1
|
Alsolami AS. The effectiveness of using artificial intelligence in improving academic skills of school-aged students with mild intellectual disabilities in Saudi Arabia. RESEARCH IN DEVELOPMENTAL DISABILITIES 2024; 156:104884. [PMID: 39631141 DOI: 10.1016/j.ridd.2024.104884] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 11/12/2024] [Revised: 11/23/2024] [Accepted: 11/23/2024] [Indexed: 12/07/2024]
Abstract
WHAT THIS STUDY ADDS Teaching academic skills to students with intellectual disabilities can be a challenge for educators. This study explored the role of AI in the field of special education and provided a novel framework for educational integration of children with mild ID. Interestingly, it demonstrated that using AI-driven interventions could significantly improve academic skills and lead to better learning outcomes. This is crucial, as the holistic approach associated with the "whole child" model of education is prevalent due to the challenges students with ID face in social interactions typically involved in academic socialization. BACKGROUND Intellectual disabilities (ID) are neurodevelopmental disorders that hinder learning, communication, and daily functioning. It negatively impacts learning of academic skills such as match and reading skills. Artificial intelligence (AI) may offer opportunities for these students to improve their academic performance. AIMS To investigate the effectiveness of using AI in improving academic skills in a sample of seventy boys aged 9-12 with mild ID. They were enrolled into special education programs integrated into public schools in the Jeddah region of Saudi Arabia. METHODS Participants were randomly assigned to an experimental and control group. The experimental group received ten 60-minute sessions twice weekly during five weeks, utilizing AI to personalize their academic skills activities. The control group received the educational program without the AI. All participants completed the Woodcock-Johnson IV-achievement test at pre-intervention, post-intervention, and one-month follow-up. RESULTS The experimental group demonstrated significant and sustained improvements in academic performance across all measured domains compared to the control group, with effect sizes ranging from moderate (η² = 0.685) to large (η² = 0.921), underscoring the efficacy of the intervention at post-intervention. CONCLUSIONS AND IMPLICATIONS This study sheds light on the promise of applying AI tools in special education to respond to distinctive needs experienced by students with mild ID. Future studies should investigate the long-term effects of such interventions and their broader applications across diverse educational contexts for inclusive learning.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Abdulaziz S Alsolami
- Department of Special Education, Faculty of Education, King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah 21441, Saudi Arabia.
| |
Collapse
|
2
|
Peng X, Long T, Su X. Preschool Teachers' Attitudes about Inclusive Education and Its Influencing Factors in China. Behav Sci (Basel) 2024; 14:904. [PMID: 39457776 PMCID: PMC11504128 DOI: 10.3390/bs14100904] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 08/30/2024] [Revised: 09/28/2024] [Accepted: 09/30/2024] [Indexed: 10/28/2024] Open
Abstract
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES The purpose of this study is to describe the current status of preschool teachers' attitudes about inclusive education and discuss the factors that influence these attitudes. METHODS A total of 449 preschool teachers who have students with disabilities or special educational needs in their classrooms and 638 teachers without students with disabilities or special educational needs in their classrooms volunteered to complete the online survey. The survey included two components: a Basic Information Questionnaire and the Early Childhood Inclusive Education Attitude Questionnaire (ECIEAQ). Data were analyzed using descriptive statistics, t-tests, and ANOVA. RESULTS Scores in the two dimensions of Positivity and Promotion were higher than those in the two dimensions of Resistance and Passivity, indicating an overall positive attitude about inclusive education. Attitudes about inclusive education significantly differed by gender, preschool location, inclusive education training opportunities, and receipt of a special education financial allowance. Inclusive class teachers who are female, aged over 30, teach classes with a child-to-teacher ratio of more than 14, and who work in urban areas show higher levels of Promotion or Resistance than general class teachers. CONCLUSIONS Overall, preschool teachers hold a positive attitude about inclusive education. Training opportunities and a special education financial allowance should be provided to foster positive attitudes. Certain groups of inclusive class teachers may need more support and resources to implement inclusive education.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Xiaomei Peng
- Department of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
| | - Toby Long
