1
|
Miravitlles M, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Gómez JT, Trigueros JA, Cosío BG, Casanova C, López-Campos JL, Riesco JA, Simonet P, Rigau D, Soriano JB, Ancochea J, Soler-Cataluña JJ. [Translated article] Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021: Updated pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. Arch Bronconeumol 2022. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.03.026] [Citation(s) in RCA: 19] [Impact Index Per Article: 9.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/13/2022]
|
2
|
Miravitlles M, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Gómez JT, Trigueros JA, Cosío BG, Casanova C, López-Campos JL, Riesco JA, Simonet P, Rigau D, Soriano JB, Ancochea J, Soler-Cataluña JJ. Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021: Updated Pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. Arch Bronconeumol 2022; 58:69-81. [PMID: 33840553 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2021.03.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 93] [Impact Index Per Article: 46.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/11/2021] [Revised: 03/02/2021] [Accepted: 03/03/2021] [Indexed: 01/16/2023]
Abstract
The Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) were first published in 2012, and since then have undergone a series of updates incorporating new evidence on the diagnosis and treatment of COPD. GesEPOC was drawn up in partnership with scientific societies involved in the treatment of COPD and the Spanish Patients' Forum. Their recommendations are based on an evaluation of the evidence using GRADE methodology, and a narrative description of the evidence in areas in which GRADE cannot be applied. In this article, we summarize the recommendations on the pharmacological treatment of stable COPD based on 9 PICO questions. COPD treatment is a 4-step process: 1) diagnosis, 2) determination of the risk level, 3) initial and subsequent inhaled therapy, and 4) identification and management of treatable traits. For the selection of inhaled therapy, high-risk patients are divided into 3 phenotypes: non-exacerbator, eosinophilic exacerbator, and non-eosinophilic exacerbator. Some treatable traits are general and should be investigated in all patients, such as smoking or inhalation technique, while others affect severe patients in particular, such as chronic hypoxemia and chronic bronchial infection. COPD treatment is based on long-acting bronchodilators with single agents or in combination, depending on the patient's risk level. Eosinophilic exacerbators must receive inhaled corticosteroids, while non-eosinophilic exacerbators require a more detailed evaluation to choose the best therapeutic option. The new GesEPOC also includes recommendations on the withdrawal of inhaled corticosteroids and on indications for alpha-1 antitrypsin treatment. GesEPOC offers a more individualized approach to COPD treatment tailored according to the clinical characteristics of patients and their level of complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Miravitlles
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Vall d'Hebron Institut de Recerca (VHIR), Vall d'Hebron Barcelona Hospital Campus, Barcelona, España; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España.
| | - Myriam Calle
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos. Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid. Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, España
| | | | - Pere Almagro
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, España
| | | | | | - Borja G Cosío
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, España
| | - Ciro Casanova
- Servicio de Neumología-Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario Nuestra Señora de La Candelaria. Universidad de La Laguna, Tenerife, España
| | - José Luis López-Campos
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Unidad Médico-Quirúrgica de Enfermedades Respiratorias, Instituto de Biomedicina de Sevilla (IBiS). Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío/Universidad de Sevilla, Sevilla, España
| | - Juan Antonio Riesco
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital San Pedro de Alcántara, Cáceres, España
| | - Pere Simonet
- Centro de Salud Viladecans-2, Atención Primaria Costa de Ponent-Institut Català de la Salut. Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Departament de Ciències Clíniques, Universitat Barcelona, Barcelona, España
| | - David Rigau
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Barcelona, España
| | - Joan B Soriano
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Julio Ancochea
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| | - Juan José Soler-Cataluña
- CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, España; Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Arnau de Vilanova-Lliria, Valencia, España
| |
Collapse
|
3
|
Spanish COPD guidelines (GesEPOC) 2021: Updated pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2021. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arbr.2021.03.014] [Citation(s) in RCA: 12] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
4
|
Li C, Zhou Y, Liu S, Zheng M, Zheng J, Peng H, Deng Z, Zhong N, Ran P. Tiotropium discontinuation in patients with early-stage COPD: a prospective observational cohort study. ERJ Open Res 2019; 5:00175-2018. [PMID: 30792986 PMCID: PMC6378343 DOI: 10.1183/23120541.00175-2018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 8] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Download PDF] [Figures] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 10/02/2018] [Accepted: 12/08/2018] [Indexed: 11/17/2022] Open
Abstract
