Early intervention of plasma exchange combined with intensive immunosuppressive treatment for anti-MDA-5 antibody-positive rapidly progressive interstitial pneumonia: Two case reports

Successful Management of Occult Breast Cancer with a Background of Anti-Melanoma Differentiation-Associated Gene 5 Antibody-Positive Interstitial Pneumonia: A Case Report

INTRODUCTION

Anti-MDA5 (melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5) antibody-positive dermatomyositis is a severe subtype of dermatomyositis associated with rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease, which carries an extremely high mortality rate. Prompt diagnosis and therapeutic intervention are crucial for survival. Here, we report a rare case of occult breast cancer in a patient with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive associated interstitial pneumonia. Following the control of the lung disease with immunosuppressive therapy, the patient successfully underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) and curative surgery.

CASE PRESENTATION

A 63-year-old woman presented with progressive dyspnea. Imaging tests revealed diffuse ground-glass opacities in both lungs and enlarged left axillary lymph nodes. Blood tests showed elevated KL-6 levels and anti-MDA5 antibodies. Although no skin lesions or myositis were observed, she was diagnosed with anti-MDA5 antibody-positive associated interstitial pneumonia. Immunosuppressive therapy, including steroid pulse therapy, tacrolimus, cyclophosphamide pulse therapy, and plasma exchange, was initiated, leading to an improvement in her lung condition. She was then initially referred to the department of plastic surgery for further evaluation of the enlarged left axillary lymph node. Excisional biopsy of the enlarged left axillary lymph node revealed triple-negative occult breast cancer (cTXN1M0, Stage IIA). After the patient was referred to our department, NAC was initiated, achieving a clinical partial response while avoiding exacerbation of the interstitial pneumonia. After completing NAC, a left axillary lymph node dissection was performed, and the final pathological diagnosis was ypTXN2aM0 (Stage IIIA). Postoperative radiotherapy was omitted due to the risk of worsening the interstitial lung disease, and capecitabine was administered for 6 months. The patient has remained recurrence-free for 3 years following treatment.

CONCLUSIONS

This case highlights the successful management of triple-negative breast cancer under the constraints of anti-MDA5 antibody-positive associated interstitial pneumonia. To ensure the smooth implementation of breast cancer treatment while controlling interstitial pneumonia, close collaboration with respiratory physicians was essential for a successful outcome.

Early Initiation of Plasma Exchange Therapy for Anti-MDA5+Dermatomyositis with Refractory Rapidly Progressive Interstitial Lung Disease

Objectives Dermatomyositis (DM) is often associated with fatal anti-melanoma differentiation-associated gene 5 (MDA5) antibody-positive rapidly progressive interstitial lung disease (RP-ILD). RP-ILD often fails to respond to intensive treatment and has a poor prognosis. We examined the effectiveness of early plasma exchange therapy plus intensive treatment with high-dose corticosteroids and multiple immunosuppressants. Methods Autoantibodies were identified by an immunoprecipitation assay and enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. All clinical and immunological data were collected retrospectively from medical charts. We divided patients into two groups based on treatment regimen: intensive immunosuppressive therapy alone as initial treatment (IS group) and early initiation of plasma exchange (PE) plus intensive immunosuppressive therapy (ePE group). Early PE therapy was designated if PE therapy was initiated within two weeks of starting treatment. Comparisons of the treatment response and prognosis between groups were performed. Patients Anti-MDA5-positive DM with RP-ILD was screened. Results Forty-four RP-ILD and DM patients had anti-MDA5 antibodies. Four patients were excluded because they died before receiving sufficient combined immunosuppressive therapy or before the evaluation of the immunosuppressive treatment effectiveness (IS, n=31; ePE, n=9). All 9 patients in the ePE group had improved respiratory symptoms and were alive, whereas 12 of 31 patients in the IS group died (100 vs. 61%, p=0.037). Of the 8 patients who had 2 values for a poor prognosis, indicating the highest risk for death using the MCK model, 3 of 3 patients in the ePE group and 2 of 5 in the IS group were alive (100 vs. 40%, p=0.20). Conclusion The early initiation of ePE therapy plus intensive immunosuppressive therapy was effective for patients with DM and refractory RP-ILD.