescribing process for proton pump inhibitor (PPI) using an algorithm within an internal medicine department]

INTRODUCTION

The prescription of proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) seems excessive. Taken over the long term, PPIs can cause serious side effects. It therefore turns out to be justified to suspend treatments whose expected benefit seems too low compared to the risks involved : it is deprescription. The objective of this study is to assess a process for the deprescription of PPIs in a hospital internal medicine department.

METHOD

After collegial deliberation, an algorithm for assisting in the deprescription of PPIs was validated. If necessary, the PPI was phased out over 1 month. A telephone follow-up at 1, 2 and 3 months was carried out in order to assess the maintenance of deprescription and the occurrence of digestive symptoms. The evaluation criteria were the rate of deprescription and the rate of maintenance of deprescription at 3 months following reports from patients, their caregivers or a family member.

RESULTS

105 patients with a mean age of 72 years were included over a period of 21 weeks, and in 31 cases (29%), deprescription was performed. After 3 months of follow-up, there was 71% maintenance of deprescription. Three patients were lost to follow-up and 6 patients resumed PPI.

CONCLUSION

The approach undertaken resulted in the suspension of PPI intake in almost 3 out of 10 cases. This result was maintained at least three months for a large majority of patients. It will be interesting to continue this process and extend the monitoring over longer periods, in order to ensure that PPI de-prescription is maintained in the long term.

[Proton pump inhibitors in pediatrics: Review of the prescriptions' relevance for hospitalised children in a university hospital]

INTRODUCTION

Proton Pump Inhibitors (PPIs) are a pharmacological class designed to reduce the acidity of gastric secretions. They are prescribed for 11 % of the children in our institution.

AIMS

To assess the relevance of PPI prescriptions in pediatrics.

MATERIAL AND METHOD

A clinical audit according to the methodology proposed by the High Authority of Health was carried out between August 27 and August 31, 2018 in the pediatric departments of our institution. The main judgement criteria were the indication of the PPI. The main guidelines are the recommendations of the European society of pediatric gastroenterology, hepatology and nutrition.

RESULTS

Thirty patients were included. The average age was 8.6 years. The indication was compliant in 19 patients. The non-compliant indications were: two ulcer risk preventions related to the prescription of non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs), one endoscopic biopsy, four ulcer risk preventions related to corticosteroid therapy, one hematopoietic stem cell transplantation and three mucositis.

DISCUSSION

The sample of patients included in the study was representative of the pediatric population with PPIs in our institution. The non-conformities identified could be justified in some cases. Only one study reported a compliance rate for PPI indications in pediatrics in the literature. This rate, in the order of 34 %, was much lower than that found in our institution (P<0.01).

CONCLUSION

The respect of the latest recommendations for the prescription of PPIs is quite good. A usage sheet will be diffused to improve the practices.

Relevance of proton pump inhibitors prescriptions in a tertiary care hospital in Lebanon

BACKGROUND AND STUDY AIMS

Studies have shown that PPIs are frequently used in an inappropriate way, above the standard doses, and against the recommendations, leading to adverse events like malabsorption problems, community acquired pneumonia, hip fractures and Clostridium difficile colitis. In Lebanon only one study about the out-patient use of PPI was done in community pharmacies, but in-patient prescription studies are inexistent. Our study will evaluate the use of PPIs in a hospital setting in Lebanon and will compare it to international recommendations.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

A cross-sectional study, conducted in a university hospital in Lebanon (CHU NDS) between June and November 2018, included 186 randomly selected Lebanese inpatient adults.

RESULTS

Less than half of the participants (46.8%) received a PPI for the adequate indication and 83.9% received the adequate PPI molecule, whereas only 9.2% received the adequate dose. The rate of PPI misuse was higher in the surgery ward (59.6%) than in the medicine department (40.4%) (Cardiology, internal medicine, neurology, pneumology, nephrology, infectious diseases, gastro-enterology, rheumatology). Concerning age, 56.3% of the ≥ 65 years old patients were taking PPI for the right indication. However, among those who are < 65 years old, only 43.7% of the prescriptions were recommended. Also adequate PPI indication and adequate choice of drug was mainly noticed in patients having GI history or taking antiplatelet therapy.

CONCLUSION

Our study has shown that a significant amount of PPIs was prescribed inadequately leading to a need to re-evaluate or adjust the use of PPIs among Lebanese physicians.