Background Tiotropium improves lung function and ameliorates the annual decline in forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1) after bronchodilator use in patients with mild to moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). However, whether these benefits persist in patients with early-stage COPD after tiotropium discontinuation is unknown. Methods In this prospective cohort observational follow-up study, patients who had completed the Tiotropium in Early-Stage COPD (Tie-COPD) trial were followed for a maximum of 3 years, continuing or discontinuing treatment according to their willingness. The outcomes measured were spirometry parameters, COPD exacerbations, COPD Assessment Test (CAT) scores, Clinical COPD Questionnaire (CCQ) scores, modified Medical Research Council (mMRC) scores and the use of respiratory medications. Results Out of 376 patients, 262 (126 in the post-placebo group and 136 in the post-tiotropium group) completed the maximum 3-year follow-up after the study medication was withdrawn. After discontinuation, the decrease in FEV1 and forced vital capacity (FVC) did not differ significantly between the two groups, and neither did their annual decline. In addition, the frequency of acute COPD exacerbations and the mMRC scores were similar between the two groups after medication withdrawal. Both the mean CAT and CCQ scores were significantly lower in the post-tiotropium group than in the post-placebo group (p<0.05 for all comparisons) at the 1-year follow-up after withdrawal, but they were not different at the next follow-up. Conclusion Withdrawal of tiotropium treatment in early-stage COPD resulted in difference reduction of both FEV1 and FVC, indicating that treatment should be continued. Tiotropium improves lung function and ameliorates the annual decline in early-stage COPD patients. In order to maintain continuous improvement of the pulmonary function, continuous drug intervention is needed.http://ow.ly/ASNx30n4Kdo
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Chenglong Li
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,These authors contributed equally to this study
| | - Yumin Zhou
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,These authors contributed equally to this study
| | - Sha Liu
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, the Second Affiliated Hospital of the University of South China, Hunan, China
| | - Mengning Zheng
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China.,Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Guizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, China
| | - Jinzhen Zheng
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Huanhuan Peng
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Zhishan Deng
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Nanshan Zhong
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| | - Pixin Ran
- The State Key Laboratory of Respiratory Disease, National Clinical Researcher Center for Respiratory Diseases, Guangzhou Institute of Respiratory Health, The First Affiliated Hospital, Guangzhou Medical University, Guangzhou, China
| |
Collapse
|
5
|
Esquema de seguimiento de la EPOC estable. Arch Bronconeumol 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2896(17)30362-9] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/18/2022]
|
6
|
Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, Trigueros JA, Cosío BG, Casanova C, Riesco JA, Simonet P, Rigau D, Soriano JB, Ancochea J. Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) 2017. Pharmacological Treatment of Stable Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2017. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arbr.2017.03.017] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.7] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 12/17/2022]
|
7
|
Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, Trigueros JA, Cosío BG, Casanova C, Antonio Riesco J, Simonet P, Rigau D, Soriano JB, Ancochea J. Spanish Guidelines for Management of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (GesEPOC) 2017. Pharmacological Treatment of Stable Phase. Arch Bronconeumol 2017; 53:324-335. [PMID: 28477954 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2017.03.018] [Citation(s) in RCA: 333] [Impact Index Per Article: 47.6] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 03/12/2017] [Revised: 03/23/2017] [Accepted: 03/29/2017] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
The clinical presentation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) varies widely, so treatment must be tailored according to the level of risk and phenotype. In 2012, the Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) first established pharmacological treatment regimens based on clinical phenotypes. These regimens were subsequently adopted by other national guidelines, and since then, have been backed up by new evidence. In this 2017 update, the original severity classification has been replaced by a much simpler risk classification (low or high risk), on the basis of lung function, dyspnea grade, and history of exacerbations, while determination of clinical phenotype is recommended only in high-risk patients. The same clinical phenotypes have been maintained: non-exacerbator, asthma-COPD overlap (ACO), exacerbator with emphysema, and exacerbator with bronchitis. Pharmacological treatment of COPD is based on bronchodilators, the only treatment recommended in low-risk patients. High-risk patients will receive different drugs in addition to bronchodilators, depending on their clinical phenotype. GesEPOC reflects a more individualized approach to COPD treatment, according to patient clinical characteristics and level of risk or complexity.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Miravitlles
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona, España; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), España.