- Center for Child and Human Development, Georgetown University, Washington, DC 20007, USA;
| | - Xueyun Su
- Department of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China;
- Department of Early Childhood Education, Faculty of Education & Changning Maternity and Infant Health Hospital, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China
| |
Collapse
|
4
|
Alhumaid MM, Althikr Allah BA, Alhuwail AA, Alobaid MA, Abu Hamad NN, Alsalman ZA, Alqahtani SS, Alherz AM, Alwael WM, Alhelal AK, Alsubaie SA, Alwarthan MS, Alnaeem FO, Aleid SH, Almuhaisen SY, Alobaydullah AA, Alzamami AR, Alqadiri SA, Alsubhi SH, Alshikh AM, Almazrui KK, Alamer MA, Alfadhel AM, Al-Sari AR, Alqatari RS, Almaghrabi FA, Alfahaid SM, Alhashim JA, Alsalman HA, Almatar AA, Almutiri NM, Bastos T. Physical education teachers' attitudes toward inclusion of students with disabilities in Saudi Arabia. Front Psychol 2022; 13:1006461. [PMID: 36507010 PMCID: PMC9730338 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1006461] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 07/29/2022] [Accepted: 11/07/2022] [Indexed: 11/25/2022] Open
Abstract
The attitudes of physical education (PE) teachers toward inclusion are critical to the successful provision of inclusive teaching for students with disabilities. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the attitudes of Saudi Arabian PE teachers toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in PE classes and the effect of sociodemographic variables (e.g., gender and length of teaching experience) on their attitudes toward inclusion. A total of 1,314 PE teachers (M age = 41.09, SD = 9.40, females = 42.8%) completed the Arabic version of the Sentiments, Attitudes, and Concerns about Inclusive Education-Revised Scale (SACIE-R). Analyses found that, in general, PE teachers had moderately positive attitudes toward the inclusion of students with disabilities in PE lessons. A significant difference was found between the two genders in their attitudes toward inclusion. Specifically, female PE teachers demonstrated more positive attitudes toward inclusion than males. Multiple linear regression analysis, meanwhile, showed that the length of teaching experience and the experience of teaching a student with a disability were significant predictors of participants' attitudes toward inclusion. Our findings highlighted the importance of reconsidering the quality of PE teachers' experiences and interactions with students with disabilities as a means to improving their attitudes, which in turn would translate into successful inclusion.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Majed M. Alhumaid
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia,*Correspondence: Majed M. Alhumaid,
| | - Bashaer A. Althikr Allah
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abeer A. Alhuwail
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maryam A. Alobaid
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Naflah N. Abu Hamad
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Zainab A. Alsalman
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sarah S. Alqahtani
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ayat M. Alherz
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Walla M. Alwael
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Aeshah K. Alhelal
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sheikh A. Alsubaie
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Maryam S. Alwarthan
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fay O. Alnaeem
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shamma H. Aleid
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara Y. Almuhaisen
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Atheer A. Alobaydullah
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Ameera R. Alzamami
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shuaa A. Alqadiri
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Shoug H. Alsubhi
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Abeer M. Alshikh
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Khulud K. Almazrui
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Madhawi A. Alamer
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Afrah M. Alfadhel
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Areej R. Al-Sari
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Reamah S. Alqatari
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Fatema A. Almaghrabi
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Sara M. Alfahaid
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Jailan A. Alhashim
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Hawra A. Alsalman
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Amnah A. Almatar
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Najla M. Almutiri
- Department of Physical Education, College of Education, King Faisal University, Al-Ahsa, Saudi Arabia
| | - Tânia Bastos
- Centre of Research, Education, Innovation, and Intervention in Sport, Faculty of Sport, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
| |
Collapse
|