[3D printing in health care facilities: What legislation in France?]

Approaching 3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery - suggestions for structured clinical standards

PURPOSE

With respect to the European Union 2017 amendment of the Medical Device Regulations (MDR), this overview article presents recommendations concerning medical 3D printing in oral and maxillofacial surgery (OMFS).

METHODS

The MDR were screened for applicability of the rules to medical in-house 3D printing. Applicable regulations were summarized and compared to the status of medical use of 3D printing in OMFS in Germany. Recommendations were made for MDR concerning medical 3D printing.

RESULTS

In-house printed models, surgical guides, and implants fall under the category of Class I-III, depending on their invasive and active properties. In-house medical 3D printing for custom-made medical devices is possible under certain prerogatives: (1) the product is not being used in another facility, (2) appropriate quality systems are applied, (3) the reason for omitting commercial products is documented, (4) information about its use is supplied to the responsible authority, (5) there is a publicly accessible declaration of origin, identification, and conformity to the MDR, (6) there are records of manufacturing site, process and performance data, (7) all products are produced according to the requirements proclaimed before, and (8) there is an evaluation of clinical use and correction of possible issues.

CONCLUSION

Several aspects must be addressed for in house medical 3D printing, according to the MDR. Devising MDR related to medical 3D printing is a growing challenge. The implementation of recommendations in OMFS could help practitioners to overcome the challenges and become aware of the in-house production and application of 3D printed devices.

Fused Deposition Modelling 3D printing and solubility improvement of BCS II and IV active ingredients - A narrative review

In the field of pharmaceutical research and development, Fused Deposition Modelling (FDM) 3D printing (3DP) has aroused growing interest within the last ten years. The use of thermoplastic polymers, combined with the melting process of the raw materials, offers the possibility of manufacturing amorphous solid dispersions (ASDs). In the pharmaceutical industry, the formulation of an ASD is a widely used strategy to improve the solubility of poorly soluble drugs (classified by the Biopharmaceutical Classification System (BCS) as class II and IV). In this review, an analysis of studies that have developed a FDM printed form containing a BCS class II or IV active substance was performed. The focus has been placed on the evaluation of the solid state of the active molecules (crystalline or amorphous) and on the study of their dissolution profile. Thus, the aim of this work is to highlight the interest of FDM 3DP to induce the amorphisation phenomenon of Class II and IV active substances by forming an ASD, and as result improving their solubility.

Legal issues and underexplored data protection in medical 3D printing: A scoping review

Introduction: 3D printing has quickly found many applications in medicine. However, as with any new technology the regulatory landscape is struggling to stay abreast. Unclear legislation or lack of legislation has been suggested as being one hindrance for wide-scale adoption. Methods: A scoping review was performed in PubMed, Web of Science, SCOPUS and Westlaw International to identify articles dealing with legal issues in medical 3D printing. Results: Thirty-four articles fulfilling inclusion criteria were identified in medical/technical databases and fifteen in the legal database. The majority of articles dealt with the USA, while the EU was also prominently represented. Some common unresolved legal issues were identified, among them terminological confusion between custom-made and patient-matched devices, lack of specific legislation for patient-matched products, and the undefined legal role of CAD files both from a liability and from an intellectual property standpoint. Data protection was mentioned only in two papers and seems an underexplored topic. Conclusion: In this scoping review, several relevant articles and several common unresolved legal issues were identified including a need for terminological uniformity in medical 3D printing. The results of this work are planned to inform our own deeper legal analysis of these issues in the future.

3D multi-tissue printing for kidney transplantation

The kidneys are among the most commonly transplanted organs in the world. Transplant patients, as a consequence of their kidney disease and other risk factors which make it difficult for the surgeon to perform vascular anastomosis during kidney transplantation, often have numerous arterial calcifications. The preoperative assessment for transplantation includes an abdominal and pelvic CT scan without contrast that allows for the mapping of atheromatous calcification. However, non-contrast enhanced CT is not optimal and the surgeon is obliged to palpate the arteries during the operation to choose the anatomical site of the vascular anastomosis. This technical note reports the development of a new technique of preoperative reproduction of atherosclerotic arteries, owing to advancements in 3D multi-tissue printing technology. We used scans of four patients with varying degrees of calcified atheroma to model and print their arteries for their pre-surgical planning.