| | | | - Myriam Calle
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad Complutense de Madrid, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria del Hospital Clínico San Carlos (IdISSC), Madrid, España
| | - Jesús Molina
- Centro de Salud Francia, Dirección Asistencial Oeste, Madrid, España
| | - Pere Almagro
- Servicio de Medicina Interna, Hospital Universitario Mutua de Terrassa, Terrassa, España
| | | | | | - Borja G Cosío
- Hospital Universitario Son Espases-IdISBa, Palma de Mallorca, España; CIBER de Enfermedades Respiratorias (CIBERES), España
| | - Ciro Casanova
- Servicio de Neumología-Unidad de Investigación, Hospital Universitario La Candelaria, Tenerife, España
| | | | - Pere Simonet
- Centro de Salud Viladecans-2, Dirección Atención Primaria Costa de Ponent-Institut Català de la Salut, Institut Universitari d'Investigació en Atenció Primària Jordi Gol (IDIAP Jordi Gol), Barcelona, España
| | - David Rigau
- Centro Cochrane Iberoamericano, Barcelona, España
| | - Joan B Soriano
- Instituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IISP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Consultor Metodológico y de Investigación de SEPAR, Madrid, España
| | - Julio Ancochea
- Servicio de Neumología, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa, Instituto de Investigación, Hospital Universitario de La Princesa (IISP), Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, España
| |
Collapse
|
8
|
Page AT, Clifford RM, Potter K, Schwartz D, Etherton-Beer CD. The feasibility and effect of deprescribing in older adults on mortality and health: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 82:583-623. [PMID: 27077231 DOI: 10.1111/bcp.12975] [Citation(s) in RCA: 279] [Impact Index Per Article: 34.9] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Key Words] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 01/25/2016] [Revised: 03/23/2016] [Accepted: 04/12/2016] [Indexed: 12/31/2022] Open
Abstract
AIMS Deprescribing is a suggested intervention to reverse the potential iatrogenic harms of inappropriate polypharmacy. The review aimed to determine whether or not deprescribing is a safe, effective and feasible intervention to modify mortality and health outcomes in older adults. METHODS Specified databases were searched from inception to February 2015. Two researchers independently screened all retrieved articles for inclusion, assessed study quality and extracted data. Data were pooled using RevMan v5.3. Eligible studies included those where older adults had at least one medication deprescribed. The primary outcome was mortality. Secondary outcomes were adverse drug withdrawal events, psychological and physical health outcomes, quality of life, and medication usage (e.g. successful deprescribing, number of medications prescribed, potentially inappropriate medication use). RESULTS A total of 132 papers met the inclusion criteria, which included 34 143 participants aged 73.8 ± 5.4 years. In nonrandomized studies, deprescribing polypharmacy was shown to significantly decrease mortality (OR 0.32, 95% CI: 0.17-0.60). However, this was not statistically significant in the randomized studies (OR 0.82, 95% CI 0.61-1.11). Subgroup analysis revealed patient-specific interventions to deprescribe demonstrated a significant reduction in mortality (OR 0.62, 95% CI 0.43-0.88). However, generalized educational programmes did not change mortality (OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.86-1.69). CONCLUSIONS Although nonrandomized data suggested that deprescribing reduces mortality, deprescribing was not shown to alter mortality in randomized studies. Mortality was significantly reduced when applying patient-specific interventions to deprescribe in randomized studies.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Amy T Page
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Rhonda M Clifford
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Kathleen Potter
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Darren Schwartz
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia, Australia.,Graylands Hospital, Mt Claremont, Western Australia, Australia
| | - Christopher D Etherton-Beer
- School of Medicine and Pharmacology, University of Western Australia, 35 Stirling Highway, Crawley, 6009, Western Australia, Australia.,Royal Perth Hospital, Perth, Western Australia, Australia
| |
Collapse
|
9
|
Braido F, Baiardini I, Cazzola M, Brusselle G, Marugo F, Canonica GW. Long-acting bronchodilators improve Health Related Quality of Life in patients with COPD. Respir Med 2013; 107:1465-80. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2013.08.007] [Citation(s) in RCA: 14] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.3] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 02/08/2013] [Revised: 07/25/2013] [Accepted: 08/08/2013] [Indexed: 11/28/2022]
|
10
|
|
11
|
Serrano-Mollar A. [Alveolar epithelial cell injury as an etiopathogenic factor in pulmonary fibrosis]. Arch Bronconeumol 2012; 48 Suppl 2:2-6. [PMID: 23116901 PMCID: PMC7131261 DOI: 10.1016/s0300-2896(12)70044-3] [Citation(s) in RCA: 6] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.5] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [MESH Headings] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 01/04/2023]
Abstract
Idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis (IPF) is characterized by a progressive accumulation of extracellular matrix and an imbalance between profibrotic and antifibrotic mediators. In the last few years, understanding of the mechanisms of the biology of IPF has increased. One of the most significant discoveries is the finding that alveolar epithelial cell injury plays an important role in the pathogenesis of this disease. In this review, we describe some of the mechanisms involved in alveolar cell injury and their contribution to the development of IPF.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Anna Serrano-Mollar
- Departamento de Patología Experimental, Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques de Barcelona, España.
| |
Collapse
|
12
|
Menezes AMB, Macedo SEC, Noal RB, Fiterman J, Cukier A, Chatkin JM, Fernandes FLA. Pharmacological treatment of COPD. J Bras Pneumol 2012; 37:527-43. [PMID: 21881744 DOI: 10.1590/s1806-37132011000400016] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 06/01/2011] [Accepted: 06/21/2011] [Indexed: 11/21/2022] Open
Abstract
Approximately seven million Brazilians over 40 years of age have COPD. In recent years, major advances have been made in the pharmacological treatment of this condition. We performed a systematic review including original articles on pharmacological treatments for COPD. We reviewed articles written in English, Spanish, or Portuguese; published between 2005 and 2009; and indexed in national and international databases. Articles with a sample size < 100 individuals were excluded. The outcome measures were symptoms, pulmonary function, quality of life, exacerbations, mortality, and adverse drug effects. Articles were classified in accordance with the Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease criteria for the determination of the level of scientific evidence (grade of recommendation A, B, or C). Of the 84 articles selected, 40 (47.6%), 18 (21.4%), and 26 (31.0%) were classified as grades A, B, and C, respectively. Of the 420 analyses made in these articles, 236 were regarding the comparison between medications and placebos. Among these 236 analyses, the most commonly studied medications (in 66, 48, and 42 analyses, respectively) were long-acting anticholinergics; the combination of long-acting β(2) agonists and inhaled corticosteroids; and inhaled corticosteroids in isolation. Pulmonary function, adverse effects, and symptoms as outcomes generated 58, 54, and 35 analyses, respectively. The majority of the studies showed that the medications evaluated provided symptom relief; improved the quality of life and pulmonary function of patients; and prevented exacerbations. Few studies analyzed mortality as an outcome, and the role that pharmacological treatment plays in this outcome has yet to be fully defined. The medications studied are safe to use in the management of COPD and have few adverse effects.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Ana Maria Baptista Menezes
- Graduate Program in Epidemiology, Department of Social Medicine, Federal University of Pelotas School of Medicine, Pelotas, Brazil.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
13
|
Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, Riesco JA, Trigueros JA, Piñera P, Simón A, López-Campos JL, Soriano JB, Ancochea J. Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC): Pharmacological Treatment of Stable COPD. ACTA ACUST UNITED AC 2012. [DOI: 10.1016/j.arbr.2012.05.003] [Citation(s) in RCA: 5] [Impact Index Per Article: 0.4] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 10/28/2022]
|
14
|
Miravitlles M, Soler-Cataluña JJ, Calle M, Molina J, Almagro P, Quintano JA, Riesco JA, Trigueros JA, Piñera P, Simón A, López-Campos JL, Soriano JB, Ancochea J. [Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC): Pharmacological treatment of stable COPD]. Aten Primaria 2012; 44:425-37. [PMID: 22704760 DOI: 10.1016/j.aprim.2012.04.005] [Citation(s) in RCA: 13] [Impact Index Per Article: 1.1] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2012] [Accepted: 04/11/2012] [Indexed: 10/28/2022] Open
Abstract
Recognizing the clinical heterogeneity of COPD suggests a specific therapeutic approach directed by the so-called clinical phenotypes of the disease. The Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) is an initiative of SEPAR, which, together with the scientific societies involved in COPD patient care, and the Spanish Patient Forum, has developed these new clinical practice guidelines. This present article describes the severity classification and the pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. GesEPOC identifies four clinical phenotypes with differential treatment: non-exacerbator, mixed COPD-asthma, exacerbator with emphysema and exacerbator with chronic bronchitis. Pharmacological treatment of COPD is based on bronchodilation in addition to other drugs depending on the clinical phenotype and severity. Severity is established by the BODE/BODEx multidimensional scales. Severity can also be approximated by assessing airflow obstruction, dyspnea, level of physical activity and history of exacerbations. GesEPOC is a new, more individualized approach to COPD treatment according to the clinical characteristics of the patients.
Collapse
Affiliation(s)
- Marc Miravitlles
- Institut d'Investigacions Biomèdiques August Pi i Sunyer (IDIBAPS), Hospital Clínic, Barcelona, Spain.
| | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | | |
Collapse
|
15
|
Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC): pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. Spanish Society of Pulmonology and Thoracic Surgery. Arch Bronconeumol 2012; 48:247-57. [PMID: 22561012 DOI: 10.1016/j.arbres.2012.04.001] [Citation(s) in RCA: 216] [Impact Index Per Article: 18.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 04/05/2012] [Accepted: 04/11/2012] [Indexed: 12/14/2022]
Abstract
Recognizing the clinical heterogeneity of COPD suggests a specific therapeutic approach directed by the so-called clinical phenotypes of the disease. The Spanish COPD Guidelines (GesEPOC) is an initiative of SEPAR, which, together with the scientific societies involved in COPD patient care, and the Spanish Patient Forum, has developed these new clinical practice guidelines. This present article describes the severity classification and the pharmacological treatment of stable COPD. GesEPOC identifies four clinical phenotypes with differential treatment: non-exacerbator, mixed COPD-asthma, exacerbator with emphysema and exacerbator with chronic bronchitis. Pharmacological treatment of COPD is based on bronchodilation in addition to other drugs depending on the clinical phenotype and severity. Severity is established by the BODE/BODEx multidimensional scales. Severity can also be approximated by assessing airflow obstruction, dyspnea, level of physical activity and history of exacerbations. GesEPOC is a new, more individualized approach to COPD treatment according to the clinical characteristics of the patients.
Collapse
|
16
|
Keating GM. Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder: a review of its use in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Drugs 2012; 72:273-300. [PMID: 22217233 DOI: 10.2165/11208620-000000000-00000] [Citation(s) in RCA: 48] [Impact Index Per Article: 4.0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Abstract] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/02/2022]
Abstract
The anticholinergic agent tiotropium bromide (Spiriva®) is a long-acting bronchodilator that is indicated for the treatment of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). This article reviews the clinical efficacy and tolerability of tiotropium bromide inhalation powder, administered using the HandiHaler® device, in patients with COPD, as well as reviewing its pharmacological properties and the results of pharmacoeconomic analyses. Shorter-term placebo-controlled trials in patients with COPD demonstrated significantly higher trough forced expiratory volume in 1 second (FEV(1)) responses with tiotropium bromide than with placebo, confirming it has a duration of action of ≥24 hours and is suitable for once-daily administration. Lung function improved to a greater extent with tiotropium bromide than with ipratropium bromide or, in most instances, salmeterol. Indacaterol was shown to be noninferior to tiotropium bromide in terms of the trough FEV(1) response. The large, 4-year UPLIFT® trial did not show a significant reduction in the annual rate of decline in FEV(1) with tiotropium bromide versus placebo in patients with COPD, although subgroup analyses demonstrated a significantly lower rate of decline with tiotropium bromide than with placebo in some patient groups (e.g. patients with moderate COPD, patients aged ≥50 years, patients not receiving maintenance therapy at baseline). Tiotropium bromide prevented exacerbations in patients with COPD, with a significantly lower exacerbation rate and a significantly longer time to first exacerbation seen with tiotropium bromide than with placebo or salmeterol. Exacerbation rates did not significantly differ between patients receiving tiotropium bromide and those receiving salmeterol/fluticasone propionate. Tiotropium bromide also had beneficial effects on health-related quality of life (HR-QOL) and other endpoints, such as dyspnoea and rescue medication use. Combination therapy with tiotropium bromide plus formoterol with or without budesonide improved lung function to a significantly greater extent than tiotropium bromide alone in patients with COPD. In addition, exacerbation rates were lower and HR-QOL was improved with tiotropium bromide plus budesonide/formoterol versus tiotropium bromide alone. Although the addition of salmeterol/fluticasone propionate to tiotropium bromide did not reduce the COPD exacerbation rate, it did improve lung function and HR-QOL. Tiotropium bromide inhalation powder is generally well tolerated in patients with COPD, with anticholinergic adverse events (e.g. dry mouth, constipation, gastrointestinal obstruction, dysuria) among the most commonly reported adverse events. The UPLIFT® trial showed no significant difference between tiotropium bromide and placebo recipients in the risk of stroke, and the risk of serious cardiac adverse events (including congestive heart failure and myocardial infarction) was significantly lower with tiotropium bromide than with placebo. The absence of a detrimental effect on cardiovascular outcomes was supported by the results of a meta-analysis and pooled analyses. In addition, on-treatment mortality was lower with tiotropium bromide than with placebo in the UPLIFT® trial. Pooled analyses showed significantly lower cardiovascular mortality with tiotropium bromide than with placebo, with a meta-analysis demonstrating no significant difference between patients receiving tiotropium bromide and controls in cardiovascular mortality. Results of modelled pharmacoeconomic analyses conducted from a healthcare payer perspective in several developed countries suggest that tiotropium bromide is a cost-effective option in patients with COPD. In conclusion, tiotropium bromide inhalation powder is a useful option for the maintenance treatment of patients with COPD.
Collapse
|
17
|
Comment on tiotropium. Respir Med 2010; 104:1388; author reply 1389. [DOI: 10.1016/j.rmed.2009.10.033] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Submit a Manuscript] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Received: 09/30/2009] [Accepted: 10/19/2009] [Indexed: 11/15/2022]
|
18
|
Current World Literature. Curr Opin Support Palliat Care 2010; 4:111-20. [DOI: 10.1097/spc.0b013e32833a1dfc] [Citation(s) in RCA: 0] [Impact Index Per Article: 0] [Reference Citation Analysis] [Track Full Text] [Journal Information] [Subscribe] [Scholar Register] [Indexed: 11/26/2022]
|